Oh dear.
I haven't got my copy of Arrivee yet so I don't know how my article was presented.
I just wrote a "wot I done on my audax" article which happened to involve a crash at the end and I submitted the picture of my helmet because I thought it would be interesting. It wasn't intended to be a pro-helmet article where n=1
For the record I am anti- compulsion too.
I'll wait to get my copy before commenting further
It's not your article that's the issue.
I find it disappointing that a club magazine gives such prominence to an article that seeks to exclude part of the membership from the pages of the magazine. It's a slippery slope.
I'm not saying that helmet issues aren't a valid discussion point
Maybe they are, maybe they aren't, but I also note lots of pictures of bikes on LEL that don't meet the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations
*. Is arrivee and AUK condoning this flagrant breach of the law by using such photo's? I look forward to that discussion.
Agreed.
This article has really fucked me off like. Not sure I want to be associated with such wank.
I did ask myself the question if it had landed on the doormat a week earlier, would I have renewed my membership?
*Unless of course all those riders are fitting their pedal reflectors every evening and removing them in the morning.
X-post with BeMoreMike