FWIW you can usually see if you have flicker by waving your fingers between you and your light; at a certain speed your fingers will strobe if the flicker is bad.
Most domestic tungsten lights flicker too, just nothing like as badly as some other lights do.
BTW one of the main differentiators between different LED lights is efficiency.
At the budget end of the spectrum you can buy cheap LED bulbs in the pound shop with about 70-90 lumens per Watt. These seem OK for the money (and are slightly more efficient than CFLs are usually); reasonable colour temperature, a bit flickery perhaps. They are still about six times more efficient than typical BC tungsten bulbs (around 10 lumens per Watt, although there are slightly more efficient types too).
Spend more and you get more light, up to about 200 lumens per Watt at present in commercial LED bulbs. In the laboratory, 200 lumens per Watt was ground-breaking just a few years ago; now they are doing about 300 lumens per Watt in the lab, maybe more.
So, does it make sense to spend more on expensive bulbs?
Suppose it is (say) a choice between a cheap 5W LED bulb or a more expensive 3W LED bulb to make the same amount of light. Over the life of the bulb (say 20000 hours...? -they claim 30000 for most LEDs) the 5W bulb will use 100 units of electricity and the 3W bulb will use 60 units of electricity. At today's prices (say 25p/unit?) that is £25 vs £15. So yes, it is worth spending up to about £10 more on the more expensive bulb in this case! [Note that this also assumes that the cheaper bulb will last as long, which is a fairly big assumption...].
Prof David Mackay (RIP) reckoned it wasn't even worth 'using up' old tungsten bulbs, they are so inefficient. In 20000 hours of tungsten bulb use, equivalent to either of the bulbs above, you will use about £150 in electricity and you will have used up the life in about 20 conventional BC bulbs. You could replace 20 bulbs with cheap LEDs (and pay the electricity bill for them) about four times over for the same money.
Another way of looking at it is that a 60W BC tungsten bulb will last about 1000Hrs and will use 60 units (about £15 worth) of electricity over its life. If you have 20 such bulbs already (that you plan to 'use up') and each one only does about 50 to 100hrs a year, you will still be using some of them in ten or twenty years time... If you replace all those with (even) cheap LED bulbs, the payback time is about 2-3 years or something like that. The higher the usage rate, the shorter the payback time. After 'payback' you are getting your light for a tiny fraction of the cost...
So tungsten lights are arguably best now thought of as a fairly expensive way of heating the room in a feeble fashion, with an additional benefit of some light coming out....
cheers