Author Topic: Transcontinental 2016  (Read 62393 times)

mattc

  • n.b. have grown beard since photo taken
    • Didcot Audaxes
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #150 on: 02 August, 2016, 09:57:21 am »
Look who has moved into second place, closing on the leader

only 50kms away... Björn Lenhard (026) must have had his Weetabix. While most of us today have struggled through our 9-5 jobs, Bjorn has put in an exemplary performance, passing Alexandre Bourgeonnier (002), Carlos Mazon (060), Ultan Coyle (004), Neil Phillips (172) and Nelson Trees (080). No wonder Kristof is still pedalling hard
I note that the routes taken have just split into 3 (after Tamins). Kristof took his own path, and Bjorn (026) took a different route to everyone else. Maybe he's gained miles while dodging metres (climbing!) ?

And where is rider 77 off to??
Has never ridden RAAM
---------
No.11  Because of the great host of those who dislike the least appearance of "swank " when they travel the roads and lanes. - From Kuklos' 39 Articles

marcusjb

  • Full of bon courage.
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #151 on: 02 August, 2016, 10:00:00 am »
I know that ascent figures need to be taken with a pinch of salt, but if this is anywhere close to true, then, well, fuck, that is an astonishing figure:

Day 3
22:00 - 21:55 Aug 1st
Track / Route: 294.5 / 359.3 km
Climbing: 15164.0 m
Moving: 24.0 hours, 15.0 km/h

(Allegaert's numbers taken from www.frrt.org)

I've climbed like 6500-7000m in a day in the big mountains. OK, not a full day's work like Kristof, but if I were racing, I could still not imagine that getting much beyond 10000m in a day and that would truly hurt.  That is mind-blowing.
Right! What's next?

Ooooh. That sounds like a daft idea.  I am in!

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #152 on: 02 August, 2016, 12:24:22 pm »
Me and the missus cycled around Bolzano last year. There is a great system of bike paths along all the valley floors in that neck of the woods. I guess the riders will use them too. (though they may be pretty clogged with families of cyclists this time of year) Apples (orchards) and cider all along the bike paths for hungry/thirsty riders.

I loved the riding around that area so much that we are booked to do the Munich to Venice cycle path route next month. After seeing the TRC route for this year we are going to take a couple of days at Cortina so I can do a climb of the Passo di  Giao. It will be from the other way up, but cool to see the road in real time that the riders are taking now.
often lost.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #153 on: 02 August, 2016, 12:47:29 pm »
Look who has moved into second place, closing on the leader

only 50kms away... Björn Lenhard (026) must have had his Weetabix. While most of us today have struggled through our 9-5 jobs, Bjorn has put in an exemplary performance, passing Alexandre Bourgeonnier (002), Carlos Mazon (060), Ultan Coyle (004), Neil Phillips (172) and Nelson Trees (080). No wonder Kristof is still pedalling hard

2 kph faster and 15 hours more sleep. I can't see Kristof holding him off for long.
often lost.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #154 on: 02 August, 2016, 01:21:30 pm »
Morbihan
Thread hijack. Will you do a write up. My wife and I were thinking of romantic road,Wurzburg- Fussen then join the Munich to Venice and do about 1000km in a month.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #155 on: 02 August, 2016, 01:57:12 pm »
Morbihan
Thread hijack. Will you do a write up. My wife and I were thinking of romantic road,Wurzburg- Fussen then join the Munich to Venice and do about 1000km in a month.

Happy to.
we've been asked by the Firefly adventure team to be one of the months posts. (Oct I think) so we will be taking pics and doing a write up en route.
It will probably be on this link below but will post here too.
http://www.fireflyadventureteam.com
often lost.

Oranj

  • Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it?
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #156 on: 02 August, 2016, 03:00:55 pm »
Looks like Hippy is heading for the southern, flatter, but much longer route (in fact he tweeted as much "Soft southern route for me. Ciao Grazi.Prego #TCRNo4").

I found there's a fair bit of informed discussion on the relative merits and demerits of taking this route on the LFGSS forum: https://www.lfgss.com/conversations/228045/?offset=2900

Karla

  • car(e) free
    • Lost Byway - around the world by bike
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #157 on: 02 August, 2016, 03:56:24 pm »
I'm watching his progress with interest as I'll be covering the same ground in the other direction (and at half the pace) in a couple of weeks.  Currently I've opted for the northern route; that might change depending on how tired I feel. 

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #158 on: 02 August, 2016, 04:56:06 pm »
... And where is rider 77 off to??

He seems to be following broadly the same routes as everyone else, currently, but where is 142 going?  He looks like he's following the same route as Control Car 1 used to get to CP3 (which is displayed in orange).

Actually, it is rocket science.
 

marcusjb

  • Full of bon courage.
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #159 on: 02 August, 2016, 05:05:59 pm »
... And where is rider 77 off to??

He seems to be following broadly the same routes as everyone else, currently, but where is 142 going?  He looks like he's following the same route as Control Car 1 used to get to CP3 (which is displayed in orange).



142 is a fat bastard that doesn't like hills, but he is flipping quick on the flatter stuff.  So this might be a genius move (though he has tweeted that he ended up on/near a motorway, so maybe not!).

As per Oranj's post above, there's a lot of good discussion on Hippy's penis and arse progress on LFGSS
Right! What's next?

Ooooh. That sounds like a daft idea.  I am in!

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #160 on: 02 August, 2016, 06:41:21 pm »
Surprised by the South routers choice.
 From what I remember the valley floors around South Tyrol were pretty gentle. (Bolzano and Merano)
Thats a big old diversion to take.
Maybe it kicks up either side of that neck of the woods.
often lost.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #161 on: 02 August, 2016, 06:54:58 pm »
Thanks for the insights and explanation after my question t'other day. I shall continue to dot-watch with fascination.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #162 on: 02 August, 2016, 07:04:58 pm »
Kristof is just about to roll into Lienz.
We stayed there last year on a Backroads cycling trip. They put you up in the Grand Hotel right on the river. Its all cocktails, massages and fancy buffet breakfasts.
Whats the bets on Kristof holing up there for a scrub up?
They probably have a complimentary parking valley for your bike.
often lost.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #163 on: 02 August, 2016, 07:27:51 pm »
Eddington: 114 Miles

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #164 on: 02 August, 2016, 07:31:05 pm »
Forget the Lienz stop, Kristof has blown right by and is still trucking. He's like a 24/7 Stannard/Tony Martin composite.
often lost.

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #165 on: 02 August, 2016, 09:26:30 pm »
Riding over the Strelapass at night on a road bike must be the most audacious route yet.

http://trackleaders.com/transconrace16i.php?name=Stephane_Ouaja

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #166 on: 02 August, 2016, 09:33:31 pm »
Riding over the Strelapass at night on a road bike must be the most audacious route yet.

http://trackleaders.com/transconrace16i.php?name=Stephane_Ouaja

was just looking at that. Intriguing.
often lost.

Oranj

  • Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it?
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #167 on: 02 August, 2016, 10:01:03 pm »
Photog is Camille McMillan

Thanks, I tracked down her Instagram feed https://www.instagram.com/camillejmcmillan/

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #168 on: 03 August, 2016, 08:52:32 am »

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #169 on: 03 August, 2016, 10:15:06 am »

Oranj

  • Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it?
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #170 on: 03 August, 2016, 10:26:44 am »

Phil W

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #171 on: 03 August, 2016, 10:34:04 am »
For Kristof fans, here are some facts about him:

 Kristof eats bullets and nails as snacks
 He wears sunglasses so that his eyes won't hurt the sun
 Kristof's jersey is actually made from a cloth they found in the meteorite he hatched out of
 His day job is to power Belgium's national grid on his turbo
 And so on

(copied from yesterdays blog)

Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #172 on: 03 August, 2016, 10:51:12 am »
She is a bloke!

My bad.

Who knew?
If you watch the documentary from last years race, he's the guy with the moustache.

EDIT- He's the first person in the film -

mattc

  • n.b. have grown beard since photo taken
    • Didcot Audaxes
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #173 on: 03 August, 2016, 10:55:54 am »
... And where is rider 77 off to??

He seems to be following broadly the same routes as everyone else, currently, but where is 142 going?  He looks like he's following the same route as Control Car 1 used to get to CP3 (which is displayed in orange).



142 is a fat bastard that doesn't like hills, but he is flipping quick on the flatter stuff.  So this might be a genius move (though he has tweeted that he ended up on/near a motorway, so maybe not!).

As per Oranj's post above, there's a lot of good discussion on Hippy's penis and arse progress on LFGSS
Hippy's moving average is now a click faster than the leader!


(#77 was briefly tracked on a cable car route, but did indeed return to normality. I shall stop being distracted by random GPS errors <writes 500 lines> ...   )
Has never ridden RAAM
---------
No.11  Because of the great host of those who dislike the least appearance of "swank " when they travel the roads and lanes. - From Kuklos' 39 Articles

marcusjb

  • Full of bon courage.
Re: Transcontinental 2016
« Reply #174 on: 03 August, 2016, 11:00:20 am »
(#77 was briefly tracked on a cable car route, but did indeed return to normality. I shall stop being distracted by random GPS errors <writes 500 lines> ...   )

As I understand it, the website 'guesses' what roads they are likely to have taken - a tracker only checks in every 5? 10? minutes depending on how they're set (my SPOT is set to 10 minutes), so the website makes a guess at how those check-ins are connected.

Ivan of ACH did all the clever work on this site, so he'd be the one to explain it better (and probably tell me off for using the word guess, rather than "complex algorithm").
Right! What's next?

Ooooh. That sounds like a daft idea.  I am in!