Interesting article on page 54-55. Not sure what to think of the statement
that a 200k randonee is similar to running a marathon.
I've done 14 marathons, 4 stand-alone and 9 as part of Ironman triathlons.
Fastest stand-alone 3.04 and fastest in Ironman 3.25. Last one in 2002.
Since then I've gained 2 stone in body weight. Started
biking again 3 years ago. Last year between Jan and Aug did
2 600s, 3 400s, 3 300s and a number of 200s, and a number of non-Audax
centuries. Without killing myself. Compared to during my years as a
triathlete I haven't really felt that fit. And have remained quite, uh,
heavy-weighted. At the moment the thought of running a marathon
is overwhelming. But biking a 200k, no problems. And doing the same
number of marathons as I did 200k+ rides last year seems way harder.
Even if just jogging slow.
Anyone else been in both worlds and have thoughts of that type of
comparisons?
<Subsequent posts moved to this thread>
Cycling distance equivalent to running a marathon?The Movers