Kim, you are very bad!
It just fails to make a significant point about art-as-art v art-as-commodity. Amusing nonetheless.
Sly bugger. If he'd shredded the whole thing it would have just been a pile of strips on the floor. Leaving half of it intact means it's still a work of art.
Quote from: T42 on 07 October, 2018, 10:52:54 amSly bugger. If he'd shredded the whole thing it would have just been a pile of strips on the floor. Leaving half of it intact means it's still a work of art.Even the pile of strips on the floor could be "a work of art".Duchamp. Urinal. 100+ years ago.https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573
Quote from: hubner on 07 October, 2018, 02:08:19 pmQuote from: T42 on 07 October, 2018, 10:52:54 amSly bugger. If he'd shredded the whole thing it would have just been a pile of strips on the floor. Leaving half of it intact means it's still a work of art.Even the pile of strips on the floor could be "a work of art".Duchamp. Urinal. 100+ years ago.https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573Yes, but picking them up would ruin it.
Quote from: T42 on 07 October, 2018, 05:17:49 pmQuote from: hubner on 07 October, 2018, 02:08:19 pmQuote from: T42 on 07 October, 2018, 10:52:54 amSly bugger. If he'd shredded the whole thing it would have just been a pile of strips on the floor. Leaving half of it intact means it's still a work of art.Even the pile of strips on the floor could be "a work of art".Duchamp. Urinal. 100+ years ago.https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573Yes, but picking them up would ruin it.Whereas pissing on them would square the circle nicely.
Andrij. I pronounce you Complete and Utter GIT