Yet Another Cycling Forum

General Category => Freewheeling => Topic started by: ABlipInContinuity on 14 November, 2008, 12:33:23 pm

Title: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: ABlipInContinuity on 14 November, 2008, 12:33:23 pm
My first bike as an independant adult.

I bought it when I was 18. It was a Raleigh Spirit Hybrid. It was fine to start with. But when I started using it for winter commuting, I ended up spending more time fixing it, stripping and regreasing parts then I did actually riding it!


The second has to be a "professional mountaineer" that someone gave me. A mild steel MTB with a sloping down tube and ashtabular cranks. It was uncomfortable and my knees hated with wide Q-factor.

So which have been your least favourite?
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Manotea on 14 November, 2008, 12:39:12 pm
Pompino. Like riding a cart horse on Temazepam.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Wobbly John on 14 November, 2008, 12:40:06 pm
A halfords bike that I bought for my son. It seemed to be one that had ended up with the wrong price - ally bars, seatpost, rims etc, when most in that price range were still steel, decent components too.

It just rode DEAD, DEAD, DEAD - like trying to run with wellies on.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Ariadne on 14 November, 2008, 12:43:09 pm
This one - it was in the shed of a gite that we rented in Provence. I did use it - rode a couple of miles down to the village every day for bread, and to the local swimming pool (where this photo was taken), but it was a piece of rubbish and every pedal stroke took twice the energy it should have!

(http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m170/gillianlaw/Provence%202006/Cyndiatlapiscine.jpg)

Actually, looking at the photo makes me nostalgic, so maybe it wasn't all bad  :)
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: border-rider on 14 November, 2008, 12:45:48 pm
Pompino. Like riding a cart horse on Temazepam.


 :o

Mine was damn fast.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: clarion on 14 November, 2008, 12:46:39 pm
When my OGME  was stolen, I decided for some bizarre reason, based on the amount of roughstuff I was doing at the time, to buy a hybrid.  I won't name the shop, as it was my fault not theirs.

It was an Alpinestars Xross.  Never buy a bike whose name youcan't say ;D

It was a bit too long, and I found out that straight bars are not for me.  My mileage dropped dramatically, and eventually I gave up riding. :(

It had a decent outcome, though.  After Pagan tried riding it unsuccessfully (wrong size again, and rode too damn heavy), I donated it to a kid I formerly did youth work with.  The son of a colleague and friend, he was trying hard to keep out of bother, and needed some way to get to work.  He was very happy to have it.

Last time I saw it, the rear tyre was worn through, and the rear brake cable was missing. :-\  Nonetheless, it was used.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Frenchie on 14 November, 2008, 12:46:56 pm
The Pompino is very comfy; slow-ish it is true though but a good workhorse and winter trainer.

I'm no big fan of Bromptons.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: pumpkin on 14 November, 2008, 12:48:26 pm
Pompino. Like riding a cart horse on Temazepam.


 :o

Mine was damn fast.

Mine still is ;D
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: mike on 14 November, 2008, 12:49:53 pm
my first proper bike was an all alloy Saracen something or other with a standard double, also too big for me.  It had an incredibly harsh ride, my hands, arms and shoulders would be in agony after about 2 hours, and the saddle was murder.

(I quite like my pompino though :) )
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: border-rider on 14 November, 2008, 12:50:56 pm
The Pompino is very comfy; slow-ish but comfy.



Comfy I agree.  Slowish ?  Not in my experience.  With light tyres and light wheels, it just flies.  OK it's not as snappy as a carbon TT machine, but then it's not a carbon TT machine.  It's gloriously stable on descents, which makes it actually a lot faster on hilly/rolling rides than something twitchier.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: border-rider on 14 November, 2008, 12:52:33 pm
Pompino. Like riding a cart horse on Temazepam.


 :o

Mine was damn fast.

Mine still is ;D

Mine now has big heavy wheels, a hub brake/dynamo and Marathon Plusses on.  In that configuration it is slower than when it did PBP.  As is the rider.  But you can't blame the frame for that.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Frenchie on 14 November, 2008, 12:53:34 pm
The Pompino is very comfy; slow-ish but comfy.



Comfy I agree.  Slowish ?  Not in my experience.  With light tyres and light wheels, it just flies.  OK it's not as snappy as a carbon TT machine, but then it's not a carbon TT machine.  It's gloriously stable on descents, which makes it actually a lot faster on hilly/rolling rides than something twitchier.

It won't match my other fixies for speed. It is much more designed to be a stable Cadillac than a Ferrari. It takes quite a hill for my Orbit to become dangerously twitchy.

Note that I like my Pompino and its guards, rack (and panniers) and Schmidt+E6 combo... I like it a lot for some riding.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: border-rider on 14 November, 2008, 12:57:46 pm

It won't match my other fixies for speed.

How much of that is gearing/wheels/tyres ?

Quote
It takes quite a hill for my Orbit to become dangerously twitchy.

Sure, but if you factor in poor road surfaces too...

Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Frenchie on 14 November, 2008, 01:10:35 pm

It won't match my other fixies for speed.

How much of that is gearing/wheels/tyres ?

Quote
It takes quite a hill for my Orbit to become dangerously twitchy.

Sure, but if you factor in poor road surfaces too...


I accept all of the above. The "rear end" of the Pompino just feels more lazy than my fast bike (even without the panniers!  ;)). Again, it doesn't make the Pompino a bad bike. In fact I took it in all its "touring" glory and with hybrid 28mm tyres on a club run last Saturday and we were doing fine. For sheer speed and response, my Orbit is still better. IMO of course.

EDIT: Mine has OPs and 28mm Conti tyres (City Contact?).
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: julianbramley on 14 November, 2008, 01:12:05 pm
Just feel I've got to step in and defend the Pompino.
I have a carbon planet x, but don't mind at all commuting and winter training on my Pomp.
Its got guards and 32mm marathons on but it still feels good, and it corners very well.
It might look like a tractor but it doesn't hang around.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: ABlipInContinuity on 14 November, 2008, 01:13:38 pm
I had a dream about a Pompino once. I dreamt that I had just taken delivery of the bike and locked it up because I couldn't ride it straight away. And then someone stole it.

The next morning on the way to work, I saw a Pompino. First time I'd seen one for ages!

This thread is just making me want a Pompino.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: bobb on 14 November, 2008, 01:39:35 pm
A bike I had as a kid. I can't remember what make it was, but it was called a "Pixie". All my mates had bikes with much more macho names which made me feel inadequate  :P

It also had solid tyres. I can still feel the vibration now.

I eventually managed to persuade my parents to buy my a Grifter for xmas. Then I rocked  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: citoyen on 14 November, 2008, 01:40:52 pm
Mine was damn fast.

That's cos it had you on it, shurely?

The only bike I bought that I didn't like was a Sterling House BSO that cost all of £40 and is now languishing at the back of the garage. I bought it reluctantly because my wife wanted to get into cycling but didn't want to spend any money in case she didn't like it, despite me telling her that she was never going to like it on such a low-quality machine!

Point proved, I have since given her "my" Edinburgh hybrid, which she actually enjoys riding and now understands why I was reluctant to get the Sterling House bike in the first place!

d.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Rhys W on 14 November, 2008, 01:49:39 pm
Re-read this, but substitute the equivalent English word for pompino:
I had a dream about a Pompino once.

The next morning on the way to work, I saw a Pompino. First time I'd seen one for ages!

This thread is just making me want a Pompino.
;D
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: kyuss on 14 November, 2008, 01:50:48 pm
An old steel Saracen Rufftrax. It was heavy, too big (my fault), had horrible gripshift, useless canti brakes, kept bending rear axles and the wheels went out of true as soon as you looked at them. It might still be in my dads shed.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on 14 November, 2008, 02:27:41 pm
Dawes Discovery 501 hybred.

Dreadful handling. Spokes brokes within days of buying it, and I was riding small mileages on the road. Despite the bike costing £500, all cables were 'rustless' rather than stainless. They rusted overnight. Clark disk brakes that required constant adjustment.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Si on 14 November, 2008, 02:43:53 pm
Caloi or airnimal, mainly because they kept breaking under me.

Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: bikenerd on 14 November, 2008, 03:50:21 pm
My Giant XTC SX MTB.  (Hey acronyms!)
It was a nice bike, just the wrong bike for me.  A very stiff, very racy MTB with 80mm travel fork.  Everytime I tried to do something technical or went down a rough downhill, it felt like it would throw me over the bars at any point.  Leaving me to walk down stuff.

Replaced by a Pipedream Sirius steel hardtail with slack(ish) angles and a 120mm travel fork.  Now I can actually ride stuff again!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Salvatore on 14 November, 2008, 03:56:18 pm
A Thorn Club Tour.

Heavy, uncomfortable, clunky and the brakes never worked properly.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: blackpuddinonnabike on 14 November, 2008, 04:00:18 pm
I can honestly say I liked every bike I had at the time I had it. And that includes the awful Halfrauds Full Sus MTB and the replacement Halfrauds Full Sus MTB when I cracked the frame on the first one.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: rogerzilla on 14 November, 2008, 08:01:14 pm
Ooh.

Raleigh Mayflower (I had it between 5 and 8 ): girly, although quite a nice purple colour.

Sun Solo (my parents decided I was growing and needed a 23.5" frame...I'm taller now and use a 21.5").  The headtube wasn't faced and the headset constantly loosened itself, it was a vile pale blue and a brake lever exploded the first time I rode it.  Eventually it was tamed with alloy wheels, a respray and a properly-fitted headset, and I used it for club runs of up to 80 miles.  I scrapped it a few years ago.

Thorn Nomad, just sold.  Reliable, but deeply uninspiring to ride and worth nothing like what it cost.  I could never get brakes that worked well; SE cantis were crap, V-brakes were great but had to be run so close to the rim that they rubbed on every climb, Oryx are just mediocre and tend to judder and squeal.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Aidan on 14 November, 2008, 08:16:30 pm
A cheap, nasty and horrible 70's folder that my dad bought me and my brother on a special deal from the back of a sunday newspaper 'cause he was too tight to buy us proper bikes.

I hated the thing. I still rode it almost every day from one side of York to the other and back to see my mates.

Cant remember ( and dont care) what happened to it
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: mr_brooks on 15 November, 2008, 09:00:53 am
Cannondale "Bad Boy".

Silly name, and (for me) jarringly uncomfortable ride, despite various changes of tyres, handlebars, saddle, grips. Could never get on with it.

Stolen from Hanwell, West London. Mad as hell at the time - looking back, they did me a favour...
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: rogerzilla on 15 November, 2008, 09:14:29 am
Stolen from Hanwell, West London.
Hmmm...better check the SEEKRIT BUNKER  ;)
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: mr_brooks on 15 November, 2008, 09:26:46 am
Perhaps now locked to a Sheffield Stand  ;)

Interestingly, when the Bad Boy was stolen, it was locked to a home made "thing" (not quite sure what too call it) - a huge flowerpot filled with concrete, with a chain sunk into it. I was surprised that the weak link was the U Lock, rather than the chain.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Sigurd Mudtracker on 15 November, 2008, 09:28:51 pm
A Raleigh RSW16 which convinced me that Dr Moulton's bikes were works of genius and never to touch a Raleigh again

A Specialized Crossroads Sport, circa 1992.  I was suspicious of mountain bikes, wanted a "rough stuff" bike and the knobbly tyres, 700C wheels and canti brakes looked just the ticket.  Unfortunately the tyres were extremely hard work on tarmac, the over-built forks transmitted every imperfection to my wrists, and it weighed a ton.  It became (as my garage bears evidence to) one of the few bikes I sold on.  I went back to rough stuffing on my Saracen Triathlon 531-framed bike with 28mm tyres.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: TheLurker on 17 November, 2008, 09:08:46 am
A Raleigh Nova. A replacement for my BSA 'Tour of Britain' that was nicked.  The Nova was a horrible bike. It was only bought because I needed transport PDQ.
Title: Re: The "bikes you didn't like" Thread
Post by: Charlotte on 17 November, 2008, 09:26:11 am
Stolen from Hanwell, West London.
Hmmm...better check the SEEKRIT BUNKER  ;)

I tell you what - if the old bill ever do stick their noses round the door of the SEEKRIT BUNKER, they're going to think we're either a community bike project or a den of thieves...