I can't follow!
I borrowed the logic of "Lance has never been found guilty of doping but we'll assume he's
probably guilty anyway".
Using that logic it's fair to say that all the great cyclists were
probably guilty. The French riders that you say were clean, were not in fact clean, they were
probably doping and
probably found a way around the tests.
Pretty soon anyone who wins at any sport will
probably be guilty of doping. I don't want to start along those lines.
If he's found guilty of doping by the ruling bodies that be then let me know, he'll go right down in my estimation.
Until then he's a great cyclist and I honestly couldn't care less what his personality is like. He's just some sporting legend who I'm never going to meet socially, why would I care if he's kind to kittens or not?
Nigel Mansell is a right old Cnut apparently but I can still admire him for winning an F1 title. I think you may need to be a right old Cnut to head an F1 team or a TdF team, there are so many people gunning for your position that it may be necessary to be totally self-centered.
Incidentally I've never seen an interview with Lance where he came across as anything other than professional and business-like so I can't even say he seems like a Cnut.