Author Topic: The cricket...  (Read 256598 times)

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1475 on: 26 November, 2017, 07:03:44 am »
 I wake up to see that normal service has been resumed.
Those wonderful norks are never far from my thoughts, oh yeah!

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1476 on: 26 November, 2017, 07:53:28 am »
At least we made it to day 5
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1477 on: 26 November, 2017, 08:50:37 am »
It's the Gabba I guess.  Aus bowlers had a good spread of wickets, though England's higher order batters 1-5, didn't manage as many runs, as #6-8. 
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1478 on: 26 November, 2017, 09:43:26 am »
Oh well, welcome to an Ashes series down under.
It's tough for the bowlers, after having slogged away in the the first innings, to come out with such an uninspiring target to bowl at.
Also psychologically very good for the Aussies not having to call on Smith yet to get the runs either.
Garry Broad

Carlosfandango

  • Yours fragrantly.
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1479 on: 26 November, 2017, 11:00:51 am »
Oh dear, Cook out of form, spinner can't spin, couple of old medium pacers leading the bowling "attack", tail bounced out, looks like another 5-0.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1480 on: 26 November, 2017, 11:36:48 am »
I notice Betfair are offering 275/1 for a draw. I also notice the Met Office are predicting potential rain in Brisbane tomorrow. Worth a quid?
Those wonderful norks are never far from my thoughts, oh yeah!

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1481 on: 26 November, 2017, 11:46:54 am »
9 hours of showers would be good...
It is simpler than it looks.

Carlosfandango

  • Yours fragrantly.
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1482 on: 26 November, 2017, 12:09:38 pm »
Aussies will only need one dry hour.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1483 on: 26 November, 2017, 12:12:32 pm »
Yes, and after a few poss showers, weather will be good in pm.  Looks like Gabba is a loss.  Unless Aus has one of the worst batting collapses in the history of the game, or a truely impressive series of dot balls.
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

mcshroom

  • Mushroom
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1484 on: 26 November, 2017, 01:48:13 pm »
Short of Broad having another day like Trent Bridge I think it's safe to say this one's dead.
Climbs like a sprinter, sprints like a climber!

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1485 on: 27 November, 2017, 07:56:53 am »
Oh well, we need to win the next one...
It is simpler than it looks.

T42

  • Apprentice geezer
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1486 on: 27 November, 2017, 08:47:00 am »
Me: I see England got hammered in the Ashes

Mrs. T42: Oh? Who by?
I've dusted off all those old bottles and set them up straight

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1487 on: 27 November, 2017, 10:06:38 am »
Cricinfo Adelaide stats  England have a slightly better record at the A Oval, than the WACA (one win/two draws since 70)
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1488 on: 27 November, 2017, 12:47:40 pm »
I have placed (perhaps rather foolishly) a two pound bet on England to win the Ashes. Unsurpisingly, the odds weren't too bad  :P
Those wonderful norks are never far from my thoughts, oh yeah!

Wowbagger

  • Stout dipper
    • Stuff mostly about weather
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1489 on: 27 November, 2017, 01:00:49 pm »
I have placed (perhaps rather foolishly) a two pound bet on England to win the Ashes. Unsurpisingly, the odds weren't too bad  :P

Shades of Rodney Marsh and Dennis Lillee?  ;D
Quote from: Dez
It doesn’t matter where you start. Just start.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1490 on: 02 December, 2017, 08:31:00 am »
Apparently, there's a seagull at deep square leg...

Wicket before the break would be good.
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1491 on: 04 December, 2017, 04:36:12 pm »
Salvage a draw?
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1492 on: 04 December, 2017, 05:33:02 pm »
Not a chance, either


a) we skittle the remaining 6 Aussie wickets out in the first session tomorrow and have to chase ~320 in 5 and a bit sessions target 4 sessions so that you don't have to bat the fifth day under lights

or

b) The Aussies bat on and set us a target of ~450 in 4 and a bit sessions to save the game including two spells with a new ball under lights

And I don't fancy our rabbits in a headlights, walking wickets ,sorry, batsmens chances of achieving either option.

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1493 on: 04 December, 2017, 05:48:34 pm »
We just need a draw, then a win and two more draws. Or a win and another win and a draw.
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1494 on: 04 December, 2017, 10:33:27 pm »
under lights

or

under lights

Fascinating to hear the coverage of 'under lights' and how the ball started doing all kinds if stuff.....it's obviously a big deal - bit like entering the lions den - survive if you can. No better bowler than Andersen in those conditions. He's world class. But tomorrow morning will no be under lights. And then we have to bat under the lights to save the game.

At least it's given them some kind of platform to feel encouraged and positive about something and not so desperately deflated with how they've been performing at times.
Garry Broad

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1495 on: 05 December, 2017, 07:21:56 am »
Possible for England, though unlikely. 

Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1496 on: 05 December, 2017, 07:33:12 am »
Bah!
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1497 on: 05 December, 2017, 07:35:26 am »
Let's see what Root can do.
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1498 on: 05 December, 2017, 09:50:39 am »
Someone needs to get a 100+

Malan's been dropped, so now onto 150...  ;)
Cycle and recycle.   SS Wilson

mattc

  • n.b. have grown beard since photo taken
    • Didcot Audaxes
Re: The cricket...
« Reply #1499 on: 05 December, 2017, 10:27:58 am »
154-3, with a 60-run partnership; at least that shows a bit of fight, and we'll lose by less than 300 :P

Still an absurd long shot of course. I had a glimmer of hope until we lost the 2nd wicket way too early ...
Has never ridden RAAM
---------
No.11  Because of the great host of those who dislike the least appearance of "swank " when they travel the roads and lanes. - From Kuklos' 39 Articles