Quote from: asterix on 08 June, 2014, 06:40:57 pm..trying to suggest there weren't subs in the area anyway. Or maybe there weren't but they are trying to make us think they'd tell us that they were sending one to cover up the fact that there wasn't one and there is a gap in our world surveillance program. Which there may or may not be.We are now looking for a whistle-blower on the not unsurprising assumption that someone out there knows more that they are letting on:http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/news/world-news/165000-missing-malaysia-jet-mh370-whistleblower-fund-set-upAs one of the crew of that submarine is a contributor to this thread, just four posts before yours, I think it's a bit crass to suggest that no British submarine was actually there and that it was some kind of PR spin!
..trying to suggest there weren't subs in the area anyway. Or maybe there weren't but they are trying to make us think they'd tell us that they were sending one to cover up the fact that there wasn't one and there is a gap in our world surveillance program. Which there may or may not be.We are now looking for a whistle-blower on the not unsurprising assumption that someone out there knows more that they are letting on:http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/news/world-news/165000-missing-malaysia-jet-mh370-whistleblower-fund-set-up
A sailing lady has come out saying she saw it go do else where.https://saucysailoress.wordpress.com
that's not science, it's semantics.
Kim, you are very bad!
Surely it's on the news because a plane has vanished?
7 minutes ago:A Virgin Atlantic passenger plane [747] "is preparing to implement a non-standard landing" at Gatwick airportFingers and everything else crossed..
Ref the Gatwick Virgin Jumbo, was that TimC at the helm I wonder ?
That's a skilful bit of plane driving: