Author Topic: Grammar that makes you cringe  (Read 840283 times)

citoyen

  • Occasionally rides a bike
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6000 on: 03 March, 2021, 08:21:33 am »
T42, you clearly have a real problem with the Guardian. Maybe it would be better for your blood pressure if you stopped buying it.
"The future's all yours, you lousy bicycles."

T42

  • Apprentice geezer
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6001 on: 03 March, 2021, 09:37:55 am »
I have a problem with language-mangling and they're all tarred with the same brush. My blood pressure is fine.
I've dusted off all those old bottles and set them up straight

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6002 on: 03 March, 2021, 10:07:42 am »
From a Scottish Fight report on The BBC:

"Ms Sturgeon is facing calls to quit from Scottish Conservatives after new documents released on Tuesday evening raised further questions about her involvement in the saga."

I thought she was leader of the SNP?
It is simpler than it looks.

Davef

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6003 on: 03 March, 2021, 10:09:13 am »
Normally “cold-blooded” is hyphenated but not “in cold blood” which is odd. French hyphenate “sang-froid”.

“He was drowned in cold blood” could be ambiguous.

Davef

Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6004 on: 03 March, 2021, 10:13:03 am »
I thought she was leader of the SNP?
is......

citoyen

  • Occasionally rides a bike
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6005 on: 03 March, 2021, 10:40:51 am »
Normally “cold-blooded” is hyphenated but not “in cold blood” which is odd.

Fwiw, the first is an adjective, the second an adverb. I think a hyphen would look odd in the latter.

Quote
“He was drowned in cold blood” could be ambiguous.

True.
"The future's all yours, you lousy bicycles."

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6006 on: 03 March, 2021, 11:52:05 am »
Some people habitually hyphenate phrases like "day to day" regardless of whether it's an adjective or adverb. "A day-to-day increase in Covid cases" and "Covid cases are increasing day-to-day". I'll accept the first though I'd prefer it without, but the second is just wrong.

Today I'm wondering whether to hyphenate "time stamping". It looks wrong as one word: "timestamp" is okay but "timestamping" looks a bit clumsy. I could leave as separate words but I don't think I've used it as a noun yet, it's all "time-stamping technology" and "time-stamping service".
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6007 on: 03 March, 2021, 11:58:57 am »
Normally “cold-blooded” is hyphenated but not “in cold blood” which is odd.

Fwiw, the first is an adjective, the second an adverb. I think a hyphen would look odd in the latter.

Quote
“He was drowned in cold blood” could be ambiguous.

True.

He was drowned cold bloodedly ?
Rust never sleeps

citoyen

  • Occasionally rides a bike
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6008 on: 03 March, 2021, 12:50:36 pm »
He was drowned cold bloodedly ?

Not exactly idiomatic, is it? Also v.clunky.

Cold-blooded tends to be used literally*, eg when talking about reptiles, whereas "in cold blood" is figurative and a set phrase.


*ETA: except in "cold-blooded murder", of course, which I think also counts as a set phrase
"The future's all yours, you lousy bicycles."

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6009 on: 03 March, 2021, 01:08:25 pm »
I should have stuck a smiley in there perhaps to indicate its clunkworthinessability.  :-)
Rust never sleeps

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6010 on: 03 March, 2021, 01:39:28 pm »
The point is to make it easier to read, and to show how the words relate to each other in a string of words. Even where the same words are used in different contexts, it's that aim that determines what should happen. Therefore, the same words may or may not be hyphenated according to context.

So, roughly (like many rules of grammar, these are somewhat more like guidelines, so there will be exceptions):
  • Are there at least three words in the string/concept? If not, no comma.
  • Does one adjective modify another word? If so, hyphenate them.

Thus "in cold blood" has no hyphen (rule 1, only two words in the actual concept), but "cold-blooded murder" (three words, cold-blooded describes the murder but cold modifies blooded, rather than murder).

And "high-power networks" means networks carrying high power (high modifies power), whereas "high power networks" means power networks located at altitude (both high and power modify networks). Which ambiguity is the point of the rule, and the reason why it's important to get it right. Again though, there will be borderline cases where you could make a case for doing it either way. Language is like that.

citoyen

  • Occasionally rides a bike
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6011 on: 03 March, 2021, 01:47:49 pm »
Language is like that.

Just as well or I would be out of a job.
"The future's all yours, you lousy bicycles."

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6012 on: 03 March, 2021, 01:52:53 pm »
All hail lexical and grammatical ambiguity !!   Anything that keeps a yacfer in a job has to be welcome.  :-D
Rust never sleeps

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6013 on: 03 March, 2021, 03:27:24 pm »
And "high-power networks" means networks carrying high power (high modifies power),
Or networks of high power (as in corridors – a word whose spelling always looks curious to me*) not that it makes much difference.

*Because I feel it should have something to do with doors, though of course that's only a later application.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6014 on: 06 March, 2021, 01:47:25 pm »
Today's example of hyphenophilia: "Did you talk to her over the phone or in-person?"
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6015 on: 24 March, 2021, 12:36:49 pm »
OK, I know, you can verb any noun. Here's two I read/heard recently: provision, maintainence.

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6016 on: 24 March, 2021, 12:40:15 pm »
"To provision" has been around for ages, meaning "to supply with provisions". You provision a ship before it sets sail, for example.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6017 on: 24 March, 2021, 02:01:30 pm »
You provision a ship before it sets sail, for example.
And add a bit extra for just in case it gets stuck en-route.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6018 on: 24 March, 2021, 03:02:57 pm »
Not so much grammar, but radio interviewees; when introduced, they say; "Thanks for having me".
FFS, the interviewer should be thanking the interviewees for making themselves available.

T42

  • Apprentice geezer
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6019 on: 24 March, 2021, 04:12:04 pm »
Be nice if the interviewer then replied "yes, you've been had all right".

Interviewers here used to have the annoying habit of saying something like "and I remind you that you are the managing director of Peugeot" when getting rid of their victim, as if they might have forgotten in the interim.
I've dusted off all those old bottles and set them up straight

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6020 on: 24 March, 2021, 04:14:58 pm »
The verb "must" seems to be changing its meaning. When I were young, it meant something that you didn't really have any option over doing. Now, it seems to mean something that I'd really like you to do, but know perfectly well you won't, as in every second news report lately of impassioned pleas from campaigners earnestly saying things such as:

Quote
The government must double the pensions of everyone with a Q in their surname.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6021 on: 24 March, 2021, 04:17:22 pm »
OK, I know, you can verb any noun. Here's two I read/heard recently: provision, maintainence.

Podium.  :facepalm:

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6022 on: 24 March, 2021, 06:18:28 pm »
OK, I know, you can verb any noun. Here's two I read/heard recently: provision, maintainence.

Podium.  :facepalm:

That, along with “medal”, has been around at least since the Beijing Olympics.  This is not an excuse, BTW.  Nor is the fact that Victoria Pendleton once said it.
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6023 on: 24 March, 2021, 08:06:47 pm »
"To provision" has been around for ages, meaning "to supply with provisions". You provision a ship before it sets sail, for example.

And by direct analogy, 'provisioning' is standard computing jargon for setting up a network client with the relevant configuration and authentication credentials.  (Eg. activating a SIM so you can use a cellular network, or an embedded device automagically obtaining its configuration from some server.)

I'm generally in favour of this sort of metaphorical jargon, because the alternative is acronym soup.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #6024 on: 24 March, 2021, 09:10:22 pm »

That, along with “medal”, has been around at least since the Beijing Olympics.  This is not an excuse, BTW.  Nor is the fact that Victoria Pendleton once said it.

It serves a purpose:

I came 4th in the egg and spoon race but would have won if it hadn't been for those medalling kids.