Author Topic: A question of engineering.  (Read 5051 times)

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #50 on: 16 March, 2011, 12:51:36 pm »
Alison is quite hot, but needs some protection.

It is simpler than it looks.

Valiant

  • aka Sam
    • Radiance Audio
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #51 on: 16 March, 2011, 01:02:29 pm »
Pfft Alison got replaced by Jess

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.

Support Equilibrium

Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #52 on: 16 March, 2011, 01:10:07 pm »
(Apologies for bad 'shopping...)

Alison is quite hot, but needs some protection.



For the live show?
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #53 on: 16 March, 2011, 01:25:07 pm »
It is simpler than it looks.

fuzzy

Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #54 on: 16 March, 2011, 02:35:37 pm »
Sam,

To counteract the possible front topple, how about reversing the triangle bracket and stepping the cabs back to move the cog back and stabilise?

In effect, the speaver stack will step away from the crowd.

fuzzy

Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #55 on: 16 March, 2011, 02:37:35 pm »
Fuzzy, WTF is a speaver stack. Have you been looking at the pictures and getting spoonerisms?

 ::-)

Valiant

  • aka Sam
    • Radiance Audio
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #56 on: 16 March, 2011, 02:41:33 pm »
Trouble is then I have to delay the speaker stacks via processing :(
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.

Support Equilibrium

fuzzy

Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #57 on: 16 March, 2011, 03:01:18 pm »
Would it make that noticeable difference?

I live and learn.

Valiant

  • aka Sam
    • Radiance Audio
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #58 on: 16 March, 2011, 03:07:06 pm »
For the sound no but it is an extra level of complexity especially when using things like front and side fills etc.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.

Support Equilibrium

fuzzy

Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #59 on: 16 March, 2011, 03:17:42 pm »
Right. Got ya.

Zipperhead

  • The cyclist formerly known as Big Helga
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #60 on: 16 March, 2011, 05:12:58 pm »
Why is Alison wearing a cycling helmet? If one of those cabs falls on her, it won't help much.  ;D
Won't somebody think of the hamsters!

David Martin

  • Thats Dr Oi You thankyouverymuch
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #61 on: 18 March, 2011, 11:46:46 am »
The butterfly clamp idea sounds like a winner. If you have an integrated hinge along the front, then use a double ended butterfly clamp (or something similar - an idea is looming in my mind..) that won't stick out in transit, then you are sorted.

To avoid the balance issue, what is the problem with having a second small empty enclosure on the back of the lower cab into which you place copious ballast such as stage weights or sandbags?) Two to four 1/2 cwt stage weights on each cab would stop them toppling too much.

..d
"By creating we think. By living we learn" - Patrick Geddes

Valiant

  • aka Sam
    • Radiance Audio
Re: A question of engineering.
« Reply #62 on: 18 March, 2011, 01:12:29 pm »
It's already a big and heavy cab lol
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.

Support Equilibrium