Author Topic: Science that makes you cringe  (Read 51019 times)

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #425 on: 01 November, 2023, 09:24:25 pm »
I think DC transmission is used in Siberia and Russia's Far East, due to the enormous distances.

And according to that Wikipedia, Britain is Europe's nexus of HVDC transmission, albeit not overhead:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #426 on: 01 November, 2023, 10:06:46 pm »
The economics shift further in DC's favour as soon as the medium you're stringing the cables through is water, rather than air, as the losses from AC become greater.

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #427 on: 02 November, 2023, 12:51:17 am »
There's quite a lot of it about, it seems: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HVDC_projects
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #428 on: 02 November, 2023, 02:22:18 pm »
And according to that Wikipedia, Britain is Europe's nexus of HVDC transmission, albeit not overhead:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current

It makes a lot of sense to trade electrons with BRITIAN, on account of us having our own timezone, and (for viewers in Scotland) an occasional surplus of wind power.  Thanks to Putin, it's recently made economic sense to off-load LNG here, burn the gas and sell the resulting electrons to Europe, where there's been a shortage of gas terminal capacity.

IIRC the North Sea Link paid for itself in about a year.

Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #429 on: 03 November, 2023, 09:11:48 am »
The economics shift further in DC's favour as soon as the medium you're stringing the cables through is water, rather than air, as the losses from AC become greater.

That's something I hadn't heard.

Some dielectric effect coupling with the water?

There is a rumbling of concern about the effect of electric cables on sealife.

They've found that crabs are reluctant to cross the HVDC cables, which is an issue when the crabs migrate for breeding.
<i>Marmite slave</i>

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #430 on: 03 November, 2023, 12:54:45 pm »
The economics shift further in DC's favour as soon as the medium you're stringing the cables through is water, rather than air, as the losses from AC become greater.

That's something I hadn't heard.

Some dielectric effect coupling with the water?

I think it's more that a rugged cable (rather than an uninsulated wire strung from pylons) is in itself a fairly effective capacitor.


Quote
There is a rumbling of concern about the effect of electric cables on sealife.

As featured in the documentary Jaws 2   ;D


Quote
They've found that crabs are reluctant to cross the HVDC cables, which is an issue when the crabs migrate for breeding.

That's not going to end well.  Never underestimate crabs.

Presumably burying the cables would mitigate that, but that's a whole lot more expense...

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #431 on: 03 November, 2023, 12:56:28 pm »
I think burying the cables would be not only a whole lot more expense, it would introduce an whole extra level of sea-bed disturbance. Something similar is being observed in some places with buried (in land) cables and pipes.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Tim Hall

  • Victoria is my queen
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #432 on: 15 November, 2023, 11:06:06 pm »
More electrically based nonsense:

Quote
The specialist global investment manager revealed the Kent-based project, which consists of 373MW of solar and “more than” 150MW of battery energy storage, is expected to be fully completed by the end of 2024.

My bold.

That from a solar power trade comic, where you might hope they know the difference between MW and MWh. I guess it's a regurgitated PR piece that was written by someone who doesn't.

(Ob. Cycling: The Whitstable FNRTTC goes past it.)
There are two ways you can get exercise out of a bicycle: you can
"overhaul" it, or you can ride it.  (Jerome K Jerome)

ElyDave

  • Royal and Ancient Polar Bear Society member 263583
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #433 on: 15 November, 2023, 11:10:13 pm »
I think burying the cables would be not only a whole lot more expense, it would introduce an whole extra level of sea-bed disturbance. Something similar is being observed in some places with buried (in land) cables and pipes.

Pipelines are generally trenched and protected against overtrawling. I'd have assumed the same kind of protection for cables
“Procrastination is the thief of time, collar him.” –Charles Dickens

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #434 on: 15 November, 2023, 11:40:52 pm »
More electrically based nonsense:

Quote
The specialist global investment manager revealed the Kent-based project, which consists of 373MW of solar and “more than” 150MW of battery energy storage, is expected to be fully completed by the end of 2024.

My bold.

That from a solar power trade comic, where you might hope they know the difference between MW and MWh. I guess it's a regurgitated PR piece that was written by someone who doesn't.

The clue's in the first part of the sentence (my bold).

Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #435 on: 16 November, 2023, 07:32:07 am »
I think burying the cables would be not only a whole lot more expense, it would introduce an whole extra level of sea-bed disturbance. Something similar is being observed in some places with buried (in land) cables and pipes.

Pipelines are generally trenched and protected against overtrawling. I'd have assumed the same kind of protection for cables
You'd assume wrong.

seabed Power cables are just draped on the seabed. Very vulnerable to anchors and beam trawling.

Hence why Lewis lost its interconnect a couple of years back.
<i>Marmite slave</i>

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #436 on: 16 November, 2023, 07:43:14 am »
There are different environmental consequences to breaking cables and oil pipelines, hence protection or not.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

Tim Hall

  • Victoria is my queen
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #437 on: 16 November, 2023, 08:45:26 am »
More electrically based nonsense:

Quote
The specialist global investment manager revealed the Kent-based project, which consists of 373MW of solar and “more than” 150MW of battery energy storage, is expected to be fully completed by the end of 2024.

My bold.

That from a solar power trade comic, where you might hope they know the difference between MW and MWh. I guess it's a regurgitated PR piece that was written by someone who doesn't.

The clue's in the first part of the sentence (my bold).
GPWM
There are two ways you can get exercise out of a bicycle: you can
"overhaul" it, or you can ride it.  (Jerome K Jerome)

ElyDave

  • Royal and Ancient Polar Bear Society member 263583
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #438 on: 16 November, 2023, 12:17:19 pm »
I think burying the cables would be not only a whole lot more expense, it would introduce an whole extra level of sea-bed disturbance. Something similar is being observed in some places with buried (in land) cables and pipes.

Pipelines are generally trenched and protected against overtrawling. I'd have assumed the same kind of protection for cables
You'd assume wrong.

seabed Power cables are just draped on the seabed. Very vulnerable to anchors and beam trawling.

Hence why Lewis lost its interconnect a couple of years back.

Every day's a schoolday
“Procrastination is the thief of time, collar him.” –Charles Dickens

Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #439 on: 16 November, 2023, 05:22:16 pm »
See also trans-oceanic data and communications cables, and the keenness of the RN to keep Russian vessels at bay.
We are making a New World (Paul Nash, 1918)

Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #440 on: 16 November, 2023, 05:42:54 pm »
they don't just lay them in a straight line, shorestation to shorestation, but do a detailed seabed survey, trying to avoid draping the cable over seamounts, or sudden crevasses, etc. A nice soft bottom is preferred, to avoid damage from being sawed back and forth by currents.
<i>Marmite slave</i>

ElyDave

  • Royal and Ancient Polar Bear Society member 263583
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #441 on: 16 November, 2023, 07:36:11 pm »
Pipelines may have a concrete coat to stop them floating as well (gas ones definitely), and are then gently puddled into the silt by a couple of meters using a water jet as I understand it.  They may also have rocks dumped along the line as trawl protection at certain points, or even artificial rock "mattresses" where there are exposed sections.  Anything like a junction or a valve that sticks up tends to have a large structural protection.

I'm slightly mind boggled that we don't even shallow-bury the cables.
“Procrastination is the thief of time, collar him.” –Charles Dickens

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #442 on: 16 November, 2023, 11:56:13 pm »
There's a whole appendix to the e-book edition of Neal Stephenson's “Cryptonomicon” dedicated to the subject of international telecommunications cables.
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Giraffe

  • I brake for Giraffes
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #443 on: 17 November, 2023, 05:58:28 pm »
Article about moving bagged waste along 'vacuum' tubes said that the bags were moved by negative pressure.
2x4: thick plank; 4x4: 2 of 'em.

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #444 on: 18 November, 2023, 12:01:34 am »
Article about moving bagged waste along 'vacuum' tubes said that the bags were moved by negative pressure.

Sub-atmospheric pressure is known as negative pressure in medical & other jargon.

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #445 on: 18 November, 2023, 01:42:24 am »
I don't think it's wrong to refer to gauge pressure (which is clearly what they mean in this context) as negative.  Absolute pressure would be another matter.

Feanor

  • It's mostly downhill from here.
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #446 on: 18 November, 2023, 11:50:47 am »
There's a whole appendix to the e-book edition of Neal Stephenson's “Cryptonomicon” dedicated to the subject of international telecommunications cables.

Ah, that's not in the Dead Tree version which I recently finished.

There is, however, a detailed discussion of the Solitaire Cipher by Bruce Schneier, the original author of the cypher.
Stephenson actually had Schneier invent this playing-card based cypher just for the book!
It's a cipher designed to be performed by hand, and required nothing more incriminating than an ordered deck of playing cards.
In the event the Secret Police come to the door, you simply shuffle the deck and the key is destroyed.

In the book, it is referred to as Pontifex.

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #447 on: 18 November, 2023, 01:12:40 pm »
And early editions contained an error in the Perl script.  Easily done give its resemblance to line noise.
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Giraffe

  • I brake for Giraffes
Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #448 on: 18 November, 2023, 05:27:24 pm »
I don't think it's wrong to refer to gauge pressure (which is clearly what they mean in this context) as negative.  Absolute pressure would be another matter.
Indeed - so say so.
2x4: thick plank; 4x4: 2 of 'em.

Re: Science that makes you cringe
« Reply #449 on: 19 November, 2023, 11:37:49 pm »
Article about moving bagged waste along 'vacuum' tubes said that the bags were moved by negative pressure.

this grinds my gears.
'Vacuums don't suck' is something I'd like taught in all schools.

Regardless of the use of negative, the bags are definitely not moved by negative pressure, but by a pressure differential. In lots of situations, they are moved by the weight of the atmosphere.
<i>Marmite slave</i>