That article just reads like the ramblings of someone who's upset that the regulations won't allow for tin foil hats to replace cycle helmets.
Summary of the article:
We're too busy to report on actual cycling.
We're not to busy to run down another journalist.
We've heard a name associated with a positive test and we're damn sure he's guilty and happy to trot out witless scandal as if it's the concrete truth.
We've heard, with no real certainty, of another positive test and even though there is no further details, we'll fit someone up for the job, probably because we're childish and don't like them.
Padded out with Daily Mail Rantings.
Or to shorten it even further, Scandals and Gossip, mostly invented and perpetrated by us.
I've never read VeloResults before and as a first article to come across, it seems to bear all the hallmarks of shoddy journalism, which isn't justified by sticking under an Editorial heading. As damaging to bike racing as actual drug taking.