Yet Another Cycling Forum

General Category => Audax => Topic started by: LittleWheelsandBig on 08 September, 2010, 03:25:42 pm

Title: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 08 September, 2010, 03:25:42 pm
While wandering through the ACP website today, I found the Super Randonnee (http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/index.php?showpage=421) webpage.

"Super Randonnées are a new category of rides organized by the Audax Club Parisien.

Super Randonnées are mountainous Permanents of 600 km (373 miles) with over 10.000 m (32.800 ft) of elevation gain.

Because of the higher level of difficulty, the time limit has been extended to 50 hours, corresponding to a minimum average speed of 12 km/h (7.45 mph).
Riders can also choose to ride a Super Randonnée as a Tourist. The requirement for Tourists is to complete the route with consecutive daily minimum riding distances of 80 km (i.e. seven days at most)."

Skimming the rules, there is a requirement to take pictures of your bicycle at summit signs along the way.

Having read the ACP's webpage, the Italian 600 km brevet (http://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=37358.0) planned for next year makes more sense, with a 40 hr BRM option or a 50 hr Super Randonnee option
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: mattc on 08 September, 2010, 05:42:38 pm
Hmmm, sensible. (Are any of our 600s over 10k - I think the well-known ones are around 8-9k?) 50h sounds much more doable for us 'less gifted' types.

Allows for a nice lunchtime/elevenses start too - start without sleep debt, finish in daylight, a few hours afterwards to get home (or at least have a nap before a nice dinner at one's hotel) :)

But isn't that Italian ride a calendar event? Or are the rules somewhat elastic on this point? And will it be a qualifier in 50h mode (seems unlikely) ?
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 08 September, 2010, 05:44:05 pm
The Italian ride is a calendar event but the "Super Randonnee" option is obviously the same concept.

BRM option is 40 hrs, 50 hrs wouldn't be a PBP qualifier (or for other international events or awards).
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Weirdy Biker on 08 September, 2010, 06:01:14 pm
I'm guessing it would be extremely difficult to get over 10,000m climbing over 600km in the UK.

Not impossible though, if pro-rating the Maniac's 17AAA by 60% is a yardstick.  And Colin Bezant's Cambrian 6A almost qualifies with 9.5AAA.

Not sure it would be much fun in the UK though.  On the continent, probably fantastic.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: kcass on 09 September, 2010, 12:07:53 am
The Italian/Mont Blanc one is starting to look quite tempting.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: simonp on 09 September, 2010, 01:16:49 am
I'm guessing it would be extremely difficult to get over 10,000m climbing over 600km in the UK.

Not impossible though, if pro-rating the Maniac's 17AAA by 60% is a yardstick.  And Colin Bezant's Cambrian 6A almost qualifies with 9.5AAA.

Not sure it would be much fun in the UK though.  On the continent, probably fantastic.

Do the Fred Whitton Challenge 3 times over (plus a bit extra).  That should do it.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ian H on 09 September, 2010, 08:05:12 am
Hmmm. If I rerouted the K&SW over Bodmin, Dartmoor and Exmoor.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 09 September, 2010, 08:11:30 am
That might be a nice route, at 80 km a day.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Weirdy Biker on 09 September, 2010, 02:23:24 pm
Hmmm. If I rerouted the K&SW over Bodmin, Dartmoor and Exmoor.

Build it and they will come.

Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: RideHard on 11 March, 2013, 03:41:08 pm
Looks like an interesting set of 4 Super Randonees has been added to the ACP site http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/FR/index.php?showpage=424 ... the easiest by train to get to is from DAUPHINE gratin  starting from Grenoble, only at 616km & 14,000M looks the most rewarding ..and an ideal opportunity to suss-out future skiing hols:)

I'm thinking Post LEL ... any takers ???
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Frank9755 on 12 March, 2013, 11:11:45 am
The Pendle 600 is listed in the calendar at 10,150
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Exit Stage Left on 12 March, 2013, 11:21:36 am
The Pendle 600 is listed in the calendar at 10,150

We had a thread about measuring the Pendle 600. https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=60204.0
It's difficult to do with any degree of certainty. I'm not really interested in climbing, only in the technical aspects. But it would be nice to have a 'Super Randonee' in England.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 01 February, 2014, 03:30:27 pm
Looking through the ACP's 2013 plaquette, it lists the results for ACP's various brevet types. Amongst the more familiar ones like Fleche Velocio team brevet (started in 1947) and Tour de Corse permanent (1956) is the relatively new (2009) Super Randonnee 600.

http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/index.php?showpage=421

Basically, the SR600 is a 600km fixed route permanent with at least 10,000m of climb that is either ridden within 50 hours + extra time for extra climbing (randonneur pace) or at least 80km per day (tourist pace).

It is interesting to see how many SR600 routes there are and how many folk are riding them. Currently there are 5 routes in France but at least 8 routes in other countries and more Japanese completed SR600 in 2014 than every other nationality combined.

Incidentally, the Japanese topped the national BRM rankings, ahead of USA, Brasil, Italy, Russia, France, Spain, Australia, Greece and Germany. I guess we'll be seeing quite a few riders from 'non-traditional' cycling countries at PBP15.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 01 February, 2014, 03:40:10 pm
From a brochure picked up last weekend, the German SR600 has 12,000m of climbing, so an extra couple of hours allowed at randonneur pace.

http://www.ara-breisgau.de/super-randonnee/
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: marcusjb on 01 February, 2014, 03:52:56 pm
There are 5 in France now.  The Garbure et Piperade in the Western Pyrenees is now official.  I have my eye on it.

The Japanese do seem to have taken to the concept rather! 
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Jeff E on 01 February, 2014, 04:34:51 pm
Well done Marcus for being the only AUK Audacious enough to get on these lists
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: marcusjb on 01 February, 2014, 06:20:38 pm
Well done Marcus for being the only AUK Audacious stupid enough to get on these lists

I really hope some more AUKs will head out and try some of these rides. 

They are different, they are rather challenging, but if the rest of them are anywhere near as good as the Pyrenean one, then they are a superb experience. 

I'd like to ride another this year - we shall see if I can take enough time off to squeeze one in later in the season. 
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: marcusjb on 30 May, 2014, 05:42:23 pm
Some videos of the German one - looks really nice indeed.  Looks like there was a large(ish) group perm for this ride. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9jJG2h4BzU

http://vimeo.com/72686189

Won't fit in with my plans for this year - but it's on the to-do list now!  My own plans are coming together slightly now. 


Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 March, 2017, 06:49:02 pm
ACP has now changed the time limit to 60 hours, which gives flatlanders a good chance of getting round one of these.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: mattc on 19 March, 2017, 07:01:06 pm
ACP has now changed the time limit to 60 hours, which gives flatlanders a good chance of getting round one of these.
That seems overly generous - assuming it's meant to be "comparable" (whatever that means!) with a 40hr flat/rolling 600km.

60hours is 2 days plus 12 hours; or 3 full days + 2 nights. So 3 rides of 200km, a day to ride each. A 200km with 3333m of climbing isn't THAT hard, and if you want to you could take 15h and still easily get 7 hours sleep on both nights. Actually that sounds rather nice!  :thumbsup:

Nevertheless, this seems to be neither fish-nor-fowl  :-\
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 March, 2017, 07:10:30 pm
There is nothing stopping you from completing a SR600 in under 50 hours.

The French measure climbing quite differently to Brits, who tote up every single speedbump. I imagine that minimising unsupported sleep-deprived riding in mountainous terrain in the dark might have something to do with it.

Friends who've completed SR600s in under 50 hours rate their rides as very tough with more sleep-deprivation than expected.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: mattc on 19 March, 2017, 07:15:35 pm
There is nothing stopping you from completing a SR600 in under 50 hours.

Not so sure about "nothing" !  I reckoned 50h was a very very big ask for the likes of me, but not totally impossible. (I find hilly 40h 600s pretty flippin' challenging).

Quote
The French measure climbing quite differently to Brits, who tote up every single speedbump. I imagine that minimising unsupported sleep-deprived riding in mountainous terrain in the dark might have something to do with it.
Hmmm, good points.

<ponders ...>
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: GPS on 19 March, 2017, 09:34:03 pm
Thanks for making this thread resurface, LW&B.

Interesting stuff.

I suppose an SR 600 perm in the UK is not totally out of the question, but difficult to create and therefore improbable ? If you've got the alps or the pyrenees in your country, it's not so difficult to come up with a route that could easily tick off 10km of climbing over a 600km ride.

I was tempted by the Norwegian ride Aunt Maud alluded to on the other thread, but getting there would be a bit of a pain. The German one looked good too and wandered into France and Switzerland for good measure.

A vague plan might be forming for next year ...
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Aunt Maud on 20 March, 2017, 10:18:27 am
The Norwegian one would take a high degree of confidence if you were going to ride it alone.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 November, 2017, 10:53:13 am
HK and I have finally decided that next year will be 'der Tag' for us and the SR600 (how many years has it taken?).

I am a big bloke and not a natural climber, so to maximise enjoyment, it'll help if:
- the descents allow real time gains, rather than riding the brakes
- the climbs are long and steady, rather than short and steep
- conditions tend to be dry and not too hot sometime between June and September
- there are some stunning views

https://randonneuredintorni.wordpress.com/super-randonnee-delle-dolomiti/ was suggested on another thread.

The new Welsh SR600 is out. That many Welsh climbs in one hit doesn't appeal to us.

Amongst the high mountains, HK thinks that the Alps might be best for us, as the Dolomites tend to be wet and the Pyrenees steeper, while there is a lot of food/ accommodation at frequent intervals in the Alps.

Any thoughts or suggestions?
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 19 November, 2017, 12:38:52 pm
It's a bit of a myth that the Pyrenees are steeper than the Alps. I've climbed all the major cols in the Pyrenees and none of them averages over 8%, with the exception of shorter ones like Marie Blanque and Portet d'Aspet. On the other hand, in the Dolomites you will easily find long climbs (cols) that exceed 8%... the mighty Passo Giau and Mortirolo just to name a couple.

What the Pyrenees have less than the Alps is probably traffic. On a two hour ascent of the Tourmalet in June, you are likely to see a dozen cars at most. That is of course true until you tackle the climb to Andorra from Aix-Les-Thermes...  :o
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: mattc on 19 November, 2017, 02:50:25 pm
I guess it doesn't really matter which range is steeper - we're not planning the routes! Probably easier to judge each event as they are.

[I'm also eyeing these things up. For the reasons LWAB gives, the Welsh one looks 'tougher' than the rides in high mountains on the continent. But I'm slightly drawn to it; I know some of the climbs, and the general area - so that helps with the logistics and with just having a "warm feeling" that comes with a bit more fore-knowledge. Plus it's (relatively!) on my doorstep, so I could slot it into any spare 4-5 days, and not spend a fortune.

But I have a load of other big rides planned for 2018, so the SR600 may well wait another year ... whilst some more Brits write some ride reports for me to study!]
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 19 November, 2017, 05:37:38 pm
What's the time limit for the Welsh SR Randonneur version? Is there going to be a Tourist version too?
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 19 November, 2017, 05:47:00 pm
60 hours for all of the SR600s at randonneur standard.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 19 November, 2017, 06:41:50 pm
60 hours for all of the SR600s at randonneur standard.

Nice!! Much more civilised than 75 for a 1K
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: fussballclub on 19 November, 2017, 07:41:20 pm
http://www.ara-breisgau.de/superrandonnee/strecke/ (http://www.ara-breisgau.de/superrandonnee/strecke/)

Walter Jungwirths book 1000 Kilometer Süden about the Mille de Sud is one of the much better books about cycling, so I would expect his super randonee 'Belchen satt' to be a cracking ride.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Veloman on 19 November, 2017, 09:37:12 pm
Report here:

http://heimatnomadin.com/belchen-satt-2016 (http://heimatnomadin.com/belchen-satt-2016)

A couple of mentions of 18% gradients and some very dour weather in the report.  Chapeau to Leona!
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 20 November, 2017, 06:26:48 am
So, assuming I can do 200 km in 12 hours, which I believe I can on that terrain... it's basically 3 days with the luxury of being able to check in a B&B at a non embarrassing time and even have breakfast!

It all sounds very civilised... the Welsh C6 appears to pass through Llanwurst at Km 400... perfect!
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ivo on 20 November, 2017, 05:38:37 pm
HK and I have finally decided that next year will be 'der Tag' for us and the SR600 (how many years has it taken?).

I am a big bloke and not a natural climber, so to maximise enjoyment, it'll help if:
- the descents allow real time gains, rather than riding the brakes
- the climbs are long and steady, rather than short and steep
- conditions tend to be dry and not too hot sometime between June and September
- there are some stunning views

https://randonneuredintorni.wordpress.com/super-randonnee-delle-dolomiti/ was suggested on another thread.

The new Welsh SR600 is out. That many Welsh climbs in one hit doesn't appeal to us.

Amongst the high mountains, HK thinks that the Alps might be best for us, as the Dolomites tend to be wet and the Pyrenees steeper, while there is a lot of food/ accommodation at frequent intervals in the Alps.

Any thoughts or suggestions?

I would check the Austrian one then, roads are good so high speed descents are an option. Traffic relatively civilised and plenty of touristic accomodation.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 20 November, 2017, 06:19:54 pm
Thanks for the suggestion Ivo. It would pick up another country for me too.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: dme on 20 November, 2017, 07:42:06 pm
Where would I find details of the Welsh SR600? None of those on the perm list seemed like an obvious match, but perhaps I’m being daft  ???
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: LittleWheelsandBig on 20 November, 2017, 07:50:45 pm
It is in the final stages of being set up.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Wycombewheeler on 21 November, 2017, 12:14:56 am
So, assuming I can do 200 km in 12 hours, which I believe I can on that terrain... it's basically 3 days with the luxury of being able to check in a B&B at a non embarrassing time and even have breakfast!

It all sounds very civilised... the Welsh C6 appears to pass through Llanwurst at Km 400... perfect!

I think I would look to plan 240km, 200km, 160km to take the stress out of the last day.  Depending on daylight hours at the time/place of the ride, I would try to start 12 hours before sunset, so there woukd only be a small amount of night riding in day 1. OR start daily at 6 and forego the breakfast in the hotel in favour of all daylight riding and a civilised evening meal. It's only the same distance as the BCM with 33% extra climbing but a whole extra day to ride.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 21 November, 2017, 08:50:48 am
Does it work like other perms, in that you can start at any control point en route? Looking at the Welsh one, Aberystwyth seems a good start point... 200 km to Llanberis (bunk beds at Pete's Ets) and another 200 to Brecon (plenty of accomodation, I would assume). Plus the benefit of finishing in a town and being able to have a decent meal + drinks  ;D.

Also, Aberystwyth has a station, should things go pear shaped, whereas Knighton doesn't
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: oggy on 21 November, 2017, 11:34:56 am
Does it work like other perms, in that you can start at any control point en route? Looking at the Welsh one, Aberystwyth seems a good start point... 200 km to Llanberis (bunk beds at Pete's Ets) and another 200 to Brecon (plenty of accomodation, I would assume). Plus the benefit of finishing in a town and being able to have a decent meal + drinks  ;D.

Also, Aberystwyth has a station, should things go pear shaped, whereas Knighton doesn't

Good question as these will be sent off for validation by ACP

I have found the answer

"Those who have registered as Randonneurs must start from the official starting point. As Tourists, they can choose any other starting point on the cue sheet."

from page http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/422%20-%20Rules%20Super%20Randonn%C3%A9e.html

Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: yorkie on 21 November, 2017, 01:55:54 pm
Also, Aberystwyth has a station, should things go pear shaped, whereas Knighton doesn't

Is that Knighton on the Anglo-Welsh border? Sort of mid-Walesish? The one with a railway station on the Central Wales line?
That one has 4 trains a day each way to/from Shrewsbury or Swansea, with 2 on Sundays. Granted it's not the 6 or more trains per hour you get in that there London, but it's still 4 more than none!  ;)
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 21 November, 2017, 01:57:55 pm
Does it work like other perms, in that you can start at any control point en route? Looking at the Welsh one, Aberystwyth seems a good start point... 200 km to Llanberis (bunk beds at Pete's Ets) and another 200 to Brecon (plenty of accomodation, I would assume). Plus the benefit of finishing in a town and being able to have a decent meal + drinks  ;D.

Also, Aberystwyth has a station, should things go pear shaped, whereas Knighton doesn't

Good question as these will be sent off for validation by ACP

I have found the answer

"Those who have registered as Randonneurs must start from the official starting point. As Tourists, they can choose any other starting point on the cue sheet."

from page http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/422%20-%20Rules%20Super%20Randonn%C3%A9e.html

Ah, OK thanks

Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: whosatthewheel on 21 November, 2017, 01:59:14 pm


Is that Knighton on the Anglo-Welsh border? Sort of mid-Walesish? The one with a railway station on the Central Wales line?
That one has 4 trains a day each way to/from Shrewsbury or Swansea, with 2 on Sundays. Granted it's not the 6 or more trains per hour you get in that there London, but it's still 4 more than none!  ;)

Well spotted
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: mattc on 03 November, 2019, 05:35:22 pm
Just bumping this thread in the light of 2 things:
- Will announcing his near Bristol Tintern-to-Snowdonia SR600 (https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=113968.0)
- me riding the Tourmalet and reigniting my passion to follow in Marcus' footsteps. Read about them here: MJB and the ACP Super Randonnee Pyrenees  (https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=75811.msg1562934#msg1562934)

I'm sure we won't be rigorously tidy about such things, but it makes sense (to me!) to have 1 master thread so that e.g. Will's thread doesn't get overwhelmed by me banging on about how great Spain is :P
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 04 January, 2020, 01:30:07 pm
Just bumping this thread in the light of 2 things:
- Will announcing his near Bristol Tintern-to-Snowdonia SR600 (https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=113968.0)
. . . makes sense (to me!) to have 1 master thread so that e.g. Will's thread doesn't get overwhelmed by me banging on about how great Spain is :P
What an excellent suggestion,@mattc!
Have just entered Will's SR600.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 04 January, 2020, 03:27:17 pm
Copying CET's comment on Will's thread:
Have just discovered this thread and so answering a few references to the 6C SR.  But firstly congrats to Will for setting this up - it takes a lot of work to get everything validated.  I'm also impressed with the lack of overlap between the two routes as its actually hard to get a sensible route with that amount of climbing

The 6C does have a AUK Permanent version.  So far it there have been 2 or 3 entries for this - but I'm not sure that anyone has actually attempted it seriously.   There are a few riders out there who could manage 10K+ of ascent in Welsh lanes and get some sleep, but only a few.  I rode the 4C, on which the 6C is based not long after waltzing around the Rough Diamond 300 at the head of the field.  I was probably in the best nick I've ever been.  Extrapolating my time on the 4C (in which I had 3 15 minute catnaps) to the 6C, I would have had about 2 - 3 hours spare for a sleep but would have probably been too worried about missing the time limit to complete it.  That's why the SR approach, with 60 hours makes sense.

There have been 5 finishes of the 6C as a super-randonnee, most of them have made near full use of the 60 hour limit, and most have struggled to make their planned overnight stops.  If you think of 3 hilly AAA 200s back to back, if you take 12 hours for the first, you will take much longer for the third...

But the completion rate is much higher than the 400 and 600 Cambrian Permanents - precisely because there is the chance to have a couple of sleep stops.   And the feedback is that it is a highly rewarding challenge that it is uniquely different from anything else that Audax has to offer.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 04 January, 2020, 03:29:44 pm
In June I did not complete CET's SR600 - http://www.aukweb.net/events/detail/sr01r/ - ran out of time on Day3 (or left too little time to complete).
Cambrian 6C/SR600 route: https://ridewithgps.com/routes/29823510?beta=false
I attempted this 10-12 Jun. Forecast a week out looked OK. One day out it looked no fun. Stayed in Kington YH and started from Knighton at 0750. On Day 1 I actually had just the odd shower wind was steady 10-12kn and tail/head/tail combo. Fast to Brecon (60k). First food in Llanwrtyd Wells (95k) followed by hardest climb of the day (no foot down)(but much easier than the morrow's) Devil's Staircase on the mountain road to Tregaron (125k, more food there). East from Aberystwyth (153k) on the A44 for 100 minutes was more climbing than I expected. Ice cream at a shop. Started 0750 and finished 2036.
219km + 4021m (Garmin)
Moving Time = 10:56
Elapsed Time 12:46
17.2 kph ave
20.1 kph moving
Overnight 15km NW of Llanidloes in bunkhouse just west of Staylittle (210k) - cooked dinner provided. In retrospect: too comfy and hospitable hosts, but supper and company, shower and bed were great.
Pissing down overnight and in the morning, with fresh cool northerly, deterring an early start. Set off north at 7am. Climbed Bwlch-y-Groes (no foot down) and then fast, cold descent to Bala (267k). 50 mins in cafe warming up, in particular, hands (a week short of mid-summer!). Still raining. Left both (filled) bottles on table outside cafe. Pressed on till mid-afternoon and had a meal in an Abergele pub (317k) - rain had stopped once north of Llansannan. Climb back out was easier than expected and soon down into Llanwrst (bought food/pizzas to cook) and after climb up and down to Swallow Falls/A5 dumped shopping at YH (quick tea at YH) and pressed on to Llanberis and back (45km there and back) in lovely evening sun. Benefitted from a tailwind back up to Pen-y-pas.
189km + circa 3000m in 13 hours ish with a fair bit stopped - roughly similar moving and average speeds to Day 1. Pleased with a good day's riding. Swallow Falls YH (394k) was excellent.
Expected (forecast) northerly to continue and therefore tail wind for Day 3 - regrettably not realised. Set off later than I ought at 6am from Swallow Falls and took 140 mins for the 37km to Denbigh (427km) and realised/decided that my speed made good (<14kph) was not going to get me to the finish in time (181km to Knighton in 11 hours, by 8pm) given the relentless hills, up and down. Breakfast in ?Morrisons? cafe just below right hand turn to Denbigh control. So, to get back to Knighton, left out Mold and after Llangollen, routed east of the hills, lower down via Oswestry, Welshpool, Montgomery and Bishop's Castle: 175km on Day 3 (as opposed to 217km and much more climb in general drizzle, and wet descents on narrow roads). Glad I made the decision as, from the 'no rain' Severn plain B roads, I could see the hills which the route traversed covered in low cloud.
My key lessons identified are:
1) Given pre-arranged accommodation, accept/plan for a late arrival Day 1 eg 10pm+.
2) Ration overnight stopped time and prioritise sleeping.
3) Don't underestimate the last day which has harder climbing than Day 1, harder descents (as far as I can see) so less beneficial to average speed, and for my plan/schedule, the longest day. One's average speed over the previous 2 days will give one a(n upper limit)  guide as to how long one needs to allow (and therefore a definite start 'no later than' time).
4) Try to hit better weather (and MTFU if actual worse than forecast).

I'd ridden 35 hours with 5 + hours sleep in a bed on the Bryan Chapman 3 weeks earlier, and that's got 7000m of climb.
When I give this another go (in 2020), I'll start earlier on Day 2, go on to Denbigh in the evening of Day2 and hopefully have better weather.
@CET - thank you for the organisation. I have control photos for the first 400k!
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: CrazyEnglishTriathlete on 05 January, 2020, 04:17:18 pm
The hardest bit on the Cambrian 6C is the section south of Llangollen to Llanfyllin.   One of the hills has no Ordnance Survey arrow, a sign saying 13% at the bottom, and then proceeds to rise 130m in 700m (sustained 17%).  The descents are narrow and twisting and so you don't make up much time on them.  There are then two more long climbing sections (heading into the prevailing wind) before Llanfyllin. 
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Wycombewheeler on 06 January, 2020, 11:37:33 pm
In June I did not complete CET's SR600 - ran out of time on Day3 (or left too little time to complete).
Cambrian 6C/SR600 route: https://ridewithgps.com/routes/29823510?beta=false
I attempted this 10-12 Jun. Forecast a week out looked OK. One day out it looked no fun. Stayed in Kington YH and started from Knighton at 0750. On Day 1 I actually had just the odd shower wind was steady 10-12kn and tail/head/tail combo. Fast to Brecon (60k). First food in Llanwrtyd Wells (95k) followed by hardest climb of the day (no foot down)(but much easier than the morrow's) Devil's Staircase on the mountain road to Tregaron (125k, more food there). East from Aberystwyth (153k) on the A44 for 100 minutes was more climbing than I expected. Ice cream at a shop. Started 0750 and finished 2036.
219km + 4021m (Garmin)
Moving Time = 10:56
Elapsed Time 12:46
17.2 kph ave
20.1 kph moving
Overnight 15km NW of Llanidloes in bunkhouse just west of Staylittle (210k) - cooked dinner provided. In retrospect: too comfy and hospitable hosts, but supper and company, shower and bed were great.
Pissing down overnight and in the morning, with fresh cool northerly, deterring an early start. Set off north at 7am. Climbed Bwlch-y-Groes (no foot down) and then fast, cold descent to Bala (267k). 50 mins in cafe warming up, in particular, hands (a week short of mid-summer!). Still raining. Left both (filled) bottles on table outside cafe. Pressed on till mid-afternoon and had a meal in an Abergele pub (317k) - rain had stopped once north of Llansannan. Climb back out was easier than expected and soon down into Llanwrst (bought food/pizzas to cook) and after climb up and down to Swallow Falls/A5 dumped shopping at YH (quick tea at YH) and pressed on to Llanberis and back (45km there and back) in lovely evening sun. Benefitted from a tailwind back up to Pen-y-pas.
189km + circa 3000m in 13 hours ish with a fair bit stopped - roughly similar moving and average speeds to Day 1. Pleased with a good day's riding. Swallow Falls YH (394k) was excellent.
Expected (forecast) northerly to continue and therefore tail wind for Day 3 - regrettably not realised. Set off later than I ought at 6am from Swallow Falls and took 140 mins for the 37km to Denbigh (427km) and realised/decided that my speed made good (<14kph) was not going to get me to the finish in time (181km to Knighton in 11 hours, by 8pm) given the relentless hills, up and down. Breakfast in ?Morrisons? cafe just below right hand turn to Denbigh control. So, to get back to Knighton, left out Mold and after Llangollen, routed east of the hills, lower down via Oswestry, Welshpool, Montgomery and Bishop's Castle: 175km on Day 3 (as opposed to 217km and much more climb in general drizzle, and wet descents on narrow roads). Glad I made the decision as, from the 'no rain' Severn plain B roads, I could see the hills which the route traversed covered in low cloud.
My key lessons identified are:
1) Given pre-arranged accommodation, accept/plan for a late arrival Day 1 eg 10pm+.
2) Ration overnight stopped time and prioritise sleeping.
3) Don't underestimate the last day which has harder climbing than Day 1, harder descents (as far as I can see) so less beneficial to average speed, and for my plan/schedule, the longest day. One's average speed over the previous 2 days will give one a(n upper limit)  guide as to how long one needs to allow (and therefore a definite start 'no later than' time).
4) Try to hit better weather (and MTFU if actual worse than forecast).

I'd ridden 35 hours with 5 + hours sleep in a bed on the Bryan Chapman 3 weeks earlier, and that's got 7000m of climb.
When I give this another go (in 2020), I'll start earlier on Day 2, go on to Denbigh in the evening of Day2 and hopefully have better weather.
@CET - thank you for the organisation. I have control photos for the first 400k!
Thd other option given the 2nd night YH was convenient is to start later on day 1 giving a later finish time on day 3 and so more time to cover the 200km. I still think it is worth front loading the ride so dailh distance decreaes as fatigue increases. But that is dependant on suitable options. Arriving late on day 1 is less important than arriving late on day 3
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 07 January, 2020, 12:00:19 am

Stayed in Kington YH and started from Knighton at 0750. . . . and finished 2036.
219km + 4021m (Garmin)
Moving Time = 10:56
Elapsed Time 12:46
17.2 kph ave
20.1 kph moving
Overnight 15km NW of Llanidloes in bunkhouse just west of Staylittle (210k) - cooked dinner provided. In retrospect: too comfy and hospitable hosts, but supper and company, shower and bed were great.

When I give this another go (in 2020), I'll start earlier on Day 2, go on to Denbigh in the evening of Day2 . . .
Thd other option given the 2nd night YH was convenient is to start later on day 1 giving a later finish time on day 3 and so more time to cover the 200km. I still think it is worth front loading the ride so dailh distance decreaes as fatigue increases. But that is dependant on suitable options. Arriving late on day 1 is less important than arriving late on day 3
You're quite right about the last bit and I agree the 'front-loading' although that rather depends if you're a full value rider and how much you value decent sleep. In June I was also driven by wishing to finish D3/611k at Knighton in the 60 hours and then getting back to Kington YH before the doors closed - and my plan had loaded more than 215k onto D3. Though the Swallow Falls YH is great and almost right on route (349k and 394k) and you can check in and then do the Llanberis loop, I think it's unwise to leave more than 180k to D3. So Denbigh will be my planned D2 overnight next time, and I'll be prepared to arrive late/in the dark. @psyclist had a plan to ride this last year, but postponed to this year (he says).
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 24 January, 2020, 06:30:38 pm
@Deano has launched his 'North of England SR600' on this thread: https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=114664.0 with a loverly montage of all the photocontrols.
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49431112768_e3cf03deb4_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2ij4nEY)

(hey, wait til bunbury see this one!)

The image is all of the photo controls you'll need to gather along the route - it's the same deal as the other Super Randonnée 600s (http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/422.html).

I always fancied one of these, but it felt a bit indulgent to travel so far when there are plenty of hills down up the road. So here it is, starting and finishing in Hexham, which has decent, bike-friendly train services from the East Coast at Newcastle, or from the West Coast at Carlisle, and access to plenty of hills.

Randonneur option (60 hours): https://www.audax.uk/event-details?eventId=8557
Tourist option (72 hours): https://www.audax.uk/event-details?eventId=8558
And the route for both is here: https://ridewithgps.com/routes/30128955

It's fair to say it owes a lot to some other local organisers - Joe Applegarth's laney routes around the North Pennines, some of Dave Atkinson's Dales rides (I fell in love with Hartlington Raikes on his 200  - not the climb, it's an evil sod, but what a name) Chris Crossland's rides around the South Pennines and Dales, and not to forget the late, much-missed Don Black's rides. I think I first rode the Wycoller-Hebden Bridge road on one of Don's perms. Everything else, you can blame on me.
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 27 January, 2020, 01:21:31 pm
Copying Will's comment across to this thread.
21 controls max!! which include the start & finish; this has been updated, it was 18 when I formulated mine. Start & finish can be independent of each other. Out and back discouraged but allowed. 619km max. 10,000m on openrunner minimum - this behaves differently to RWGPS, it isn't just a multiplier, I think OR under-reads small variances but I could be wrong.

Full details in part 2: http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/427%20-%20Super%20Randonn%C3%A9e%20International.html (http://www.audax-club-parisien.com/EN/427%20-%20Super%20Randonn%C3%A9e%20International.html)
Title: Re: ACP's Super Randonnee
Post by: Ajax Bay on 02 February, 2020, 10:17:50 pm
My advice, plan in Google Maps Walking (RWGPS). Aim for 11,000m or close to. Export GPX. Upload to OpenRunner.
This ^^^. Works well. Interesting the different effects on RwGPS climb and OR climb assessments on different types of terrain (eg the glens and passes of Scotland, the scenery of mid and north Wales, and the scenic moors and myriad of small valleys in the West Country). Others on here will know the detailed reasons for that.
In Wales Cambrian 6C - https://ridewithgps.com/routes/29823510
608.7 kilometers · +10,766 m (RwGPS)
609.9 km, 10289 m in OR

I've also done a detailed contour count - which comes out at 11,200 to 11,300m ascent.  Feedback from riders is that GPS devices on the actual event record between 11,500 and 12,000m.  I do warn people that OR and contour count figures are usually 10 - 15% lower than what a Garmin will actually record in the Uk.
Copying CET's reply onto this 'general' SR600 thread.
I don't doubt that the Cambrian 6C has plenty of climb, though I only made it to Denbigh: 7450m in 430km - and another 180k+3600m of climb and descent to crack . . . next time.
I'm just saying that the nature of terrain seems to make a difference, as opposed to OR always showing less.