I'm afraid this one is just about getting a tick-in-the-box for my SR and not about enjoyment as such.
If you're not doing it for fun, what's the point?
(A question asked by our Arrow team just before numerous pints were purchased, somewhere near The Wash.)
I always plan on having a good time. Can't remember the last time it worked out like that, but that's a different point...
Slowly but surely audaxes are becoming more and more fun. That's because they are getting easier and easier. A 100km is now an easy pub ride (even the Faccombe Grimpeur variety), a 200km has got to the point where I can finish in a healthy condition and contemplate some beers en-route. A 300 however is still at the extreme of my abilities so I expect it may be grind over the final 50km. It's not that I don't enjoy myself on Audaxes but my enjoyment of the longer ones tends to be the enjoyment of finishing.
I distinctly remember getting into John O Groats and thinking "Great, I'm glad that's over, now I don't need to do it any more". No tears of joy as happens with other folks.
It's the way my brain is wired. Challenges keep rearing their ugly head and I can't rest easily until I have crossed them off. PBP 2011 is the reason I was out this morning for 3 hours in the cold and rain. If I manage to complete PBP I doubt if I'll break down in tears of joy, rather I'll think "Thank feck that's crossed off my list". I can't imagine I'll do PBP twice or even do an SR again once I don't need to as a qualifier for something.
Cycle camping with a tent, riding down sunny lanes, stopping when I want (near a pub usually) and for as long as I want is my idea of true cycling fun.
Currently 300km Audaxes are a bit (Mt Everest) "Because it's there" challenges.
Of course, there may well come a time when 300km and 400km rides don't take the same physical toll on me and I can do an SR series for fun. Time will tell on that one but, for now, 300km will hurt.