This is a devilishly difficult call isn't it? On the one hand, it is on the face of it, unfair on those people who live in areas more badly affected by the snow (especially given that the apparent option of driving outside their own area to reach an event or Permanent in a snow free region probably isn't feasible if their vehicles are snowed in) but the challenge by definition cannot be conducted on a level playing field for everyone anyway. Those among us who are retired or otherwise able to choose the optimum moment to knock off a DIY ride have a considerable advantage over the chap/chapess who has to work most of the week. Some of us have the benefit of gently rolling or flattish country (thank God!) to assist in those quick DIY rides - if I had to do my RRTY in Wales, I'd never manage it!
I sympathise with Fidgetbuzz and companions who from what I read about it had to put in a ride of Herculean endeavour to score on 2nd January. I was seriously p**sed of to fall ill around that time and see my careful plans to snatch a ride on 3rd January go down the pan (literally!) and then watch with horror as the ice sheets closed in. But if I fail to get the job done in January and have to score two rides in February to maintain my claim, I know I shall feel that my RRTY will seem second rate. In fact, I'm not sure I'd continue it on that basis; I might choose to swallow the disappointment and start afresh with a "real one".
Hard as it may seem, I think this decision will devalue the RRTY, at least a bit. I can appreciate the concern that the challenge could lead someone to take risks that turn out to be unwise, but the Audax concept does that anyway, in challenging people to get out among our maniac motoring population for ever longer distances. You pays your money and you takes your chances .....
The other point about this is that having set a precedent, what do you do next time? If this weather is repeated in January 2011, but perhaps more regionally confined, how do you determine whether or not to call "special conditions". If 2011 is even worse, how will you avoid the argument that "you did it in 2010 and this is much worse, so..."?
I'm not sure this genie can be put back in its box, but if it is to be, it has to done be jolly quick!