Author Topic: Grammar that makes you cringe  (Read 840172 times)

jellied

  • skip to the end
    • Ealing Bike Hub
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #125 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:28:37 am »
what is the opposite of flamable?

and why does flamable and inflamable mean the same?
A shitter and a giggler.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #126 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:29:07 am »
This weekends horrible word courtesy of Clyde coastguard Gun and Subfacts broadcasts

Deconfliction

I think I know what it means but I'd never heard anyone say it before.
“There is no point in using the word 'impossible' to describe something that has clearly happened.”
― Douglas Adams

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #127 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:29:52 am »
what is the opposite of flamable?

and why does flamable and inflamable mean the same?

Non flamable?
“There is no point in using the word 'impossible' to describe something that has clearly happened.”
― Douglas Adams

jellied

  • skip to the end
    • Ealing Bike Hub
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #128 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:30:32 am »
why is it not "unflamable"
A shitter and a giggler.

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #129 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:32:53 am »
what is the opposite of flamable?


Perfectly crafted with no opportunity for a troll to come back?
It is simpler than it looks.

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #130 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:39:30 am »
what is the opposite of flamable?

and why does flamable and inflamable mean the same?

It's lucky this isn't a "spelling that makes you cringe" thread ;)
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #131 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:41:34 am »
This weekends horrible word courtesy of Clyde coastguard Gun and Subfacts broadcasts

Deconfliction

I think I know what it means but I'd never heard anyone say it before.

I first heard it in a military context, "to deconflict targets" meaning to make sure that two guns weren't both aiming at the same thing.

I guess it's American in origin.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #132 on: 07 May, 2008, 10:46:19 am »
what is the opposite of flamable?

and why does flamable and inflamable mean the same?

I think it's the case that 'flammable' is a modern construction because 'inflammable' was deemed to be capable of misinterpretation, but think of the difference between 'to inflame' and 'to flame'.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #133 on: 07 May, 2008, 12:16:51 pm »
Quote
Strictly, a semi-colon should be used in your examples ...


Is this a grammar thread or a punctuation thread?  Using semi-colons would hardly make the (not very well-chosen) examples any clearer.

Thor

  • Super-sonnicus idioticus
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #134 on: 07 May, 2008, 12:20:38 pm »
Ad nauseum recorded message while queuing for a bank call centre operative "someone will be with you as soon as they are available"  >:(
It was a day like any other in Ireland, only it wasn't raining

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #135 on: 07 May, 2008, 02:06:21 pm »
A couple of grammatical (or possibly ungrammatical) traits from the Emerald Isle that I find irritating...

Using "bring" in place of "take" as in "I'll bring you to the shops tomorrow" a la America...

Using "avail" to mean (which it may in fact do!) "take advantage of" or "benefit from" as in "to avail of this offer phone..."

Strangely I've readily adapted to the use of Euro (singular) in place of Euros (plural) when saying "10 Euro" and now the use of the plural sounds odd to my ears. 
We are making a New World (Paul Nash, 1918)

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #136 on: 07 May, 2008, 02:23:21 pm »

Strangely I've readily adapted to the use of Euro (singular) in place of Euros (plural) when saying "10 Euro" and now the use of the plural sounds odd to my ears. 

Is that the counterpoint of, "That'll be one pence, please."

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #137 on: 07 May, 2008, 02:37:26 pm »
I rather like the optional rule that, for most wild animals (especially game animals) there is no separate plural.

"A herd of wildebeest"

"A school of fish"

"There are lion on these plains"

Sadly it doesn't extend to

"There was a great bunch of chav outside McDonalds".

Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #138 on: 07 May, 2008, 02:49:58 pm »
what is the opposite of flamable?

Flame resistant.

and why does flamable and inflamable mean the same?

I spose it's cos the 'in' prefix does not mean not and is more akin to 'a' as in awake or abed (different language roots though).

<pedant>
It's flammable with a double m
<pedant>

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #139 on: 07 May, 2008, 02:53:29 pm »

Strangely I've readily adapted to the use of Euro (singular) in place of Euros (plural) when saying "10 Euro" and now the use of the plural sounds odd to my ears. 

Is that the counterpoint of, "That'll be one pence, please."

One pence has made me cringe for the last 37.245 years.

It never seemed to happen before decimalisation.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #140 on: 07 May, 2008, 04:02:52 pm »
Is this a grammar thread or an idiom thread?   :demon:

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #141 on: 07 May, 2008, 04:08:44 pm »
It's an idiomatic guide to grammar.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #142 on: 07 May, 2008, 04:10:38 pm »
Is this a grammar thread or an idiom thread?   :demon:

No, I think it's a pedant-who-subscribes-to-one-prescriptive-grammar  thread.

Pete

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #143 on: 07 May, 2008, 05:27:06 pm »
One pence has made me cringe for the last 37.245 years.

It never seemed to happen before decimalisation.
I think I'd be delighted to learn that some item cost just "one penny", or "one pence", or "1p", or whatever...  ;)  Seeing as you can scarce get on a bus these days without taking out a mortgage....

In the early days of decimalization we all said "one pee", "two pee" etc., which made a lot of folks cringe!  But that was mainly to reinforce the message that we were talking decimal, at a time when many folks were still thinking in terms of half-crowns, sixpences, threepenny* bits, and old pence (and ha'pence) with a 'd'...  Happily the "pee" practice seems to have died out now...

*And now a poser for our younger listeners - what was the correct pronunciation of "threepenny"?

HTFB

  • The Monkey and the Plywood Violin
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #144 on: 07 May, 2008, 05:54:29 pm »
I rather like the optional rule that, for most wild animals (especially game animals) there is no separate plural.

"A herd of wildebeest"

"A school of fish"

"There are lion on these plains"
And of course a mob of euro. Though I don't think anyone actually hunts Macropus robustus, and my marsupial books call them, en masse, euros.

But actually the usage of not pluralising units of currency is defensible and regular. You don't dig in your pocket for twenty quids.
Not especially helpful or mature

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #145 on: 07 May, 2008, 06:07:34 pm »
Is this a grammar thread or an idiom thread?   :demon:

No, I think it's a pedant-who-subscribes-to-one-prescriptive-grammar  thread.

Now, do you mean "prescriptive" or "proscriptive"?

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #146 on: 07 May, 2008, 06:27:18 pm »
One pence has made me cringe for the last 37.245 years.

It never seemed to happen before decimalisation.
I think I'd be delighted to learn that some item cost just "one penny", or "one pence", or "1p", or whatever...  ;)  Seeing as you can scarce get on a bus these days without taking out a mortgage...

You can't buy anything for 1p, but 'one pence change' adds to the pocket-ripping shrapnel after you've made your £*.99 purchase.


*And now a poser for our younger listeners - what was the correct pronunciation of "threepenny"?

Sorry, I'm not one of the younger readers...

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #147 on: 07 May, 2008, 07:22:24 pm »
what is the opposite of flamable?

and why does flamable and inflamable mean the same?

It's lucky this isn't a "spelling that makes you cringe" thread ;)

But since it is a grammar thread, that 'does' should be 'do'. ;D

Eccentrica Gallumbits

  • Rock 'n' roll and brew, rock 'n' roll and brew...
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #148 on: 07 May, 2008, 07:49:31 pm »

*And now a poser for our younger listeners - what was the correct pronunciation of "threepenny"?

Thrupny?
My feminist marxist dialectic brings all the boys to the yard.


Pete

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #149 on: 07 May, 2008, 07:57:53 pm »

*And now a poser for our younger listeners - what was the correct pronunciation of "threepenny"?

Thrupny?
:thumbsup:  I just wondered if anyone didn't know....