Hello Dave, I originally posted the query below in its own thread, but Samuel D pointed out it would be worth posting in your frame-related thread too. Thanks!
With the standard of road surfaces in Britain declining so alarmingly from an already dire state, I've decided my Roberts commuter needs to be modified to take up to 35mm tyres (with mudguards). This will also allow me to fit Continental Top Contact Winter Premium tyred wheels on dodgy days - these are nominally '37mm', but I understand they come up narrower than this. And my 30mm Schwalbe Winters will fit without rubbing annoyingly.
Currently it just about takes 28mm tyres with Shimano BR650 brakes - it's their Audax frame with oversized downtube (Chas had been experimenting with the oversized tubing and I was willing to give it a go in a frame that was custom-built to my specified dimensions and fittings).
The frame transfer states 'Columbus Nivacrom', but of course Roberts were noted for mixing tubesets, so I don't actually know what individual tubes are made from. Not sure what model Nivacrom it is - the transfer is under a chain-catcher which obscures the lower section of it, but I understand there are/were different types. I'll look under the chain-catcher if it makes a difference. My chainstays in this frame are 16.5mm wide horizontally and 31mm tall at the rim - I wonder if this helps identify the tubing?
I reckon by moving the brake bridge up 10mm and the chainstay bridge forwards by 8mm I will get plenty of clearance for the desired 35mm tyres. This will necessitate switching to Tektro R559 deep-drop brakes, which are 55-73mm, compared with '47-57mm' for the BR650s. 45mm mudguards will squeeze in too, but I'll need a new fork.
So I'm wondering whether the seatstay and chainstay tubing will be up to a re-brazing (by an expert, of course), or is Nivacrom too thin or delicate to risk it (if that's what the stays are) - what do the frame tubing experts here think?