Author Topic: fugly or Phwoar?  (Read 5571 times)

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: fugly or Phwoar?
« Reply #50 on: 19 March, 2017, 09:16:13 am »
This company isn't aiming downmarket/ to be the cheapest.
http://www.bmc-switzerland.com/int-en/about/
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

ian

Re: fugly or Phwoar?
« Reply #51 on: 19 March, 2017, 01:22:35 pm »
Doesn't the water just come out of the side with mudguards like that? I have proper mudguards (SKS) and water still sluices from under the sides when it's really wet and I'm turning.

It doesn't look that bad, just impractical and at a laughable price point. My skinny hybrid commuter (a Ridgeback Flight 1 of fine vintage) cost about £400. Even adding disk brakes and a hub gears surely wouldn't add that much. I do need to probably buy a new all-weather commuting bike as the converted MTB I currently use most of the time is making more and more ominous groaning noises. It wouldn't be this. Something cheap and cheerful with mudguards, a rack etc. that I can lock up outside without worrying about. What's the point of having a utility bike that you leave anywhere?

Torslanda

  • Professional Gobshite
  • Just a tart for retro kit . . .
    • John's Bikes
Re: fugly or Phwoar?
« Reply #52 on: 19 March, 2017, 08:07:10 pm »
BMC appear to have some funny ideas about design.

I recently replaced the lower headset bearing on one. Integrated and oversize. Absolutely no weatherproofing and not even a crown race. A proprietary bearing that sits directly on the flare of the steerer. Looked all wrong to me...
VELOMANCER

Well that's the more blunt way of putting it but as usual he's dead right.