Author Topic: Grammar that makes you cringe  (Read 857143 times)

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2225 on: 05 June, 2012, 08:39:34 pm »
Power cut does not necessarily mean power failure. It can be planned & scheduled, as with power cuts in Japan since the tsunami last year, where schedules have been published & warnings given.

'Outage' should mean the same as 'cut' in this context.
"A woman on a bicycle has all the world before her where to choose; she can go where she will, no man hindering." The Type-Writer Girl, 1897

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2226 on: 05 June, 2012, 08:56:13 pm »
Yes, but there are three lines on the graph....

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2227 on: 05 June, 2012, 09:01:51 pm »
Ooops!
"A woman on a bicycle has all the world before her where to choose; she can go where she will, no man hindering." The Type-Writer Girl, 1897

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2228 on: 05 June, 2012, 09:02:30 pm »
Yes, but there are three lines on the graph....

One for each phase :)

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2229 on: 05 June, 2012, 09:16:55 pm »
I suppose that both 'outage' and 'failure' could be used to describe an unknown loss of power, especially in the increasingly common situation of dealing with equipment on a remote site where you know that it's no longer receiving power, but have yet to determine why.

"The servers shut down due to a power outage" could mean the cleaner chose the wrong socket for the hoover, or the breakers tripped, or there was a power cut.


Incidentally, is anyone else irked by the trend to translate "shut down" as "turn off" in British English localisations of popular operating systems?  To me, the former implies the operating system cleanly (or not so cleanly) killing processes and unmounting volumes and so on, while the latter merely implies powering down the hardware.  It's almost as bad as using 'programme' to refer to software, especially as a verb.  :hand:

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2230 on: 05 June, 2012, 09:35:07 pm »
The graph is from Google Ngram Viewer. As I'm sure you know, Google have been digitizing books on an industrial scale for the last few years, and currently estimate that they have about 4% of all the books ever published. The Ngram Viewer uses this corpus to draw graphs showing changes in the usage of words or phrases over time (as a proportion of all printed words). If you've ever wanted to know when Chili became Chile or the changing fortunes of Brontosaurus versus Apatosaurus, or when the Great War became the First World War, or any other question that can be phrased in terms of the relative popularity of particular words, then Ngram Viewer is your tool.

The graph I drew shows the relative frequency over time in Google's corpus of the three phrases, power outage, power failure, and power cut. You can see that power failure has always been the most popular term, but power outage started to appear in the early 1970s and has gained in popularity ever since, overtaking power cut in the mid-1980s and still going strong. So this confirms Peter's original suspicion that power outage is a term that has been gaining in popularity over the last few decades.

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2231 on: 05 June, 2012, 09:54:57 pm »
Black out
Brown out
Load shedding
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2232 on: 05 June, 2012, 10:00:57 pm »
The graph is from Google Ngram Viewer....

Cool!

I just looked up something I've wondered about - when did 'haulage' become 'logistics'?

http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=haulage%2Clogistics&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3

Not really relevant though, unless they are digitising the logos on HGV's too...  Fun though!

I refuse to look up 'supply chain solutions' though.
If I had a baby elephant, it could help me wash the car. If I had a car.

See my recycled crafts at www.wastenotwantit.co.uk

Andrij

  • Андрій
  • Ερασιτεχνικός μισάνθρωπος
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2233 on: 18 June, 2012, 09:19:57 am »
Headline from an article on the "Utility Weekly" website:  SSE agrees to buy Ireland fossil generation assets.

I never knew they generated fossils in Ireland.
;D  Andrij.  I pronounce you Complete and Utter GIT   :thumbsup:

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2234 on: 18 June, 2012, 09:50:29 am »
Utility Weekly sounds like a periodical for everyday cyclists. :thumbsup:
Getting there...

Andrij

  • Андрій
  • Ερασιτεχνικός μισάνθρωπος
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2235 on: 18 June, 2012, 10:35:54 am »
Utility Weekly sounds like a periodical for everyday cyclists. :thumbsup:

Sadly, UW is not that exciting.
;D  Andrij.  I pronounce you Complete and Utter GIT   :thumbsup:

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2236 on: 18 June, 2012, 10:46:24 am »
 "due to an earlier accident" . It appears in most traffic reports .

"Earlier" has ben morphed into an adjective. It just sounds wrong (to me ) and yet we know what is meant. 

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2237 on: 18 June, 2012, 10:52:55 am »
It would be ok if the "earlier" came "later"!  This is known as de-adjectivising.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2238 on: 18 June, 2012, 10:56:59 am »
I agree but even the BBC (Radio 2 listener mostly) expresses it the" wrong" way.

rower40

  • Not my boat. Now sold.
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2239 on: 18 June, 2012, 10:59:22 am »
"due to an earlier accident" . It appears in most traffic reports .

"Earlier" has ben morphed into an adjective. It just sounds wrong (to me ) and yet we know what is meant.
"Early" is an adjective as well as an adverb.  ("The Early bird...")  So "Earlier" is a comparative adjective, just as "Earliest" is a superlative adjective.  So I'm completely OK with "earlier accient".
Be Naughty; save Santa a trip

citoyen

  • Occasionally rides a bike
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2240 on: 18 June, 2012, 11:05:46 am »
I'm not bothered by "earlier" used as an adjective, but it got me to wondering what would be a better word to use in that context. Previous, perhaps?

Then I realised that the word is redundant. Of course the accident happened earlier. Or indeed previously. No one would close a road in anticipation of a later accident, would they? This isn't Minority Report.

d.
"The future's all yours, you lousy bicycles."

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2241 on: 18 June, 2012, 11:15:28 am »
"due to an earlier accident" . It appears in most traffic reports .

"Earlier" has ben morphed into an adjective. It just sounds wrong (to me ) and yet we know what is meant.
"Early" is an adjective as well as an adverb.  ("The Early bird...")  So "Earlier" is a comparative adjective, just as "Earliest" is a superlative adjective.  So I'm completely OK with "earlier accient".

Yes, it's fine. As long as there were two accidents, and the other was was also early.

Otherwise, surely it should be "because of an accident earlier"
Quote from: tiermat
that's not science, it's semantics.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2242 on: 18 June, 2012, 03:36:55 pm »
"Due to an earlier accident". It appears in most traffic reports. "Earlier" has been morphed into an adjective. It just sounds wrong (to me) and yet we know what is meant.

Can you explain why earlier sounds wrong to you here?

Do other comparatives sound wrong to you, or is it just earlier? How do you feel about "the taller man", "the later Roman Empire", "the higher learning", "a better world", "the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary"?

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2243 on: 18 June, 2012, 03:51:49 pm »
Only if there is an equivalent comparator.  Earlier than what?  Earlier than now?  That's redundant.  Earlier than another accident, well maybe.
Getting there...

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2244 on: 18 June, 2012, 03:56:28 pm »
"Earlier accident" meaning not happening now or the immediate results of an accident, ie they're not now dealing with the accident.

Meaning it happened earlier. Earlier than now.

Language is loaded with redundancies, it's perfectly normal.

citoyen

  • Occasionally rides a bike
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2245 on: 18 June, 2012, 03:59:04 pm »
Stating why it is wrong doesn't explain why it sounds wrong, especially when "we know what is meant".

When something like this sounds wrong to us, I suspect it's often to do with the way we were brought up/educated/otherwise indoctrinated.

My first boss's pet hate was dangling modifiers. Since working for her, I find myself highly sensitised to them (as I may have mentioned earlier in this thread), though most people seem not to notice them, never mind care about them.

d.
"The future's all yours, you lousy bicycles."

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2246 on: 18 June, 2012, 07:37:31 pm »
... was was ...
<OT>Reminds me of the old challenge to use the same word consecutively, as many times as possible, in a sentence that still makes reasonable sense. Intervening punctuation is allowed, but not other words. For example, the dance "can-can" would be two instances of "can".</OT>

(click to show/hide)

Salvatore

  • Джон Спунър
    • Pics
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2247 on: 18 June, 2012, 07:59:57 pm »
... was was ...
<OT>Reminds me of the old challenge to use the same word consecutively, as many times as possible, in a sentence that still makes reasonable sense. Intervening punctuation is allowed, but not other words. For example, the dance "can-can" would be two instances of "can".</OT>

(click to show/hide)

See also here

I like the one about the walk in the Cambridgeshire town held in the early part of the year, and its associated piece of music called the 'March March March March'.

While riding in northern Germany in August 2010 I noticed that a farmer had created a tourist attraction in his crop of what the Americans call 'Indian corn'. The German expression is 'Maislabarynth', the english would be 'maize maze', and if it belonged to a Top Gear presenter, might be 'May's maize maze'.
Quote
et avec John, excellent lecteur de road-book, on s'en est sortis sans erreur

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2248 on: 18 June, 2012, 08:06:01 pm »
Americans have "corn maze" which is a big FAIL compared to the beauty of "maize maze".  To Americans corn=maize, to us corn=some general unidentified cereal, or wheat.  The other stuff is, of course, sweetcorn.

A word that is particularly confusing is "momentarily", which to us means "for a short while" or "briefly" but to them means "in a short while", where we'd say "shortly" or "presently".
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Grammar that makes you cringe
« Reply #2249 on: 18 June, 2012, 09:12:28 pm »
Mealies. :)
Your Royal Charles are belong to us.