http://www.worldchess.com/candidates/london.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2013/mar/10/chess-magnus-carlsen-world-titleThe World Chess Champion is fortunate: his rivals slog it out for the right to play him in the final and, unless they've changed the rules since I last checked, he keeps his title in the event of a tied match.
The Graun article is more than tinged with hyperbole: Carlson is the highest-rated player of al time, it's true, but he's not the greatest. Ratings suffer from inflation, just as currency does, and I think it's only possible after a player has a bit of a track record, no matter what the sport, that you can say he's a candidate for "the greatest of all time". I think Kasparov still holds that accolade. He was World Champion for the best part of 15 years and the world's highest rated player for about 20 years. I'll regard Carlsen as the greatest of all time if he can match that.
I don't think I will be paying £25 for a ticket, either. All the games will be online pretty much as soon as they are played, if they aren't broadcast live.