SRAM PC951 - three for thirty of the BRITONS' pounds from Chain Reaction.
I know many people swear by SRAM chains, but I have only aver sworn at them.
Every one I've ever bought has jumped, skipped, chainsucked, and finally snapped in the course of the first 20 miles...
Ah, timely subject for me. After my Sram 951 snapping three times on the Elenith on Saturday, and once last year on the Brian Chapman, it's time to question things a bit. Is it me or 'it'? It would be nice to think that I'm generating so much power that the chain just can't cope, but I fear otherwise is the case. Reading the mtb review site last night [it's a grand life] it would appear that snapping is not an uncommon occurrence with these things, but also worth pondering is whether it's good practice to link the 951's together with a chain tool as opposed to a power link? Sram seem tom recommend the link but I've been splitting and joining them all over the place with a tool all the time, as I swap chains from different builds etc. I tend to loop all the chains with the tool and then just have the one power link for easy removal. Maybe this is where I've been going wrong - using a chain tool, and setting up too many weak spots in the chain.
If you want cheap then you may as well get
these, as they look very similar to the 951 to me.
Also reading about the KMC X9, it appears that they're quite difficult to separate with a chain tool. So if you did manage to join two ends and drive the pin back it sounds like you've got a weak spot straight away.
Maybe power links are the way to from now on.