Yet Another Cycling Forum

General Category => The Knowledge => OT Knowledge => Topic started by: Kathy on 21 May, 2008, 09:25:38 am

Title: "Zeroise"
Post by: Kathy on 21 May, 2008, 09:25:38 am
Can the word "zeroise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeroise)" be used to mean "set the number(s) in the spreadsheet to zero"?

If not, is there a better word for it?

And even if it can, can I still slap the person who persistently uses it in this context? >:(
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Charlotte on 21 May, 2008, 09:27:40 am
Yes.  Along with those misguided souls who think "leverage" is a verb.

As Mr Larrington would put it, "burn them all and use the Lighthouse Family as kindling".
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: clarion on 21 May, 2008, 09:41:25 am
Can the word "zeroise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeroise)" be used to mean "set the number(s) in the spreadsheet to zero"?

No.

Quote
If not, is there a better word for it?

What's wrong with 'zero' as a verb?

Quote
And even if it can, can I still slap the person who persistently uses it in this context? >:(

Ohhh yuss </Churchill>
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Deano on 21 May, 2008, 09:48:34 am
How about "null"?

And as for anyone who uses "zeroise" - I'm not normally in favour of corporal punishment, but...
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Jaded on 21 May, 2008, 09:56:51 am
What is wrong with carrying out a zeroisation of the figures?
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 May, 2008, 09:56:55 am
Yes.  Along with those misguided souls who think "leverage" is a verb.

As Mr Larrington would put it, "burn them all and use the Lighthouse Family as kindling".

ITYM "shoot them and burn the bodies, using the Lighthouse Family as kindling"
</pendant>
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Charlotte on 21 May, 2008, 09:57:22 am
That's the one  :D
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: HTFB on 21 May, 2008, 10:00:40 am
"Set to zero" is best. Or "zero". Or "annul", if you're feeling racy, or just possibly "nullify". "Reset" in a spreadsheet is implicitly to zero, I'd have thought.

Zeroise -- and I say this as one who has proved my own Nullstellensatz, and should know---is Not A Word.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Séamas M. on 21 May, 2008, 10:01:20 am
Yes.  Along with those misguided souls who think "leverage" is a verb.

As Mr Larrington would put it, "burn them all and use the Lighthouse Family as kindling".

ITYM "shoot them and burn the bodies, using the Lighthouse Family as kindling"
</pendant>

He may be in favour of hanging them first!  ;D
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Frenchie on 21 May, 2008, 10:03:47 am
Nullify?
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: chris on 21 May, 2008, 10:09:00 am
Nullify?

Null is not the same as zero. In IT it usually means 'not known'. For instance a zero cell in a spreadsheet used to store a credit limit could have a different meaning to one that is blank (nuul).
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Greenbank on 21 May, 2008, 10:10:15 am
http://www.anothercyclingforum.com/index.php?topic=39500
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Kathy on 21 May, 2008, 10:27:25 am
Sorry, I'm not allowed there any more. :(
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: andygates on 21 May, 2008, 10:36:41 am
What's wrong with 'zero' as a verb?

Nothing except the confidence of the writer that it will be interpreted as a verb.  The cheesy "-ize" suffix clearly denotes that this is not a quantitude but an enverbulation.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: chris on 21 May, 2008, 10:39:32 am
Sorry, I'm not allowed there any more. :(

cos all her posts are now YACFized ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Woofage on 21 May, 2008, 10:49:42 am
What is wrong with carrying out a zeroisation of the figures?

Because it's spelled with a "zee" :sick:
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 May, 2008, 10:55:52 am
Anyone condoning the use of such revolting neologisms as "zeroise" :sick: wants badly to be sent to the camps for re-education.

Possibly involving an overclocked cattle prod.
</BOFH>
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Clare on 21 May, 2008, 11:10:41 am
Can the word "zeroise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeroise)" be used to mean "set the number(s) in the spreadsheet to zero"?

No, it isn't a word  >:(
Putting "ise" on the end of a word to create a brand new management word is not big or clever, it's just plain wrong.
 >:(

If not, is there a better word for it?

I'm tempted to suggest Floccinaucinihilipilification but that would just be silly.
What's wrong with "Set to zero"?

And even if it can, can I still slap the person who persistently uses it in this context? >:(

You can only slap them if you utilise a large, splinter prone wooden club with 6" nails sticking out of the business end of it.
 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Greenbank on 21 May, 2008, 11:21:05 am
Putting "ise" on the end of a word to create a brand new management word is not big or clever, it's just plain wrong.
 >:(

You can only slap them if you utilise a large, splinter prone wooden club with 6" nails sticking out of the business end of it.
 :thumbsup:

Is there any justification for the word "utilise" over the word "use"? (I can't think of one, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.)

He burgles, she burgles, they burgle. No-one should ever burglarise/burglarize.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: andygates on 21 May, 2008, 11:21:49 am
What's wrong with "Set to zero"?

Works for me, especially as I'm playing with a slide rule inbetween spasms of work.  Gotta prepare for the EMP-and-then-you-need-Science zombocalypse. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: clarion on 21 May, 2008, 11:38:22 am
Putting "ise" on the end of a word to create a brand new management word is not big or clever, it's just plain wrong.
 >:(

You can only slap them if you utilise a large, splinter prone wooden club with 6" nails sticking out of the business end of it.
 :thumbsup:

Is there any justification for the word "utilise" over the word "use"? (I can't think of one, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.)

He burgles, she burgles, they burgle. No-one should ever burglarise/burglarize.

Isn't that utiliZe?
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Wowbagger on 21 May, 2008, 11:44:42 am
<H. G. Wells>
In the Country of the Blind, the one-eyed man is King. Everyone else has zeroise.
</H.G. Wells>
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Mr Larrington on 21 May, 2008, 12:08:54 pm
<H. G. Wells>
In the Country of the Blind, the one-eyed man is King. Everyone else has zeroise.
</H.G. Wells>

<HMHB>
In the Kingdom of the Bland
It's nine o'clock on ITV
</HMHB>
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: andygates on 21 May, 2008, 12:09:39 pm
Ouch.

Worse, a complete neologism from zero and nix - zix.  "Zix those cells" :)
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: mattc on 21 May, 2008, 12:14:46 pm
Sorry, I'm not allowed there any more. :(
Can't you just click on it and read the topic without logging in? Would have saved a lot of typing here ... ;)
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Kathy on 21 May, 2008, 12:16:11 pm
Sorry, I'm not allowed there any more. :(
Can't you just click on it and read the topic without logging in? Would have saved a lot of typing here ... ;)

But I couldn't search to see the topic.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Sergeant Pluck on 21 May, 2008, 12:28:04 pm
Most annoying not being able to search the old place - a very odd change to require a log-in before you can search.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 24 May, 2008, 09:46:45 am
"Zero" or "set to zero" would be much better than "zeroi(s/z)e".

But (burn me! with our without kindling!) I can't see much wrong with "leverage" as a verb. As I understand it, it's used to mean "take the opportunity of our advantageous situation in order to gain a great deal more than we normally would be able to". As such it nicely encompasses the idea of levers to multiply input.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Woofage on 24 May, 2008, 10:16:28 am
I can't see much wrong with "leverage" as a verb.


Aaaarrrgghhhh!!!! My eyes!!!
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: hellymedic on 24 May, 2008, 10:16:44 am
We should use the 'tare' word more.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: border-rider on 24 May, 2008, 10:22:05 am
"Zero" or "set to zero" would be much better than "zeroi(s/z)e".

But (burn me! with our without kindling!) I can't see much wrong with "leverage" as a verb. As I understand it, it's used to mean "take the opportunity of our advantageous situation in order to gain a great deal more than we normally would be able to". As such it nicely encompasses the idea of levers to multiply input.

When used that way as a noun, it's a perfectly good word.  The verb is to lever; if you lever something you are using/applying leverage.

I guess that if you used leverage as a verb then you would end up with leveragaciousness  as the result ;)
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Zoidburg on 25 May, 2008, 12:31:34 am
"Zero" or "set to zero" would be much better than "zeroi(s/z)e".

But (burn me! with our without kindling!) I can't see much wrong with "leverage" as a verb. As I understand it, it's used to mean "take the opportunity of our advantageous situation in order to gain a great deal more than we normally would be able to". As such it nicely encompasses the idea of levers to multiply input.

When used that way as a noun, it's a perfectly good word.  The verb is to lever; if you lever something you are using/applying leverage.

I guess that if you used leverage as a verb then you would end up with leveragaciousness  as the result ;)
I would use the term "to zero"

To recalibrate something from scratch

Military term
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 27 May, 2008, 05:54:40 am
"Zero" or "set to zero" would be much better than "zeroi(s/z)e".

But (burn me! with our without kindling!) I can't see much wrong with "leverage" as a verb. As I understand it, it's used to mean "take the opportunity of our advantageous situation in order to gain a great deal more than we normally would be able to". As such it nicely encompasses the idea of levers to multiply input.

When used that way as a noun, it's a perfectly good word.  The verb is to lever; if you lever something you are using/applying leverage.

I guess that if you used leverage as a verb then you would end up with leveragaciousness  as the result ;)
But I don't think leverage as a verb is used with the same meaning as to lever. At least, I've only ever heard lever as a verb used in a physical or mathematical sense, not in the business/political/military situations that "leverage" tends to occur in.

Of course it is an Americanism (which I suspect is a factor in why many people dislike it  ;)) and Americans do (why?) tend to go for the longer, more complex form when there is often a simpler version already extant, so it could be that "leverage" has simply replaced "lever" in these areas. But I feel it wasn't used much in that way.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: border-rider on 27 May, 2008, 07:24:25 am


Of course it is an Americanism (which I suspect is a factor in why many people dislike it  ;))

I dislike that usage because it's wrong.  There is no verb in the English (or American) language "to leverage", because leverage is a noun. 

But that's not the real issue - the migration of nouns or adjectives to verb status is quite accepted - to green something, or to tarmac it.  It's that the word has "age" on the end of it.  It's a word that already describes the result of using, or action of using, or advantage of using a lever.  Not the use of the lever itself. The verb is "to lever" and the result of doing it is "leverage".  Those business/military people could talk of "applying leverage", or they could ask how much leverage there was.  That'd be fine :)
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 27 May, 2008, 08:14:07 am
So it seems we agree on the meaning of the word.  :)

And certainly saying "apply leverage" would be fine. But I can't see the -age ending as a problem. What about haemorage? That's a noun and a verb, surely (even if I've misspelled it, as I'm sure I have). We could say "suffer/have a haemorage" with the same meaninng, but it's simpler to use a one-word verb.

That said, I can't imagine using the verb "leverage" myself, any more than I'd say "to advantage" - I'd probably use a completely different phrase - but I don't object when others do.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: HTFB on 27 May, 2008, 08:38:48 am
I dislike that usage because it's wrong.  There is no verb in the English (or American) language "to leverage", because leverage is a noun. 

But that's not the real issue - the migration of nouns or adjectives to verb status is quite accepted - to green something, or to tarmac it.  It's that the word has "age" on the end of it.  It's a word that already describes the result of using, or action of using, or advantage of using a lever.  Not the use of the lever itself. The verb is "to lever" and the result of doing it is "leverage".  Those business/military people could talk of "applying leverage", or they could ask how much leverage there was.  That'd be fine :)
Ah: but the businessmen want a word to describe the result of using, or the action of using, leverage, which is a well-defined financial concept that doesn't involve---except in the most figurative sense---levers.
Title: Re: "Zeroise"
Post by: border-rider on 27 May, 2008, 08:47:13 am

Ah: but the businessmen want a word to describe the result of using, or the action of using, leverage, which is a well-defined financial concept that doesn't involve---except in the most figurative sense---levers.

The result of using leverage would be..'leverage :)

If it were me, I'd describe the action as "applying leverage"