Yet Another Cycling Forum

General Category => Freewheeling => Racing => Topic started by: benborp on 16 October, 2019, 05:27:40 pm

Title: Tour de France 2020
Post by: benborp on 16 October, 2019, 05:27:40 pm
The route has been announced for the 2020 edition.

And WOOP! It's visiting my department for the first time in 17 years.

And WOOP! It's not just happening to pass through on its way somewhere else.

https://www.sudouest.fr/2019/10/14/tour-de-france-deux-etapes-en-charente-maritime-en-2020-c-est-confirme-6697761-4868.php

The 7th of July should be quite spectacular for a flat route.

It starts on one Atlantic island and finishes on another.

Hugging the coast for much of the day it will be one of the few opportunities for the riders that will be disadvantaged by the lack of time-trialling in 2020 to take back chunks of time. If there is any wind at all it could be brutal as the race turns to cross the marshes.

There are going to be several incredible roadside viewing opportunities - I think my preference will be from the town walls of Brouage as the race enters through the main gate (there's also a small bike museum in the town which has always been closed when I have visited).
The blast across the quayside at La Rochelle would be worth seeing too.
There are several nice enough resort towns where spending the day waiting for the caravan to pass wouldn't be any hardship, and a day out on the Côte Sauvage amongst the pine forests where the road winds over the dunes would be pleasant enough as well.

WOOP! Again.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 11 July, 2020, 02:11:25 pm
Right now we should be speculating as to how much grog TV's *** Boulting washed down his lunch with.  Happy birthday, ***, and roll on August 29th.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: mzjo on 12 July, 2020, 12:35:19 pm
I've booked some holiday for the end of september, I wasn't thinking of Le Tour. It will be far away from me when I'm off which would seem to indicate telly viewing. But what's the point when reading the Larrington reports every evening will give me all the information that I need!  8)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 12 July, 2020, 01:23:02 pm
'tis a mixed blessing that there is no Battle Mountain event this year as otherwise I'd be missing the Tour instead of the Vuelta.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: SpaceBadger on 08 August, 2020, 06:46:38 pm
I've just had the realisation that I don't need to plan any strategic working-from-home days on the days of the major mountain stages this year  ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 10 August, 2020, 01:44:28 pm
I'm finding it hard to look forward to. Not a fan of Froome or Ineos/Sky or Jim Ratcliffe and his stupid Land Rovers. I just want races won by teams with an old skool flavour...Belgians sponsored by supermarkets, that sort of thing. Maybe the Jumbo Vismas can rescue the race from non stop gossip about whuch Skineos rider will be allowed up the road.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 10 August, 2020, 01:57:58 pm
My sentiments entirely!  Merckx and Molteni - anyone less like a sausage it's hard to imagine!  Have you read William Fotheringham's book?  It contains some stunning photos., not least the one which shows a distressed Eddy as he realises it's all over.  Presumably the Italians are still too bitter to rename Milan-San Remo after him.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: slugbait on 10 August, 2020, 01:59:33 pm
I'm finding it hard to look forward to. Not a fan of Froome or Ineos/Sky or Jim Ratcliffe and his stupid Land Rovers. I just want races won by teams with an old skool flavour...Belgians sponsored by supermarkets, that sort of thing. Maybe the Jumbo Vismas can rescue the race from non stop gossip about whuch Skineos rider will be allowed up the road.

Luckily, Jumbo is a (Dutch) supermarket chain with a couple of talented Belgians under contract (van Aert, de Plus).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 10 August, 2020, 02:05:30 pm
Yes, I understood the reference, young man (!) but I prefer my memories!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 10 August, 2020, 02:53:57 pm
I'm finding it hard to look forward to. Not a fan of Froome or Ineos/Sky or Jim Ratcliffe and his stupid Land Rovers. I just want races won by teams with an old skool flavour...Belgians sponsored by supermarkets, that sort of thing. Maybe the Jumbo Vismas can rescue the race from non stop gossip about whuch Skineos rider will be allowed up the road.

Luckily, Jumbo is a (Dutch) supermarket chain with a couple of talented Belgians under contract (van Aert, de Plus).
Well, that's why I mentioned them. They say they're aiming for the GC with Roglic and Dumoulin, but I just can't see it. I hope I'll be proved wrong.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: slugbait on 10 August, 2020, 04:10:40 pm
I can see Roglic winning, especially if Kruijswijk and Dumoulin are willing to act as superdomestiques. Team Ineos will definitely struggle more than ever to win this one.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 10 August, 2020, 04:14:15 pm
Don't you think we may be underestimating just how good Bernal is?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 10 August, 2020, 05:58:16 pm
Bernal is the favourite, but I think we're underestimating Dumoulin. He's won both the other grand tours (and come close a couple of other times with an underperforming team). It will be interesting to see how these super teams manage their roster with several riders capable of leading a team. I guess the crash at TdP probably removed the change of Jumbo having to split resources and go for green as well. It's going to be an interesting battle between relatively well matched teams this year.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 10 August, 2020, 11:49:25 pm
I'm finding it hard to look forward to. Not a fan of Froome or Ineos/Sky or Jim Ratcliffe and his stupid Land Rovers. I just want races won by teams with an old skool flavour...Belgians sponsored by supermarkets, that sort of thing. Maybe the Jumbo Vismas can rescue the race from non stop gossip about whuch Skineos rider will be allowed up the road.

Luckily, Jumbo is a (Dutch) supermarket chain with a couple of talented Belgians under contract (van Aert, de Plus).

Can P@nd3m1c Pr0duckt10nz refer to them as Team Stroopwafel? Please, please!?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rafletcher on 19 August, 2020, 08:54:59 am
No Froome, no Thomas @ TDF2020

Bernal
Amador
Carapaz
Castroviejo
Kwiatkowski
Rowe
Sivakov
Van Baarle

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/chris-froome-and-geraint-thomas-dropped-from-ineos-tour-de-france-team/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 19 August, 2020, 10:35:57 am
I think that's the fewest number of British riders I've ever seen on a Sky/Ineos GT team
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 19 August, 2020, 11:11:50 am
Froome I can understand.  But Thomas won in 2018 and was second last year.  That's pretty brutal.  what will Bethany make of this?

Edit:  Ah, I see that Geraint has been "saved" for the Giro.  Remember the days when Eddy did them both, even if they were being run at the same time and on different continents?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 August, 2020, 11:29:12 am
Bethany (10):s'OK.  5 dunt haz a crush on G Thomas ne moar.  Cyclists 2 her are liek wite litenin 2 mi mum teh fukn C-O-W sumtiems I wish shed ov got carambavirus an' DYED an' then I cud ov gone 2 live in Spaign-o wif TV's Super D Millar an' hiz hats!

Or something.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 19 August, 2020, 11:33:56 am
Ha - just as I suspected!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 19 August, 2020, 02:10:07 pm
Is Bethany still 10yo? I think we should be told.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 19 August, 2020, 03:09:34 pm
I reckon Egan will crash and Ineos will look sheepish.  Roglic, Dumoulin or Pinot for the win (though my hopes are still on Bardet).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 19 August, 2020, 03:16:02 pm
Bernal pulled out of the Dauphine with a back issue after a crash.  They have to be pretty confident he's going to be 100% (or that Carapaz can step up) to leave out G.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 19 August, 2020, 04:38:09 pm
Bernal pulled out of the Dauphine with a back issue after a crash.  They have to be pretty confident he's going to be 100% (or that Carapaz can step up) to leave out G.

This is Sky, they know they want the Tour and they won't have thought twice as sacrificing the Dauphine at the slightest sign of even minor trouble to improve their Tour chances even a tiny bit.  It's straight out of their playbook, and I wouldn't read too much into it at all.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 19 August, 2020, 05:54:19 pm
Apparently Froome or his agents disrespected Ineos in contract negotiations, so this could be revenge.  Jim Ratcliffe is not someone you want to cross.  Little chance of Froome winning it again, as he's ancient in Grand Tour terms.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: SpaceBadger on 19 August, 2020, 06:16:24 pm
It's been kicked into the long grass for a bit. Do Ineos really think the Giro and Vuelta will happen? Problem solved.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 19 August, 2020, 06:17:41 pm
Don't think Cavendish will be chosen to ride the tour either. He wasn't even contesting the sprint
win in his last two races (even when he did make it to the pointy end of the stages). Demare,
Ewen and Bennett were there though.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: slugbait on 19 August, 2020, 07:00:48 pm
Let's not exaggerate. Zoetemelk was 33 when he won the Tour de France  (2 years younger than Froome currently is). However, he did win the world championship at 38.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 August, 2020, 07:37:44 pm
Cadel Evans was 34 when he won the 2011 Tour, the oldest winner in modern times. Oldest ever was Firmin Lambot in 1922 at 36.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 19 August, 2020, 08:59:54 pm
Ineos will have Grenadier branding for the Tour. Hard to think of a more obnoxious sponsor. Even Sky was less shit.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 19 August, 2020, 09:55:23 pm
Ineos and Jim Ratcliffe don't have a great reputation for kindness in industrial relations.  Mind you, Froome's next outfit is sponsored by an Israeli business promotion outfit.  I doubt they'll sell as many team tops as they did when they were Alpecin.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 20 August, 2020, 04:24:47 am
Apparently Froome or his agents disrespected Ineos in contract negotiations, so this could be revenge.  Jim Ratcliffe is not someone you want to cross.  Little chance of Froome winning it again, as he's ancient in Grand Tour terms.

I don't think even his biggest fans would claim that Froome is in the form he needs to be in to win the Tour, and his comments since the announcement would suggest he's totally on board with the decision. Brailsford is focussed on one thing: winning the Tour. If he thought Froome was the man to do it, no amount of perceived disrespect during contract negotiations would stop him from putting Froome in the leadership position.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: RichForrest on 20 August, 2020, 07:46:28 am
Sivakov will be one to watch.
Maybe a bit inexperienced but the same was said about Bernal.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: quixoticgeek on 20 August, 2020, 10:28:29 am
Ineos will have Grenadier branding for the Tour. Hard to think of a more obnoxious sponsor. Even Sky was less shit.

There seems to be a lot of shit sponsors in pro cycling. Either human rights abusing regimes, or companies attempting the green wash. It's a real shame. Makes it hard to support many teams.

Please tell me Canyon or SRAM isn't some how evil too :(

J
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 20 August, 2020, 10:48:14 am
Is Bethany still 10yo? I think we should be told.

Yes.  Yes, she is.  Until May 2021, apparently.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 20 August, 2020, 11:09:00 am
Ineos and Jim Ratcliffe don't have a great reputation for kindness in industrial relations.  Mind you, Froome's next outfit is sponsored by an Israeli business promotion outfit.  I doubt they'll sell as many team tops as they did when they were Alpecin.

Jim Ratcliffe May have some influence as sponsor, but the team owner is a company which contracts, usually, with companies set up by the riders. It’s business, pure and simple. If a rider had a contract issue it would be between his/her company, usually represented by an agent,  and the holding company of the team ( some less high profile riders might just contract in their own right, but once pro many would at least use an agent).
In Froome’s case his agent/ representative and executive of his company (it’s highly likely he’ll have one for tax and pension purposes) is his wife. She has some history of being” robust” , and could have had views about his status and treatment going on past performance.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Davef on 20 August, 2020, 11:38:02 am
Ineos will have Grenadier branding for the Tour. Hard to think of a more obnoxious sponsor. Even Sky was less shit.

There seems to be a lot of shit sponsors in pro cycling. Either human rights abusing regimes, or companies attempting the green wash. It's a real shame. Makes it hard to support many teams.

Please tell me Canyon or SRAM isn't some how evil too :(

J
Sponsorship of cycling makes no commercial sense. You get far better value for money elsewhere. Those who would have bought super yachts (billionaires and dodgy regimes) are now buying cycling teams. I don’t think there is much motive other than showing off.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 20 August, 2020, 12:02:08 pm
If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.  Perhaps a Corbyn-Hamas team would restore the balance?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 20 August, 2020, 12:04:26 pm
It gets your The Product's name on the telly a lot, unless the colemantators keep referring to your team by its old name.  Yes, *** and Super D, YOU.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 20 August, 2020, 12:04:48 pm
Is Bethany still 10yo? I think we should be told.

Yes.  Yes, she is.  Until May 2021, apparently.

A bit like Bart, Lisa and Maggie Simpson, she will never age
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 20 August, 2020, 12:11:07 pm
If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.  Perhaps a Corbyn-Hamas team would restore the balance?

Cycling's chequered past has not endeared itself well to big name brands. Many will consider it too much of a risk in case Lance Armstrong Mk2 turns up somewhere. It will take a long time to clear it's reputation. Real or imagined. Until then we have to deal with somewhat less scrupulous involvement.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 20 August, 2020, 01:28:21 pm
If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.
Israel Startup Nation is owned by Sylvan Adams, it's not an arm of the Israeli state. He is a real-estate billionaire who moved to Israel in 2015 and has been promoting cycling there since (he's also won a bunch of world masters TT and track titles).
I can see why some people find it distasteful for a cycling team to be promoting a repressive regime (Astana, Bahrain, UAE), or greenwashing mining/polluting companies. They feel that it undermines the idea that cycling is an environmentally friendly transport solution that should be prioritised to help the planet, and these associations damage the brand. They might have a point, but pro cycle racing s a business, and greenwash is one of the main USPs. Aside from that, you mostly have lotteries (gambling sponsorship is a touchy subject), and holiday or DIY companies.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: philip on 20 August, 2020, 01:58:49 pm
Jim Ratcliffe May have some influence as sponsor
He is more than a sponsor. Team Sky/Ineos is setup as the company Tour Racing Limited, and that company was majority owned by Sky in the past and is now majority owned by Ineos. To a certain extent the riders contracts with Team Ineos are contracts with Jim Ratcliffe.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 20 August, 2020, 02:49:35 pm
Apparently the worst sponsor ever was ADR, who Greg LeMond says never paid him for winning the Tour in their kit.  Or anyone else that year.  They were a Belgian car rental firm.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 20 August, 2020, 02:52:19 pm
If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.
Israel Startup Nation is owned by Sylvan Adams, it's not an arm of the Israeli state. He is a real-estate billionaire who moved to Israel in 2015 and has been promoting cycling there since (he's also won a bunch of world masters TT and track titles).
I can see why some people find it distasteful for a cycling team to be promoting a repressive regime (Astana, Bahrain, UAE), or greenwashing mining/polluting companies. They feel that it undermines the idea that cycling is an environmentally friendly transport solution that should be prioritised to help the planet, and these associations damage the brand. They might have a point, but pro cycle racing s a business, and greenwash is one of the main USPs. Aside from that, you mostly have lotteries (gambling sponsorship is a touchy subject), and holiday or DIY companies.

I stand corrected.  Bunging Israel into the category of 'repressive regime' belongs in POBI though, just as if anyone wants to criticize any other legitimate nation state.  If I choose not to venture into POBI, I'd rather not read about people's hatred of particular countries on here.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: ElyDave on 20 August, 2020, 03:33:30 pm
Ineos will have Grenadier branding for the Tour. Hard to think of a more obnoxious sponsor. Even Sky was less shit.

There seems to be a lot of shit sponsors in pro cycling. Either human rights abusing regimes, or companies attempting the green wash. It's a real shame. Makes it hard to support many teams.

Please tell me Canyon or SRAM isn't some how evil too :(

J
Sponsorship of cycling makes no commercial sense. You get far better value for money elsewhere. Those who would have bought super yachts (billionaires and dodgy regimes) are now buying cycling teams. I don’t think there is much motive other than showing off.

Tax management? Like Hotblack Desiato?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 20 August, 2020, 05:29:09 pm
If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.
Israel Startup Nation is owned by Sylvan Adams, it's not an arm of the Israeli state. He is a real-estate billionaire who moved to Israel in 2015 and has been promoting cycling there since (he's also won a bunch of world masters TT and track titles).
I can see why some people find it distasteful for a cycling team to be promoting a repressive regime (Astana, Bahrain, UAE), or greenwashing mining/polluting companies. They feel that it undermines the idea that cycling is an environmentally friendly transport solution that should be prioritised to help the planet, and these associations damage the brand. They might have a point, but pro cycle racing s a business, and greenwash is one of the main USPs. Aside from that, you mostly have lotteries (gambling sponsorship is a touchy subject), and holiday or DIY companies.

I stand corrected.  Bunging Israel into the category of 'repressive regime' belongs in POBI though, just as if anyone wants to criticize any other legitimate nation state.  If I choose not to venture into POBI, I'd rather not read about people's hatred of particular countries on here.
I agree that belongs in POBI, but I think you have jumped to conclusions somewhat there - as far as I can tell no-one named ISN as being part of the repressive regime crew (and that wasn't my intention - is anyone going to argue with Astana, Bahrain, UAE?).

And I think that sponsorship of cycling teams can make commercial sense in the right circumstance, even outside of greenwashing/sportswashing. Cycling is surprisingly cheap and has a global reach - Segafredo are probably paying less than the shirt sponsor of Bournemouth (data here: https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/premier-league-shirt-sponsorship-201920-every-club-man-utd-arsenal-liverpool-chelsea-tottenham - 10 gambling companies!). We're definitely off topic on TdF 2020 though, so I'm going to stop polluting this thread.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 20 August, 2020, 06:13:36 pm
If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.
Israel Startup Nation is owned by Sylvan Adams, it's not an arm of the Israeli state. He is a real-estate billionaire who moved to Israel in 2015 and has been promoting cycling there since (he's also won a bunch of world masters TT and track titles).
I can see why some people find it distasteful for a cycling team to be promoting a repressive regime (Astana, Bahrain, UAE), or greenwashing mining/polluting companies. They feel that it undermines the idea that cycling is an environmentally friendly transport solution that should be prioritised to help the planet, and these associations damage the brand. They might have a point, but pro cycle racing s a business, and greenwash is one of the main USPs. Aside from that, you mostly have lotteries (gambling sponsorship is a touchy subject), and holiday or DIY companies.

I stand corrected.  Bunging Israel into the category of 'repressive regime' belongs in POBI though, just as if anyone wants to criticize any other legitimate nation state.  If I choose not to venture into POBI, I'd rather not read about people's hatred of particular countries on here.

Ditto comments about Jeremy Corbyn and Hamas, wouldn't you say?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 20 August, 2020, 07:34:14 pm
Oh but Peter, I made no comment on the ethics of a Hamas-sponsored team, only that it would restore the balance!

If you don't like a chemical company, a media company or an arm of the state of Israel sponsoring cycling teams, you're getting pretty darn picky.
Israel Startup Nation is owned by Sylvan Adams, it's not an arm of the Israeli state. He is a real-estate billionaire who moved to Israel in 2015 and has been promoting cycling there since (he's also won a bunch of world masters TT and track titles).
I can see why some people find it distasteful for a cycling team to be promoting a repressive regime (Astana, Bahrain, UAE), or greenwashing mining/polluting companies. They feel that it undermines the idea that cycling is an environmentally friendly transport solution that should be prioritised to help the planet, and these associations damage the brand. They might have a point, but pro cycle racing s a business, and greenwash is one of the main USPs. Aside from that, you mostly have lotteries (gambling sponsorship is a touchy subject), and holiday or DIY companies.

I stand corrected.  Bunging Israel into the category of 'repressive regime' belongs in POBI though, just as if anyone wants to criticize any other legitimate nation state.  If I choose not to venture into POBI, I'd rather not read about people's hatred of particular countries on here.
I agree that belongs in POBI, but I think you have jumped to conclusions somewhat there - as far as I can tell no-one named ISN as being part of the repressive regime crew (and that wasn't my intention - is anyone going to argue with Astana, Bahrain, UAE?).

And I think that sponsorship of cycling teams can make commercial sense in the right circumstance, even outside of greenwashing/sportswashing. Cycling is surprisingly cheap and has a global reach - Segafredo are probably paying less than the shirt sponsor of Bournemouth (data here: https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/premier-league-shirt-sponsorship-201920-every-club-man-utd-arsenal-liverpool-chelsea-tottenham - 10 gambling companies!). We're definitely off topic on TdF 2020 though, so I'm going to stop polluting this thread.

I wasn't aiming at you, I was quite impressed how you named everyone except Israel!  It was Rogerzilla who brought them up.  As for Kazakhstan, Bahrain and the UAE, they're not exactly the worst countries in the world.  The former two make it into the top 100 on the Human Freedom Index (https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/human-freedom-index-files/cato-human-freedom-index-update-3.pdf) and the UAE and Israel have just made peace!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 20 August, 2020, 09:53:57 pm
I like a lot of things about the Israelis, just not their appropriation of Arab territory by force.  I certainly prefer them to the rest of the Middle East.  I don't think there'll be a roaring trade in replica kit though.  The brand is tainted.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 21 August, 2020, 08:56:07 am
Apparently the worst sponsor ever was ADR, who Greg LeMond says never paid him for winning the Tour in their kit.  Or anyone else that year.  They were a Belgian car rental firm.

There’s a lot of contenders in the worst team competition. TJ Cycles/ Glemp even worked over one of the sponsors ( Trevor Jarvis who built Flying Gate frames for the team). Belgium was awash with dodgy teams back in the 80s and beyond. Graham Webb, the last UK amateur world champion, wasn’t treated well when he turned pro.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 August, 2020, 06:38:20 pm
Tour de France: teams will be expelled if two members test positive for Covid (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/aug/21/tour-de-france-teams-will-be-expelled-if-two-members-test-positive-for-covid-cycling).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 21 August, 2020, 08:01:49 pm
What does Bethany think about the withdrawal by Steve K-Wipe?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 August, 2020, 08:35:49 pm
Apparently the worst sponsor ever was ADR, who Greg LeMond says never paid him for winning the Tour in their kit.  Or anyone else that year.  They were a Belgian car rental firm.

There’s a lot of contenders in the worst team competition. TJ Cycles/ Glemp even worked over one of the sponsors ( Trevor Jarvis who built Flying Gate frames for the team). Belgium was awash with dodgy teams back in the 80s and beyond. Graham Webb, the last UK amateur world champion, wasn’t treated well when he turned pro.
There is an apocryphal story of the ADR team owner driving through the night in his Merc with a suitcase full of cash, incurring thousands of Belgian francs in speeding fines, to try to pay LeMond what he owed in one lump sum at the arse-end of 1989, in the hope he would ride for ADR again.  It didn't work.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 August, 2020, 08:37:39 pm
Tour de France: teams will be expelled if two members test positive for Covid (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/aug/21/tour-de-france-teams-will-be-expelled-if-two-members-test-positive-for-covid-cycling).
Can they claim a TUE for that too?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 21 August, 2020, 09:38:47 pm
Did you see that massive truckload of Dexamethasone being shipped to Sky HQ?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 August, 2020, 11:03:11 pm
What does Bethany think about the withdrawal by Steve K-Wipe?

Bethany (10):As long as W Barguil & mi Da… R Uran r still there, I doan care! Oh, an' TD Gendt 4 teh lolz0rz!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 21 August, 2020, 11:37:05 pm
I see the Grand Départ is in Nice. My memories of Nice are of seeing our bike tour leader's thong poking out above his shorts and the old ladies with walnut boobies on the beach. Oh, and the plane landing being a bit reminiscent of Sumburgh.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 22 August, 2020, 10:14:15 am
I went there in 1985 prior to starting a terrible overnight train journey to Dijon.  My bike travelled separately, and rather more slowly :(. Let's have these so-called “cyclists” in the so-called “Tour” de France [“Back in your box, laddie! – Ed.]
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 22 August, 2020, 05:50:04 pm
Last stage before Paris: ITT finishing on La Planche des Belles Filles.  That could liven things up a bit :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 22 August, 2020, 06:17:09 pm
Or be a case like e.g. 2009 where everyone just sits on each other and waits for the last stage?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nuncio on 22 August, 2020, 07:39:04 pm
On an ITT?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 22 August, 2020, 09:56:29 pm
Basso of INEOS has been tested positive for Covid. I guess it depends who else was at the same training camp how much effect this might have.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Rupert on 24 August, 2020, 08:39:09 am
With almost 5000 new Covid 19 cases confirmed in France in the last 24 hours, I really think France needs to be considering another national lockdown and cancelling this year's Tour.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: SpaceBadger on 24 August, 2020, 08:41:04 pm
It's the end of stage 20 and Carapaz is 3 minutes in the lead. He just needs to cross the line in Paris the following day and the GC is his.

That night, a second member of Ineos tests positive for Covid-19.

Discuss.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nuncio on 24 August, 2020, 09:07:38 pm
[A couple of days later] What did Brailsford know and when did he know it?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 24 August, 2020, 09:40:36 pm
Evil C Boardman:Ahahahaha! Ha ha ha ha ha!  Oh yes!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 26 August, 2020, 06:06:29 pm
That night, a second member of Ineos tests positive for Covid-19.

Seems that is going to change: https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-de-france-ready-to-ease-covid-19-exclusion-rules/

I saw two problems

a) Teams not getting people tested for fear of getting booted
b) Team gets booted & then a day or so later a second test on the same person comes back negative. Oops. Shouldn't have removed said team

In regards to France, cases are increasing but only in certain areas. But I do think there's a high chance the race won't see Paris, or it will see Paris but will have skipped some stages in the approach.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Jack_P on 26 August, 2020, 09:38:12 pm
Two potentials for the Covid tour.
1. Pinot goes nuts for 10 days to take the yellow jersey, ASO then stop the race due to the risk because of too many spectators, Pinot declared the winner for France 😁

2. Testing scandal uncovered by the press when riders failing tests are mysteriously pulled from the race with mystery injuries, or failed tests are just bribed to disappear  ::-)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 27 August, 2020, 12:42:28 am
We at P@nd3m1c Pr0duckt10nzTM® are SO stealing idea #1, but substituting J Alaphilippe to make it look original  ;)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 27 August, 2020, 07:48:41 pm
Crikey.  “Team B&B HOTELS - VITAL CONCEPT P / B KTM“ is going to be a source of RSI if they actually achieve anything.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 27 August, 2020, 08:05:05 pm
That night, a second member of Ineos tests positive for Covid-19.

Seems that is going to change: https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-de-france-ready-to-ease-covid-19-exclusion-rules/

I saw two problems

a) Teams not getting people tested for fear of getting booted
b) Team gets booted & then a day or so later a second test on the same person comes back negative. Oops. Shouldn't have removed said team

In regards to France, cases are increasing but only in certain areas. But I do think there's a high chance the race won't see Paris, or it will see Paris but will have skipped some stages in the approach.

The DS of Bora-Hansgrohe was waxing wroth about that issue after it happened to one of his riders at the Bretagne Classic earlier this week.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/53916524
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 27 August, 2020, 09:15:04 pm
Tour de France in doubt after Covid red alert issued before Grand Départ in Nice (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/aug/27/tour-de-france-in-doubt-after-covid-red-alert-issued-before-grand-depart-in-nice)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 27 August, 2020, 10:22:58 pm
The unknown distance race:

https://spokeydokey.blog/2020/08/27/the-silent-bell-of-maillot-mayhem
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 28 August, 2020, 11:12:06 am
Tour de France in doubt after Covid red alert issued before Grand Départ in Nice (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/aug/27/tour-de-france-in-doubt-after-covid-red-alert-issued-before-grand-depart-in-nice)

They've said it's going ahead but under strict oversight from the plague police.  On the radio this morning they interviewed a couple of thickos who were all "I don't understand.  I've bought the maillot jaune and the cap and now they say we can't watch it. I don't understand. It's the Tour de France, Covid or not. I don't understand. It's the greatest sporting event of [thing]. I don't understand. They can't do this. I don't understand. I don't understand. I don't understand." Da capo.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 28 August, 2020, 04:10:30 pm
They must have been English?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 28 August, 2020, 08:52:08 pm
(https://img.aso.fr/core_app/img-cycling-tdf-jpg/push-covid19/21125/0:0,660:660-660-0-100/62dfb)

What could possibly go wrong?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 29 August, 2020, 01:13:55 am
And we're back to two positives and you're out

https://www.velonews.com/events/tour-de-france/stricter-two-strikes-policy-returns-to-the-tour-de-france-after-government-decision/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 29 August, 2020, 07:17:45 pm
I reckon the govt may impose a lockdown, which will leave the streets clear for Le Tour.  The French will welcome the chance to stay at home and watch/ stay at home to ensure the Tour goes on.

Predictions:
A rider will abandon and then test positive a couple days later.  Another member of the team will test positive during the race. 
Bernal and Roglic will not make it to Paris.
The Tour won't be finished early to ensure a French rider wins.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Ivo on 29 August, 2020, 08:37:10 pm
I'll add another predition
The tour won't finish in Paris but in one of the major cities in the East of France.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: quixoticgeek on 29 August, 2020, 08:43:02 pm

Oh, let's complete the set.

The tour will never finish... they'll just keep riding and riding and riding and riding... :p

J
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 29 August, 2020, 10:23:09 pm
John Degenkolb eliminated while the TV cameras weren’t looking. Team's appeal turned down.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 29 August, 2020, 11:19:35 pm
Bahrain-McLaren's Rafael Valls is out as well, with a leg injury.

Quite a lot of road rash today:

https://cyclingtips.com/2020/08/the-tour-de-france-ice-rink-who-crashed-and-whos-hurt/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 29 August, 2020, 11:54:06 pm
“Andrew Greipel”?  Has the goriler of 3b got a hitherto unknown twin brother?

The news about Gilbert probably explains why De Gendt also lost over 11 minutes.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 30 August, 2020, 09:19:56 am
John Degenkolb eliminated while the TV cameras weren’t looking. Team's appeal turned down.

It was a day of bashed knees, apart from Pinot's wingman Gaudu who, according to francetvinfo.fr, caught it in the "scratum" [sic. As a dog, probably].
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 30 August, 2020, 09:28:26 am
John Degenkolb eliminated while the TV cameras weren’t looking. Team's appeal turned down.

Degenkolb would have retired anyway, so the disqualification is academic.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Ivo on 30 August, 2020, 10:06:45 am
Astana didn't make a lot of friends yesterday. There won't be many stage wins from them this time.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 30 August, 2020, 10:38:49 am
INEOS wankpanzer are using #BuiltOnPurpose on Twitter. What, opposed to being built by accident or something? Surely all cars are built on purpose?!  ???
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 30 August, 2020, 10:55:44 am
INEOS wankpanzer are using #BuiltOnPurpose on Twitter. What, opposed to being built by accident or something? Surely all cars are built on purpose?!  ???

I wondered who Grenadier were before you posted that. How humiliating, belonging to a team named after a mere car.  Imagine riding for Morris Minor or Austin Allegro.  Ford Prefect? Well, maybe.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 30 August, 2020, 12:56:37 pm
Ford France did sponsor a team in the 1960s. Anquetil rode for them, according to Wikinaccurate.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 30 August, 2020, 01:25:28 pm
TV's D Friebe says Philippe Gilbert is a DNS today too :o
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 30 August, 2020, 01:58:07 pm
TV's D Friebe says Philippe Gilbert is a DNS today too :o

Not too surprising, seeing as he's got a broken kneecap.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Beardy on 30 August, 2020, 03:00:18 pm
I wonder if the Garmin outage is having any meaningful impact on the teams. Obviously it’s not going to affect the riding, but the team managers will not get their data to analyse.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 30 August, 2020, 03:16:41 pm
I wonder if the Garmin outage is having any meaningful impact on the teams. Obviously it’s not going to affect the riding, but the team managers will not get their data to analyse.

Yes they will. It's all available by direct upload to the team's computers for analysis in Training Peaks or similar programs. It doesn't have to go anywhere near Garmin Connect.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 30 August, 2020, 03:28:06 pm
TV's D Friebe says Philippe Gilbert is a DNS today too :o

Not too surprising, seeing as he's got a broken kneecap.

Yes, I can imagine that would put you off spending three weeks riding a bike.  Not the first time he's done it either.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 30 August, 2020, 03:38:43 pm
He said he recognized the pain as soon as it happened.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 30 August, 2020, 04:44:37 pm
But still finished the stage.  Because, it's just a broken kneecap.

He also said it was rude to DQ Dagenkop, seeing as he was going to abandon the next day anyway.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 02 September, 2020, 05:35:58 pm
Nothing happens until 17.8 km when Alaphilippe takes a bidon & is slapped with 20 sec penalty, handing Yates yellow. Oh and WvA   :o https://twitter.com/Alec_Pedaler/status/1301185146146770946
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 02 September, 2020, 05:49:41 pm
Super D Millar opined right at the start of today’s live coverage that there was no way on earth van Aert would be allowed to have a go today ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 02 September, 2020, 06:22:19 pm
It’s worth watching the analysis programmes tonight - an unexpected turn!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 02 September, 2020, 07:57:13 pm
On the bright side, there'll be a vacancy for a soigneur tomorrow.  Too fat and old to compete?  This is your way into the dazzling world of pro cycling.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 02 September, 2020, 08:27:32 pm
Team DQS directeur sportif Tom Steels, of all people, should know what you can and can’t do with bottles near the end of a stage
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 02 September, 2020, 11:12:38 pm
Intentional shedding of yellow to save the team?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 03 September, 2020, 01:35:24 am
Now that Yates has yellow, Mitchelton-Scott should round up some Covid sufferers and send them to all the team hotels.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 03 September, 2020, 01:44:45 am
Sam Bennett says that DQS “could” be concentrating on the points competition.  Yeah, right.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 03 September, 2020, 01:48:39 am
Whoever has yellow needs to cling on to it - there's a very real chance the Tour won't make it to Paris.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: slugbait on 04 September, 2020, 09:20:48 am
Whoever has yellow needs to cling on to it - there's a very real chance the Tour won't make it to Paris.

Unless the yellow has a commanding lead when the Tour is cancelled, he will never be seen as a proper Tour winner. Personally, I think they have to make it at least until Planche des Belles Filles before a winner can be declared.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 04 September, 2020, 02:12:27 pm
Bora Hansgrohe doing their best to liven up what might otherwise have been a rather dull day :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 04 September, 2020, 02:57:55 pm
Bora Hansgrohe doing their best to brighten an otherwise dull afternoon

.. by re-enacting the Harvard Bard's "In Old Mexico (http://graeme.50webs.com/lehrer/mexico.htm)" via the medium of interpretative dance. :demon:



The above may contain traces of LIE and FTFY.



Sorrynotsorry, but the original wording was just close enough that I couldn't resist. ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: benborp on 04 September, 2020, 04:09:33 pm
Makes me wonder what is in Sandy Casar's trophy cabinet.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: slope on 05 September, 2020, 06:44:25 pm
Today's otherwise exciting stage up the Peyresourde must have been very scary for all the riders, with the manic dense crowds aggressively spreading any potential virus directly in the riders' faces :'(
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 05 September, 2020, 09:00:54 pm
I suspect they were more worried about the crowds knocking them off.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 05 September, 2020, 09:08:36 pm
They seemed fairly subdued by normal TdF mountain stage standards, or at least they didn’t appear to be lobbing distress flares or cups of piss.  Still, it's good* to see that the French gammonariat is just as thick as its rosbif counterpart.

* FSVO “good”
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 06 September, 2020, 08:27:39 am
Pogacar set a new record for climbing the Peyresourde yesterday, apparently.

Beating Vino and Mayo's time  ::-)

Another early fail for Pinot. At least he is consistent. Bernal looked under pressure, Roglic looked in control.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 06 September, 2020, 10:21:25 am
Pinot, yes. He went down in the wet during the first stage and someone ran into his lower back.  Not much fun.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 06 September, 2020, 11:24:31 am
At least we should be spared the Alaphilippe fanboism from the colemantators for a day or two.  Won't we?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: slope on 07 September, 2020, 06:19:25 pm
At least we should be spared the Alaphilippe fanboism from the colemantators for a day or two.  Won't we?

But Julian has such an entertaining dancing devil twitch, bien sur, surelize?

Anyway, Wout van Aert is the current fave pet of Mrs Millar and Boulting, who now call him WOW! van Aert.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 07 September, 2020, 06:43:48 pm
At least we should be spared the Alaphilippe fanboism from the colemantators for a day or two.  Won't we?

Depends whether or not Begbie had a word.

"Keep singin' ma praises, else ya get a wee dose o' ma chib..."
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: drgannet on 07 September, 2020, 07:21:23 pm
The end of the stage 9 yesterday was pretty exciting. Hirschi's descent is one of the best bits of racing I have seen in a long time.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 07 September, 2020, 08:40:44 pm
TV's G Imlach said in tonight's highlights that Ineos and Astana have all tested negative for C19 but other teams, and the Tourganisation itself, have had some positive results :'(
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Beardy on 08 September, 2020, 08:24:28 am
TV's G Imlach said in tonight's highlights that Ineos and Astana have all tested negative for C19 but other teams, and the Tourganisation itself, have had some positive results :'(
So the tour is done for another year then?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 08 September, 2020, 10:35:47 am
The end of the stage 9 yesterday was pretty exciting. Hirschi's descent is one of the best bits of racing I have seen in a long time.

Helluva lot better than a bunch of thugs sprinting at the end of a long, flat, deadly stage.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 08 September, 2020, 10:48:53 am
TV's G Imlach said in tonight's highlights that Ineos and Astana have all tested negative for C19 but other teams, and the Tourganisation itself, have had some positive results :'(
So the tour is done for another year then?

Still waiting for the results.  Nowt on letour.fr, but then it's a steaming pile of cack at the best of times.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Salvatore on 08 September, 2020, 11:15:29 am
From cyclingnews.com

Quote
L'Equipe has reported that no rider has tested positive for COVID-19 during the rest day of the Tour, but we are still awaiting official confirmation of that news from the UCI and ASO. The report does not specify whether any staff members returned positive tests.

Deceuninck-QuickStep have responded to reports that there had been a positive case among their staff. "As you will have seen, it has been reported that a member of our team staff was collected from our team hotel this morning. An error was made in the laboratory with the sample that the individual gave yesterday, meaning they were taken for restesting this morning. The result of this second test has been returned as negative and we will continue to race as normal."
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Beardy on 08 September, 2020, 11:42:44 am
TV's G Imlach said in tonight's highlights that Ineos and Astana have all tested negative for C19 but other teams, and the Tourganisation itself, have had some positive results :'(
So the tour is done for another year then?

Still waiting for the results.  Nowt on letour.fr, but then it's a steaming pile of cack at the best of times.
And the Skoda app has been ‘improved’ to iPhone only scale as well as the content being streamlined. Tour Tracker wants money. So I’m stuck with the steaming pile..  >:(
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 08 September, 2020, 11:47:01 am
Some reports that Prudhomme tested positive yesterday.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 08 September, 2020, 11:56:36 am
I'm not sure how much credence to place on those reports, mind. road.cc quotes a tweet from one Valentin Jacquemet [“Who he?” – Ed.] and Heil Online doesn't appear to quite any source at all.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: philip on 08 September, 2020, 12:05:31 pm
There is an official press release on twitter: https://twitter.com/LeTour/status/1303284798786543618

1 staff member at Cofidis, AG2R, Ineos, Mitchelton-Scott, plus a technical service provider.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 08 September, 2020, 12:29:24 pm
TV's G Imlach has just confirmed that C Prudhomme has tested +ve :o
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 08 September, 2020, 01:22:22 pm
Not surprising. He had Macrobe in his car last week.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 09 September, 2020, 05:37:17 pm
Crazy P Sagan demoted to the back of the bunch on today's stage after his little altercation with van Aert in the sprint.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Ivo on 09 September, 2020, 07:26:07 pm
It was more something like bumping someone deliberatly out of the way. There simply wasn't enough space at that side of van Aert.
He should be very lucky not to have received a points penalty for this.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rafletcher on 09 September, 2020, 08:40:34 pm
It was more something like bumping someone deliberatly out of the way. There simply wasn't enough space at that side of van Aert.
He should be very lucky not to have received a points penalty for this.

He did, 13 point deduction.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 10 September, 2020, 09:10:26 am
I've never liked Sagan. Can't stand his voice. Or his wheelies.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rafletcher on 10 September, 2020, 10:07:21 am
He's certainly been a lot more subdued this edition.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 10 September, 2020, 11:59:42 am
I think Sagan is the best thing to have happened to male cycling in the last 10 years.  Three successive WCs.  No-one has ever done that.  And he livens things up.  I love my cycling but there are few "spectacles" as boring as a four hour flat stage: the same six or seven riders always contest the sprint finish, so why not just let them ride a stage of, say, 500 metres together and let everyone else have a day off to watch films of Eddy Merckx in the snow?  If you have to have those long flats, Peter Sagan is a welcome clown!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 10 September, 2020, 12:15:36 pm
Doing a wheelie?  On a 17% hill?  On a time-trial bike?  On a Friday?  What’s not to like ;)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 10 September, 2020, 12:51:39 pm
Sagan was an obnoxious brat as a youngster but I have been a fan for several years. Personality, talent, combativeness and an obvious enjoyment of cycling.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 10 September, 2020, 01:04:30 pm
I like the fact that he's the only mesomorph left in the peloton.  The rest are whippets with little dinosaur arms.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 10 September, 2020, 02:59:05 pm
Colemanballs from Steve Sutcliffe (who he?) on BBC commentary:-

"One thing about the Tour is the diversity of views. They never fail to disappoint over the 21-stage race."
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: mattc on 11 September, 2020, 06:59:16 am
Sagan was an obnoxious brat as a youngster but I have been a fan for several years. Personality, talent, combativeness and an obvious enjoyment of cycling.
Ditto.

He still deserved that penalty though  :)

Could be a serious scrap for Green now, Sagan looking 2nd best but hungry.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TheLurker on 11 September, 2020, 07:19:54 am
Quote from: LittleWheelsandBig
Sagan was an obnoxious brat as a youngster...
Isn't that the default personality type for a sprinter?  Abrasive, confident even arrogant?   

I think the penalty was appropriate, as Ivo said earlier he wasn't preserving his own space or line, he barged van Aert out of the way which could have had him off his bike into the other riders.

Still have a more than sneaking admiration of him as a rider though.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: L CC on 11 September, 2020, 08:53:21 am
Still have a more than sneaking admiration of him as a rider though.
In my all-women vteam the general feeling is "love him till he opens his mouth"
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: CrazyEnglishTriathlete on 11 September, 2020, 10:24:02 am
There is an official press release on twitter: https://twitter.com/LeTour/status/1303284798786543618

1 staff member at Cofidis, AG2R, Ineos, Mitchelton-Scott, plus a technical service provider.

Egon Bernal has a good day on the Puy Mary or Grand Colombier and takes over yellow.  Ineos mechanic tests positive (2nd strike) on Monday.  Hypothetically.  Discuss.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: JonBuoy on 11 September, 2020, 10:27:59 am
There is an official press release on twitter: https://twitter.com/LeTour/status/1303284798786543618

1 staff member at Cofidis, AG2R, Ineos, Mitchelton-Scott, plus a technical service provider.

Egon Bernal has a good day on the Puy Mary or Grand Colombier and takes over yellow.  Ineos mechanic tests positive (2nd strike) on Monday.  Hypothetically.  Discuss.

Not a problem:

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-de-france-covid-19-counter-to-be-reset-for-second-rest-day-tests/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: quixoticgeek on 11 September, 2020, 01:38:05 pm
Still have a more than sneaking admiration of him as a rider though.
In my all-women vteam the general feeling is "love him till he opens his mouth"

I second this.

J
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 11 September, 2020, 03:28:35 pm
Schachmann: tongue hanging out and head oscillating from side to side like a lizard.  Hope his mum's not watching. :sick:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 11 September, 2020, 03:35:59 pm
I don't like his sunglasses at all.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 11 September, 2020, 03:38:10 pm
He's starting to remind me of Jason Statham. I don't like him either.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 11 September, 2020, 03:52:24 pm
The Massif Central looks lovely though.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 11 September, 2020, 04:16:50 pm
Great cheeses, too.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 11 September, 2020, 04:42:55 pm
TV's Super D Millar went on record as not being “a cheese person” this afternoon. Can we burn him?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Salvatore on 11 September, 2020, 04:54:24 pm
That brought back some memories. Puy Mary was a secret control on the 1200 du Massif Central.  A small crowd (about 2 people) unconnected with the ride, cheered me to the control e.g. "Allez John" etc. Odd that they should know my name. They were day trippers who had asked what was going on, and Andreas from Karsruhe who arrived a few minutes before me told them I'd be next. The control was in the car park just before the top and I was so knackered the controller had to push me before I could get going again.

 
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 11 September, 2020, 05:11:01 pm
TV's Super D Millar went on record as not being “a cheese person” this afternoon. Can we burn him?

Fondue.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: tatanab on 11 September, 2020, 05:31:52 pm
That brought back some memories.
And for me.  I went up that route with touring kit about 4 years ago.  That long steep straight was a killer with no respite after the bend.  Sandwiches in the cafe at the top were pretty awful.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 11 September, 2020, 09:46:41 pm
TV's Super D Millar went on record as not being “a cheese person” this afternoon. Can we burn him?

With petril.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 11 September, 2020, 11:07:46 pm
TV's Super D Millar went on record as not being “a cheese person” this afternoon. Can we burn him?

With petril.

No, Cheesoid!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 11 September, 2020, 11:14:16 pm
TV's Super D Millar went on record as not being “a cheese person” this afternoon. Can we burn him?

Fondue.

Like the one in Asterix in Switzerland?  :demon:

https://www.omgbeaupeep.com/comics/Asterix/016/16/
https://www.omgbeaupeep.com/comics/Asterix/016/17/
https://www.omgbeaupeep.com/comics/Asterix/016/18/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 12 September, 2020, 12:15:29 am
Bardet out with concussion.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 12 September, 2020, 12:48:40 am
And Mollema from the same crash.  They mentioned it in the highlights but if they did so on the live prog I blinked and missed it, or was looking up the spelling of “Madouas”.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 12 September, 2020, 08:31:07 am
I can never get this out and of my head when I watch Max Schachmann

https://twitter.com/laflammerouge16/status/1301849634432790528?s=19
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 12 September, 2020, 08:44:59 am
TV's Super D Millar went on record as not being “a cheese person” this afternoon. Can we burn him?

Fondue.

Like the one in Asterix in Switzerland?  :demon:

https://www.omgbeaupeep.com/comics/Asterix/016/16/
https://www.omgbeaupeep.com/comics/Asterix/016/17/
https://www.omgbeaupeep.com/comics/Asterix/016/18/

Farpaîtement.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 12 September, 2020, 08:50:27 am
Going to be an interesting final week. The time gap between the top 9 is only 2 minutes. Next Saturday's hilly TT will be crucial. It looks like itll be Roglic, Podačar*, Bernal podium, but in which order is not clear.

*reminds me of Ricardo Ricco.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 12 September, 2020, 08:52:24 am
And Mollema from the same crash.  They mentioned it in the highlights but if they did so on the live prog I blinked and missed it, or was looking up the spelling of “Madouas”.

Yeah. French commentator said he could see from the TV monitor that his wrist was broken, so ouch.

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/bauke-mollema-crashes-out-of-tour-de-france/

Somewhat horrifying the way Bardet was hauled to his feet after an obvious concussion. Tour doc should have hauled him out immediately.  Commentator here mentioned that they have concussion rules in rugby etc. but not in UCI/TdF.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 12 September, 2020, 08:55:17 am
Going to be an interesting final week. The time gap between the top 9 is only 2 minutes. Next Saturday's hilly TT will be crucial. It looks like itll be Roglic, Podačar*, Bernal podium, but in which order is not clear.

*reminds me of Ricardo Ricco.

In a good way?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 12 September, 2020, 08:58:46 am
Not in a good way.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 12 September, 2020, 08:59:54 am
It's easier in rugby etc as you can bring on a sub for the time needed to do a head assessment. In cycling if a doctor spends, say, 8 minutes doing an assessment and then decides they are okay the rider has had that stage / race ruined.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 12 September, 2020, 09:29:22 am
Yup, and if Bardet hadn't been lucky he could have keeled over and died before the finish.  As it was he's sort-of OK with no lesions.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: hatler on 12 September, 2020, 10:09:18 am
And Mollema from the same crash.  They mentioned it in the highlights but if they did so on the live prog I blinked and missed it, or was looking up the spelling of “Madouas”.

Yeah. French commentator said he could see from the TV monitor that his wrist was broken, so ouch.

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/bauke-mollema-crashes-out-of-tour-de-france/

Somewhat horrifying the way Bardet was hauled to his feet after an obvious concussion. Tour doc should have hauled him out immediately.  Commentator here mentioned that they have concussion rules in rugby etc. but not in UCI/TdF.
I thought helmets prevented concussion.   :demon:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 12 September, 2020, 11:33:07 am
And Mollema from the same crash.  They mentioned it in the highlights but if they did so on the live prog I blinked and missed it, or was looking up the spelling of “Madouas”.

Yeah. French commentator said he could see from the TV monitor that his wrist was broken, so ouch.

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/bauke-mollema-crashes-out-of-tour-de-france/

Somewhat horrifying the way Bardet was hauled to his feet after an obvious concussion. Tour doc should have hauled him out immediately.  Commentator here mentioned that they have concussion rules in rugby etc. but not in UCI/TdF.

Super D Millar seems to think they DO have rules about concussion – he mentioned it after Ion Izaguirre's crash and subsequent retirement the other day.  Of course Izaguirre isn't a French rider in the top ten :demon:

Yes please, the one with the matching tinfoil hat.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Salvatore on 12 September, 2020, 01:24:54 pm
UCI regs. Removed from the race if concussion suspected. If it turns out you're OK, fromage dur, presumably.
Quote
Concussion and return to competition
13.3.061 All those in the presence of a rider and in particular all doctors and paramedical
assistants shall be watchful for riders showing symptoms of concussion.
13.3.062 Concussion is defined as a complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain,
induced by traumatic biomechanical forces. The diagnosis of acute concussion
usually involves the assessment of a range of domains including clinical symptoms,
physical signs, behavior, balance, sleep and cognition.
13.3.063 If any one or more of the following components is seen to be present, a concussion
should be suspected:
1. Symptoms: somatic (e.g. headache), cognitive (e.g. feeling like in a fog)
and/or emotional symptoms (e.g. lability)
2. Physical signs (e.g. loss of consciousness, amnesia)
3. Behavioural changes (e.g. irritability)
4. Cognitive impairment (e.g. slowed reaction times)
5. Sleep disturbance (e.g. drowsiness)
13.3.064 Any rider with a suspected concussion should be immediately removed from the
competition or training and urgently assessed medically.

13.3.065 For appropriate clinical evaluation for suspected concussion, for concussion
management and return to training and competition doctors should refer to the
published guidelines (Consensus statement on concussion in Sport – 4th
International Conference, Zurich 2012) and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool
3 (SCAT 3) and any update thereof.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 12 September, 2020, 04:52:06 pm
Yup, and .if Bardet hadn't been lucky he could have keeled over and died before the finish.  As it was he's sort-of OK with no lesions.

FCVO "sort-of OK"...

Quote
1/2: Romain Bardet posted this update on his condition on instagram. "I was far from imagining yesterday afternoon that under the comforting words of @vlavenu my @letourdefrance would abruptly end.
Since then, headaches and nausea have not left me...#TDF2020

2/2: Bardet cont... "The MRI performed this morning confirmed a small hemorrhage from the concussion. With rest for an indefinite period of time, I should quickly recover. Thank you all for your messages."
https://twitter.com/SadhbhOS/status/1304794773212061697
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 12 September, 2020, 05:17:10 pm
Yup, and .if Bardet hadn't been lucky he could have keeled over and died before the finish.  As it was he's sort-of OK with no lesions.

FCVO "sort-of OK"...

Quote
1/2: Romain Bardet posted this update on his condition on instagram. "I was far from imagining yesterday afternoon that under the comforting words of @vlavenu my @letourdefrance would abruptly end.
Since then, headaches and nausea have not left me...#TDF2020

2/2: Bardet cont... "The MRI performed this morning confirmed a small hemorrhage from the concussion. With rest for an indefinite period of time, I should quickly recover. Thank you all for your messages."
https://twitter.com/SadhbhOS/status/1304794773212061697

FCVO "small", "indefinite period" and "quickly".
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 12 September, 2020, 05:29:30 pm
Exactement.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nuncio on 12 September, 2020, 11:15:41 pm
UCI regs. Removed from the race if concussion suspected. If it turns out you're OK, fromage dur, presumably.
Quote
Concussion and return to competition
13.3.061 All those in the presence of a rider and in particular all doctors and paramedical
assistants shall be watchful for riders showing symptoms of concussion.
13.3.062 Concussion is defined as a complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain,
induced by traumatic biomechanical forces. The diagnosis of acute concussion
usually involves the assessment of a range of domains including clinical symptoms,
physical signs, behavior, balance, sleep and cognition.
13.3.063 If any one or more of the following components is seen to be present, a concussion
should be suspected:
1. Symptoms: somatic (e.g. headache), cognitive (e.g. feeling like in a fog)
and/or emotional symptoms (e.g. lability)
2. Physical signs (e.g. loss of consciousness, amnesia)
3. Behavioural changes (e.g. irritability)
4. Cognitive impairment (e.g. slowed reaction times)
5. Sleep disturbance (e.g. drowsiness)
13.3.064 Any rider with a suspected concussion should be immediately removed from the
competition or training and urgently assessed medically.

13.3.065 For appropriate clinical evaluation for suspected concussion, for concussion
management and return to training and competition doctors should refer to the
published guidelines (Consensus statement on concussion in Sport – 4th
International Conference, Zurich 2012) and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool
3 (SCAT 3) and any update thereof.

For a moment I misread the example
 for symptoms as 'feeling like a frog'
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Salvatore on 13 September, 2020, 10:54:44 am
Notable replies of British riders in France who when asked their name in order to establish their degree of compost mentis include "the mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche" and "John Major". Geraint Thomas is said to have answered "Chris Froome" aft as a crash.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 13 September, 2020, 11:29:56 am
No “is said to” about it.  It was on the telly an' everyfing.

G, that is, not me ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Ruthie on 13 September, 2020, 12:47:24 pm
Enough of the sad donkeys! I can’t bear it!!!!  :'(
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 13 September, 2020, 02:33:16 pm
Are we nearly there yet? 🥱
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 13 September, 2020, 05:25:49 pm
Ineos will rue the day they left their secind and third best riders at home.  Utterly pwned.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 13 September, 2020, 05:48:39 pm
 Wouldnt have made any difference, I suspect.  JV are the new Sky. Lots of Flumicil packages and TUEs for industrial steroids I daresay. Classics riders killing pure climbers. Its 2013-18 again

This is a weird tour. The strongest rider, Pogačar, is pretty much riding without a team. It is only JV's strength that is keeping Roglic in yellow. On tuesday there is an 8 second bonus atop the penultimate climb.  JV wont chase the break because they'll want to deny Pog the bonus.  Pog's team arent strong enough to chase break.

Meanwhile, the race for green goes on (especially this Wednesday)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 13 September, 2020, 06:47:18 pm
Just call them Rabobank?  Glowing orange like their positives  :D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 13 September, 2020, 11:02:21 pm
Classics riders killing pure climbers.
Yebbut he's Belgian so it must be legit.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: mattc on 14 September, 2020, 07:22:23 am
And Mollema from the same crash.  They mentioned it in the highlights but if they did so on the live prog I blinked and missed it, or was looking up the spelling of “Madouas”.

Yeah. French commentator said he could see from the TV monitor that his wrist was broken, so ouch.

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/bauke-mollema-crashes-out-of-tour-de-france/

Somewhat horrifying the way Bardet was hauled to his feet after an obvious concussion. Tour doc should have hauled him out immediately.  Commentator here mentioned that they have concussion rules in rugby etc. but not in UCI/TdF.
I thought helmets prevented concussion.   :demon:
Ouch!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 14 September, 2020, 12:37:29 pm
WvA isn't finishing with the climbers though, he's just applying his power over a subset of the climb and then blowing up. Reminds me of Kwiatkowski blowing up so bad he had to stop and have a rest after doing the same job in previous tours.
Roglic on the other hand seems much less whippet like and is still out climbing the specialist climbers.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 14 September, 2020, 01:43:07 pm
Enough of the sad donkeys! I can’t bear it!!!!  :'(

S'ok, they're all getting recast in Listerine shitverts.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 14 September, 2020, 01:46:59 pm
Wouldnt have made any difference, I suspect.  JV are the new Sky. Lots of Flumicil packages and TUEs for industrial steroids I daresay. Classics riders killing pure climbers. Its 2013-18 again

This is a weird tour. The strongest rider, Pogačar, is pretty much riding without a team. It is only JV's strength that is keeping Roglic in yellow. On tuesday there is an 8 second bonus atop the penultimate climb.  JV wont chase the break because they'll want to deny Pog the bonus.  Pog's team arent strong enough to chase break.

Meanwhile, the race for green goes on (especially this Wednesday)

While I am hugely enjoying this Tour (as I did during the Armstrong years), it's difficult to understand or justify the incredible performances of the leaders this year. However, none of that affects me, so I'll just sit back and enjoy!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 14 September, 2020, 02:53:17 pm
Wouldnt have made any difference, I suspect.  JV are the new Sky. Lots of Flumicil packages and TUEs for industrial steroids I daresay. Classics riders killing pure climbers. Its 2013-18 again

This is a weird tour. The strongest rider, Pogačar, is pretty much riding without a team. It is only JV's strength that is keeping Roglic in yellow. On tuesday there is an 8 second bonus atop the penultimate climb.  JV wont chase the break because they'll want to deny Pog the bonus.  Pog's team arent strong enough to chase break.

Meanwhile, the race for green goes on (especially this Wednesday)


While I am hugely enjoying this Tour (as I did during the Armstrong years), it's difficult to understand or justify the incredible performances of the leaders this year. However, none of that affects me, so I'll just sit back and enjoy!

I await your analysis of the ride leaders data to qualify the above.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fimm on 14 September, 2020, 03:01:27 pm
Notable replies of British riders in France who when asked their name in order to establish their degree of compost mentis include "the mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche" and "John Major". Geraint Thomas is said to have answered "Chris Froome" aft as a crash.

G was messing about - it was a few years ago when sport mostly didn't take concussion as seriously as we do now.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 14 September, 2020, 05:27:56 pm
Wouldnt have made any difference, I suspect.  JV are the new Sky. Lots of Flumicil packages and TUEs for industrial steroids I daresay. Classics riders killing pure climbers. Its 2013-18 again

This is a weird tour. The strongest rider, Pogačar, is pretty much riding without a team. It is only JV's strength that is keeping Roglic in yellow. On tuesday there is an 8 second bonus atop the penultimate climb.  JV wont chase the break because they'll want to deny Pog the bonus.  Pog's team arent strong enough to chase break.

Meanwhile, the race for green goes on (especially this Wednesday)

While I am hugely enjoying this Tour (as I did during the Armstrong years), it's difficult to understand or justify the incredible performances of the leaders this year. However, none of that affects me, so I'll just sit back and enjoy!

I'm enjoying it hugely...especially the way the race for green jersey is affecting how the whole stage plays out. 

JV do rather look like Sky, and it's not a good look.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 14 September, 2020, 05:29:34 pm
WvA isn't finishing with the climbers though, he's just applying his power over a subset of the climb and then blowing up.

I dont think this is what people are alluding to. It's the fact that pure climbers are blowing up before he does.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 14 September, 2020, 08:56:42 pm
Egan and Sky Ineos failing is filling me with shadenfreude, but freude nevertheless.

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 15 September, 2020, 01:08:56 am
Wouldnt have made any difference, I suspect.  JV are the new Sky. Lots of Flumicil packages and TUEs for industrial steroids I daresay. Classics riders killing pure climbers. Its 2013-18 again

This is a weird tour. The strongest rider, Pogačar, is pretty much riding without a team. It is only JV's strength that is keeping Roglic in yellow. On tuesday there is an 8 second bonus atop the penultimate climb.  JV wont chase the break because they'll want to deny Pog the bonus.  Pog's team arent strong enough to chase break.

Meanwhile, the race for green goes on (especially this Wednesday)


While I am hugely enjoying this Tour (as I did during the Armstrong years), it's difficult to understand or justify the incredible performances of the leaders this year. However, none of that affects me, so I'll just sit back and enjoy!

I await your analysis of the ride leaders data to qualify the above.

Ok here you go.

1). Qualitative analysis? I’m enjoying it. Job done.

2). Are some teams’ performances a little too good? Maybe, but I don’t care because 1 above.

3). What happens if someone gets caught after the event? See 2 then 1 above.

I enjoyed the Armstrong tours too, and subsequent events did not negate that enjoyment.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 15 September, 2020, 06:48:07 am
Data?

Pogačar set a new record up the Peyresourde.

On the Puy Mary last year's Tour winner, Egan Bernal, couldnt keep up with the Slovenians despite producing some of his best ever numbers.

It isnt proof of anything, but it does suggest abnormal performances.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 15 September, 2020, 07:26:07 am
Egan and Sky Ineos failing is filling me with shadenfreude, but freude nevertheless.
:-D :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 15 September, 2020, 11:01:45 am
Data?

Pogačar set a new record up the Peyresourde.

On the Puy Mary last year's Tour winner, Egan Bernal, couldnt keep up with the Slovenians despite producing some of his best ever numbers.

It isnt proof of anything, but it does suggest abnormal performances.


I'm teasing, of course, and I don't want to accuse anyone of anything without a little more than circumstantial evidence, but experience teaches us that doubt about exceptional athletic performances is quite often justified. Add to that the least rigorous doping regime for many years, the difficulties of achieving effective training, and the lack of racing through most of 2020, and the reasons for doubt are at least enhanced.

However, all that said, I am thoroughly enjoying this Tour. I would feel sorry for the losers if it was subsequently discovered that any of the leading lights weren't entirely clean, but - as I said above - it won't take away from the fact that I will have very much enjoyed the spectacle, as I don't believe in that kind of retrospective regret.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 15 September, 2020, 11:35:09 am
With Zwift, turbos etc, I think effective training will have been possible during Covid (especially after the lockdown bit ended). I don't think effective out-of-competition drug testing will have been so easy to sort out.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 15 September, 2020, 11:49:20 am
Inevitably, Zwift/Sufferfest and other indoor training regimes worked better for some than others. Sagan and Valverde are famously not fans, and there will be plenty of others. On the other hand, there will be some who responded very well to the indoor training environment.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: quixoticgeek on 15 September, 2020, 11:51:40 am

Why is it the moment a rider is doing better than others, people immediately think it's drugs?

Come on, it's 2020, they may be motor doping too!

J
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 15 September, 2020, 12:28:10 pm
Data?

Pogačar set a new record up the Peyresourde.

On the Puy Mary last year's Tour winner, Egan Bernal, couldnt keep up with the Slovenians despite producing some of his best ever numbers.

It isnt proof of anything, but it does suggest abnormal performances.

A VAM of 1711, hardly abnormal.

Keep going Sheep with your arm chair critiques, opinions are like arseholes etc, etc.

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 15 September, 2020, 12:37:17 pm
A pleasure to do business with you!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 15 September, 2020, 03:16:10 pm
Data?

Pogačar set a new record up the Peyresourde.

On the Puy Mary last year's Tour winner, Egan Bernal, couldnt keep up with the Slovenians despite producing some of his best ever numbers.

It isnt proof of anything, but it does suggest abnormal performances.

A VAM of 1711, hardly abnormal.

Keep going Sheep with your arm chair critiques, opinions are like arseholes etc, etc.

LMT is like an opinion.

Besides, LMT is, as usual, wrong. Pogačars VAM was 1859 on his attack, or in other terms Pogačar did 6.7 W/kg for 24 minutes, at the end of a four-hour mountain stage, on the eighth consecutive day of the world's hardest bike race.  

Yeah. Normal.

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 15 September, 2020, 07:21:22 pm
Data?

Pogačar set a new record up the Peyresourde.

On the Puy Mary last year's Tour winner, Egan Bernal, couldnt keep up with the Slovenians despite producing some of his best ever numbers.

It isnt proof of anything, but it does suggest abnormal performances.

A VAM of 1711, hardly abnormal.

Keep going Sheep with your arm chair critiques, opinions are like arseholes etc, etc.

LMT is like an opinion.

Besides, LMT is, as usual, wrong. Pogačars VAM was 1859 on his attack, or in other terms Pogačar did 6.7 W/kg for 24 minutes, at the end of a four-hour mountain stage, on the eighth consecutive day of the world's hardest bike race. 

Yeah. Normal.

His VAM for the climb was 1711, carry on bleating Sheep.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: C-3PO on 15 September, 2020, 08:18:31 pm
Other fora are available for name-calling.  I understand that the Twittersphere and YouTube comments are particularly truculent.  I respectfully suggest you find another outlet for such pleasantries, not here.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 15 September, 2020, 09:09:24 pm
Inevitably, Zwift/Sufferfest and other indoor training regimes worked better for some than others. Sagan and Valverde are famously not fans, and there will be plenty of others. On the other hand, there will be some who responded very well to the indoor training environment.

Well, Valverde is sitting in 12th. Not bad for a 40 year old who doesnt like Zwift.

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 15 September, 2020, 09:35:34 pm
40?  That's Jurassic in Grand Tour terms.  I know Duclos-Lasalle was winning stuff in early middle age but they were one-day Classics.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 15 September, 2020, 10:12:07 pm
Inevitably, Zwift/Sufferfest and other indoor training regimes worked better for some than others. Sagan and Valverde are famously not fans, and there will be plenty of others. On the other hand, there will be some who responded very well to the indoor training environment.

Well, Valverde is sitting in 12th. Not bad for a 40 year old who doesnt like Zwift.


The fact that he doesn't like it doesn't mean he didn't get effective training from it. But I suspect that he used other software, or old-fashioned roller drills. Nevertheless, good point!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: basset on 16 September, 2020, 08:57:27 am
It did make me chuckle last night when David Miller made a comment that the Jumbo team were unbelievably good  ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 16 September, 2020, 09:07:15 am
It did make me chuckle last night when David Miller made a comment that the Jumbo team were unbelievably good  ;D
As in "David Millar was unbelievably good once"  ;)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: hatler on 16 September, 2020, 09:11:26 am
Bernal quits.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 16 September, 2020, 10:08:38 am
Bernal quits.

Saw that one coming when I noted that he'd finished in the autobus yesterday.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: sg37409 on 16 September, 2020, 10:24:47 am
Thats very disappointing.  Wouldn't be surprised to see him leave Ineos now.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 16 September, 2020, 10:50:53 am
Even allowing for controversies Bernal's losses are colossal, unlike, say, Quintana's.  I suspect he's actually ill.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 16 September, 2020, 10:56:16 am
Even allowing for controversies Bernal's losses are colossal, unlike, say, Quintana's.  I suspect he's actually ill.

From what I was reading elsewhere just now, it appears that it's a recurrence of the back problem that he had at the Critérium du Dauphiné.

ETA: https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/egan-bernal-im-screwed-up-on-all-sides/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TheLurker on 16 September, 2020, 10:57:07 am
Quote from: sg37409
...Wouldn't be surprised to see him leave Ineos now.
If you mean Ineos giving him the push, I would.  He had a bad off not long before the TdF from which he hasn't recovered properly, he's a proven GT winner and, so far at least, Ineos have been prepared to let hurt riders recover and try again.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 16 September, 2020, 10:59:00 am
Thats very disappointing.  Wouldn't be surprised to see him leave Ineos now.

His contract with $ky/Ineo$ is until the end of 2022, and with Froome already leaving and Thomas (34) being indescribably ancient he'll be undisputed team leader and get paid lots of money.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 16 September, 2020, 10:59:58 am
INEOS have invested their future in him. Seems unlikely they will offload a 23 year old because of one bad result in a topsy turvy year
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 16 September, 2020, 03:28:48 pm
Col de la Loze: my first car wouldn't have got up there.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Beardy on 16 September, 2020, 04:22:53 pm
That was quite exciting wasn’t it?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 16 September, 2020, 04:29:03 pm
Yeah.  My tea's gone cold.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Redlight on 16 September, 2020, 04:56:53 pm
First stage that I've watched live this year. I was enjoying it most of the way up the final climb, thinking how much nicer it was without all the imbeciles in stupid costumes running alongside or in front of the riders waving flags in their faces.

And then....  :(
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 16 September, 2020, 06:43:46 pm
Col de la Loze: my first car wouldn't have got up there.

That’s why it’s Hors Category ( the categories are based on the gear a certain Citroen of long ago needed to get up the climb) Hors Category meant that it couldn’t get up.
I doubt that such a Citroen even exists any more, and organisers have been known to over and under play categories, but the principle remains.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 16 September, 2020, 07:09:54 pm
HC as a category was only introduced in 1979.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 16 September, 2020, 09:27:41 pm
Col de la Loze: my first car wouldn't have got up there.

That’s why it’s Hors Category ( the categories are based on the gear a certain Citroen of long ago needed to get up the climb) Hors Category meant that it couldn’t get up.
I doubt that such a Citroen even exists any more, and organisers have been known to over and under play categories, but the principle remains.
Is that true?  It's brilliant if it is.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 16 September, 2020, 09:32:55 pm
It is a good story but just a story. Don’t talk about the facts too much, the legend is much better. There are lots of cycling stuffs along those lines.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mrs Pingu on 16 September, 2020, 09:41:43 pm
That was brilliant!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 16 September, 2020, 11:21:30 pm
Bernal quits.
One down, Roglic to go.  (looks like my predictions will only be 50% accurate).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Beardy on 16 September, 2020, 11:45:10 pm
Bernal quits.
One down, Roglic to go.  (looks like my predictions will only be 50% accurate).
It depends on whether he has the capacity to fully utilise his ‘diet’ and to a lesser extent if his super domestics can also do,so. 
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fimm on 17 September, 2020, 09:51:01 am
First stage that I've watched live this year. I was enjoying it most of the way up the final climb, thinking how much nicer it was without all the imbeciles in stupid costumes running alongside or in front of the riders waving flags in their faces.

And then....  :(
How come they let the spectators up there when they'd closed off the climb they did the other day?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 17 September, 2020, 09:54:37 am
Because there is always a track, a little known back road and 'helpful' Gendarme
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 17 September, 2020, 10:37:05 am
TIL that the Madone is not a col ridden in the Tour, it's just a favourite of Armstrong's for training. FFS.  :demon: Let's think of a new name for Trek's bike. It will have to be anagrammable so they can also rename the other two. Go on, have a go. Something for you to do during long breakaways.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 17 September, 2020, 11:32:09 am
How come they let the spectators up there when they'd closed off the climb they did the other day?
In addition to the people who will just walk/ride up other routse up the mountain, lot s of people go up the day (or 2) before and camp on the mountainside. You can't close the road for a week in advance. It was quite dangerous the other year in the Giro when they skipped some of the alpine finishes because of snow - there were campervans stuck up there! Some would-be spectators also ended up missing the race when it was in Yorkshire thanks to the re-route - they had been camping on the original route!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 17 September, 2020, 11:46:14 am
(https://live.staticflickr.com/4548/24026793647_fed55ab347_o.png) (https://flic.kr/p/CBaAET)
90B(C)DHM (https://flic.kr/p/CBaAET) by Mr Larrington (https://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_larrington/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 17 September, 2020, 11:58:23 am
(https://live.staticflickr.com/4548/24026793647_fed55ab347_o.png) (https://flic.kr/p/CBaAET)
90B(C)DHM (https://flic.kr/p/CBaAET) by Mr Larrington (https://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_larrington/), on Flickr

<kilroy> Wot no Didi Senft? </kilroy> :demon:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 17 September, 2020, 12:19:51 pm
You just can’t see him.  He's behind the geezer on the donk, as instructed.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 17 September, 2020, 01:31:52 pm
Greipel has abandoned.  Surprised it took him this long.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 17 September, 2020, 01:46:30 pm
Rider the other day tossed his empty bidon to a bunch of kids instead of handing it into his team car and was fined 500 swiss francs. :o
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TheLurker on 17 September, 2020, 02:09:40 pm
A Cv-19 related rule perhaps? Or anti-littering?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 17 September, 2020, 02:46:50 pm
Anti-littering. OK for bars, wrappers etc. but every discarded bottle on the TdF is snapped up.  The penalty was 200 Sfr to start with but the riders didn't take much notice so they doubled it and got 500.  Considering that I just saw an official car take half the road away from a rider in a hairpin bend I'm not surprised.

---o0o---

Meanwhile, France TV commentators, the S on the end of Aravis is pronounced.  We used to spend a week every year in that area.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 17 September, 2020, 03:22:38 pm
Allan Peiper, with typical Australian relish, told a story about a rider who shat in a cotton cap and flung it into the hedge.  Unfortunately this was just after a feeding station, and fans were hanging around waiting to grab empty musettes  ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 17 September, 2020, 03:44:32 pm
If you are on a disk bike and get a rear puncture could you not use a neutral service rim brake only wheel just to get you through with only one brake or would it simply not fit in the frame or is it because of through axles?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: philip on 17 September, 2020, 04:13:08 pm
A QR hub is 135mm and fits between the dropouts. The dropouts in a disk frame are also 135mm apart but they have additional 3.5mm slots to hold a 142mm hub. A QR hub won't work in a through axle frame.

Some dropouts/hubs have adaptors to switch between the two systems, but not during a race.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 17 September, 2020, 04:20:14 pm
Ah fair enough I'd forgotten about the extra 3.5mm each side
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 17 September, 2020, 04:32:55 pm
Losing Bernal did Ineos a power of good.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 17 September, 2020, 06:15:31 pm
Have they opened the jiffy bags?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: andyoxon on 17 September, 2020, 06:48:12 pm
The best laid plan at the finish seemed slightly unplanned...
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 17 September, 2020, 06:51:13 pm
Rider the other day tossed his empty bidon to a bunch of kids instead of handing it into his team car and was fined 500 swiss francs. :jurek:
I've noticed lots of riders tossing their empty bidons by the roadside. Not convinced they all get
collected by roadside fans. Lots of gel wrappers being tossed on the road by riders too.


I suppose they do the same thing when they're on their long 5 => 6 hour training rides?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 17 September, 2020, 08:57:46 pm
Curiouser and curiouser...

One of Jumbo-Visma's sports directors has been booted off the Tour after an altercation with a UCI bike-check official yesterday.

https://www.velonews.com/events/tour-de-france/jumbo-visma-sport-director-kicked-out-of-tour-de-france-following-stage-17-incident/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 17 September, 2020, 09:01:12 pm
Allan Peiper, with typical Australian relish, told a story about a rider who shat in a cotton cap and flung it into the hedge.  Unfortunately this was just after a feeding station, and fans were hanging around waiting to grab empty musettes  ;D

Tom Simpson did this - in a team member’s hat!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 17 September, 2020, 09:05:16 pm
Rider the other day tossed his empty bidon to a bunch of kids instead of handing it into his team car and was fined 500 swiss francs. :jurek:
I've noticed lots of riders tossing their empty bidons by the roadside. Not convinced they all get
collected by roadside fans. Lots of gel wrappers being tossed on the road by riders too.


I suppose they do the same thing when they're on their long 5 => 6 hour training rides?

The bidons are made with some sort of rice starch in the composition, so they naturally degrade over time I understand.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 17 September, 2020, 09:10:09 pm
A QR hub is 135mm and fits between the dropouts. The dropouts in a disk frame are also 135mm apart but they have additional 3.5mm slots to hold a 142mm hub. A QR hub won't work in a through axle frame.

Some dropouts/hubs have adaptors to switch between the two systems, but not during a race.

Just an observation, more teams are using rim brakes again this year, and I guess this is part of the reason they’ve stood up to the manufacturers. Riders in 1 and 2 positions are on rim brakes.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 17 September, 2020, 09:33:56 pm
I think Porte's wheel change delay is a good example of the downsides of discs in a race.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rafletcher on 17 September, 2020, 09:40:09 pm
Should the neutral service carry disc wheels though?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: hatler on 17 September, 2020, 09:40:48 pm
Are all disc wheels the same ?  Rotor size ?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 17 September, 2020, 09:41:10 pm
The brake will drag when they swap a disc brake wheel. Maybe we will go back to the days of the rider being dragged back up to the peloton by the team car while the team mechanic fiddles with ‘something’.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: hatler on 17 September, 2020, 09:41:52 pm
The brake will drag when they swap a disc brake wheel.
Why ?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 17 September, 2020, 09:43:28 pm
Slight differences between wheels. Need to centre the caliper.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 17 September, 2020, 09:43:40 pm
The disc is never in the same lateral location and the clearances are so small. Rim brakes have much bigger clearances.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: hatler on 17 September, 2020, 09:45:18 pm
Cool. Thanks both. Can you tell I'm a disc newbie ?  :-)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 17 September, 2020, 09:49:10 pm
I expect Ineo$ have a special mechanic whose sole job is to make sure all disc wheels match to within fractions of a millimetre  ;)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 17 September, 2020, 10:57:30 pm
Ineos are riding rim brake bikes

No need to complicate the mechanical side of racing when you've got all those drugs to ferry around and tests to evade.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: freeflow on 18 September, 2020, 08:52:32 am
If the neutral service car wasn't carrying disc wheels it wasn't neutral.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 18 September, 2020, 12:49:10 pm
If the neutral service car wasn't carrying disc wheels it wasn't neutral.

Given the number of disc brake “ standards” it might have to be a neutral service lorry :-)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 18 September, 2020, 01:18:00 pm
The only support near Porte when he punctured was a neutral service motorbike which at most carries 4-5 wheels. There's more variations of disc/hub design than it can carry and it has to have front and rear so carries rim only wheels.

I don't know if the neutral service cars carry more than just rim brakes?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 18 September, 2020, 02:31:16 pm
I'd rather replace my wheels every couple of years that live with that faff.  Last time El Prez had a bent wheel he was all of a tizzy because he couldn't find the wee spacer to slip into the caliper.  Jeez.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 18 September, 2020, 03:32:25 pm
Sivakov lost a bidon when he fell just now. I wonder if they'll fine hím 500 Sfr.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 18 September, 2020, 03:38:24 pm
If the neutral service car wasn't carrying disc wheels it wasn't neutral.

Given the number of disc brake “ standards” it might have to be a neutral service lorry :-)

Not that many in terms of hubs and spacing. Tends to be 142mm rear 12mm axle. Front always 100mm and 12, but occasionally 15mm axle. Cannondale used to be rear QR but I think theyve abandoned that.

Discs can vary in size so, yes, in theory  there are a few permutations, but in practice not so much.

It's probably more faff that it is worth for racing in the dry, although I was listening to Armstrong and Hincapie's podcast the other day and disc brakes were their number one lament for technology they wished they had had in their era.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 18 September, 2020, 04:46:19 pm
The only support near Porte when he punctured was a neutral service motorbike which at most carries 4-5 wheels. There's more variations of disc/hub design than it can carry and it has to have front and rear so carries rim only wheels.

I don't know if the neutral service cars carry more than just rim brakes?

Neutral service only carry rim brake wheels for the reasons given above. Another win for rim brakes today, although some Sunweb riders seem to be on discs.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 18 September, 2020, 05:47:42 pm
Most wins have been on discs

In other news, this:

https://www.leparisien.fr/sports/cyclisme/tour-de-france-ceux-qui-connaissent-le-velo-savent-que-ce-n-est-pas-normal-17-09-2020-8386752.php

Recent  yellow jersey winning ex pro, Romain Feillu, calls bulllshit on Wout Van Aert, and the Slovenians.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 18 September, 2020, 06:30:47 pm
Tres interesting, HF!  I especially liked the bewilderment at cruiserweight riders climbing faster than a bantam Pantani - who was on speed anyway!  It has all been a bit, well,  incroyable, nicht wahr?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: JonBuoy on 18 September, 2020, 06:39:53 pm
My French is just about good enough to understand this bit.

Quote
JUMBO

LES ÉLÉPHANTS VOLANTS, C'EST PAS NOUVEAU !!!

IL SUFFIT D'Y CROIRE

 :)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 18 September, 2020, 06:49:09 pm
Yes, I liked that, too.  I guess the French refer to elephants, where we might use pigs!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rafletcher on 18 September, 2020, 07:22:41 pm
If the neutral service car wasn't carrying disc wheels it wasn't neutral.

Given the number of disc brake “ standards” it might have to be a neutral service lorry :-)

If they all ride 140mm it’d work ok.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Lightning Phil on 18 September, 2020, 08:30:06 pm
I'd rather replace my wheels every couple of years that live with that faff.  Last time El Prez had a bent wheel he was all of a tizzy because he couldn't find the wee spacer to slip into the caliper.  Jeez.

Different width rims and you have to unclamp and reclamp the brake cable for rim brakes. Not that’s a faff!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 18 September, 2020, 08:36:06 pm
There is a reason for a continuously variable QR and a barrel adjuster.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 18 September, 2020, 09:44:02 pm
Yes, I liked that, too.  I guess the French refer to elephants, where we might use pigs!

Jumbo --> Dumbo.  Who just has to believe he can fly.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 18 September, 2020, 10:09:56 pm
There is a reason for a continuously variable QR and a barrel adjuster.

True that.

A thru axle is a solution to a problem that does not exist to the extent which its made too imo.

Anything to get the marketing peeps to do thier thing and talk up the next best thing.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: basset on 19 September, 2020, 07:21:48 am
I found it quite amusing that the winner yesterday was on a none disc Cervelo , but yet they Only sell (as far as I know) disc brakes to us mere mortals  :- ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 19 September, 2020, 10:40:00 am
Yes, I liked that, too.  I guess the French refer to elephants, where we might use pigs!

Jumbo --> Dumbo.  Who just has to believe he can fly.

Ah, thanks, Roger - I've never read that story (or seen the film)!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: JonBuoy on 19 September, 2020, 01:33:27 pm
Pavel Sivakov chips in on the brake debate after yesterday's fall:  https://streamable.com/k1ot69

Warning: contains rude words!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 01:42:35 pm
Pavel Sivakov chips in on the brake debate after yesterday's fall:  https://streamable.com/k1ot69

Warning: contains rude words!

 ;D ;D

Obviously Sivakov is just a bleating Sheep responding to marketing  ;)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: andyoxon on 19 September, 2020, 02:42:32 pm
What on earth was he doing with his brakes then? Jabbing them on too hard?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 03:03:58 pm
Dunno. Rim braking on carbon rims is pretty shite, and in the wet is unbelievably shite. (Poor power and poor modulation).

Did he go over the bars? (Snatchy brakes)

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 19 September, 2020, 03:25:35 pm
Pavel Sivakov chips in on the brake debate after yesterday's fall:  https://streamable.com/k1ot69

Warning: contains rude words!

Being half Russian, he knows the full name of the FSB.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 04:58:15 pm
Oh my god this is going to be close  :o
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 05:00:14 pm
7 secs @ 3k

I almost cant watch
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 19 September, 2020, 05:15:11 pm
Unbelievable.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 19 September, 2020, 05:15:34 pm
Bloody hell.  And not that close.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 19 September, 2020, 05:16:18 pm
His bikes are going to be reduced to spare parts before he has his dinner.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 05:21:31 pm
 :o
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: drgannet on 19 September, 2020, 05:30:42 pm
Unbelievable.

Spot on.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 05:38:49 pm
Amazing that he managed to go so hard on the entire course to take 2 minutes out of Roglic, win the stage,  AND still go up the climb faster than polka-dot jersey wearer, Carapaz, who took it easy on the flat section.

Quite remarkable, especially for a rider who has never won a TT before.

EDIT: when I say remarkable, what I really mean is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 19 September, 2020, 05:44:12 pm
Unbelievable.

Spot on.
Indeed.  I am not sure I can suspend my disbelief anymore.
The question in my mind is the rider numbers: is it that some have basically not been able to train, making those that managed to train well look like superhumans?  Or is it really obvious cheating to a level that would make [political statement removed as we are not in POBI].
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 05:46:49 pm
He set a record time on the climb.

And that was after 40 minutes of Tour winning ITT.

 ;D
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 05:47:39 pm
Amazing that he managed to go so hard on the entire course to take 2 minutes out of Roglic, win the stage,  AND still go up the climb faster than polka-dot jersey wearer, Carapaz, who took it easy on the flat section.

Quite remarkable, especially for a rider who has never won a TT before.

EDIT: when I say remarkable, what I really mean is ridiculous.

He's been Slovenian national TT champion two years running.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 19 September, 2020, 05:49:14 pm
Which makes him a likely international TT winner?  Didn't realise Slovakia were a big player in the world cycling scene.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 05:49:45 pm
Amazing that he managed to go so hard on the entire course to take 2 minutes out of Roglic, win the stage,  AND still go up the climb faster than polka-dot jersey wearer, Carapaz, who took it easy on the flat section.

Quite remarkable, especially for a rider who has never won a TT before.

EDIT: when I say remarkable, what I really mean is ridiculous.

He's been Slovenian national TT champion two years running.

Yeah, I know. I'm talking about WT level.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 05:51:28 pm
Which makes him a likely international TT winner?  Didn't realise Slovakia were a big player in the world cycling scene.

In a way, they are...

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/roglic-and-nibali-left-to-face-questions-over-milan-erzen-and-his-links-to-operation-aderlass/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 19 September, 2020, 06:07:37 pm
Is the new Merckx, I wonder?  He could have five or six in him.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 06:09:59 pm
Yeah he might be, for a few weeks.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: ElyDave on 19 September, 2020, 06:15:56 pm
That was a bit exciting wasn't it. From seeing them 1km apart on the road and then watch Roglic going backwards was a bit unexpected.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 06:16:37 pm
Which makes him a likely international TT winner?  Didn't realise Slovakia were a big player in the world cycling scene.

My grate frend Mr Zabovnik gets very cheesed off with people who confuse Slovakia and Slovenia :P
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 19 September, 2020, 06:27:41 pm
Awesome ride by Pogacar, may he dominate for years to come.

Haters gonna hate as always.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 07:21:33 pm
^ exactly what the Armstrong fanbois used to say
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 19 September, 2020, 07:37:45 pm
One change I'd like to see is getting rid of Boulting. He's rubbish. Get Millar to do it.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 08:32:20 pm
However rubbish TV's *** Boulting may be, he's still streets ahead of Phil Liggett :demon: Matt Rendell is OK as a source of obscure facts and as Nice Chris Boardman's straight man but should on no account be allowed to colemantate on the actual race.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 19 September, 2020, 08:42:44 pm
Phil Liggett (my mum used to sit next to him at work in the 60s) looked a bit of an arse when he was the last person to keep defending LA in the face of overwhelming evidence.  I guess that's why he's been off the British TV coverage.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: quixoticgeek on 19 September, 2020, 08:43:48 pm
Having now watched the highlights. I have one question.

Why does Roglic's helmet look like it doesn't fit?

J
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 08:51:22 pm
Phil Liggett (my mum used to sit next to him at work in the 60s) looked a bit of an arse when he was the last person to keep defending LA in the face of overwhelming evidence.  I guess that's why he's been off the British TV coverage.

IIRC the Liggett-Sherwen Show was an independent operation which charged broadcasters $BIGNUM for its services. Vsquared probably decided they could do it cheaper with *** & Super D Millar and the vast majority of the viewers wouldn’t notice, because they only ever watch one race a year.  Super D was absolutely dreadful on his first outing – I think it was the Tour of BRITAIN – but got a lot better very quickly when sent to France.

Having now watched the highlights. I have one question.

Why does Roglic's helmet look like it doesn't fit?


His Jumbo Visma baseball caps don’t fit either.  I can only conclude it's because he's got a funny-shaped head.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 19 September, 2020, 09:01:44 pm
^ exactly what the Armstrong fanbois used to say

Pogacar is not Armstrong.

HTH.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 19 September, 2020, 09:06:13 pm
Squirrel (OK, a tree rat) behind NC Boardman in the highlights!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 09:09:14 pm
^ exactly what the Armstrong fanbois used to say

Pogacar is not Armstrong.

HTH.

Nor was Armstrong until he was found out.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 19 September, 2020, 09:50:18 pm
^ exactly what the Armstrong fanbois used to say

Pogacar is not Armstrong.

HTH.



Nor was Armstrong until he was found out.

Which was in 1999 but was covered up by the UCI.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rob on 19 September, 2020, 09:55:22 pm
Having now watched the highlights. I have one question.

Why does Roglic's helmet look like it doesn't fit?

J

The thing with aero lids is that they are positioned to work best when you are down in the aero position.   It will look crap when in a normal road position.   The thing with this though is that it actually looked quite crap when he was in the tuck to begin with.   All a bit odd as Jumbo have done a shit load of work with aero expert and multi UK TT champ Dan Bingham.

As for the rest of today, not normal.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 19 September, 2020, 10:27:53 pm
Amazing that he managed to go so hard on the entire course to take 2 minutes out of Roglic, win the stage,  AND still go up the climb faster than polka-dot jersey wearer, Carapaz, who took it easy on the flat section.



Carapaz who is the current Giro champion.

The more I think if this the more I struggle to believe.

Matching Dumolin on the flat followed by fastest ever climb up the Planche. And it's now the end of the TdF opposed it's normal position early on in the race.

What happened to out of competition tests during the pandemic?


https://mobile.twitter.com/i/web/status/1307425217770381312
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 September, 2020, 10:46:51 pm
How long to wait for the other shoe to drop? Weeks, months or years?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 19 September, 2020, 10:47:11 pm
Out of competition testing was reduced by 90-95% during the height of the lockdown, according to Mr Google, but the CADF claims it was back to normal by early September. Pinot “expressed concern” about it back in April, saying he hadn’t had one since October 2019, but the rest of article is behind the Torygraph's paywall.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 19 September, 2020, 11:03:26 pm
If people are judging Pogacar I hope they are taking into account that Roglic had a very, very bad day.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 19 September, 2020, 11:07:27 pm
the rest of article is behind the Torygraph's paywall.

Thibaut Pinot, the Groupama-FDJ rider, has admitted he is concerned by the current lack of out-of-competition drug testing. In an interview with L’Equipe, Pinot revealed that his last test was back in October of last year.

While that predates the coronavirus pandemic, the lockdown currently being enforced across much of the globe in an attempt to slow the spread of Covid-19 has led to huge reduction in out-of-competition testing.

That is being seen by some as a ‘golden window’ for athletes to cheat with impunity.

Pinot’s words follow similar warnings from other athletes worldwide. American swimmer Katie Ledecky admitted last week that she had “a little bit of concern” about the lack of testing during the pandemic.

“I do have hope it will ramp up in Olympic year, but it’s a little concerning and I don’t think it will give some athletes the same kind of confidence that they’re competing against clean athletes,” she told USA Today.

Even before this summer’s Games were postponed, Travis Tygert, the chief executive of the United States Anti-Doping Agency and the man who brought down both Lance Armstrong and Sir Mo Farah’s former coach Alberto Salazar, was warning that they had to be delayed as they risked becoming “the dirtiest Games ever”.

Tygart said there was a “window of opportunity” for athletes who were not “willing to compete clean”.

Some anti-doping agencies around the world have halted their testing programmes completely during the pandemic while others, including UK Anti-Doping, have announced a “significant reduction”.

Nicole Sapstead, the Ukad chief executive, responded to criticism of that announcement by insisting that athletes were “strongly mistaken” if they believed the rules could be broken amidst the coronavirus outbreak.

Sapstead said: "There will always be a minority that will seek to dope, and whether that is now, when they think they are effectively off the radar of national anti-doping organisations, or at any other time, my message to them is very, very clear - we will continue to process intelligence, we will continue to monitor whereabouts, and we will continue to monitor the raft of information we have available to us, such as the athlete biological passports.”

Her words will not inspire huge confidence, although without the lockdown being lifted, and social distancing rules eased, it is difficult to know what can be done. Usada has begun trialling a remote testing programme with various Olympic stars.

More than a dozen athletes, including Olympic swimming champions Ledecky and Lilly King, have been invited to take part in a trial which involves the athletes collecting their own urine and blood while being observed remotely on Zoom or FaceTime by officials.

Testing kits have been sent to those involved, who must produce samples of their blood and urine upon receiving an unannounced call from a Usada doping control officer.

A spokesman for UK Anti-Doping told Telegraph Sport last week that it was “watching with interest” to see how the trial went.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 September, 2020, 11:08:18 pm
It isn’t about Roglic. It is all about which performances are believable.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 19 September, 2020, 11:09:23 pm
If people are judging Pogacar I hope they are taking into account that Roglic had a very, very bad day.

Its irrelevant.

See Adamski's post above. It wasnt Roglic's ride that makes Pogacar's look insane
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 19 September, 2020, 11:21:21 pm
It's believable when compared with WVA's ...
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 19 September, 2020, 11:33:55 pm
That shot of Dumoulin and van Aert, both looking shell-shocked, said a lot.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 20 September, 2020, 12:41:17 am
That shot of Dumoulin and van Aert, both looking shell-shocked, said a lot.

As in “Wait… WHAT! His [”kumquats” – The Invigilator] are even MOAR potent than ours :o” shell-shocked :demon: ?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 20 September, 2020, 07:05:09 am
I wonder what LeMond will have to say?  Probably keep very quiet if asked for a quote...he must have his suspicions.  At least he's generally accepted to have beaten Fignon through aerodynamics (and Fignon's lack of sleep due to saddle sores) 
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 07:13:53 am
He won't say anything, I suspect.

The thing that struck me about Pogačar throughout the Tour was the weakness of his team, and how he pretty much rode it on his own...against JV who were the strongest team by miles.

Anyway, Pogačar's manager and sports director must be delighted to get a win. When their protege, Riccardo Ricco, turned out to be using a new and (previously) undetectable product (CERA) it must have been such a shock and surprise.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 20 September, 2020, 07:19:14 am
If people are judging Pogacar I hope they are taking into account that Roglic had a very, very bad day.

Roglic was fifth fastest on the stage, so it really wasn’t that bad! Pogacar was just so beyond everyone else that Roglic looked bad.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 07:33:49 am
Roglic will regret  riding conservatively once in yellow, especially given the team he had*

*suspension of disbelief reactivated for this post
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: perpetual dan on 20 September, 2020, 09:52:37 am
Having now watched the highlights. I have one question.

Why does Roglic's helmet look like it doesn't fit?

J
Doesn’t he also do the twisted loops thing with his face masks? (Strap goes from top, under ear, over ear, down to chin.)

The ride, however, left me short on belief. Over 2% faster than the next rider, having maintained a peak, and associated effort, that gave him wins in each week.

I’m really pleased for Porte though.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: andyoxon on 20 September, 2020, 10:19:31 am
...
The thing that struck me about Pogačar throughout the Tour was the weakness of his team, and how he pretty much rode it on his own...against JV who were the strongest team by miles.

...

Guessing that in general if a lack of competition during lockdown may have meant riders were fitter & fresher than they would normally have been (in a non-covid year), one might expect the impact to be seen across the board with many more teams posting great times etc?

edit.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 20 September, 2020, 10:41:28 am
The thing that struck me about Pogačar throughout the Tour was the weakness of his team, and how he pretty much rode it on his own...against JV who were the strongest team by miles.

Aru didn't finish stage 9. Formolo didn't finish stage 11. The next UAE rider on GC is Polanc, #41, 2½ hours down.

EDIT: This is interesting especially the graph at the end: https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/analysis-where-tadej-pogacar-won-the-tour-de-france-time-trial/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 20 September, 2020, 11:58:08 am
I find winning without a team less of a surprise, but then I am far from an expert in this.
To me, you want a team to be able to pick you up if you get dropped or to push the sudden attacks in the climbs.  But since Roglic is more of a TT rider you would expect a climber like Pog to be able to sit on the JV train with the other leaders.  It's a bit like you would expect Cav (in his day) to be able to win a sprint sitting on another sprinter's train.
I am suspicious of a climber beating/matching TT speeds on the flat and then putting 2 mins in to everyone on the climb. 
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 20 September, 2020, 01:05:38 pm
He was as fast or faster than the best TTers on the flat bit, and then the hill faster than the best climbers who saved themselves for the hill on the hilly bit. Basically, he rode at a power for 1 hour that no-one else could match when only focussing on 20 minute chunks. He's been the best rider at the TdF, no question, but that performance was unbelievable.
All the commentators would say was that Roglic cracked and had a bad day. And he clearly wasn't at his best - you would expect him to come in at a similar time to Dumoulin and Wout, and he was 20 seconds down. The thing is, Pogacar beat those guys by a minute and 20/30 seconds, so while Roglic clearly had a poor day, Pogacar had a "no chain" day. At the end of a tour where he was fighting for every second from very early on.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 20 September, 2020, 01:08:55 pm
It does all seem a bit incredible - and may well be.  But we are due another phenomenon; it's 50 years since Eddy Merckx, after all.  Eddy is supposed to have failed 3 drugs tests in his career, I think: a couple were medication-related and the other seems to have been a successful plot by the Italians to have him thrown out of the Giro in Gimondi's favour.  So, in official terms, Eddy was clean and could probably have beaten most whilst riding backwards.  But is it thought now that there might have been substances available which would not have been picked up by the then-current tests?    I am looking in my mind at a picture of a distraught young Merckx as he hears of the Italian decision.  There's no " ho-hum, some you win, some you lose" about it; he is in tears.  What does the team think?


The Slovenian's rise to the top of world cycling may be meteoric but its not altogether unprecedented.  Do we accept Eddy, or don't we?  I do.  I'm not sure about the Slovenians.  But they may be ok, too.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 20 September, 2020, 01:14:38 pm
Merckx doped using the characteristic drugs available then, like everybody else. Amphetamines create comparatively small performance improvements and had lots of downsides. Merckx was expected to be a worldbeater from the very beginning. Doping didn’t make him a winner.

EPO and blood doping was a game changer, turning sprinters into climbers and mid-pack riders into exceptional winners. This ride was of that magnitude.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 20 September, 2020, 01:25:58 pm
Merckx doped using the characteristic drugs available then, like everybody else. Amphetamines create comparatively small performance improvements and had lots of downsides. Merckx was expected to be a worldbeater from the very beginning. Doping didn’t make him a winner.

EPO and blood doping was a game changer, turning sprinters into climbers and mid-pack riders into exceptional winners. This ride was of that magnitude.

I don't disagree with any of that, D.  Going to be interesting to see (if I make it that far!) whether Pogacar manages 500 + in ten years time.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: vorsprung on 20 September, 2020, 01:52:16 pm
...
The thing that struck me about Pogačar throughout the Tour was the weakness of his team, and how he pretty much rode it on his own...against JV who were the strongest team by miles.

...

Guessing that in general if a lack of competition during lockdown may have meant riders were fitter & fresher than they would normally have been (in a non-covid year), one might expect the impact to be seen across the board with many more teams posting great times etc?

edit.

Or maybe it was the suspension of out of competition drug testing that was a significant factor?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 20 September, 2020, 02:16:43 pm
I find it deeply depressing that, faced with an exciting race in difficult circumstances, people from the cycling community, if not necessarily the cycle racing community, rush to assign performance to drugs.
I don’t see football fans doing similar, nor athletics followers.
I’d prefer to suspend any doubts until any actual evidence is presented.
Don’t forget that Pogacar beat Rodlic in his National Championship time trial. He also demonstrated an ability to outclimb Rodlic frequently throughout the Tour.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 20 September, 2020, 02:23:07 pm
...
The thing that struck me about Pogačar throughout the Tour was the weakness of his team, and how he pretty much rode it on his own...against JV who were the strongest team by miles.

...

Guessing that in general if a lack of competition during lockdown may have meant riders were fitter & fresher than they would normally have been (in a non-covid year), one might expect the impact to be seen across the board with many more teams posting great times etc?

edit.

Or maybe it was the suspension of out of competition drug testing that was a significant factor?

It's not necessarily one thing or another...

It's within the bounds of possibility that Roglic and Jumbo Visma missed opportunities to put the race to bed and that Pogacar sand blood-bagged everyone yesterday.

It's within the bounds of possibility that training under lockdown conditions worked better for some riders than others and that the lifting of lockdown at different times in different countries may have aided some riders more than others, and that the impact of lockdown on anti-doping surveillance/testing made it easier for some riders to get their "preparation" right.

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: simonp on 20 September, 2020, 02:44:19 pm
The climb was done without a power meter or computer. Just rode by feel and crushed everyone. Seems legit.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 03:04:17 pm
I find it deeply depressing that, faced with an exciting race in difficult circumstances, people from the cycling community, if not necessarily the cycle racing community, rush to assign performance to drugs.


Drugs have always made for exciting racing.


Don’t forget that Pogacar beat Rodlic in his National Championship time trial.

By 9 seconds.

Not 2 minutes

He also demonstrated an ability to outclimb Rodlic frequently throughout the Tour.

That must be why Pogacar was 57 seconds down on Roglic after a week of mountains  ::-)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: PeterM on 20 September, 2020, 03:30:51 pm
A lot of scepticism about Pog (and Rog) in the comments on l’Equipe’s report on the TT, for some reason...

https://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur-route/Actualites/Tour-de-france-tadej-pogacar-renverse-primoz-roglic-et-s-empare-du-maillot-jaune/1173655
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 20 September, 2020, 06:18:21 pm
In other news, Marc Hirschi has won the Supercombativité  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 06:22:58 pm
Great to see Bennett win in green
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Ian H on 20 September, 2020, 06:27:55 pm
Do you think the white jersey should be dropped and replaced with a grey one for the best old rider?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 06:31:25 pm
Just one with brown stains, Ian
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: perpetual dan on 20 September, 2020, 06:52:52 pm
I find it deeply depressing that, faced with an exciting race in difficult circumstances, people from the cycling community, if not necessarily the cycle racing community, rush to assign performance to drugs.

It was an exciting race, I’m glad they found a way to race and I’m glad I watched. Even so, skepticism is, I think, healthy. Even if it is mostly a learnt response, to make it easier to cope with my own future disappointment.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 07:14:18 pm
It was a highly unusual performance.

Sure, records can be broken...

...but when the records being broken were set by uber doped riders like Pantani and Armstrong I think we are allowed to question it, even though you'd prefer to just accept it.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 20 September, 2020, 07:16:36 pm
Just one with brown stains, Ian

Isn't that AG2R's normal colours?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: StuAff on 20 September, 2020, 07:21:05 pm
Do you think the white jersey should be dropped and replaced with a grey one for the best old rider?
Presented by someone on a mobility scooter?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TheLurker on 20 September, 2020, 07:23:55 pm
Quote from: StuAff
Quote from: Ian H
Do you think the white jersey should be dropped and replaced with a grey one for the best old rider?
Presented by someone on a mobility scooter?
So that'd be the last French winner then?  *evil grin*
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: StuAff on 20 September, 2020, 07:25:34 pm
Quote from: StuAff
Quote from: Ian H
Do you think the white jersey should be dropped and replaced with a grey one for the best old rider?
Presented by someone on a mobility scooter?
So that'd be the last French winner then?  *evil grin*
Well, Bernard might need some aid to keep up his occasional role as podium bouncer…
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 07:31:48 pm

Dumoulin rode similar values to his winning 2017 Bergen Worlds TT ride yesterday (still lost 1:20). Says reaching that level is impossible for him. If this is new normal, he's never going to win another TT


https://twitter.com/ebbenieuweboer/status/1307741990520524800?s=20

Beaten by a guy who has never won a TT at world level.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 20 September, 2020, 07:39:55 pm
Do you know if he's taken part in a TT at world level?  He's very young.  I just don't know.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 07:45:34 pm
Yeah, he has.

Example. stage 10 of 2019 vuelta. He wasnt even in top 10, and was 1m29 behind the winner (Roglic)

Consider this....he wasnt even the leader of his own team for this TdF. That was Aru (who? you ask). That tells you something about the unexpected nature of his win. Even his team didnt expect it.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 20 September, 2020, 08:33:39 pm
Interesting.  The team leader thing was also true for Egan Bernal, last year, I think.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 08:37:22 pm
Not exactly. Bernal was co-leader of TdF team with Thomas. He was fully expected to be a GT winner. Would have led the Giro team, but for a training crash.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 20 September, 2020, 08:52:20 pm
It will be interesting to see what that young Belgian lad does when he makes his grand tour debut.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 20 September, 2020, 09:13:24 pm
Tho Pogacar was #131 suggesting he was UAE team leader. If Aru was sole leader surely he won have been #131?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 09:20:35 pm
Tho Pogacar was #131 suggesting he was UAE team leader. If Aru was sole leader surely he won have been #131?

Just checked. They were co-leaders

http://www.uaeteamemirates.com/uae-team-emirates-set-sights-tour-de-france/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: quixoticgeek on 20 September, 2020, 09:32:29 pm

I wish we could watch them cross the finish line. Look at the 3 people on the top of the podium. Applaud their achievements, sit back, and not have to talk about who is or isn't taking what drugs.

I don't know how we can get to that point. Just so upsetting. I want to give them all the benefit of the doubt, that they are just truly impressive humans.

Fed up of the whole drug reputation :(

J
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 20 September, 2020, 09:41:46 pm
Everyone who gets to the Tour de France is a one in a million rider. That is the absolute minimum to get to the start line. The winner is two orders of magnitude rarer.

Performance enhancing drugs have been a part of professional sport since Victorian times. After all, to mis-quote Rudi Altig, they are professionals, not sportsmen.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 09:43:19 pm
https://www.ouest-france.fr/tour-de-france/tour-de-france-je-ne-regarde-plus-ca-me-degoute-dit-l-ex-maillot-jaune-stephane-heulot-6981305
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 20 September, 2020, 09:45:27 pm
https://www.ouest-france.fr/tour-de-france/tour-de-france-roglic-pogacar-ce-n-est-pas-normal-dit-un-ancien-maillot-jaune-du-tour-6976210
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 20 September, 2020, 10:14:42 pm
...I don’t see football fans doing similar, nor athletics followers...

Perhaps they should. And golf & tennis fans.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 20 September, 2020, 10:22:45 pm
...I don’t see football fans doing similar, nor athletics followers...

Perhaps they should. And golf & tennis fans.

Operación Puerto, nudge, nudge, wink, wink (https://www.google.co.uk/search?source=hp&ei=2sZnX4XTBYvQaeD6vMAH&q=operation+puerto+football&oq=operation+puerto&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQARgBMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCC4yAggAMgIIADoICAAQsQMQgwE6DgguELEDEIMBEMcBEKMCOgsILhCxAxDHARCjAjoFCAAQsQM6CAguELEDEJMCOgUILhCxAzoECC4QClCjBli0GmCRO2gAcAB4AIABmwOIAdIckgEJMi42LjQuMy4xmAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab)...

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Pingu on 20 September, 2020, 10:36:40 pm
...I don’t see football fans doing similar, nor athletics followers...

Perhaps they should. And golf & tennis fans.

Operación Puerto, nudge, nudge, wink, wink (https://www.google.co.uk/search?source=hp&ei=2sZnX4XTBYvQaeD6vMAH&q=operation+puerto+football&oq=operation+puerto&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQARgBMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCC4yAggAMgIIADoICAAQsQMQgwE6DgguELEDEIMBEMcBEKMCOgsILhCxAxDHARCjAjoFCAAQsQM6CAguELEDEJMCOgUILhCxAzoECC4QClCjBli0GmCRO2gAcAB4AIABmwOIAdIckgEJMi42LjQuMy4xmAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab)...

Quite
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 September, 2020, 12:40:04 am
I wonder what LeMond will have to say?  Probably keep very quiet if asked for a quote...he must have his suspicions.  At least he's generally accepted to have beaten Fignon through aerodynamics (and Fignon's lack of sleep due to saddle sores)

Lemond told L'Equipe that this was “The birth of a great champion” (https://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur-route/Article/Greg-lemond-a-propos-de-l-exploit-de-tadej-pogacar-la-naissance-d-un-grand-champion/1173840) (paywalled).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 21 September, 2020, 05:48:15 am
Merckx doped using the characteristic drugs available then, like everybody else. Amphetamines create comparatively small performance improvements and had lots of downsides. Merckx was expected to be a worldbeater from the very beginning. Doping didn’t make him a winner.

EPO and blood doping was a game changer, turning sprinters into climbers and mid-pack riders into exceptional winners. This ride was of that magnitude.

Merckx took his own son, Axel, to Michele Ferrari to be doped.

It was Merckx who introduced Armstrong to Ferrari.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 06:53:41 am
It's a power sport, like athletics.  There is little skill, and tactics consist of doing what the DS says.  So, generally, the guy who can sustain the highest power for the stage should win.  This means doping will never be far away.

There is doping in more skills-based sports like ball games or target games, but the drugs confer much smaller advantages.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: TimC on 21 September, 2020, 08:09:49 am
Not sure I agree with the ‘little skill’ remark. Watching these guys go downhill shows that some of them are very skilled - and some less so. I think there’s a fair degree of tactical skill too, especially in events without team radio. However, it is essentially a strength and endurance sport, as you say, and as such is particularly susceptible to additive-based ‘improvement’!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 21 September, 2020, 08:19:52 am
Drugs or no drugs, if the the TT had been before the Grand Colombier, Roglič wouldn't have been to keen to let him over the line first.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Beardy on 21 September, 2020, 09:37:04 am
Now here’s a thought. Should they just allow doping to remove one aspect of the hidden completion? The problem with the current situation is that there is a hidden completion in which team can more effectively cover up the doping that does take place and encourages corruption in the officials.

Competitive people will always seek whatever advantage they can and banning performance enhancing drugs drives them underground, it doesn’t make them go away.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 09:39:57 am
Are you prepared for (indeed encouraging) folk, including your children, to take performance-enhancing drugs for your entertainment?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 09:49:08 am
The use of EPO first came to light when Dutch cyclists started dying in their sleep.  Some guys then started setting an alarm for the early hours so they could walk around and stir up the blood a bit.

It's amazing that "Mr 60%" Riis is still with us (60% was, allegedly, his preposterously high haemocrit).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 09:54:17 am
The smarter riders would sleep with a heart rate monitor. When their heart rate dropped dangerously low, they would be woken by the monitor’s alarm, drink a couple of litres of water to thin out their blood and hop on the turbo for a few minutes to lift their base heart rate before going back to sleep.

TdF journalists would often stay in the same hotels as teams and hear the turbos in the early hours but they didn’t write about it. I hope (but doubt) that those journalists feel bad about their lack of action at the time.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 21 September, 2020, 11:41:12 am
Not sure I agree with the ‘little skill’ remark. Watching these guys go downhill shows that some of them are very skilled - and some less so. I think there’s a fair degree of tactical skill too, especially in events without team radio. However, it is essentially a strength and endurance sport, as you say, and as such is particularly susceptible to additive-based ‘improvement’!

The DS role and the role of radio is a little overstated. According to Super David Millar the other day the radios are pretty crap at more than 1km range, add the noise of the fans - less so this year but they were there in numbers on some of the hills - and the stress the body and brain are under I believe (having never been in that position) it will feel like you are on your own. You might be in a small group on a mountain, the team car a long way back stuck behind a splintered peleton and any decision making is down to you.

There are definately power riders and these days as a kid if you aren't producing the numbers you don't get a look in but power isn't just what makes a good race winner. The power/kg differences on any day in the top riders probably won't vary by more than about 1-2% the rest is down to tactical ability and watching the race situation unfold.

The result on Saturday wasn't very believable. I've watched Tour racing since the 90's (although you only got half hour highlights then, not full live coverage) and you had unbelievable days then which turned out to be just that. This sadly, feels the same.

I hope I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Ruthie on 21 September, 2020, 11:55:52 am
Has anyone else been trying to do that  TT Countdown thing with their fingers? Like on that show 321 in the 80’s?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 12:00:02 pm
I've been starter at evening "10s", so I can!

Starter is a good job, the only fly in the ointment being when someone misses their slot.  Pusher-offer is less good.  Finish timekeeper is awful when three riders arrive at once and people pester you for their time (which is bad etiquette).

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 21 September, 2020, 12:53:30 pm
Merckx doped using the characteristic drugs available then, like everybody else. Amphetamines create comparatively small performance improvements and had lots of downsides. Merckx was expected to be a worldbeater from the very beginning. Doping didn’t make him a winner.

EPO and blood doping was a game changer, turning sprinters into climbers and mid-pack riders into exceptional winners. This ride was of that magnitude.

Merckx took his own son, Axel, to Michele Ferrari to be doped.


It was Merckx who introduced Armstrong to Ferrari.

I am crest-fallen.  I preferred it when I was gullible.  I suppose I must console myself that if they all doped, then Merckx was still the best - by a stratospheric distance.  I shouldn't be upset (I am well-known in my "circle" as a cynic, about most things) but I am.  I also agree wholeheartedly with LWaB about continuing the fight against drugs in sport to protect people and because, well, just because it's WRONG.  I certainly don't want people killing themselves for my entertainment - that's so Roman.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nuncio on 21 September, 2020, 01:01:11 pm
Quote
I certainly don't want people killing themselves for my entertainment - that's so Roman.
I hope M. Bardet has recovered from his concussion, or is well on the way, and hasn't died quite yet.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 21 September, 2020, 01:05:29 pm
Go AWAY!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 01:08:47 pm
In terms of skill: there are some truly astounding bike handlers, like Sagan, but most pro cyclists are notoriously poor (or cautious) descenders. 

It does take a certain amount of experience to ride closely in the middle of the peloton; it helps that all the bikes corner the same, as road racing head angles and fork offsets hardly vary from 73/74 degrees and 43-45mm.  Anything different would be dangerous in the pack.  Mind you, there were plenty of wheel touches causing chutes this year.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 21 September, 2020, 01:10:18 pm
I hope M. Bardet has recovered from his concussion, or is well on the way, and hasn't died quite yet.
After Bardet's head was in collision with the ground, did his team and tdf medical authorities let
him continue with the same helmet? :demon:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 21 September, 2020, 01:21:09 pm
Are you prepared for (indeed encouraging) folk, including your children, to take performance-enhancing drugs for your entertainment?

Considering his subsequent history, I wouldn't be surprised if someone told me that Peter "Papa Merciless" Graf had put Steffi on the juice.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 01:34:32 pm
Doping in the junior ranks has existed for a long time.
https://road.cc/content/news/225039-italian-cyclist-aged-14-reportedly-fails-anti-doping-control-after-regional-race
https://cycling.today/ex-pro-cyclist-handed-lifetime-ban-for-doping-his-son/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 September, 2020, 01:52:07 pm
Are you prepared for (indeed encouraging) folk, including your children, to take performance-enhancing drugs for your entertainment?

Considering his subsequent history, I wouldn't be surprised if someone told me that Peter "Papa Merciless" Graf had put Steffi on the juice.

“Tax evasion?  He just needed a better accountant!” – The Conservative Party, yesterday.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 03:40:08 pm
Rumour is that it's rife in amateur TT racing too.  You've got the skinsuit, the pointy hat, the shoe covers, the disc wheel and the aero frame...better start on the steroids and stimulants.

I only ever went as far as coffee.  I think I was off salbutamol in my last (and fastest) season, because my asthma had pretty much gone.  It wasn't much of a performance enhancer anyway, because it can give a higher heart rate, which is the last thing you need when you're flirting with MHR on each short climb.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 03:42:42 pm
EPO works better.

https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/19-year-old-british-cyclist-handed-ban-taking-epo-255882
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 04:04:34 pm
What a nob end.  Ir shows the pressure to win is there just the same, even if it's not your livelihood.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 21 September, 2020, 05:17:27 pm
Merckx was obviously clean ... spoke with a French cycling fan who pints out that Hinault never says that he didn't dope - he says that he never had a positive test.  Speaks volumes.

But, it's true that back then you had speed and sleeping pills, the gains were marginal, not to EPO standards.

From a skill POV, in Football (of any code) if you take EPO you can keep running for longer, this won't help you pass, catch, or run round the opposition.  In cycling, yes you need to be able to stay on a bike, but a drug that will allow you to ride at 120%, 200% of the time will obviously give you a significant advantage.

Clearly the commentators are hailing this as amazing, because their alternative is to call Pog a drug cheating fuck, which they won't get away with.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 21 September, 2020, 06:14:01 pm

From a skill POV, in Football (of any code) if you take EPO you can keep running for longer, this won't help you ,,,,,,,,,, run round the opposition. 
Yes it would.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 21 September, 2020, 06:16:15 pm
Reports that police raided Arkéa–Samsic hotel and are investigating the team. And Nario came 17th. He'd need a hell of a lot more stuff to get onto the podium.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rob on 21 September, 2020, 06:46:08 pm
What a nob end.  Ir shows the pressure to win is there just the same, even if it's not your livelihood.

He was riding for my club then.  One of the other riders Dad’s busted him and he was kicked off.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 21 September, 2020, 06:57:11 pm
Reports that police raided Arkéa–Samsic hotel and are investigating the team. And Nario came 17th. He'd need a hell of a lot more stuff to get onto the podium.

It would appear that Nairo's brother is a target of the investigation, according to this report:

https://rmcsport.bfmtv.com/cyclisme/tour-de-france-une-enquete-ouverte-pour-des-soupcons-de-dopage-1979865.html

ETA - Per Cycling News, L'Equipe were saying Nairo himself was the target:

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/nairo-quintanas-hotel-room-searched-by-french-police-on-tour-de-france/


Edited.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 21 September, 2020, 07:14:16 pm
Interesting development: people taking drugs to do worse than usual?  Betting's gone a bit quiet in cricket - maybe it's moved!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 07:25:20 pm
PDM had to pull out of the 1991 Tour de France because of a doping problem.
http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/results/archives/dec97/dec1.html
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 21 September, 2020, 07:40:38 pm
Sean Kelly rode for them?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 21 September, 2020, 07:47:44 pm
Kelly's record is tainted to a similar degree to Merckx et al.  The odd positive test with plausible denial.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 07:48:31 pm
Kelly rode for PDM 1989-91.

Sorry to bust some illusions. I didn’t enjoy learning this stuff as a callow youth either.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 21 September, 2020, 07:52:40 pm
Sean Kelly rode for them?

1989-91 (ninja'd!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDM_(cycling_team)#Team_Riders
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 21 September, 2020, 07:58:32 pm
What's the verdict on Indurain? He had one issue with salbutamol/asthma TUE, but I was always prepared to buy the argument that he was a physical freak - you could see his lungs inflating where there ought to have been just stomach. There are others making the physical freak argument for Pogacar, whose blood processing capability is said to be once in a generation.   
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 21 September, 2020, 08:01:58 pm
Kelly's record is tainted to a similar degree to Merckx et al.  The odd positive test with plausible denial.

Popped twice (1984 and 1988). The first time was quite funny in retrospect - according to Willy Voet (remember him?), he'd tried the old urine switcheroo to mask taking ephedrine to treat bronchitis, not realising that the team mechanic who supplied it had been taking Stimul in order to stay awake while driving the team truck.

The second time was for codeine - his excuse being that he'd swigged from a bottle of cough medicine between the end of the race and attending doping control, the eejit...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Kelly_(cyclist)#Doping
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 08:07:02 pm
Indurain was likely on EPO but didn’t want to take dangerous amounts to beat Riis.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rafletcher on 21 September, 2020, 08:07:59 pm
PDM had to pull out of the 1991 Tour de France because of a doping problem.
http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/results/archives/dec97/dec1.html

I remember that at the time, but was the IV feed that caused the problem illegal?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 08:15:57 pm
I thought no needles was well after PDM (20 years?) but don’t keep too much track of that sort of minutia. PDM sticks in my memory because I worked in a shop that sold Concorde race bikes at that time.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 21 September, 2020, 08:18:55 pm
Is there a list of untestable substances which today's dopers are suspected of using?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 21 September, 2020, 08:20:39 pm
You want some?!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 21 September, 2020, 08:31:50 pm
Synthetic hemoglobin is one thing:

https://runningmagazine.ca/the-scene/the-new-drug-in-endurance-doping/

https://www.stickybottle.com/latest-news/new-unknown-blood-doping-drug-used-for-years-in-cycling-investigators-find/

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/operation-aderlass-investigators-discover-new-doping-product/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rob on 21 September, 2020, 09:34:38 pm
Kelly rode for PDM 1989-91.

Sorry to bust some illusions. I didn’t enjoy learning this stuff as a callow youth either.

Kelly gets mentioned in David Walsh’s book on Lance.  I think their relationship wasn’t really the same afterwards.  Also see Kimmage’s tough anti-doping pieces and how he fell out with Roche afterwards.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rob on 21 September, 2020, 09:36:06 pm
Kelly rode for PDM 1989-91.

Sorry to bust some illusions. I didn’t enjoy learning this stuff as a callow youth either.

I didn’t make the link at the time as I was also pretty young.  I do remember the whole team withdrawing and blaming it on illness.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 21 September, 2020, 09:40:31 pm
What's the verdict on Indurain? He had one issue with salbutamol/asthma TUE, but I was always prepared to buy the argument that he was a physical freak - you could see his lungs inflating where there ought to have been just stomach. There are others making the physical freak argument for Pogacar, whose blood processing capability is said to be once in a generation.

The issue with that is that your lungs are seriously overspecced, which is why smokers and people with one lung can still lead relatively normal lives, and is why Dr Hutch hasn't yet beaten Eddy Merckx, despite having an absolutely huge pair of lungs. 

Your lungs aren't the limiting factor: that's the ability of your heart and your blood to transport oxygen from your lungs to where it's needed.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: andyoxon on 21 September, 2020, 10:12:09 pm
...There are others making the physical freak argument for Pogacar, whose blood processing capability is said to be once in a generation.

Any source/info for this?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 21 September, 2020, 11:06:18 pm

From a skill POV, in Football (of any code) if you take EPO you can keep running for longer, this won't help you ,,,,,,,,,, run round the opposition. 
Yes it would.
I think I see what you did there, but I disagree.  Running about in circles for 45 mins will not give you a significant level of fatigue that EPO will alleviate.  In association footy you don't get a significant drop at the end of matches unless you're in a cup tie with teams in very different leagues.  You'll see this more often in Rugby, but there it's fatigue that makes them make wrong decisions or drop passes.  I don't think EPO will help with that either.
Do correct me if I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 21 September, 2020, 11:47:54 pm
EPO is used by 100m sprinters to help them train harder and to recover better from high training volumes.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Mr Larrington on 22 September, 2020, 12:40:05 am
Football players know the game is only going to last 90 minutes too, so when a cup-tie goes into extra time they drop like flies.  A family friend who used to coach the Army Apprentices' footie team reckoned that his junior squaddies were fitter over the longer haul than the foopballers.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 22 September, 2020, 08:19:33 am
Football players know the game is only going to last 90 minutes too, so when a cup-tie goes into extra time they drop like flies.  A family friend who used to coach the Army Apprentices' footie team reckoned that his junior squaddies were fitter over the longer haul than the foopballers.

I understand that an EPO test on various sports showed the highest % use was in football players, especially in Italy.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 22 September, 2020, 08:24:34 am
It seems that a branch of the French Police ( not the usual sports doping section), searched Arkea team rooms late last week.
They have just announced that an official investigation has been launched based on that search, which would seem to indicate that they found something. May or may not be pharmaceutical of course.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 22 September, 2020, 08:29:59 am
They found some equipment
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 22 September, 2020, 09:15:58 am
Two people being held in custody, apparently Quintana's personal physiotherapist & doctor. "Numerous" health products and medicines seized along with a "plan that could be characterized as a doping régime".  The team and its staff are not concerned.

- https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/bretagne/ille-et-vilaine/rennes/soupcons-dopage-arkea-samsic-equipe-que-son-staff-pas-mis-cause-emmanuel-hubert-manager-general-1876148.html  and reports on the radio
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 22 September, 2020, 09:30:24 am

From a skill POV, in Football (of any code) if you take EPO you can keep running for longer, this won't help you ,,,,,,,,,, run round the opposition. 
Yes it would.
I think I see what you did there, but I disagree.  Running about in circles for 45 mins will not give you a significant level of fatigue that EPO will alleviate.  In association footy you don't get a significant drop at the end of matches unless you're in a cup tie with teams in very different leagues.  You'll see this more often in Rugby, but there it's fatigue that makes them make wrong decisions or drop passes.  I don't think EPO will help with that either.
Do correct me if I'm wrong.
Check the numbers. Football is basically a game of repeated sprints, and aerobic capacity can help you recover quicker and stop you needing to burn so much per sprint. Players get bought/sold based in part on how much distance they can cover (at a certain speed). The sprinting bit is really important - at Liverpool Charlie Adam used to cover vast distances, but incredibly slowly, meaning he was nearly in the right place for the entire game! It's entirely possible to judge your effort and pace yourself, but if it means choosing to not track a run then you are going to get into trouble. Here's an article with some actual numbers:
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11661/11996016/premier-league-running-stats-this-season-revealed
It's not just at the end of games, you can see a trend in the numbers from about 30-45 minutes and then from about 60 minutes onwards. As well as reducing your ability to run, fatigue also impacts on fine motor control and decision making, so it impacts on the execution of skills too.
The other area where drugs help athletes, especially those in sports where there are a lot of games and the season is long is in recovery from injury, and masking the pain so you can play through injury. The number of NFL players who end their career addicted to painkillers is significant - missing a game could mean losing your place and having your million dollar contract ended.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: spesh on 22 September, 2020, 12:47:52 pm
Back to the Arkea-Samsic raid for a second, there's an interesting point made in one of the replies to The Inner Ring's mini-thread on Twitter:

Quote
I'm hoping this turns out to be stupidity, not cheating. Quintana had an allergic reaction after crashing into nettles four days earlier. Possible that ?steroid? treatment of that is the doping. Strict liability, and a ban would follow, but it wouldn't make him an EPO cheat etc.
https://twitter.com/malaconotus/status/1308205844484575232

Via: https://twitter.com/inrng/status/1308088639482744832

If that is the case, that's a bit of a boo-boo on his/their part - I wouldn't have thought that you'd need a TUE for dock leaves...  :demon:
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Séamas M. on 22 September, 2020, 02:53:55 pm
The UK libel laws offer some protection from unwanted publicity. The English language version of Willy Voet's book, Breaking The Chain, has a section that refers to an unnamed cyclist who doped, but only as much as necessary for special events. The French language version of the book names that rider as Kelly.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 22 September, 2020, 03:40:53 pm
I thought most doping was now out of competition - take EPO (or whatever) so you can train yourself into a superman, then ride the races clean.  There are out of competition tests but you are much less likely to be caught.  If you win a stage of the Tour, you ARE going to be tested.

How common are blood tests, btw?  What doesn't show up in urine, only in blood?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 22 September, 2020, 04:51:21 pm
Blood passport logs blood values over time, and (in theory) the range of acceptable variation narrows over time
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: αdαmsκι on 22 September, 2020, 05:10:01 pm
Other point around Arkea-Samsic is the no needles policy. So even if it is only saline or something similar, it still shouldn't be injected.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: andyoxon on 22 September, 2020, 06:43:08 pm
Is this actually the LA..?  https://twitter.com/lancearmstrong/status/1307357755880083457
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 22 September, 2020, 07:27:16 pm
Yes
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 22 September, 2020, 11:28:20 pm
Check the numbers. Football is basically a game of repeated sprints, and aerobic capacity can help you recover quicker and stop you needing to burn so much per sprint. Players get bought/sold based in part on how much distance they can cover (at a certain speed). The sprinting bit is really important - at Liverpool Charlie Adam used to cover vast distances, but incredibly slowly, meaning he was nearly in the right place for the entire game! It's entirely possible to judge your effort and pace yourself, but if it means choosing to not track a run then you are going to get into trouble. Here's an article with some actual numbers:
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11661/11996016/premier-league-running-stats-this-season-revealed
It's not just at the end of games, you can see a trend in the numbers from about 30-45 minutes and then from about 60 minutes onwards. As well as reducing your ability to run, fatigue also impacts on fine motor control and decision making, so it impacts on the execution of skills too.
The other area where drugs help athletes, especially those in sports where there are a lot of games and the season is long is in recovery from injury, and masking the pain so you can play through injury. The number of NFL players who end their career addicted to painkillers is significant - missing a game could mean losing your place and having your million dollar contract ended.
Happy to believe all that, didn't think EPO would help with either though (but I don't know enough about drugs or Biology).
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LMT on 23 September, 2020, 07:20:36 am
Is this actually the LA..?  https://twitter.com/lancearmstrong/status/1307357755880083457

The tick next to the twitter handle is the thing to look for that's shows that the user is verified.

I'm waiting on Pogacar to upload his data to Strava, word is he was pushing about 7w/kg for about 15 mins up the climb on the TT.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: JonBuoy on 23 September, 2020, 07:26:21 am
Is this actually the LA..?  https://twitter.com/lancearmstrong/status/1307357755880083457

The tick next to the twitter handle is the thing to look for that's shows that the user is verified.

I'm waiting on Pogacar to upload his data to Strava, word is he was pushing about 7w/kg for about 15 mins up the climb on the TT.

It is not going to happen:  https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/pogacar-rode-without-power-meter-or-computer-for-la-planche-des-belles-filles/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 23 September, 2020, 08:11:56 am
Word on radio re Quintana et al is that the police seized blood serum & associated kit, but it's hard to say if it was being used legitimately (100ml/day for rehydration purposes) or to mask doping, putatively by reducing haematocrit when tests impend.

Quintana's proclamations that he's never had a positive test have an eerie ring to them, reminiscent of the 'gentleman' named up-thread a bit.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: giropaul on 23 September, 2020, 09:23:56 am
There’s a very interesting account of how Podacar and his team prepared for the time trial on Pez news. An interview with Allan Pieper ( DS) tells of a number of reconnaissance trips and trials. A “ junior” 14-29 cassette was sourced for the climb to give one tooth progression in the middle sprockets. The changing of bikes was practiced and refined. Preparation, preparation, preparation.
In the post race interview Podacar said he “ knew the climb “ - he did, intimately.
Pieper had worked out that this was where the race was to be won or lost.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: trekker12 on 23 September, 2020, 09:55:36 am
The bike change was spot on. The car stopped in just the place he could lean the TT bike against it and his mechanic had the road bike to hand already. Roglic - who was already struggling by then stopped about ten metres ahead of the car so the mech had to run up to him with the bike. In the long term it was a few seconds of a minute deficit but small margins and all that
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 23 September, 2020, 01:35:02 pm
Roglič was also missing his nice comfy armchair.  The point, though, is that Pog put 1:21 into the entire field.

Tain't him being investigated, though.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 23 September, 2020, 03:08:30 pm
There may well be something in the fact that Pogacar is 10 - 15 years younger than the obviously totally innocent riders who finished second and third.  Mas is the only rider in the top ten who is in the first half of his twenties.  Several of the others are well over 30.  Experience is not everything.  As the football adage has it : If they're good enough, they're old enough (or if they're good enough Newcastle will sell them).  It was still a pretty incredible time trial though, whatever.  There may well be tales to tell...
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 23 September, 2020, 06:40:02 pm
Word on radio re Quintana et al is that the police seized blood serum & associated kit, but it's hard to say if it was being used legitimately (100ml/day for rehydration purposes) or to mask doping, putatively by reducing haematocrit when tests impend.

Quintana's proclamations that he's never had a positive test have an eerie ring to them, reminiscent of the 'gentleman' named up-thread a bit.

Well, Quintana certainly didnt look like he'd doped.

Pogačar, on the other hand...
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 23 September, 2020, 06:41:31 pm
Roglič was also missing his nice comfy armchair.  The point, though, is that Pog put 1:21 into the entire field.

Tain't him being investigated, though.

Pog put nearly 2 minutes into Roglic in the TT.

And here's the thing...Roglic's TT was actually very quick.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: mzjo on 23 September, 2020, 07:34:08 pm
Word on radio re Quintana et al is that the police seized blood serum & associated kit, but it's hard to say if it was being used legitimately (100ml/day for rehydration purposes) or to mask doping, putatively by reducing haematocrit when tests impend.

Quintana's proclamations that he's never had a positive test have an eerie ring to them, reminiscent of the 'gentleman' named up-thread a bit.

Well, Quintana certainly didnt look like he'd doped.

Pogačar, on the other hand...

I must admit to having paid very little attention to the Tour this year (apart from enjoying Cyril Guimard's expert analysis on RTL during my day centre taxi run!) and the reason was I was convinced that Jumbo as a whole team were doped (or prepared) up to the eyeballs after seeing how they were a very large cut over the other teams as a unit in the pre-Tour races. Shades of US Postal and Sky so I rather lost interest!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on 23 September, 2020, 11:23:55 pm
Word on radio re Quintana et al is that the police seized blood serum & associated kit, but it's hard to say if it was being used legitimately (100ml/day for rehydration purposes) or to mask doping, putatively by reducing haematocrit when tests impend.

Quintana's proclamations that he's never had a positive test have an eerie ring to them, reminiscent of the 'gentleman' named up-thread a bit.

Well, Quintana certainly didnt look like he'd doped.

Pogačar, on the other hand...

He’s quite Froome-shaped.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 24 September, 2020, 11:11:41 am
Word on radio re Quintana et al is that the police seized blood serum & associated kit, but it's hard to say if it was being used legitimately (100ml/day for rehydration purposes) or to mask doping, putatively by reducing haematocrit when tests impend.

Quintana's proclamations that he's never had a positive test have an eerie ring to them, reminiscent of the 'gentleman' named up-thread a bit.

Well, Quintana certainly didnt look like he'd doped.


Maybe the masking stuff worked too well.

Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 24 September, 2020, 11:15:22 am
I think if I were Nairo Quintana (which I'm not, by the way - let's get that straight) and I had doped, I'd be asking for my money back.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 24 September, 2020, 01:10:58 pm
I'm baffled by the certainty of some of the opinions here.  You shouldn't tout an opinion as unchallegeable, or attack people who don't share it. That's because it's an opinion, not a fact.  And in this case, where there are about a bazillion unknowns, why make so many assumptioms? It's not wise. We don't get the facts until there's an adverse test result, which might not happen until testing improves in ten or twenty tears and samples can be defrosted.

Doping is a medical matter, so about half of the bazillion unknowns come under the heading of an individual's physiology. We've all got different genes.

Nearly all the drugs we talk about have been repeatedly double blind tested for their intended purpose, but not as performance enhancers. The effects and side-effects as performance enhancers are not well understood. Particularly for the newer drugs, riders and their doctors are experimenting wildly. We don't hear much about the drugs which don't work for certain riders, perhaps because they don't get enough of a boost to put them under suspicion.  And we should remember the high number of dopers who've died young. This must be a strong disincentive to take up doping. We never talk about it though. There's an assumption that an ambitious rider will probably dope if he thinks he won't get caught. It's not like that. Put yourself in the shoes of a young, talented, fit, law-abiding person before you judge them. If a domestique isn't coming up to scratch and he fears he might have to go and work in a bike shop, you can understand the huge motivation to dope. But for someone naturally good enough to be a potential team leader or even a monument winner, why risk everything when you already have a fairly safe career doing the one thing you love? 

And FWIW, I was an 'undecided' about Lance until the Simeoni incident and the other happenings of 2004. Some will say proudly that they 'knew' Lance was dirty before that. That's just pub talk. Nobody knew, except a few insiders like the Andreus. What we did know, from 2001 onwards, was that Lance had worked with Ferrari. But I gave him the benefit of the doubt - I reckon an arrogant Texan so-called champion would probably work with a dirty doctor if said doctor had some unique insights into clean cycling.

If you're still reading, my chin-stroking on matters of pharmaceuticals is not borne of scientific qualifications.  I could never be any sort of doping expert. But I did a stint as a medical writer for a newspaper. I expressed a lot of strong opinions which were highly controversial in some quarters.  You have to do that as a journalist, if you want to work. But I was never busted for making a mistake. Not even a little one!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 24 September, 2020, 01:54:54 pm
Isn't there a bit of special pleading in your final paragraph?!  It sounds rather like the athlete's statement "I have never tested positive" and there are obviously opinions about such a defence!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 24 September, 2020, 02:08:58 pm
It was purely meant to convey that I'm not an expert, and that my opinions have no more merit than anyone else's. You can't be an expert without technical expertise. If I were commissioned to write about it I would ask enough questions of experts to get everything right.  (This is why the hourly rate for my medical stuff was worse than McJob levels.) I would even slyly get an expert to check the article before handing it in, which is a big sin. (You get the sack.)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 24 September, 2020, 02:39:11 pm
Nearly all the drugs we talk about have been repeatedly double blind tested for their intended purpose, but not as performance enhancers. The effects and side-effects as performance enhancers are not well understood. Particularly for the newer drugs, riders and their doctors are experimenting wildly. We don't hear much about the drugs which don't work for certain riders, perhaps because they don't get enough of a boost to put them under suspicion.  And we should remember the high number of dopers who've died young. This must be a strong disincentive to take up doping. We never talk about it though. There's an assumption that an ambitious rider will probably dope if he thinks he won't get caught. It's not like that. Put yourself in the shoes of a young, talented, fit, law-abiding person before you judge them. If a domestique isn't coming up to scratch and he fears he might have to go and work in a bike shop, you can understand the huge motivation to dope. But for someone naturally good enough to be a potential team leader or even a monument winner, why risk everything when you already have a fairly safe career doing the one thing you love? 
I agree about the opinions and speculation, but there's always pressure to improve your performance. Especially given the current market for riders, where there may be fewer WorldTour teams next year, and lots of the Pro-Conti teams have been going under. If you read David Millar's book, he gets to the point where he's 24, he's team leader, and it's time for him to justify his salary and get the team enough wins to keep going the following year.  He claims that he basically doped for certainty of winning (and he ended up winning a world TT title by about a minute and half). Whether you believe that or not, the thought process would be understandable  - the market is always there for quality riders to a certain extent, but the pressure to deliver is huge, especially at second tier teams where wins are harder to come by. And it's not just personal pressure to keep your job, it's pressure to win so that your team-mates, the mechanics, the soigneurs and so on all get to keep their jobs.

There are a bunch of studies into top level athletes, pro and amateur, asking about risk/reward and how far they would go to get better (eg asking if they could take something that would give them an extra 10%, but would cut their life by x years). The numbers of people who would take the performance gain and the reduced lifespan is significant. If you pour your life into something, it becomes the only thing that matters.

Hopefully, the biological passport means that even with the reduced out-of-competition testing, they would still be able to catch anyone doping. And hopefully the Tour result this year is just the result of a bunch of great clean performances. But the incentive will always be there and the opportunity has been much greater this year than in recent years, so some scepticism is natural.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Nick H. on 24 September, 2020, 03:06:38 pm
If you read David Millar's book, he gets to the point where he's 24, he's team leader, and it's time for him to justify his salary and get the team enough wins to keep going the following year.  He claims that he basically doped for certainty of winning (and he ended up winning a world TT title by about a minute and half). Whether you believe that or not, the thought process would be understandable  - the market is always there for quality riders to a certain extent, but the pressure to deliver is huge, especially at second tier teams where wins are harder to come by. And it's not just personal pressure to keep your job, it's pressure to win so that your team-mates, the mechanics, the soigneurs and so on all get to keep their jobs.

There are a bunch of studies into top level athletes, pro and amateur, asking about risk/reward and how far they would go to get better (eg asking if they could take something that would give them an extra 10%, but would cut their life by x years). The numbers of people who would take the performance gain and the reduced lifespan is significant. If you pour your life into something, it becomes the only thing that matters.

I take your point 100%, but since Millar's time, surely the likelihood of being caught and the severity of the punishments have adjusted the risk/reward ratio enormously? Lance is a good example...look at all the lawsuits taking away his many millions. His life is so wrecked...being a narcissist-cum-psychopath he'll never admit it, but think of the humiliation for his wives, kids, friends. The more you win, the more prize money you get, the more you'll be slaughtered if you're caught. Just one adverse test result is enough.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Peter on 24 September, 2020, 03:20:44 pm
I certainly hope you're right, Porkins.  I would love to believe I've actually seen one of the true phenomenal performances.  I want to believe that the phrase "Ce n'est pas normal" is just French for "why do we never win anything these days?"!
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 24 September, 2020, 07:14:13 pm
Porkins, you mention the likelihood of us knowing about Pogacar is dependent upon testing, but actually that is not really true.

Very few of the huge cycling doping cases have come about through dope testing.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 24 September, 2020, 10:23:04 pm
LA made tens of millions from Uber, so he hasn%u2019t got holes in his shoes. His TdF wins have officially gone but he still has the yellow jerseys on his wall. Didn%u2019t he say that he would do the same thing again if he had his time over?

The risk vs. reward calculation for doping is still there. How many ex-dopers are team managers, commentators or simply retired after collecting their winnings?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 24 September, 2020, 10:58:37 pm
I take your point 100%, but since Millar's time, surely the likelihood of being caught and the severity of the punishments have adjusted the risk/reward ratio enormously?
I doubt it.  If you break the law you do it expecting that you won't get caught.  If you do drugs you do it expecting to get away with it.  Punishment doesn't come in to the logic, which is why harsher sentencing doesn't work as a deterrent.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 24 September, 2020, 11:15:52 pm
LA made tens of millions from Uber, so he hasn’t got holes in his shoes. His TdF wins have officially gone but he still has the yellow jerseys on his wall. Didn’t he say that he would do the same thing again if he had his time over?

He's worth a cool $50 mil (https://www.republicworld.com/sports-news/other-sports/lance-armstrong-net-worth-tour-de-france-doping-and-docementary.html) if the link is to be believed, and yes, I recall him saying that too.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: simonp on 24 September, 2020, 11:24:25 pm
The BBC looked at EPO microdosing years ago. If you take a small dose the half life being so short and the fact that you only have to give a small window each day for testing means it’s easy to avoid detection. Microdosing also helps with covering up blood doping. I’d say the testers have a huge uphill battle.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 25 September, 2020, 09:28:22 am
The Science of Sport podcast was interesting. Ross Tucker has been vocal in the past about performances that he thought were just not credible, and he seems to have done the math and concluded that Pogacar's performance while outstanding was not outside the bounds of a top level cyclist. That gives me a certain level of hope that it wasn't just ridiculous.
It's a shame that there will never be any actual measured power data on the climb, but apparently doing the bike swap meant that sorting out power data for both parts of the ride wasn't a priority. It has to be doable, as CX riders manage it with 3 bikes and swapping every 6 minutes no problem.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 26 September, 2020, 02:06:00 pm
I think Tucker was a little sceptical. If you remember where he describes how Pog went faster on the flat that flat TT specialists, and then faster up the mountain than climbing specialists.

And all after 3 weeks of being on the pointy end of the race.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 26 September, 2020, 02:44:05 pm
He was sceptical, but wasn't accusing Pog of being an alien. In the past he has basically said that certain performances were outside the realms of human physiology.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 26 September, 2020, 02:49:35 pm
Interesting comparison between Pog, who chose to ride crucial tour TT on "feel", and this...

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/geraint-thomas-left-to-rue-missing-garmin-after-fourth-place-finish-in-worlds-time-trial/
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 26 September, 2020, 03:21:17 pm
Pog had a PM on his TT bike but chose to lose it from the climbing bike to save weight, according to his team.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 26 September, 2020, 03:31:11 pm
The Science of Sport podcast was interesting. Ross Tucker has been vocal in the past about performances that he thought were just not credible, and he seems to have done the math and concluded that Pogacar's performance while outstanding was not outside the bounds of a top level cyclist. That gives me a certain level of hope that it wasn't just ridiculous.
It's a shame that there will never be any actual measured power data on the climb, but apparently doing the bike swap meant that sorting out power data for both parts of the ride wasn't a priority. It has to be doable, as CX riders manage it with 3 bikes and swapping every 6 minutes no problem.

You can get a very approximate average from the physics involved. Pog weighs N + bike weight + kit and climbed through X metres at average speed of V. Plug the figures in and you get a figure that's too low because it leaves out rolling resistance and drag, but it gives you a rough idea. Back in the LA days a couple of physicists did this and screeched "drugs!"

I'd need to be on a different type of drug just to think about doing les Belles Filles. The climb, that is.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 26 September, 2020, 04:08:15 pm
Yeah, there are riders who had power data though, so you can assume that the effect of the wind and the rolling resistance were very similar for them and for Pog. That's what Ross Tucker did - I think he was basically saying it worked out to about 6.7 W/kg for 15 minutes, which is super high, but not impossible without drugs.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 26 September, 2020, 04:14:03 pm
On the Geraint Thomas comparison, I'd also note that 4th is about where I'd have expected Thomas to place so it's not like the lack of data cost him a massive amount. 
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: drgannet on 26 September, 2020, 08:28:18 pm
Yeah, there are riders who had power data though, so you can assume that the effect of the wind and the rolling resistance were very similar for them and for Pog. That's what Ross Tucker did - I think he was basically saying it worked out to about 6.7 W/kg for 15 minutes, which is super high, but not impossible without drugs.

The TDF climb had 506 m height gain over 5.82 km.

Wikipedia has Pog at 66 kg (who knows at the end of 3 week TDF). Legal bike race weight is 6.8 kg. Additional kit (skinsuit, shoes, helmet, socks, gloves, GPS, etc) will be about 1 kg, so total weight ~ 74 kg.

Pog's time was 16 min 17 s for the climb = 977 s.

Average power required for Pog + bike to gain that potential energy over that time = 375 W, which equates to 5.7 W/kg (rider weight).

Power required to overcome wind & rolling resistance on a still day (no idea what the wind would have been on that climb, mostly in trees, with 5 hairpins) on the flat at a velocity of 21.44 kph (~ 6 m/s) is reckoned to be ~ 60W on drops at 750 m altitude and 25 °C.

435 W at 66 kg is ~ 6.6 W/kg. Online power calculators give about 450 W or 6.8 W/kg. So 6.7 W/kg is about right.

But, this was after beating every other rider (including Tom Dumoulin by 4s) on a gently rising course for the previous 40 minutes.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: rogerzilla on 27 September, 2020, 08:01:03 am
Doping seems just like computer hacking - the dopers (or their doctors) find new exploits, and the testers and rule-makers are always playing catch-up.  You'd be stupid to use dexedrine or testosterone in a race these days but someone will be out there working on something which isn't tested for, isn't yet banned (hello Pedro Delgado) or mimics natural body chemistry closely enough that it's very hard to detect.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 27 September, 2020, 08:29:33 am
Remember, the rule-makers dont want to catch the cheats. The people running the events certainly dont want to catch the cheats.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: De Sisti on 01 October, 2020, 04:35:29 pm
Following on from the half-attempt of the 2020 tour to show solidarity to the BLM cause on the final stage, here's a link to a story that shows some riders still have divisive views on race.

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/trek-segafredo-suspend-quinn-simmons-for-divisive-incendiary-and-detrimental-statements-on-social-media/ (https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/trek-segafredo-suspend-quinn-simmons-for-divisive-incendiary-and-detrimental-statements-on-social-media/)
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: sg37409 on 24 October, 2020, 10:26:22 am
https://www.bicycling.com/tour-de-france/a34252569/tadej-pogacar-tour-de-france-win-unfair-doubt/

Interesting article.    Not much new in it but it’s a more complete analysis of the TT than I’ve read elsewhere
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 24 October, 2020, 11:55:57 am
Quote
a mark that is within Sassi's bounds for clean riding.
To my untrained eye this sounds a lot like reading about riders' Hemocrit levels being within the bounds for clear riding.  Looking back at that data the bounds for clean riding were about double what they should have been and anyone near those levels was fo sho a cheating bastard.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 24 October, 2020, 12:31:29 pm
Quote
a mark that is within Sassi's bounds for clean riding.
To my untrained eye this sounds a lot like reading about riders' Hemocrit levels being within the bounds for clear riding.  Looking back at that data the bounds for clean riding were about double what they should have been and anyone near those levels was fo sho a cheating bastard.
Haematocrit levels were set at 50%. Normal range is mid 30s to mid 40s, so it's hardly double.
And the article is basically saying that performances above a certain W/kg for a certain length of time immediately raise questions about whether the athlete is clean, and that Pogacar's numbers were below those thresholds. Doesn't make him clean, but isn't totally alien. That's basically what Ross Tucker said on his podcast too - it was a spectacular performance, but not one that is beyond the possibilities of a clean rider.
None of that can take away the doubt. To be an exceptional cyclist is to be outside the normal, and to produce performances like that will always bring some shadow. The article implies that if he wants to be viewed as clean then he should move to a different team, but you can cast shade over any pretty much any team, either from past associations with known doping (like they do with his current team), or from other shady practises (like the clouds that hung over Sky). Could you "put your hand in the fire" and name 5 riders in the 100 year history who have won the TdF clean?
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Hot Flatus on 24 October, 2020, 12:40:35 pm
If you listen to Ross Tucker's podcast he is far from comfortable with Pogacar's performance. It's about context of the climb. He didn't just put in a superlative climb, he did it after putting in a superlative flat tt.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: T42 on 24 October, 2020, 01:03:06 pm
Sounds to me as if everyone wants him to be found out and shamed.  Reminds me of the peelers who stopped us once in Edinburgh because they thought one of us was a villain. After the tall bloke who arrived in the unmarked Jag said "it's not him" another one said "oh come on, we'll get them for something". Hey, maybe Pog cheated on his school lunch money when he was 7.

In other words, until the preserved samples are opened up and analysed N years from now there's no point in worrying it to death. The best you can hope for until then is that he's caught at another event.  Keep on hoping.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 24 October, 2020, 02:19:05 pm
Nice to see that the consensus is that "he might bot have cheated" as his results are on the below/borderline of "definitely cheated" levels.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 24 October, 2020, 03:20:04 pm
Nice to see that the consensus is that "he might bot have cheated" as his results are on the below/borderline of "definitely cheated" levels.
That's every Tour winner for 40 years, except the ones that were at "definitely on something" levels.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: fd3 on 24 October, 2020, 11:27:36 pm
It's less believable than Landis' win or Froome's mad attack on the Giro.  When even the journos run an article which might as well be saying "he probably cheated but it's not totally impossible" you do wonder what the point is.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Karla on 25 October, 2020, 12:29:41 am
Not really. 

Firstly, he only beat Roglic by the margin he did because Roglic had a really bad day.  Roglic already has form for fading toward the end of grand tours - just ask Richard Carapaz - and here he did it in spectacular form. 

Secondly, Pogacar had been looking stronger than Roglic all race, but didn't have the same level of team support to back him up.  Come the ITT where the team-mates weren't there for either of them, and that disadvantage disappeared.

Thirdly, and most importantly, the gap between them really wasn't exceptional by TT standards.  If Roglic hadn't fallen apart, Pog would have beaten him by a minute on the day and they'd have been neck and neck on GC.  A minute, or even two minutes, really isn't anything to write home about though. 

This year's Giro TT: Ganna beat everyone else by 22 seconds, on a course only 15k long. 
Last year's world's TT: Dennis beat Evenepoel by over a minute, and everyone else by another minute, on a course that took them only 10 minutes longer to ride than this year's TdF course. 
Going back to 1989, that was on a 25k course that didn't even have a hill. 

I could go on, but I don't need to do that.  A minute or even two minutes' gap on a TT of that length simply isn't enough to warrant suspicion.  You can think he's a dirty doper if you like but if you're using the final TT as your reason, it's a very ill-founded one.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: DuncanM on 25 October, 2020, 09:15:53 am
Also, he beat Roglic in the Slovenian national TT, on a course that suited Roglic, when Roglic was absolutely flying and Pogacar was not at peak form. And Pogacar only lost his major time on the crosswind day - he was clearly the strongest rider in the race otherwise. None of this says that he's clean. But there's no more reason to think that he's dirty than that for the previous 2 winners.

Landis was utterly ridiculous. He lost a ton of time on one day and then took it all back the following day. The only era that happened was back in the days of amphetamines, otherwise a blow up one day means you're going backwards the next day too.
Title: Re: Tour de France 2020
Post by: Davef on 25 October, 2020, 10:16:42 am
Quote
a mark that is within Sassi's bounds for clean riding.
To my untrained eye this sounds a lot like reading about riders' Hemocrit levels being within the bounds for clear riding.  Looking back at that data the bounds for clean riding were about double what they should have been and anyone near those levels was fo sho a cheating bastard.
Haematocrit levels were set at 50%. Normal range is mid 30s to mid 40s, so it's hardly double.
And the article is basically saying that performances above a certain W/kg for a certain length of time immediately raise questions about whether the athlete is clean, and that Pogacar's numbers were below those thresholds. Doesn't make him clean, but isn't totally alien. That's basically what Ross Tucker said on his podcast too - it was a spectacular performance, but not one that is beyond the possibilities of a clean rider.
None of that can take away the doubt. To be an exceptional cyclist is to be outside the normal, and to produce performances like that will always bring some shadow. The article implies that if he wants to be viewed as clean then he should move to a different team, but you can cast shade over any pretty much any team, either from past associations with known doping (like they do with his current team), or from other shady practises (like the clouds that hung over Sky). Could you "put your hand in the fire" and name 5 riders in the 100 year history who have won the TdF clean?
I think up to 50 is considered normal. I have had one a smidge over that along with some other odd measurements. I had a repeat test a couple of weeks later and it was lower. The gp put it down to lab error or dehydration.