Author Topic: Not Road Users  (Read 4671 times)

Not Road Users
« on: 12 January, 2017, 08:17:55 pm »
Sunshine approaching from the South.

First time in 1,000 years.

Pingu

  • Put away those fiery biscuits!
  • Mrs Pingu's domestique
    • the Igloo
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #1 on: 12 January, 2017, 08:25:34 pm »
Grayling is a cunt - not news.

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #2 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:16:52 pm »
 :D ;D :D ;D :D
Pete Crane E75 @petecrane5

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #3 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:27:45 pm »
By the logic that cyclists are in cycle lanes and road users are on the road then I am a road user as there aren't cycle lanes on most of the roads I ride down.

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #4 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:31:39 pm »
And car-parkers aren't road users either...

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #5 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:34:31 pm »
The more time goes by, the more I realise just how ignorant our so called leaders actually are.
Get a bicycle. You will never regret it, if you live- Mark Twain

spindrift

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #6 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:42:03 pm »
 Nobody seems to like him, I get what he was TRYING to say and now it's been twisted into

"NO PLACE FOR YOU ON THE ROADS, YOU SCUM!" Grayling barks at cyclists.

Then again he knew he was under fire and he had loads of time to prepare and give a sensible answer so he can go and boil his stupid head.

Redlight

  • Enjoying life in the slow lane
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #7 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:42:50 pm »
Grayling is prize twat - let's recall his great idea of banning books from prisons - but I think his actual answer to the question was so incoherent as to defy interpretation:

Mr Zeichner asked: “I was wondering if he could clarify for the house exactly who he thinks road users are?”

Mr Grayling told him: “Where you have cycle lanes, cyclists are the users of cycle lanes and the road users are the users of the road. It’s very simple.”


I agree that he seems to be saying that cyclists should not be on the road when there are cycle lanes available - which is legally and in practice incorrect - but I wouldn't take this to mean that cyclists are not road users when there are no cycle lanes available. It was a poor answer, reflecting a lack of knowledge and revealing a lack of interest in some aspects of his brief, but I would expect the department to issue a 'clarification' shortly.
Why should anybody steal a watch when they can steal a bicycle?

spindrift

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #8 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:46:29 pm »
Claimed expenses to refurbish a flat we paid the mortgage on cos his real home was too far away to commute.

(17 miles)

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #9 on: 12 January, 2017, 09:51:13 pm »
(17 miles)

That would have involved Road Using...

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #10 on: 12 January, 2017, 10:26:36 pm »
He is a prime product of Big Road Inc.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

spindrift

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #11 on: 12 January, 2017, 10:35:14 pm »
Quote
THE child actor who played Damien in The Omen punched two cyclists in a road rage attack and faces jail when he is sentenced — Friday the 13th.

Notre Dame predicted all this. What chance do we have with the arraigned forces of The Antichrist AND Damien off The Omen against us?

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #12 on: 13 January, 2017, 12:22:34 pm »
Quote from: tiermat
that's not science, it's semantics.

spindrift

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #13 on: 13 January, 2017, 12:46:41 pm »
Grayling became best known for the scene in which he cycles on a tricycle, before watching calmly as his "mother" falls from a balcony. His real mother was a jackal.

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #14 on: 13 January, 2017, 12:55:24 pm »
So, if a cyclist is using a cycle lane which is painted on the road is not a road user and I'm driving in the left hand lane of a motorway, Am I also not a road user, I'm a left lane user?
Duct tape is magic and should be worshipped

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #15 on: 13 January, 2017, 01:08:35 pm »
I was eleven when I first saw the Highway Code in 1969.
It had various sections as I recall:

The Road User on Foot
The Road User on Wheels
The Road User and Animals etc

If Grayling does not think pedestrians and cyclists are road users, he is unfamiliar with the Highway Code and unfit for purpose.

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #16 on: 13 January, 2017, 01:09:56 pm »
Yes, Chris Grayling is clearly NOT a Transport Minister.  But what is he?  In addition to what Pingu said?
Move Faster and Bake Things

spindrift

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #17 on: 13 January, 2017, 01:18:54 pm »
He's the child of Beelzebub. This was all foretold, I forget the exact version:

Quote
"When the Jews return to Zion,

                and a comet fills the sky

Something something something

Tum ti tum ti tie

Chilling.




Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #18 on: 13 January, 2017, 03:41:46 pm »
We're talking about the same Transport Minister who says the Government won't get involved in the Southern Rail dispute when in fact the unique franchise they have means the government are foot the bill which allows the company to continue its stance.

http://www.lbc.co.uk/news/the-news-explained/lbcs-long-read-the-southern-rail-debacle/

The cynic in me can't help thinking there has to be something in this for the government & also wonders why the underlying facts are so poorly reported in the media.


Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #19 on: 13 January, 2017, 06:01:39 pm »
The government has instructed Southern not to give in to the rail unions, in order not to set a precedent for other rail franchises. That's why they won't take any action against Southern.

Remember, Grayling is the twat who screwed up the justice system, including the prisons.

red marley

Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #20 on: 13 January, 2017, 07:20:16 pm »
The language of his original comment, his "clarification" in the house and his dooring of a cyclist all seem to betray an underlying problematic (and factually wrong) view of roads. A view that assumes that the entire road from pavement to pavement, as well as a door's width beyond, belongs to people driving private motor vehicles. Anyone else is intruding into that space and does should do so at their own risk and only with permission of  drivers.

That the secretary of state for transport can come out with this view and largely get away with it is as "post-truth" as a £350m bus painting or a Trumptweet.

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #21 on: 13 January, 2017, 07:26:00 pm »
The language of his original comment, his "clarification" in the house and his dooring of a cyclist all seem to betray an underlying problematic (and factually wrong) view of roads. A view that assumes that the entire road from pavement to pavement, as well as a door's width beyond, belongs to people driving private motor vehicles. Anyone else is intruding into that space and does should do so at their own risk and only with permission of  drivers.

A view which is probably representative of that of the average member of the public, of course.

For some reason - in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary - we seem to expect ministers to have (or at least refer to) some expert knowledge of their department's responsibilities.

Guy

  • Retired
Re: Not Road Users
« Reply #22 on: 16 January, 2017, 10:15:37 am »
...Grayling...is...unfit for purpose.

FTFY :thumbsup:
"The Opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject"  Marcus Aurelius