have an insurance claim re a laptop that was stolen.
I have been offered a laptop with the following spec:-
Intel Celeron Processor C550 (2.0GHz, 533 MHz FSB, 1 MB Cache) Genuine Windows (R) Vista Home Basic 1 GB Memory 80 GB Hard Drive
to replace a laptop with the following spec: -
1.8GHz processor (AMD I think), Windows XP, 1GB RAM memory 80GB Hard drive
I say that a laptop with 1GB RAM memory running XP would be faster than laptop with 1GB RAM running Vista - not withstanding the slightly faster chip speed
Am I right- and can anyone point me to anything to support my argument
I have no problem with Vista per se
Thanks