I mistakenly had my 705 set to record every second last week on a 200km. I had it powered rom my Portapow equivalent. After 8.5 hours of recording it started telling me that I was getting further away from my destination. I stopped to check the power connection and disconnected the battery. The machine rebooted and I had to re-load the gpxx for directions. It then behaved properly on directions, but only showed the time accumulating from the time it rebooted, forgetting the original 8.5 hours. The distance recorded was right for the whole ride.
Back home the whole ride was there, but in two laps.
Jaded
I always record on the every second basis and now and then I get a 'getting further away' reading, but I don't think it's caused by 'every second'.
I think it's triggered by going 'off route' and the Garmin thereafter calculates your remaining distance to end as if you are going to go back and ride through the bit you missed. (Even if you click 'no' when it asks if you want to recalculate). The following happened last weekend.
I rode to Southampton on a DIYxGPS, using a route I plotted on Bikeroutetoaster - stayed overnight - next day did New Forest Onshore Offshore - stayed another night - next day rode back home, again on DIYxGPS, using the
BikeHike reversed version of the outward route. However Bike Hike 'reverse' doesn't readjust one way system bits, so I had to navigate a slightly different route through Frome, and from there the Garmin was thereafter plotting an ever increasing distance home.
The cure maybe is to have a perfect route every time, but we are only human... Interesting to note that reloading the route put it right, though you are bound to get an extra lap if the machine was turned off. The total time should have been correct, but maybe you are showing 'lap' time' ? It takes mine up to ten minutes to reload, and doesn't seem to be able to reload if I am riding as well, so tend to put up with the distance to go issues - after all I knew how far the journey was going to be when I started, so it is only a bit of mental arithmatic to work out the remainder...
Anyone else agree with this, or have I made 2 + 2 = 17 ?