Yet Another Cycling Forum

Off Topic => The Pub => The Sporting Life => Topic started by: Wowbagger on 27 December, 2019, 01:00:07 am

Title: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 27 December, 2019, 01:00:07 am
Leicester 0- 4 Liverpool

OK. I have never been a great football fan but I have always taken an interest, at times more passing than others.

I don’t ever remember any team so dominant in every competition they take part in as the current Liverpool team.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 27 December, 2019, 08:21:13 am
They’ve scored 500 goals since Koop took over
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 27 December, 2019, 09:37:15 am
Dalglish McDermott et al were pretty big in their era too :)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 27 December, 2019, 01:51:47 pm
It's interesting hearing Liverpool fans of a certain age. For 25 years they've been telling everyone who would listen (and some who wouldn't!) that we would never see the likes of the Paisley sides again. They have changed their tune over the last year or so. I just about remember the side that Dalglish managed, and I genuinely think that this is the best Liverpool team ever.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 27 December, 2019, 02:06:34 pm
It's interesting hearing Liverpool fans of a certain age.
Oi!  >:(
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 27 December, 2019, 02:44:28 pm
It's interesting hearing Liverpool fans of a certain age.
Oi!  >:(

As someone who watched Shankly's sides - Double Oi  >:(

Anyway the kids lost in the League cup so we still need to try harder.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 05 January, 2020, 09:37:29 pm
They won today with a very young team and a magnificent goal scored by an 18 year old.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 06 January, 2020, 09:16:29 am
Everton, aren't they?  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 26 January, 2020, 07:02:53 pm
Klopp tried the same trick again today and came spectacularly unstuck, which is great to see.  I don't know why he is protecting so many players.  They could practically lose all their remaining matches and still win the League and the Champions League is always in the lap of the dogs.  Well done Shrewsbury.  How long can you hang on to Laurent?  After all, he's already played for Hartlepool, so Real and Barcelona (or Liverpool) will be knocking at the door......
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 26 January, 2020, 08:20:56 pm
I've just been watching what I assume are the official BBC highlights. There I was waiting for the equaliser and it had been brilliantly edited out, the score shown in the top LH corner seamlessly moving from 1 - 2 to 2 - 2  without any nets being disturbed.

Edit: I found another version with the goal in it. The first version may have been an accidental release or a bootleg. The "BBC" wossname was visible on the screen though.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 26 January, 2020, 08:33:57 pm
We have no cover for the fullbacks, and losing VVD, Firmino or Salah (on top of Mane) for any length of time would have a massive impact. They have all played a huge amount of minutes this season. I don't think he should have brought any of the first teamers on either.
This was not an inexperienced team though - between them Adrian, Matip, Lovren, Fabinio, Minamino and Origi have a lot of caps, PL and CL minutes. They are all short of minutes recently, which might explain their rustiness. They won't play in the replay though, when the FA announced the winter break they insisted the club couldn't arrange any friendlies or other games.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 26 January, 2020, 08:48:15 pm
Hmmm.  Your loyalty does something credit!

Liverpool are "world champions", European champions, Premier League runners-up and Champions elect.  Yet they haven't got any reserve fullbacks?  Who's running the scouting and the bank, then?  And while I can see that losing ALL of VVD, Firmino, Salah and Mane might be a problem, the odd one shouldn't be a problem.  I mean, Newcastle had nine, NINE first team players unavailable in the first match against high-flying Rochdale and still managed to score their equaliser first and hang on effortlessly for a draw (who knows what might have happened if they'd not been so effortless?).

No, Klopp underestimated the task, plain and simple!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 26 January, 2020, 08:52:51 pm
According to the Graun's website, Liverpool had 69% of the possession but Shrewsbury had 4 shots on target to Liverpool's 3, and 4 corners to Liverpool's 3. It makes you wonder why Liverpool were fannying around so much.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 26 January, 2020, 10:42:01 pm
Hmmm.  Your loyalty does something credit!

Liverpool are "world champions", European champions, Premier League runners-up and Champions elect.  Yet they haven't got any reserve fullbacks?  Who's running the scouting and the bank, then?  And while I can see that losing ALL of VVD, Firmino, Salah and Mane might be a problem, the odd one shouldn't be a problem. 
No, Klopp underestimated the task, plain and simple!
Neco Williams and Larouci are the reserve fullbacks. The only other players to have played fullback this season are Milner (injured), Henderson (CM, massively in the red after playing every game since November) and Gomez (CB, has also played every game since November). Mane is already out - he twanged his hamstring against Wolves.

Klopp doesn't care about the FA Cup, neither do the ownership.  Neither do many of the fans (nor the Citeh fans it seems) - bigger fish to fry this year. He picked a more experienced side than against Everton though. Clearly he should have recognised that Shrewsbury are better than Everton.  ;D

Shrewsbury always play on the counter with 7 behind the ball - they did that against Accrington. That's probably why they had so little possession - the shot numbers are poor from both sides, as illustrated by the 6 and 11 shots off target...
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 02 February, 2020, 08:24:29 am
Liverpool now have more than twice as many points as the team in 5th place. That’s just greedy.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 29 February, 2020, 08:22:16 pm
Crikey!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 29 February, 2020, 11:08:18 pm
I predicted that.

Sadly I didn't put any money on it.

Double sadly I was actually in Liverpool when it happened, not Vicarage Road.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Von Broad on 01 March, 2020, 10:33:47 am
Double sadly I was actually in Liverpool when it happened, not Vicarage Road.

By sheer luck, I was there - mate of mine had the loan of two season tickets - just above the dugout - fantastic position.
I hadn't been over there for a few years, but it was just brilliant. Great atmosphere. The ground's looking pretty decent these days too.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 01 March, 2020, 12:07:54 pm
 :thumbsup:

If I hadn’t been visiting HMS The Prince of Wales I’d probably have been able to use my brothers season ticket. Which is near the dugout!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: pcolbeck on 08 March, 2020, 07:24:29 pm
Man City lost to Man United.

I make that two wins needed now by Liverpool to lift the title or less if Man City lose or draw again.

There are only 10 matches left to play (9 for some teams including Liverpool) so a max of 30 points. Liverpool are already more than 30 points ahead of everyone bar Man City who are 25 behind with ten to play. Liverpool need six points from nine matches to be uncatchable.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 08 March, 2020, 07:32:29 pm
I make that two wins needed now by Liverpool to lift the title or less if Man City lose or draw again.

Man City are playing twice (Arsenal on Wednesday, Burnley on Saturday, both at home) before Liverpool play next (away at Everton on Monday week) so it could theoretically be all done by the time Liverpool play. Even if not Liverpool might have a good chance of sealing it at Goodison Park.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 08 March, 2020, 07:34:45 pm
Man City lost to Man United.

I make that two wins needed now by Liverpool to lift the title or less if Man City lose or draw again.

There are only 10 matches left to play (9 for some teams including Liverpool) so a max of 30 points. Liverpool are already more than 30 points ahead of everyone bar Man City who are 25 behind with ten to play. Liverpool need six points from nine matches to be uncatchable.
I confess to a small snigger about this. My bro-in-law is a card-carrying City supporter, sufficiently keen to have travelled to Madrid a week or two ago. He's a lovely chap, but oozes Smug, so I'm always quite pleased when City lose.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 14 March, 2020, 08:17:57 am
If the 2020 season does not resume, as now seems likely, will Liverpool be officially champions or will there be no official results? The same obviously applies to promotion and relegation.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 14 March, 2020, 08:20:18 am
I’d hope that they could be crowned champions, given they are so far ahead, and there would be no relegation.  :P
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 14 March, 2020, 08:35:37 am
I'd agree. But that effectively means freezing everything in current positions, which opens up all sorts of potential for arguments and bitterness in leagues where results are closer. OTOH if the season is voided, how will qualification for next year's Champions League be decided? I'm sure they'll make something up by then.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Basil on 14 March, 2020, 09:52:09 am
No relegations would certainly be challenged by those clubs currently in expectation of promotion.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Deano on 14 March, 2020, 10:38:13 am
They should use the Duckworth-Lewis method.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 14 March, 2020, 11:12:13 am
They should use the Duckworth-Lewis method.

That would probably end up with Southampton being crowned champions.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 14 March, 2020, 11:22:52 am
I'm sure the EPL and other organisations have a disaster plan* with guidance for what happens if a season cannot be completed.

* Although It may well be the joke plan they knocked up down the pub with Zombie apocolypse crossed out and Covid19 pencilled in.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 14 March, 2020, 12:51:37 pm
They should use the Duckworth-Lewis method.

That would probably end up with Southampton being crowned champions.

Watford are clearly champions, having beaten Liverpool.

Oh no, wait, that means Crystal Palace are...
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Mr Larrington on 14 March, 2020, 01:10:22 pm
They should use the Scaryduckworth-Lewis method.

FTFY.  Google it if you have a strong stomach.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 14 March, 2020, 01:11:26 pm
The problem with planning is there's no idea when it'll be "safe" to start playing football again, so you can't really make any plans or decisions other than "stop it all for now".

If they just end this season as it is and say they'll start the next one in August then there's very little chance that will happen, and so two seasons could end up being incomplete.

My guess is that this season will be finished off at some point later in the year or early next year. Euro 2020 will be moved to 2021 and the football calendar for next season radically chopped up before things get back on track starting August 2021. If there's any significant spare time between the end of the current season and the start of the next one (e.g. Aug 2021) then they'll come up with something to fill the time that wouldn't be a full standard season.

Meanwhile a huge number of clubs will either go under or have to be bailed out significantly to keep afloat.

P.S. It's Duckworth-Lewis-Stern now.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 14 March, 2020, 01:59:29 pm
Most leagues have about ten games to go.  If it was safe to start again, say by June, that would leave two months to get a dozen games in.  The grounds are still going to be there.  The players could get a bit of experience of what it's like to have a real job and still only have to play a couple of times a week.   But I expect we'd get a lot of lawyer stuff from owners and agents about protecting investments from injury.

In the case of there being no completion, I would have thought it would be fair to say a side's current position represents fairly it's efforts so far this season. And that includes promotion and relegation.  But, being fair, it probably won't happen.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 14 March, 2020, 02:50:34 pm
I think if the resumption of this season is delayed into what is nominally next season, so August 2020, it will cease to make sense to complete it. Therefore it will probably be an uncompleted season.  In fact, an uncompleted season followed by either a fallow season or some sort of half-season. Whether champions will be crowned oops, awarded, will presumably come down to league by league decisions.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: andrewc on 14 March, 2020, 03:04:28 pm
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ETE8Ix3XYAIy8d1?format=jpg&name=small)


https://twitter.com/Cartoon4sale/status/1238837530876948483?s=20
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 14 March, 2020, 09:59:16 pm
I think if the resumption of this season is delayed into what is nominally next season, so August 2020, it will cease to make sense to complete it. Therefore it will probably be an uncompleted season.  In fact, an uncompleted season followed by either a fallow season or some sort of half-season. Whether champions will be crowned oops, awarded, will presumably come down to league by league decisions.

An uncompleted season would be a field day for lawyers (and this is a multi billion pound league).

I'd expect the existing league to be finished eventually.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 16 March, 2020, 01:14:34 pm
If we're aiming, according to the current official plan, for a long flat peak, then isolation season might well not be over before August, which will make it complicated either running two seasons simultaneously or accepting a delay to next season. But they might go for matches in locked stadiums, as I think they're doing in Spain.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 16 March, 2020, 02:50:50 pm
There is another complication in that the majority of player contracts only run to July 1. So even if they decided to complete the season (I expect they will want to play the games so as to avoid refunding TV and season ticket holders), it may be that players have become unavailable due to contracts expiring (and that's ignoring the transfer window possibilities).
I wonder if they can complete this season in the autumn, run Euro 2020 during January alongside Afcon, and have a sort of half season tournament involving 19 games (and playoffs?) next spring, to restart normal league operation in August 2021. Probably too many things to fit in though, and too many legal arguments.
I also wonder if they will complete the national cups and the Champions/Europa leagues - while ehy might not affect relegation, they still offer the possibility of qualifying for european competition next time around, so I can't see anyone being happy about it being abandoned.

It's a mess. :(
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 16 March, 2020, 03:32:34 pm
It's a mess. :(
That at least is certain!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 16 March, 2020, 03:48:58 pm
Serie A is talking about spreading the remaining fixtures across next season:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/mar/16/italy-considers-splitting-2019-20-serie-a-campaign-over-two-seasons
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 17 March, 2020, 08:20:36 pm
Jurgen has inspired us all:

https://twitter.com/lauralexx/status/1238601779773952005
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 22 March, 2020, 12:46:02 pm
She seems like a nice, genuine girl...

Thank you Matty for sharing -
A pleasure Steve  :-*
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 22 March, 2020, 01:45:34 pm
Just a pipe dream but I was wondering whether we might come out of this all with a desire for amateur sport again and kiss goodbye to the values that have distorted the sports we love for so long.  There has been football for a couple of weeks, England have decided against an embarrassing Test defeat in Sri Lanka and the world is still going round.  Pro sport - who needs it.....?!  Obviously there will be a knock-on effect in the steroids industry, etc.  But that has to be balanced against no more pundits.....  Just dreaming, as I said.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 22 March, 2020, 04:23:18 pm
Just a pipe dream but I was wondering whether we might come out of this all with a desire for amateur sport again and kiss goodbye to the values that have distorted the sports we love for so long.  There has been football for a couple of weeks, England have decided against an embarrassing Test defeat in Sri Lanka and the world is still going round.  Pro sport - who needs it.....?!  Obviously there will be a knock-on effect in the steroids industry, etc.  But that has to be balanced against no more pundits.....  Just dreaming, as I said.

What do you say, David?
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 25 March, 2020, 07:55:27 pm
Just a pipe dream but I was wondering whether we might come out of this all with a desire for amateur sport again and kiss goodbye to the values that have distorted the sports we love for so long.  There has been football for a couple of weeks, England have decided against an embarrassing Test defeat in Sri Lanka and the world is still going round.  Pro sport - who needs it.....?!  Obviously there will be a knock-on effect in the steroids industry, etc.  But that has to be balanced against no more pundits.....  Just dreaming, as I said.
You are the new John Lennon (sports dept, anyway). Do you have a Yoko yet??

David Millar was talking about arranging Rebel Racing for all the pro cyclists in Girona with nothing to do (this was during Paris-Nice i.e. pre-full-lockdown, to be clear). Some brilliant mad ideas about impromptu, turn-up and ride, semi-improvised format races. Nothing wrong with dreams  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: De Sisti on 04 April, 2020, 05:02:59 pm
Super-rich Liverpool FC to use the government furlough scheme. :jurek:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52165826 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52165826)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 04 April, 2020, 09:49:17 pm
 >:( I know there are other clubs doing it, and many other businesses will do so, but Carra is right. LFC should do the right thing, not the easy thing.  >:(
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 05 April, 2020, 08:48:53 am
>:( I know there are other clubs doing it, and many other businesses will do so, but Carra is right. LFC should do the right thing, not the easy thing.  >:(
As you say, plenty of other businesses doing it - it feels like footballers are an easy target here. There isn't an easy answer here, it looks like most PL players are trying to do something.

Matt Hancock's speech about this was quite pathetic. "my colleagues in the NHS" ?!? twat.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 05 April, 2020, 09:32:24 am
I don’t know the ins and outs of LFC’s decision to furlough staff but it wouldn’t be the first time the current owners have misjudged the public mood.

However, Hancock is an arse. Trying to make political capital out of footballers while demonstrating his basic incompetence for his job every time he opens his mouth.

Jamie Carragher also has a track record for talking shite as well, and regularly exposes himself as a bit clueless.

Meanwhile, Jordan Henderson is doing less talking and more getting on with stuff:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/apr/03/liverpool-jordan-henderson-sets-up-premier-league-coronavirus-fund-for-nhs
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 05 April, 2020, 11:49:35 am
The thing is that the Premier league clubs don't live hand to mouth, and could afford to cover the cost of the staff they have furloughed without access to the scheme. There was a "Price of Football" podcast where they basically said that the amount of money Spurs would save by using the furlough scheme for 3 months was slightly smaller than the bonus that Daniel Levy got paid (as announced in the accounts 1 day before the furlough announcement). It might be normal business practise, but it is a terrible PR move. Likewise, the vast majority of premier league players could take a sizeable pay cut and not be significantly affected.

However, the clubs further down the pyramid live hand-to-mouth, and in many cases the players are paid the sort of money that non-sportspeople earn - they have mortgages and all the normal sort of expenses. These are the people the PFA need to look after when agreeing wage cuts/deferrals (and deferrals aren't much good if you think the club might go bust). So while all these meetings and delays seem excessive, when Barca players (or whoever) have agreed to wage cuts, the situation is much more complex than first meets the eye.
The idea of getting Premier League squads to contribute a portion of their salaries towards coronavirus measures seems like a good one however, much better than the clubs just paying them less (and then banking the money).
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 06 April, 2020, 08:24:59 pm
U-turn - LFC will now just pay the furloughed staff from club funds:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/apr/06/liverpool-reverse-decision-to-furlough-staff-after-fierce-criticism-coronavirus

Lots of fans, local and national press, local authorities and others applied pressure. Should have consulted with them (not the press) before announcing stuff.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 06 April, 2020, 08:51:28 pm
Or could have simply Done The Right Thing.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 07 April, 2020, 08:34:24 am
Or could have simply Done The Right Thing.
That's an interesting statement. Many football clubs will be using this scheme, and it will be a lifeline for many smaller clubs that will stop them going under. At least 4 other premier league clubs have used the scheme (including the one who made the biggest profit last year).

I understand why people hold football clubs to higher standards than other businesses. They are supposed to be part of the community etc. The bit that confuses me is why do we hold some clubs to a higher standard than others? Norwich, Spurs, Bournemouth and Newcastle have had put the staff on this scheme, to almost no noise at all.  And at least one of them (Spurs) is not topping up the wages - they are just paying furloughed staff 80% of their normal salary. No-one expects Newcastle to do anything other than try to save pennies (Mike Ashley), but the other 3 are supposedly bastions of well run clubs with sound owners.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 07 April, 2020, 08:58:31 am
The reason we hold football clubs to higher standards is because of our emotional connection to them. It was mostly Liverpool fans who were clamouring for this decision to be overturned.

John Henry, the owner, is widely perceived as one of the good guys (relatively, for a hedge-fund billionaire). Peter Moore, the chief exec, is a boyhood Liverpool fan, 'one of us'. So Liverpool fans felt betrayed by this action that they felt didn't represent their values. Newcastle fans don't quite have the same relationship with their owner.

The initial decision won't have been taken lightly, and probably was made with expectation of some backlash (given the public reaction to Spurs and Newcastle doing the same). But maybe they didn't anticipate the level of the backlash.

I have mixed feelings about it. Even though Liverpool are one of the world's richest clubs, this situation will be hitting them hard financially, and there will be lasting effects on the business side of things. So I didn't feel quite so strongly as some people about their decision to use the furlough scheme. We also don't know what other measures have been taken - I'm assuming that like many other companies, the board have taken significant pay cuts themselves, they just haven't publicised the fact (and nor should they - they can afford to take the hit so it's nothing to congratulate them for).

But I am glad that they have backtracked and done what is perceived to be the decent thing, and been big enough to make an unequivocal apology for it.

In the long term, I'm hoping this terrible situation forces the whole football industry to recalibrate its values. But I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jakob on 09 April, 2020, 08:56:29 am
John Henry, the owner, is widely perceived as one of the good guys

Yeah,despite also being the owner of the Red Sox (Eurgh), he is actually doing the right thing there:
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2020/03/coronavirus-boston-red-sox-expand-funding-for-ballpark-workers-to-15-million-covering-aramark-employees.html
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: pcolbeck on 25 June, 2020, 09:02:45 am
And their back! Stuttering re-start to the season in the Liverpool derby on Sunday but a 4:0 thrashing of Crystal Palace last night.
Two points needed now from seven games and that's only if Man City win every match they have left.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 25 June, 2020, 09:09:35 am
Three and a half amazing goals!*

* One wasn't half amazing, it was just quite good.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 25 June, 2020, 09:28:19 am
Which one do you think was less than fully amazing?

I thought everything about the all-round performance was fantastic, especially Fabinho's part in it. One of the best of the season, in fact - only behind the Boxing Day game at Leicester, and the two home wins against the Manc clubs.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 25 June, 2020, 09:35:28 am
I think the last one.

But you are right, they were all good!

Which reminds me, I must find a rerun of the Watford - Liverpool match to watch. I missed it live  ;D
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 25 June, 2020, 10:36:42 am
This was off the back of 4 straight wins by Palace, albeit a pandemic ago.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 25 June, 2020, 12:36:53 pm
I think the last one.

But you are right, they were all good!

The finish on the last one was pretty run-of-the-mill by Mané's standards, but the sublime through ball from Salah is what made it special for me.

Quote
Which reminds me, I must find a rerun of the Watford - Liverpool match to watch. I missed it live  ;D

 :hand:
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 25 June, 2020, 01:15:04 pm
I think the last one.

But you are right, they were all good!
The other thing about the last goal is that Mane recovers the loose ball midway inside the Liverpool half (right on the touchline) and starts his run from there.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 25 June, 2020, 01:25:09 pm
The other thing about the last goal is that Mane recovers the loose ball midway inside the Liverpool half (right on the touchline) and starts his run from there.

Yep - Mané to Firmino to Salah to Mané. Beautiful harmony from the front three.

Mané also does well to change the angle of his run to stay onside.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: mattc on 27 June, 2020, 11:57:20 am
Good to see:

https://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/announcements/400082-joint-statement-from-lfc-merseyside-police-and-liverpool-city-council

Throughout the last week, Liverpool Football Club, Merseyside Police, Liverpool City Council and Spirit of Shankly have worked together to consistently remind people that the region is still disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and ask people to celebrate LFC’s Premier League title win safely.

Several thousand people turned up at the Pier Head on Friday June 26 and some chose to ignore the social distancing guidance and risk public safety.

Our city is still in a public health crisis and this behaviour is wholly unacceptable.

The potential danger of a second peak of COVID-19 still exists and we need to work together to make sure we don’t undo everything that has been achieved as a region during lockdown.

When it is safe to do so, we will all work together to arrange a victory parade when everyone can come together to celebrate. Until that time, the safety of our city and our people continues to be our number one priority.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: pcolbeck on 09 July, 2020, 11:55:14 am
So do we thing they will break Manchester City’s record points tally? Nine points needed from the four games left this season, that's tight.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 09 July, 2020, 01:42:42 pm
The games left are
Burnley (h)
Arsenal (a)
Chelsea (h)
Newcastle (a)

As impressive as the current points tally (only dropped 10 of a possible 102) is the fact that they have won all 17 of their home (PL) games this season so far. I see no reason why they can't get 9 points from those games (and 8 would get them 100 points and level with City).
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 09 July, 2020, 02:55:49 pm
Winning all four remaining games is a distinct possibility. Three wins and a draw would be 102 points, which would put Liverpool's two-season aggregate one point ahead of Man City's 198 amassed over the previous two seasons.

The current 92 points is already the sixth-highest title winning total ever - and two of the higher totals are from City's 17-18 and 18-19 seasons, which is mad. Between City and Liverpool, they've raised the bar to ridiculous levels over the past three seasons.

There's a website that rates clubs using an Elo-type scoring system (a reference Wowbagger should get!), and they rate this year's Liverpool as the fourth greatest team of all time.
http://clubelo.com/Stats

The last (and only) team to win all its home games was Sunderland in 1892, when there were only 13 home games in the season (and they lost five of their away games). Incidentally, the same year Liverpool FC was formed.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 09 July, 2020, 03:11:01 pm
Interesting to see Pep Guardiola three times in the top ten with three different teams. They seem to have stats going back to 1939 – I reckon those two figure year formats are going to become ambiguous soon, if they aren't already!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 09 July, 2020, 03:33:28 pm
Interesting to see Pep Guardiola three times in the top ten with three different teams.

But conspicuously no sign of "the Special One"  :P
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 09 July, 2020, 05:24:46 pm
Winning all four remaining games is a distinct possibility. Three wins and a draw would be 102 points, which would put Liverpool's two-season aggregate one point ahead of Man City's 198 amassed over the previous two seasons.

The current 92 points is already the sixth-highest title winning total ever - and two of the higher totals are from City's 17-18 and 18-19 seasons, which is mad. Between City and Liverpool, they've raised the bar to ridiculous levels over the past three seasons.

There's a website that rates clubs using an Elo-type scoring system (a reference Wowbagger should get!), and they rate this year's Liverpool as the fourth greatest team of all time.
http://clubelo.com/Stats

The last (and only) team to win all its home games was Sunderland in 1892, when there were only 13 home games in the season (and they lost five of their away games). Incidentally, the same year Liverpool FC was formed.

Calculating Elo ratings uses a complicated formula and when I was junior organiser for the Essex Chess Association, I managed to get it into a spreadsheet, and it seemed to work pretty well. We had a number of youngsters who were top internationals and one of these, Karl Mah, was playing FIDE rated tournaments from an early age. I was always very pleased that the results he achieved in local tournaments always produced a rating very close the his performance against world class players.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 11 July, 2020, 04:53:48 pm
The last (and only) team to win all its home games was Sunderland in 1892, when there were only 13 home games in the season (and they lost five of their away games). Incidentally, the same year Liverpool FC was formed.

And they'll remain the only team to have won all their home games (I'm guessing that's just the top division).

Points record a bit harder now.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 11 July, 2020, 04:55:10 pm
Yep. Amazing performance by the Burnley keeper today. Can't argue with that.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 16 July, 2020, 07:52:28 am
And the chance of a 100 point season gone now.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 16 July, 2020, 04:07:28 pm
Bizarrely, a lot of Liverpool fans on social media seem to be quite upset by this. Which is insane. It has still been an incredible season.

There was a banner in the stands last night gloating about Arsenal's unbeaten season but that's what they're reduced to these days - living on past glories.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 16 July, 2020, 05:25:04 pm
I think they may already be living on past glories!  A look at the table shows that, apart from Leicester, Newcastle (13th) are the first team you get to who have a worse record since the re-start.  Interesting.  Maybe they are missing Geordie Henderson!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 16 July, 2020, 05:32:37 pm
There's a certain perception that if they had just focused in the last couple of games then they could be on for a 104 point season, which would give them a shout as the greatest season in the history of top flight football. Especially given 97 last year! Likewise, winning all of the home games would have been something for the ages.
I  think it's interesting how the City 100 point season carried on after they won the league. I feel like it illustrates the difference between a City side that dismantled many teams at will, while this LFC team are a bit heavier on intensity, focus and effort, and lighter on elegance and style. I wonder if the intensity would have dropped if Hendo or Milner were fit.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 23 July, 2020, 12:30:48 pm
That game last night could have had about 12 goals!
This seasons home league record - W18, D1.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 23 July, 2020, 01:16:31 pm
That game last night could have had about 12 goals!
This seasons home league record - W18, D1.
A suitably mad game to crown a crazy season. No-one looked happier than Klopp. Who can deny his unbounbing passion for the game.  Great celebrations in our house (including the normally passive cats that had a mad hour to coincide with the ceremony).


Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 23 July, 2020, 01:18:54 pm
It was certainly a terrific game to watch.  Liverpool's opening goal (Keita?) was one of the best I have ever seen.  But I think Chelsea were unlucky that Sadio Mane wasn't sent off for what appeared to me to be a blatant dive, which led to that terrific free kick goal by Arnold.  I saw Mane dive earlier in the season, too and it's disappointing that a manager like Klopp doesn't stop him.  OK, it's a way to get an edge but it leaves a bad taste.  It was a terrific tackle by the Chelsea player who got the ball and not the Mane.  This sort of behaviour penalises skill.

But all the goals were very good, weren't they?  Hard to predict next season.  Liverpool's performance since the restart hasn't been spectacular and Salah looks a trifle slower than we're used to.  But Manchester City are a bit rocky, too.  I think Chelsea may do well, though I think they need to off-load their arrogant and currently ineffective keeper, if only to make it easier for commentators!

As for the behaviour of SOME fans, I'll bowdlerise Shankly:  "Covid is a matter of life and death - football is less important."

Duncan, Liverpool are playing my side at the weekend in the final match.  Could you ask them to declare at half-time, please?

Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 23 July, 2020, 02:51:39 pm
The first one was Keita, and it's kinda what we were expecting from his time in Germany - pressing high and driving at the defence. Long may it continue. In defence of Mane, while the Chelsea player got the ball with his foot, he landed on Mane's ankle with his arse hard enough to twist it over a bit. I never liked the way that the likes of Owen would dive (knock it past, trail a leg, fall over as soon as that leg touches something), but the way the game is refereed these days you get penalised for staying on your feet. If someone booted you over the stand but you landed on your feet and ran back in, the ref wouldn't give a foul. The commentators reference it a lot, especially with regard to cards and players getting straight back up or staying on their feet after violent conduct, and it drives me nuts.

As for the weekend, we've been giving gifts in our last few matches - maybe it's a good day to play us. There's nothing riding on it for either club, so it wil be interesting to see how they approach it.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 23 July, 2020, 03:04:21 pm
Cheers, Duncan, I'll thank you for the gifts now - in case they don't materialise on the day!   I may have had one anyway because there is a rumour The Lads won't be bought by the Saudi assassins!  So we might end up with an honest owner - just like everyone else!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 23 July, 2020, 04:58:01 pm
But I think Chelsea were unlucky that Sadio Mane wasn't sent off for what appeared to me to be a blatant dive

Give over. I expect better of you, Peter.

The first offence was the hack on Mane's ankles by the Chelsea player, and the free kick was the correct decision.

The furore over that incident typifies what this season has been like for Salah and Mane - they get no favours from refs, despite constantly having lumps hacked out of them. So they sometimes go to ground to help the ref make the right decision. And get a reputation as divers because of it. It's because of dickhead refs like Atkinson and Marriner who "like to let the game flow" that the more agricultural players get away with so much foul play against Salah and Mane - which, to be fair, is their only option given that they are totally outclassed skills-wise.

Doesn't help when you get pundits like Shearer being totally two-faced about diving. On one occasion he might say "the defender has given him an excuse to go down", on another it will be "it's a contact sport, you have to stay on your feet". Strangely, he never says the former when it's a Liverpool player. Some might suspect him of bias.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 23 July, 2020, 05:10:59 pm
D, I only have a very small screen and I never have the sound on, because I have the same opinion of pundits as you but am therefore not prejudiced by them.  If I get a chance to see it again, possibly on yer tube, I'll happily retract if you are right!  However, there did seem to be enough time for Mane to think, "Hang on, what is it I'm supposed to do in this situation?  Oh, I remember....."

I agree with your general point about nifty players being subjected to the Leeds Chop, which should not be confused with anything perpetrated by Ron Harris or Tommy Smith!

Edit:  Hmmmm.  Just watched the Lampard interview.  I know you might expect him to say that but he was a lot closer than any of us (except the ref., natch!)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 23 July, 2020, 05:33:25 pm
It was a tackle from behind and in that circumstance if you catch the player at all it is a free kick. Mane's scream and the referees hesitation might have swayed some people but it was the correct decision. I would have thought that Lampard would have known the rules but he has to defend his player.

The keeper didn't have too much chance with the free kick, it was going into the top corner but which one? He couldn't cover them both
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 23 July, 2020, 05:35:15 pm
However, there did seem to be enough time for Mane to think, "Hang on, what is it I'm supposed to do in this situation?  Oh, I remember....."

I'm not saying Mane didn't make the most of it. My point is that the first and greater offence was the hack by the Chelsea player on Mane's ankles.

If it had been a different player, many pundits would say he was justified in going to ground for that, but for some reason the pundits never see it that way when it's Mane.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 23 July, 2020, 05:36:36 pm
I would have thought that Lampard would have known the rules but he has to defend his player.

I have no axe to grind with Lampard's reaction. It's only right that managers defend their players.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 23 July, 2020, 05:38:29 pm
I would have thought that Lampard would have known the rules but he has to defend his player.

I have no axe to grind with Lampard's reaction. It's only right that managers defend their players.

Absolutely
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 23 July, 2020, 05:43:55 pm
Anyway, I'm a Liverpool fan, I've got nothing to moan about. Life is good.

Peter, I don't much care about the result on Sunday - I could even take a defeat, as long as Salah gets a goal to match Roger Hunt's record of scoring 20+ in the league in three consecutive seasons. He's still agonisingly one short...
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 23 July, 2020, 05:51:47 pm
Anyway, I'm a Liverpool fan, I've got nothing to moan about. Life is good.

Peter, I don't much care about the result on Sunday - I could even take a defeat, as long as Salah gets a goal to match Roger Hunt's record of scoring 20+ in the league in three consecutive seasons. He's still agonisingly one short...

Who'd have thought it?!

Yes, it only has academic interest on Saturday, although I'd like to see Andy Carroll get on the scoresheet.  Also, Salah has been a terrific player but I'd like to see the record stay in English hands!  (By the way, Mane is also a terrific player and a not inconsiderable gymnast!)

Then it's all over ….. for a week!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 23 August, 2020, 09:50:48 pm
I understand that if Bayern Munich win the European Cup, Barcelona will owe Liverpool €5m.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 23 August, 2020, 10:43:31 pm
The rumour was that the clause was player-related rather than club-related but the Echo are now reporting that it’s bollocks.

Not sure if it has been confirmed either way.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 24 August, 2020, 11:09:46 am
The only portion of the transfer fee left unpaid is about 5 mill if Coutinho makes 90 appearences for Barca (He's currently on 75, Lets hope the new manager likes him). There was a clause triggering payouts every time Barca reached the CL semi final stage which have been paid.

The interesting clause which I didn't know about until recently was one stopping Barca signing any more Liverpool players (or having to pay a hefty premium) until 2020.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 02 November, 2020, 12:48:19 pm
Current table makes interesting reading:-

Liverpool top - with the worst defensive record in the division; 15 conceded.  7 of those were against Aston Villa and Saint Van Dijk, the "world's greatest defender ever" was playing for Liverpool.  It's going to be an interesting season, though I suspect it may be abandoned when the authorities finally realise what an appalling example sportsmen are setting with their cuddling and snogging!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 02 November, 2020, 02:00:45 pm
The players are inside their own bubbles, though right? So in Covid terms, it's the same as hugging their family.

In terms of the table, we have a small sample size problem. Everton and Southampton would be in the Champions league, and Man U are 6 points off the relegation zone!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 02 November, 2020, 02:05:30 pm
Yes, it's much less boring, isn't it!

Regarding the snogging, I'm not so sure how effective the sports "bubbles" are: all sorts of games are getting cancelled with players being ill.  And all sorts of people in families are getting covid, too.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 02 November, 2020, 02:21:11 pm
Several Liverpool players have been confirmed as having had covid, and there are a few more suspected but unconfirmed. I imagine it's much the same across other teams. Given the amount of travel involved and close contact with other people, it seems inevitable that players will continue to get it, however careful they are in training and off duty.

Cristiano Ronaldo has tested positive three times. Rumours abound that Lionel Messi is trying to catch it four times to outdo him.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 02 November, 2020, 06:48:25 pm
 Good one!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 02 November, 2020, 07:18:46 pm
Several Liverpool players have been confirmed as having had covid, and there are a few more suspected but unconfirmed.

Can't see anything online about this.  Got a link?
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 03 November, 2020, 08:05:12 am
Several Liverpool players have been confirmed as having had covid, and there are a few more suspected but unconfirmed.

Can't see anything online about this.  Got a link?
Shaquiri got first, Keita and Tiago tested positive for covid around the last international break https://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/first-team/410566-thiago-alcantara-tests-positive-for-covid-19 , and Mane missed the Villa game with covid https://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/first-team/411091-sadio-mane-tests-positive-for-covid-19.
If you google the name and covid then you can find all the details. International games feel like even more rolling of the dice than normal club games.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 03 November, 2020, 09:12:06 am
Shaquiri got first

Not officially. During the summer, Shaqiri seemed to go missing from the club's training camp for a spell and there were rumours it was covid, but no reason was ever announced. He has more recently had a confirmed positive test while on international duty with Switzerland.

The thing is, the club can only confirm it's covid with the player's consent, and not all players may be happy for that information to be made public. Origi is another who went missing for a while with no explanation. You can see this happening at other clubs as well.

Ajax, who played Liverpool in the Champions League two weeks ago, currently have 11 players out with covid.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 03 November, 2020, 09:15:48 am
Liverpool top - with the worst defensive record in the division; 15 conceded.  7 of those were against Aston Villa and Saint Van Dijk, the "world's greatest defender ever" was playing for Liverpool.

Just to get back to actual football, did you watch the Villa game? It was insane. Probably the most ridiculously open game of football I have ever seen. Villa could easily have got into double figures if their finishing had been better, and Liverpool should have bagged half a dozen goals themselves, despite being absolutely dreadful in all areas of the pitch.

Kind of nice to see evidence that Van Dijk is actually human and not some mad football cyborg sent back from the future.  ;D
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 03 November, 2020, 09:41:13 am
Ah OK.  Past tense.  You had me worried that they would be missing half their squad for the next few matches  :o ;D
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 03 November, 2020, 10:05:38 am
Ah OK.  Past tense.  You had me worried that they would be missing half their squad for the next few matches  :o ;D

The worry is that this could happen at any time - exactly as it has for Ajax.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 03 November, 2020, 01:39:48 pm
Ajax, who played Liverpool in the Champions League two weeks ago, currently have 11 players out with covid.
That could make a huge difference to the Champions League. They won 13-0 in the Eredivisie very recently, but if they have a load of players out they will find Midjtyland a lot harder (and they aren't bad).
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: pcolbeck on 06 November, 2020, 03:07:18 pm
Current table makes interesting reading:-

Liverpool top - with the worst defensive record in the division; 15 conceded.  7 of those were against Aston Villa and Saint Van Dijk, the "world's greatest defender ever" was playing for Liverpool.  It's going to be an interesting season, though I suspect it may be abandoned when the authorities finally realise what an appalling example sportsmen are setting with their cuddling and snogging!

Most teams seem to have forgotten how to defend this season. The number of goals has been ridiculous.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 06 November, 2020, 03:27:38 pm
No pre-season means that the defensive structures haven't been as well organised. It's an interesting question as to whether the absence of crowds has made a difference...
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 06 November, 2020, 04:51:22 pm
The absence of crowds is probably a red herring introduced to try and explain away these crazy results without having to admit that these hitherto invincible players are actually nothing special.  After all, ALL teams are playing without crowds, so that should even out.  Perhaps the way to decide about crowds might be to study the Scottish lower divisions, where absence of crowds is normal at all times.  I wonder if their results are noticeably different under covid, but it's too tedious to allow of analysis!

One thing is certain, though: Liverpool's foreign legion certainly haven't forgotten how to score!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 06 November, 2020, 04:59:28 pm
Perhaps the way to decide about crowds might be to study the Scottish lower divisions, where absence of crowds is normal at all times.

There was a surreal televised game a few years ago between Rangers (relegated and fighting their way back up through the leagues) and Brechin City.  There were a few locals standing by the sideline on a bleak Scottish winter's afternoon and there was some choice language (thenceforth known as Brechinese) when Rangers players were taking throw-ins or corners just inches away, all picked up on the live broadcast mics.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 06 November, 2020, 07:01:13 pm
"Brechinese" - superb!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Mr Larrington on 06 November, 2020, 07:06:43 pm
Perhaps the way to decide about crowds might be to study the Scottish lower divisions, where absence of crowds is normal at all times.

There was a surreal televised game a few years ago between Rangers (relegated and fighting their way back up through the leagues) and Brechin City.  There were a few locals standing by the sideline on a bleak Scottish winter's afternoon and there was some choice language (thenceforth known as Brechinese) when Rangers players were taking throw-ins or corners just inches away, all picked up on the live broadcast mics.

A pitch-side mike at the 1982 World Cup once caught a heavily Scottish voice shouting “Archibald, yer a fuckin' wanker!” as Steve of that ilk was about to take a throw-in.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: hatler on 07 November, 2020, 02:59:38 am
Just to get back to actual football, did you watch the Villa game? It was insane. Probably the most ridiculously open game of football I have ever seen. Villa could easily have got into double figures if their finishing had been better, and Liverpool should have bagged half a dozen goals themselves, despite being absolutely dreadful in all areas of the pitch.

Kind of nice to see evidence that Van Dijk is actually human and not some mad football cyborg sent back from the future.  ;D

Stupidly bonkers that game.

As my poor brother noted (we're both long-suffering Spurs fans) "Fooking 'ell, what are the chances of the Spurs beating Man U 6 - 1 at Old Trafford and not being first on Match of the Day ?"
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 07 November, 2020, 11:11:45 am
One aspect of the lack of crowds is that players and coaches are able to comunicate better with each other.* Whether that favours defence over attack is another question.

Also a lot of teams have taken up the "defend high up the pitch and press even higher" philosophy" with varying degrees of success. Done well this gets a lot of goals. If it all goes wrong the opposition get goals as per the Villa match.

* gives the commentators a work out as well. In one match I watched last weekend there was a loud shout from the pitchside followed by the commentator saying "sorry for that if any of you speak portugese"
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 07 November, 2020, 11:49:14 am
Also a lot of teams have taken up the "defend high up the pitch and press even higher" philosophy" with varying degrees of success. Done well this gets a lot of goals. If it all goes wrong the opposition get goals as per the Villa match.

The goal that Man U conceded against Istanbul Basaksehir on Wednesday is a good example, see this image:-

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/800/cpsprodpb/1506/production/_115228350_bt.png)

That's all 10 outfield Man U players in the opposition half and Demba Ba[1] (now Basaksehir's centre forward) the nearest to the Man U goal by a good 10 yards or so.

1. Yes, sorry Liverpool fans, *that* Demba Ba. This one. (https://talksport.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/10/slip171014v2.jpg?strip=all&w=700&quality=100)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 07 November, 2020, 12:09:15 pm
The absence of crowds is probably a red herring introduced to try and explain away these crazy results without having to admit that these hitherto invincible players are actually nothing special.  After all, ALL teams are playing without crowds, so that should even out.  Perhaps the way to decide about crowds might be to study the Scottish lower divisions, where absence of crowds is normal at all times.  I wonder if their results are noticeably different under covid, but it's too tedious to allow of analysis!
I'm not saying that the presence or absence of a crowd is responsible for Liverpool conceding 7 or Utd conceding 6 or Citeh conceding 5 or any of the other high scoring results. Last year Southampton conceded 9, and they were actually pretty good.
I just think that the crowd inducts emotion into the players, and emotion means that you make different decisions. It can influence how a player feels about taking risks. You see it all the time (most often with younger players) - as players get abuse they take fewer and fewer risks because they know what happens if they do something wrong. Playing without fear and doing what your boss has told you to do is a lot easier when 30,000 people aren't yelling at you for doing it wrong.
Put yourself in the scenario as a fan - your team is 3-0 up, pouring forward like they have all game, and get caught on the break and it's 3-1. If you are expecting to win the game, you probably think it's time to get #4. If you aren't expecting to win the game, you just want it all be be over and get to the end at 3-1. Crowds communicate that sort of thing very effectively to the players - you can hear it happen.  The tension suddenly rises, and what was a cruise to victory becomes all panicy. You can also hear when teams are playing badly, the crowd will get on their back and further inhibit them - Everton are a good example of this over quite a few years.
Alternatively, look at goal celebrations - players involve fans (when they are in the stadia) when they score because of the emotion pouring down from the stands.
You can't draw a conclusion by comparing with lower league teams, because those players are used to not having (significant) crowds, and don't feed off the emotion like the top level players do.

Fundamentally for Villa (strange how we're still talking about that), I think it was an issue about the front half of the team not working in concert with the back half (and neither with the goalkeeper). The back half were playing as if they had a sweeper keeper, and pressure on the ball. The front half weren't pressing, either because they were confused as to who to press or because they weren't thinking they were supposed to press. If you're high, with a stay-at-home 'keeper and no pressure on the ball, they are going to get in behind time after time.

And that picture is astonishing. Ole called it schoolboy, but if that happened in a schoolboy game you're wondering about the coaching. Also, no fans means that Ole (+staff) should have been yelling at whichever defender was last man not to wander. And there's no pressure on the ball either.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 07 November, 2020, 04:23:57 pm
The goal that Man U conceded against Istanbul Basaksehir on Wednesday is a good example, see this image:-

That really is not a good example of the high press - it's more an example of a team in total disarray. Their defending was absolutely shocking in that game.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Greenbank on 07 November, 2020, 05:06:04 pm
The goal that Man U conceded against Istanbul Basaksehir on Wednesday is a good example, see this image:-

That really is not a good example of the high press - it's more an example of a team in total disarray. Their defending was absolutely shocking in that game.

Well, yes, that was the joke.

(And an excuse to bring up Demba Ba in a Liverpool thread...)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 07 November, 2020, 08:39:58 pm
Well, yes, that was the joke.

Sorry! Slow on the uptake today.

Quote
(And an excuse to bring up Demba Ba in a Liverpool thread...)

I just ignored that bit.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 13 November, 2020, 08:03:13 am
Anyone play centre back and got their boots with them?
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 13 November, 2020, 09:02:46 am
The scouts will be working overtime. Let's hope they pick up more bargains in the January sales!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 13 November, 2020, 09:11:14 am
Nah, give Billy Koumetio a run out. Only 17 but looks like he would put the fear of god into the average Premier League striker.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 13 November, 2020, 10:27:41 am
Nah, give Billy Koumetio a run out. Only 17 but looks like he would put the fear of god into the average Premier League striker.
He's a real prospect, but you don't want to play him alongside another youngster. A back 4 of Neco Williams, Rhys Williams, Nat Philips and Andy Robertson looks like a league cup lineup. And Robbo needs a rest too. I've not included Matip, because he managed a total of 13 appearances last season (that's appearances, not starts). If he or Fab are fit it looks a bit better, but I reckon we'll be seeing Milner at fullback and a CM at CB a few times in the next couple of  months.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 13 November, 2020, 10:38:32 am
Rhys Williams looks the absolute business already. I'd be confident playing him against most forward lines in the premier league, or even Europe.

Koumetio is an unknown proposition, but in all seriousness, I'd rather see the club give the youngsters a chance than sign some ageing free agent who was deemed surplus to requirements at Watford.

Watford!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 13 November, 2020, 01:16:41 pm
Agreed that it wouldn't be a good idea to sign an indifferent stop-gap defender, but that's not the way Lpool do things these days.  They will pay top dollar for a long-term signing, and their recent signings have all been fantastic both ability-wise and financially.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 13 November, 2020, 01:22:32 pm
Agreed that it wouldn't be a good idea to sign an indifferent stop-gap defender, but that's not the way Lpool do things these days.  They will pay top dollar for a long-term signing, and their recent signings have all been fantastic both ability-wise and financially.

They can't do that until January at the earliest though. Question is whether or not to make a short-term signing to cover the immediate shortage, which means a free agent.

If the answer is "Daryl Janmaat", you're probably asking the wrong question.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 13 November, 2020, 02:02:16 pm
If the answer is "Daryl Janmaat", you're probably asking the wrong question.
Especially since he's an indifferent right back! :)

Rhys Williams will have to play in Europe - Phillips and any newly signed player wouldn't be eligible for the Chapions league until the knockout stages.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 13 November, 2020, 04:37:49 pm
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54935734 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54935734)

FFS  ::-)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: DuncanM on 13 November, 2020, 06:16:11 pm
Missing Leicester is a bit of a pain, but if he only misses that and Atalanta, it's not soo bad...
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 13 February, 2023, 10:12:01 pm
I read a few minutes ago that tonight's win v Everton is the 250th since Klopp became manager, and of all Liverpool's managers, he's got to that target in the fewest games (414).

On current form, it will take him a lot longer to get to 500.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 14 February, 2023, 09:38:34 am
Form is temporary

Class is permanent


Good to get a win though. Now need to take advantage of the players coming back from injury and salvage something from the rest of the season.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 05 March, 2023, 06:41:45 pm
Good grief!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 05 March, 2023, 06:44:37 pm
Just watched that.

Much fun!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 05 March, 2023, 07:01:05 pm
The ref was feeling sorry for the MUFC's towards the end and let a lot of fouls go - inc. Fernandez hitting the linesman in a fit of petulance.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Snakehips on 05 March, 2023, 09:53:48 pm
Fernandez hitting the linesman in a fit of petulance.
Could this not be reviewed retrospectively? And indeed, should it not be?
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 05 March, 2023, 10:07:48 pm
Fernandez hitting the linesman in a fit of petulance.
Could this not be reviewed retrospectively? And indeed, should it not be?

Certainly should be.  Fernandez is one of the biggest brats in the premier league - and that's saying something.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 11 March, 2023, 08:04:54 pm
After the Lord Mayor's Show...
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: PeteB99 on 12 March, 2023, 12:11:42 pm
From Mr Kipling (not the cakes guy)

If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same:

Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 13 March, 2023, 12:37:43 am
Only obliquely about Liverpool, but topical:-

from the BBC's report of Newcastle's game against Wolves:  "Magpies ended a run of three straight defeats in all competitions to leapfrog Liverpool into fifth on goal difference"

If they'd had a Gary Lineker to ask he would have been able to tell them that in fact Newcastle are two points above Liverpool and with a game in hand.  At least they are according to the BBC's table.

Also, I wonder if anybody checked for unusual betting activity over Liverpool's games with Manchester United and Bournemouth?!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 13 March, 2023, 11:25:17 am
That would implicate Mr. Klopp, which I find most unlikely.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 13 March, 2023, 11:38:24 am
It wouldn't necessarily have anything to do with Klopp. Far easier to fix it with a couple of key players, say de Gea and Salah. But I can't say the Bournemouth result looks dodgy really. Upsets do happen.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 14 March, 2023, 12:35:28 am
I wasn't really being serious - after all, this isn't cricket we're talking about!  Although I am old enough to remember the Tony Kay scandal.  Actually, speaking of cricket, New Zealand have just pulled off their second last-ball win in only 2 or 3 games, I think.  That's not unusual in short-order games but very rare in Test Matches.  But strange things do happen, obviously.  I mean, England beat Italy at the rugby.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: andyoxon on 07 June, 2023, 06:00:31 pm
So why exactly is the Liverpool Man City/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

ETA.   :P
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 07 June, 2023, 06:04:42 pm
So why exactly is the Liverpool/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

If only  ;D  I think you'll find it's a certain other English team.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Mr Larrington on 07 June, 2023, 06:08:13 pm
They pick the venue for European finals ages in advance.  See for e.g. 2020 when two BRITISH teams were obliged to travel to Portugal at the height of Teh Plague.  Though they did move one from St Petersburg last year.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 07 June, 2023, 06:09:16 pm
So why exactly is the Liverpool/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

If only  ;D  I think you'll find it's a certain other English team.
West Ham v Dukla Prague Away Kit in Fiorentina?
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 07 June, 2023, 06:12:58 pm
So why exactly is the Liverpool/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

If only  ;D  I think you'll find it's a certain other English team.
West Ham v Dukla Prague Away Kit in Fiorentina?

In a really small stadium, tonight.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: andyoxon on 07 June, 2023, 07:40:40 pm
So why exactly is the Liverpool/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

If only  ;D  I think you'll find it's a certain other English team.

yes, oops.   :)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 08 June, 2023, 12:01:29 am
So why exactly is the Liverpool/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

If only  ;D  I think you'll find it's a certain other English team.
West Ham v Dukla Prague Away Kit in Fiorentina?

The good news is that Liverpool won!
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 08 June, 2023, 10:54:51 am
So why exactly is the Liverpool/Inter Champions League final in Turkey?  That's a lot of extra travelling miles/hassle...

If only  ;D  I think you'll find it's a certain other English team.
West Ham v Dukla Prague Away Kit in Fiorentina?

The good news is that Liverpool won!
A magnificent goal from Gerrard Bowen, taking away the pain of Steven Jarrod's goal that cost them last season's Big Cup of England. That's last season 17 years ago.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 26 January, 2024, 04:56:59 pm
I see that Herr Klopp is to leave Liverpool at the end of the season.  I fully understand his reasons.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: drossall on 26 January, 2024, 05:26:58 pm
So will it be the Kop or the opposition fans who will be giving us adaptations of "The leaving of Liverpool" for the rest of the season?
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: John Stonebridge on 26 January, 2024, 10:45:09 pm
Or perhaps a chorus of that old Bee gees classic "Mass o' chew sets" to serenade Herr Klopp off?   

I can see either (a) him being persuaded to stay on a bit a la Sir Alex or (b) being brought back sharpish if his replacement isn't a rip roaring success. 
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Peter on 27 January, 2024, 05:07:22 pm
More likely to be heading for the national side, I think, if he stays in the game at all.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Wowbagger on 27 January, 2024, 06:22:35 pm
If it's the constant pressure that's getting to him, then he will take a break from the game for a while.
Title: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 28 January, 2024, 01:33:31 pm
I can see either (a) him being persuaded to stay on a bit a la Sir Alex or (b) being brought back sharpish if his replacement isn't a rip roaring success.

Nah. He’s not the type to go back. If he does ever return to management, it won’t be in England. German national team does seem the most likely option.

A lot of Man United’s current problems are down to not having proper succession planning in place when Ferguson retired. I’ve also seen it suggested that Ferguson deliberately “salted the ground” to ensure his replacement wasn’t a success. Which is an interesting theory.

Circumstances are very different at Liverpool. They are run very differently. It will be a clean break. Klopp has already explicitly stated that he will have no say in appointing his replacement.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 28 January, 2024, 01:54:05 pm
A lot of Man United’s current problems are down to not having proper succession planning in place when Ferguson retired. I’ve also seen it suggested that Ferguson deliberately “salted the ground” to ensure his replacement wasn’t a success. Which is an interesting theory.

The spent months prepping for Moyes' takeover.  Mind you this may have included Ferguson's man-traps!  I've always suspected that MU's subsequent demise (right up to the present) is in part due to the red-nosed one's omnipresence and meddling with whoever is in charge.  Can't be a pleasant experience.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 28 January, 2024, 01:54:18 pm

A lot of Man United’s current problems are down to not having proper succession planning in place when Ferguson retired. I’ve also seen it suggested that Ferguson deliberately “salted the ground” to ensure his replacement wasn’t a success. Which is an interesting theory.

They spent months prepping for Moyes' takeover.  Mind you this may have included Ferguson's man-traps!  I've always suspected that MU's subsequent demise (right up to the present) is in part due to the red-nosed one's omnipresence and meddling with whoever is in charge.  Can't be a pleasant experience.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 28 January, 2024, 03:25:09 pm
The spent months prepping for Moyes' takeover.

Ferguson had to postpone his original retirement plans because the club just weren’t prepared for it to happen.

They still don’t look like they’ve come to terms with the loss 10 years later.
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: farfetched on 01 February, 2024, 10:09:20 am

You might even argue that Man Utd have never been a well run club, after Matt Busby left they even went down to the old Div2 in the early 70's
after which they never really competed for titles until the 90's. In those days much smaller clubs (Leeds, Villa, Derby, Notts Forest) all went on to win the league
and on occasion even the European cup.

So in that respect the last 10 years look like normal service has been resumed.... Perhaps Fergie was a genius.

With respect to Klopp, I remember when Shankly left (was also a shock at that time) commentators said it would be the beginning of the end and we
all know what Bob Paisley went on to achieve. Stable management and good ownership is as important as to what is on the field. (See Chelsea)
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: toontra on 25 February, 2024, 07:24:31 pm
Yeeeessss!  Moral and actual victory  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: Jaded on 25 February, 2024, 10:03:04 pm
 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Liverpool
Post by: citoyen on 25 February, 2024, 11:08:39 pm
You’ll never win anything with kids!