As for GP4000 sidewall failures I'd like to see stats, I've ridden those for years with no undue issues
You're not going to see 'stats'. Who would compile and publish them? Continental? Unlikely.
Who knows about my failure at Nullarbor? A few friends, dotwatchers and people who read cycling forums: I didn't tell Continental. As with all these things, a reputation is acquired, sometimes rightly, sometimes wrongly.
But, thinking statistically for a second, let's assume that the average rate for tyre sidewall failure within 5000 km of riding is 1 in 10,000. That's a complete guess with no basis. What rate would a particular model need to have to become known for having a tendency to blow?
If it was 1 in 2, that would be massively worse than average. A GP 4000 user could expect they would have one good tyre and one bad. Although some, 25%, would be lucky and get two good tyres and not see what the fuss was about.
If it was 1 in 200, that would still be 50 times worse than average and sounds like clear evidence of a problem. But the chances for any given rider of getting a dud would only be 1%. Buy a new set every year for 10 years and you still have a 90% chance of not having a blowout.
The point is that your happy experience of no failures is not inconsistent with there actually being an issue. But they are nice tyres when intact, so long may your good luck continue!