My fillings are still amalgam. It's stable (completely insoluble, hence their use) and there's no need to remove them (in fact, it's safer to leave them in place, though of course, that doesn't pay for your dentist's ski holiday).
I have a several of amalgam fillings dating from the mid 1990s, when the damage caused by a brief fad for applying a preemptive sealant to children's molars took effect. My dentist wants to replace them, but I'm operating on the "sure, once they actually show any sign of falling apart" principle. If they've lasted 25 years, they're probably good for a few more, so why disturb them?
I have a more recent filling from about 2004, where I was strongly encouraged to go for amalgam, as it was more durable than the polymer stuff. It seems set to out-last the surrounding tooth, which got bodged with some polymer filling a couple of years ago. (When it goes, I'm going to have it extracted. It's right at the back, and I don't use it for chewing anyway.)