"A trial date was provisionally set for November 9 with an estimate of five days."
Does anyone have an update on this?
The driver was convicted - while Mr Radford was still alive - of the relatively new offence of causing serious injury by dangerous driving.
This has a maximum of five years.
Mr Radford later died - 16 months after the crash.
The 'year and a day' rule no longer exists, so the driver could be held responsible for the death.
That puts him in line for death by dangerous driving, which has a maximum of 14 years.
Prosecutors are looking at trying the driver for death by dangerous driving.
Given what's happened already, the jury would be asked to decide if the crash caused the death.
Not as simple as it sounds, given the time delay.
So there would be lots of complex and competing medical evidence - the trial would have very little to do with the crash, because the legal responsibility for that has already been decided.
The likely sentence for death by dangerous in this case is not going to be more than a few years, which the driver could conceivably get for the offence for which he has already been convicted.
Thus prosecutors have to seriously weigh up the public interest in pursuing a second trial for which, of course, there is no guaranteed outcome.
It is likely the views of Mr Radford's family will be sought as part of that decision making process.