Author Topic: Members' bikes  (Read 2463834 times)

Oscar's dad

  • aka Septimus Fitzwilliam Beauregard Partridge
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6100 on: 05 February, 2013, 04:09:42 pm »
^^^ Good grief  :o  What sort of hill would you need one of those on?

tiermat

  • According to Jane, I'm a Unisex SpaceAdmin
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6101 on: 05 February, 2013, 04:11:25 pm »
What IZ failed to mention is that the XX1 on has one chainring at the front (and SRAM plan it to always be that way).

So a nice range, but not as many steps as say a triple with a MTB chainset.  Or a road triple with a MTB cassette.
I feel like Captain Kirk, on a brand new planet every day, a little like King Kong on top of the Empire State

Oscar's dad

  • aka Septimus Fitzwilliam Beauregard Partridge
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6102 on: 05 February, 2013, 04:12:21 pm »
OK, that makes sense.

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6103 on: 05 February, 2013, 04:13:47 pm »
What IZ failed to mention is that the XX1 on has one chainring at the front (and SRAM plan it to always be that way).
This is very true, but then I didn't mention it because I was fairly confident that once people noticed the pricetag of the cassette they'd lose interest fairly quickly :) (the pricing of the other components is also suitably insane - the whole groupset will set you back somewhere north of a grand)

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6104 on: 05 February, 2013, 04:15:51 pm »
That's a biggie.  I remember when 38t was not unusual on an ATB.  But that was 5/6 speed.
Getting there...

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6105 on: 05 February, 2013, 04:18:54 pm »
That's a biggie.  I remember when 38t was not unusual on an ATB.  But that was 5/6 speed.
Yep - one of the guys I worked with when I was at University had a touring bike with a Suntour Alpine 14-38T freewheel on it; not sure if it was 5 or 6 speed. Think he used a Simplex rear mech, since that was the only one that could handle shifting up onto the big sprocket, although Suntour did do dedicated rear mechs (Suntour AG, if memory serves - the AG standing for Alpine Gearing or somesuch)

zigzag

  • unfuckwithable
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6106 on: 05 February, 2013, 05:39:16 pm »
What IZ failed to mention is that the XX1 on has one chainring at the front (and SRAM plan it to always be that way).

So a nice range, but not as many steps as say a triple with a MTB chainset.  Or a road triple with a MTB cassette.

i was using 1x7 and 1x8 setup for about five years now, good to see major manufacturers are starting to understand the benefits of such transmission ;)

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6107 on: 05 February, 2013, 05:43:00 pm »
What IZ failed to mention is that the XX1 on has one chainring at the front (and SRAM plan it to always be that way).

So a nice range, but not as many steps as say a triple with a MTB chainset.  Or a road triple with a MTB cassette.

i was using 1x7 and 1x8 setup for about five years now, good to see major manufacturers are starting to understand the benefits of such transmission ;)
I've been running 1x11* for at least 18 months ;D

* - gears-inna-can, obviously.

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6108 on: 06 February, 2013, 05:33:05 pm »
I'd read about the SRAM XX1 and been interested in a wondering-if-it-would-work-with-a-double way, as I have a vague plan - just a daydream, really - of building a touring bike with double chainset, as I've decided I prefer them to triples. I hadn't got as far as checking the price. Oh well.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6109 on: 06 February, 2013, 05:44:58 pm »
The Suntour AG freewheel was 5sp 14-38t. The 2nd largest cog was a 28t. Suntour AG mechs were designed for the 38t cog, as was the Huret Duopar derailleur. The Shimano Triple Plate mech coped easily too.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

tiermat

  • According to Jane, I'm a Unisex SpaceAdmin
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6110 on: 06 February, 2013, 05:58:13 pm »
I'd read about the SRAM XX1 and been interested in a wondering-if-it-would-work-with-a-double way, as I have a vague plan - just a daydream, really - of building a touring bike with double chainset, as I've decided I prefer them to triples. I hadn't got as far as checking the price. Oh well.

Sram say not as the chainring is sepcially designed to prevent the chain coming off (IIRC the teeth are slightly hooked or such like in a way which would make shifting at the front impossible)
I feel like Captain Kirk, on a brand new planet every day, a little like King Kong on top of the Empire State

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6111 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:07:17 pm »
That doesn't make any sense.  What do they mean 'designed to prevent the chain coming off'?  Of course it has to come off - to change sprocket!  The angles on a single ring would be greater than for a double, or even triple, and the shape of the sprockets will have no effect at the front, where it's just a chain going by.

I scent bullshit.
Getting there...

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6112 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:13:55 pm »
Longer teeth.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

tiermat

  • According to Jane, I'm a Unisex SpaceAdmin
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6113 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:14:00 pm »
Exactly, LWaB, it doesn't affect the rear shifting as it's a chainring thang.
I feel like Captain Kirk, on a brand new planet every day, a little like King Kong on top of the Empire State

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6114 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:17:13 pm »
I scent bullshit.
I believe the word you're looking for is 'marketing'.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6115 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:17:49 pm »
So any normal chainset would work just fine.  Next!
Getting there...

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6116 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:18:30 pm »
I scent bullshit.
I believe the word you're looking for is 'marketing'.


Thank you.  So hard to tell the difference sometimes. ;D
Getting there...

TimC

  • Old blerk sometimes onabike.
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6117 on: 06 February, 2013, 06:34:38 pm »
I scent bullshit.
I believe the word you're looking for is 'marketing'.


Thank you.  So hard to tell the difference sometimes. ;D

This month's Cycle includes a short review of the Sram XX1, and suggests that the front chainring has extra-deep teeth to prevent accidental unshipping of the chain. As there's no need or intention for the groupset to have front shifting, it's actually quite a desirable feature. I await reports of how well it works in practice.

Edit: of course, there is no reason why it couldn't be used with conventional chainrings and a front shifter if even lower gearing was required!

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6118 on: 06 February, 2013, 08:44:52 pm »
Or more efficient chainline.
Getting there...

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6119 on: 06 February, 2013, 09:59:37 pm »
Yep. However, when/if I come to look for such a thing, I shall look elsewhere.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

welshwheels

  • stop eating cheeseburgers big boy!!!!
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6120 on: 09 February, 2013, 05:17:52 pm »
N+1 for me :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: off macb of this very parish
struggling up hills since 1981 !!!

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6121 on: 09 February, 2013, 05:22:47 pm »
An impeccable choice, if you ask me ;)  :thumbsup:

My ideal next purchase is a CrossCheck .... or possibly a Moonlander ;D ;D

IanDG

  • The p*** artist formerly known as 'Windy'
    • the_dandg_rouleur
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6122 on: 12 February, 2013, 07:50:59 am »
Current re-incarnation of my Bob Jackson


P2109163a by windy_, on Flickr

LEE

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6123 on: 12 February, 2013, 03:05:09 pm »
N+1 for me :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: off macb of this very parish

I'm so glad it found a good home.  It's a lovely looking bike and you've saved me having leg-extension surgery so I could ride it.

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #6124 on: 12 February, 2013, 03:08:53 pm »
N+1 for me :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: off macb of this very parish

I'm so glad it found a good home.  It's a lovely looking bike and you've saved me having leg-extension surgery so I could ride it.
It's a CrossCheck, therefore it is pure awesome fashioned out of iron pipes :) (fortunately for my bank balance it was too big for me, too)