I scanned through the article. It is interesting; of course the writer is hardly neutral in the present case, although I agree that some judgment, by its nature and in its early implementation, may be tough (but aren't they all?). This leaves us with a dilemna: Do we accept doping openly or do we indeed put in place a tough anti-doping culture to try and dissuade people?
Something else always amazes this me. The French lab is always criticised; is it because it dares to enforce measure or, taking tips from the Italian authorities, say on Mr Ricco, or because they are those actually able to come up "with the goods" and invetsigate the case? It is not nice to be the police; but it is sometimes necessary to have them.