If the ribbing is genuinely useful for blind people then I don't mind simply avoiding it when on two wheels. It's not difficult.
Well, that depends a lot on how it's been installed.
If it's manufactured correctly, and the right style is used, in the correct locations, then it should be OK, although as mentioned earlier on in the thread, the actual styles chosen seem to show a lack of forethought.
If it's across a cycle path from one side to the other (which is how it's supposed to be installed), then it's difficult to avoid, without ether crossing into the pedestrian path (if possible), or leaving the cycle path possibly off the a kerb into the road, or onto a grassed area. Since the paviors are often at there most slippery, and dangerous, during rain, then grass tends to be muddy and slippery, and not exactly ideally suited to cycling on with narrow high pressure tyres.
And regardless that the designs are supposed to be designed to cycle over, many of the ones which I've used are verging on being lethally slippery when wet.
It's not that people feel averse to facilities being installed to improve things for those with compromised vision, but that all too often, as with many cycling facilities, the implementation is poor.
(...and to be fair, this sort of instance isn't exactly unique to cyclists. I know various paviors placed where pedestrians will be walking over them, which are slippery and dangerous for pedestrians when wet, and it's not as though we haven't had centuries of placing such things. Why do people manage to manufacture, and use, paviors which are clearly not suitable for their purpose?).