Footballers are tested regularly anyway. After each premiership game they usually pick 3 from each team and take samples from them. They also turn up at the training grounds and pick random players for testing. (Including, famously, forcing a Muslim to drink water during Ramadan in order to provide a sample
1. The testers refused to wait until sundown. How's that for respecting religious beliefs.)
They're objecting to the "location for an hour a day" notifications that they would have to give WADA. They'd have to specify in advance (but you are able to change it right up until the last minute but it's a hassle) exactly where you'll be for an hour each and every day, no matter whether you're on holiday, whether it's Christmas day, etc, no exceptions.
Miss 3 of these in the space of a year and you're in for lots of fun like Christine Ohuruogu.
I know a few people involved in anti-doping (sports lawyers, anti-doping officials for the Olympics and one guy who has the lovely job of collecting the samples from the players and watching to ensure it's definitely their urine) and they agree that the WADA rules are draconian.
Arse, this means I agree with something Sepp Blatter has said.
If they've nothing to hide, there's nothing to fear, eh?
That's not the point. They're not objecting to the testing (they get tested regularly anyway) but the way they have to notify people of their whereabouts in advance.
1.
City say Negouai drug test 'violated' Ramadan |
Football |
The Guardian