Hmmm. I do kind of think it's much easier to accuse teams or individuals of cheating than it is to back up your accusations, and of course many teams and individuals over the years have been found guilty of gaming the system, as it's regarded as 'ok' to throw out accusations whether or not you have any substantive evidence to back your accusations up - and being part of a mob is sufficient defence to avoid having to justify yourself. I'm not convinced yet, because no one has given any understandable explanation for or against, why we should leap on a bandwagon of castigation of BC in this case, or what actually was done wrong (ie not what I might infer has been done wrong after reading half of the press releases and none of the background).
I simply do not believe BC are on the side of doping cyclists, and I don't read the press releases of the analysis of the errors of 2011 as saying that they are. That, on the other hand, does not suggest that I believe that professional teams, then or now, are not trying to subvert the rules.