Author Topic: Life After People  (Read 12008 times)

D0m1n1c Burford

Life After People
« on: 27 May, 2008, 12:27:50 pm »
Did anyone else see this?  Really interesting documentary that showed the effects on our planet if the human species went extinct.  It showed how our man made structures such as buildings, bridges, roads etc would all eventually collapse.  Eventually, there would be no trace that our species had ever existed.  It also showed which species of animals would survive in our wake. 

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Life After People
« Reply #1 on: 27 May, 2008, 12:35:02 pm »
The great pyramid of Cheops would last the longest, apparently!
It is simpler than it looks.

Dave

Re: Life After People
« Reply #2 on: 27 May, 2008, 12:36:59 pm »
Eventually, there would be no trace that our species had ever existed. 

Hmm. Not sure about that. At the very least there would be a nice thin layer of irradiated material that would keep the cockroach scientists guessing...

Re: Life After People
« Reply #3 on: 27 May, 2008, 12:37:57 pm »
It was pretty interesting viewing - it's just a shame it was CGI'd to death.  And I found the VO downright irritating.

But there were loads of points of interest - who'd have thought the Hoover Dam would last so long?  And I've never considered how ephemeral our culture is compared to, say, stone tablets.


Re: Life After People
« Reply #4 on: 27 May, 2008, 12:47:02 pm »
...Eventually, there would be no trace that our species had ever existed...

You might find this book interesting. The billions of tons of plastic created in the last fifty years will be around for a very long time, because bacteria have not evolved the ability to break down the petrochemical polymers of which it is comprised  :(
Profit or planet?

andygates

  • Peroxide Viking
Re: Life After People
« Reply #5 on: 27 May, 2008, 01:10:43 pm »
Mines.  Mines would really confuse the cockroach geologists.

It's only the absence of mine-sign that proves that dinosaurs didn't have a technological culture...
It takes blood and guts to be this cool but I'm still just a cliché.
OpenStreetMap UK & IRL Streetmap & Topo: ravenfamily.org/andyg/maps updates weekly.

D0m1n1c Burford

Re: Life After People
« Reply #6 on: 27 May, 2008, 01:20:31 pm »
...Eventually, there would be no trace that our species had ever existed...

You might find this book interesting. The billions of tons of plastic created in the last fifty years will be around for a very long time, because bacteria have not evolved the ability to break down the petrochemical polymers of which it is comprised  :(

That looks like  great read!

Dave

Re: Life After People
« Reply #7 on: 27 May, 2008, 01:36:22 pm »
Mines.  Mines would really confuse the cockroach geologists.

It's only the absence of mine-sign that proves that dinosaurs didn't have a technological culture...

One dinosaur scientist to another, as the radioactive ash rains down, "I told you there was a fundamental design flaw with those iridium-fuelled reactors"

Mr Larrington

  • A bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
  • Custard Wallah
    • Mr Larrington's Automatic Diary
Re: Life After People
« Reply #8 on: 27 May, 2008, 01:54:56 pm »
The great pyramid of Cheops would last the longest, apparently!

Longer than the Toyota HiLux pickup?

(Boggles)
External Transparent Wall Inspection Operative & Mayor of Mortagne-au-Perche
Satisfying the Bloodlust of the Masses in Peacetime

Re: Life After People
« Reply #9 on: 27 May, 2008, 02:29:54 pm »
I didn't see it, but wandering the Cornish coves this weekend and looking at the many layers of history in the cliffs did get me thinking along the lines of which layer would be all that was left of us, at some point in the future.

Really Ancien

Re: Life After People
« Reply #10 on: 27 May, 2008, 03:17:17 pm »
Will the whole surface of the Earth  be recycled in subduction zones? Is the surface of the Moon stable? What processes are acting on that stuff left over from the Apollo missions?

Damon.

Dave

Re: Life After People
« Reply #11 on: 27 May, 2008, 04:33:56 pm »
Will the whole surface of the Earth  be recycled in subduction zones? Is the surface of the Moon stable? What processes are acting on that stuff left over from the Apollo missions?

Damon.

In theory, but as there are sedimentary rocks over 3 billion years old, it'll take quite a while before subduction erases us from the geological record. Hmm. Some of the sedimentary rock being laid down today probably won't get subducted before the Sun goes kablooey (technical term), so geological evidence of us could be around for a loooooooooong time.

No subduction on the moon, so you're really only left with meteor strikes/visitin scrap metal merchants/expoding nuclear waste dumps.

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Life After People
« Reply #12 on: 27 May, 2008, 04:54:06 pm »
What processes are acting on that stuff left over from the Apollo missions?


Sunlight and meteorites, mainly.
It is simpler than it looks.

border-rider

Re: Life After People
« Reply #13 on: 27 May, 2008, 05:09:42 pm »
I found it a bit irritating, but also very interesting.

What irritated:

Much was made of the fate of poor old Fido, trapped in the house, but no mention of farm animals.  Cows would explode and everything else die - except sheep I guess.  But maybe that would have lead to hard questions about farming practices...

It was very US-centric, despite a few bits about the London Underground & the Thames Barrier.  No mention of the gas supply network under our streets which might hasten the destruction of cities a bit, I felt

I was unconvinced that the generators in the Hoover dam would  supply power for years; they might keep spinning, but I bet the grid wouldn't take it and the station itself would disconnect

I don't think that the dose rates near Chernobyl were high enough to kill all plant life :).  Mammals, OK, in the hot spots.

They kept saying that after 5 years the roads would have become greened right over (with nice graphics) but the city of Pripyat seemed still to be mostly there after 20 years.

</pedant>

What was good was the way that the planet got on with it after we'd gone and, frankly, seemed like a much nicer place with a much brighter future.  Food for thought.

Si

Re: Life After People
« Reply #14 on: 27 May, 2008, 07:40:27 pm »
Quote
What was good was the way that the planet got on with it after we'd gone and, frankly, seemed like a much nicer place with a much brighter future.


You have just qualified as either a Dr Who or a James Bond baddie.

steveB

Re: Life After People
« Reply #15 on: 27 May, 2008, 08:22:47 pm »

You might find this book interesting.

I'm actually reading the book at the moment, only read a couple of chapters though - it puts me to sleep quicker than a bottle of Shiraz  ;)

Re: Life After People
« Reply #16 on: 27 May, 2008, 10:31:12 pm »
I found it a bit irritating, but also very interesting.
[...]
What was good was the way that the planet got on with it after we'd gone and, frankly, seemed like a much nicer place with a much brighter future.  Food for thought.

Yes, it was a bit mixed.
Frenchie - Train à Grande Vitesse

border-rider

Re: Life After People
« Reply #17 on: 27 May, 2008, 10:36:15 pm »
Quote
What was good was the way that the planet got on with it after we'd gone and, frankly, seemed like a much nicer place with a much brighter future.


You have just qualified as either a Dr Who or a James Bond baddie.

 ;D

You know, I had that same thought when i was watching it.  I realised that I might be routing for the baddie in the next Hollywood blockbuster ;)

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Life After People
« Reply #18 on: 28 May, 2008, 06:43:19 am »
Presumably the trees would take over Britain (exwept high moorland) within 10 years.  Things like ash are rather good at seeding themselves.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

border-rider

Re: Life After People
« Reply #19 on: 28 May, 2008, 07:33:36 am »
I dunno

The field behind our house has been left abandoned since 1985, and wasn't farmed before that.  It has some thickets of shrub here and there (mostly where hedges of adjacent houses have encroached) and a couple of big trees, but the rest is nettles and long scraggy grassy stuff which all dies down in the winter.  Maybe the rabbits and deer are sufficient to keep it clear.



Taken in early March.  It's a lot more green now :)

Re: Life After People
« Reply #20 on: 28 May, 2008, 09:32:19 am »
not having seen this, what circumstances pushed us over the edge to an exctinction event?

blackpuddinonnabike

Re: Life After People
« Reply #21 on: 28 May, 2008, 09:33:47 am »
not having seen this, what circumstances pushed us over the edge to an exctinction event?

Televisual licence I do believe. We simply vanished...

Re: Life After People
« Reply #22 on: 28 May, 2008, 09:36:51 am »
...I realised that I might be routing for the baddie in the next Hollywood blockbuster ;)

No kids? Then join me as a member of VHEMT. Although I suspect we will always be outnumbered by the slaves of instinct...

But there is a solution to that problem too: Pentti Linkola's the man  :)
Profit or planet?

border-rider

Re: Life After People
« Reply #23 on: 28 May, 2008, 09:40:01 am »
not having seen this, what circumstances pushed us over the edge to an exctinction event?

Televisual licence I do believe.

Oh come on !

It's less than £150 a year.




Re: Life After People
« Reply #24 on: 28 May, 2008, 09:41:16 am »
Televisual licence I do believe. We simply vanished...

Hmmmm. I don't have a television licence. I wonder if that makes me invisible to the powers that be?


<edit> Arse! Second, as usual...
Profit or planet?