Yet Another Cycling Forum

Random Musings => Gallery => Topic started by: Kim on 26 July, 2013, 03:30:24 pm

Title: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 26 July, 2013, 03:30:24 pm
Inspired by this post (https://yacf.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=26458.msg1530582#msg1530582).

Tragically I don't have photos of my real favourites (first person to post a picture of that spiral gate on the Wandle Trail wins), but I'm thinking:

Silly Sustrans Gates:
(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/obstructions/IMG_5558.sized.jpg)

Ministry Of Crap Design:
(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/secret_park/IMG_20120328_152151.sized.jpg)

Obstructive wildlife:
(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/mild_touring_june2011/IMG_20110603_161108.sized.jpg)

Dense undergrowth:
(http://sphotos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/523588_10151289484526318_1967337396_n.jpg)

Impossible surfaces:
(http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k411/cycleman108/019-5.jpg)  (http://www.alfiecat.co.uk/yetacf/basil.gif)

Portals to hell:
(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/barakta_tunnel/IMG_20120527_191546.sized.jpg)

Strategically spaced bollards:
(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/obstructions/Photo0233.sized.jpg)

As well as:
Ludicrous gradients and/or steps
Broken lifts (Greenwich wins by default)
Navigational ambiguity
Badly parked vehicles (preferably interesting ones, or badly-placed designated parking spaces)
Amazing feats of fly tipping
Flooding
etc, etc.


Let's see what you've got...
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: TimO on 26 July, 2013, 08:11:15 pm
Diamond Geezer has some images of the Wandle Trail (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dgeezer/sets/72157594322107695/), including these two, which may be what you're referring to.  That does look like a spectacularly stupid design.

(http://farm1.staticflickr.com/102/266320852_3e40b1fcee.jpg)

(http://farm1.staticflickr.com/93/266320864_490a8494a5.jpg)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: clarion on 26 July, 2013, 08:21:32 pm
Dash it all!  I rode over the twirly bridge tonight, but took no photo.  It's been amended since TimO's photo.

Gate 74 has now been replaced, and, to be fair, is at the end of a section of footpath, where the cycle route diverts.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 26 July, 2013, 10:08:41 pm
The spiral bridges are wonderful. There should be one in ever kids' playground. But they do not belong on cycle paths.

What do the numbers on them refer to?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: jogler on 26 July, 2013, 10:54:49 pm
I've always been pleased that the video of Basil having a sudden lie down terminates when it does 'cause it's me behind him;still upright at that moment  ;)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: mattc on 27 July, 2013, 07:33:20 am
The spiral bridges are wonderful. There should be one in ever kids' playground. But they do not belong on cycle paths.

What do the numbers on them refer to?
Fatalities in the last 12 months, usually.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 27 July, 2013, 07:59:19 am
Or the numbers of people trapped inside.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Tewdric on 27 July, 2013, 08:06:05 am
It all depends on whether you'd rather share the path with spotty 17 year olds doing 50 mph on nicked motocross bikes.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 27 July, 2013, 08:17:48 am
It all depends on whether you'd rather share the path with spotty 17 year olds doing 50 mph on nicked motocross bikes.

Not really.  They lift the bike in the way that many legitimate path users can't.  Or use the gap in the hedge, or enter the path from the other end or simply ride across the grass or whatever.

I've encountered them on paths from time to time, and tbh, they're less hazardous than the average dog.  By their nature, they want to avoid the busy sections of path, and I don't believe that illegal motorcycles do significant damage to surfaces that are actually appropriate for cycling on anyway.  The solution to such abuse is policing, not disproportionately inconvenient barriers that don't actually stop the problem.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: TimO on 27 July, 2013, 01:14:55 pm
... The solution to such abuse is policing, not disproportionately inconvenient barriers that don't actually stop the problem.

This, exactly.

I've very rarely seen motor vehicles of any description where they shouldn't be.  The only place I've seen them with any regularity, is on Tooting Bec Common, where once or twice a year caravans will appear for a few days.  The cycle paths there can actually be partially closed off with gates to stop this, but the council workers often leave these gates open to make it easy for them to get their vans through when emptying the bins, or doing maintenance.

The spiral ones shown on the Wandle Path are excessively stupid examples of such, they're far more involved and complicated than they need to be for this purpose, and look to have been made because someone liked the attractive design, which is tolerable on a path where you'd use them occasionally, but not really appropriate on a route which could be used by a lot of people regularly.  As we all know, they aren't just annoying for regular cyclists, they fail to work for tandems, tricycles, recumbents, trailers, pushchairs, and wheel chairs, all of which are legal and generally responsible users of the routes.

The perception that there will be vast numbers of illegal motorcycles is often far larger than the reality of the situation.  Most motor cyclists don't want to go down narrow, ill surfaced routes with poor visibility.  Cyclists use those routes because the limitations are tolerable given the distances that they can often shorten their travels by.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 13 January, 2015, 01:26:39 pm
Sustrans: Leading the war on Silly Sustrans Gates™. (http://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/access-controls-wandle-trail-london)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: LEE on 15 January, 2015, 02:54:43 pm
Diamond Geezer has some images of the Wandle Trail (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dgeezer/sets/72157594322107695/), including these two, which may be what you're referring to.  That does look like a spectacularly stupid design.

(http://farm1.staticflickr.com/102/266320852_3e40b1fcee.jpg)

(http://farm1.staticflickr.com/93/266320864_490a8494a5.jpg)

I don't see Wobbly John complaining about this one.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: mrcharly-YHT on 15 January, 2015, 02:58:48 pm
How the f*ck are you supposed to get a bike+trailer around that?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 January, 2015, 03:15:22 pm
What a ridiculous question, Mr Charly. Frankly, I'm ashamed that we have anyone on YACF who can consider such an absurd scenario.  ::-)


It's a cycle path, that means it's for solo bikes only, with tyres suited to muddy conditions and riders blessed with outstanding coordination, balance and nerves. They will also have the strength to ride up a grassy one in four slope but the self-restraint to never exceed 12mph. It's not meant for anything like practical bike usage. That's what we have roads erm, cars for.

(Alternative answer: on a unicycle)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 January, 2015, 03:24:55 pm
As for the problem of motorcycles on cycle paths, if these are really a problem* then why not adopt the design used on rural bridleways of the muddy, horsey type: a padlocked gate which can be swung open for maintenance access, but in its closed position has a large cutout with a lip a few inches high. Just high enough to stop a motorbike (or other wheeled vehicle) crossing it, but easy for a horse to step over. Obviously, you can't cycle over this - but it's quite easy for most people to lift most cycles over, even a tandem. It would, of course, still be a problem for many disabled people unless they had an able-bodied companion, and might require unhitching a trailer. It's far from perfect, but it's got to be a lot better for cyclists (and cheaper to install) than those spirals (or even lots of bollards and chicanes currently in use).

*Having used the Bristol-Bath path off and on since 1986, I've only once seen a 'live' motorcycle on the path, and that was chugging along slowly and respectfully with a fisherman on its back (might have been a bit lost, actually). OTOH, I've seen lots of scooter-shaped charred tar areas - always in the same districts, too.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 January, 2015, 03:42:48 pm
As for the problem of motorcycles on cycle paths, if these are really a problem* then why not adopt the design used on rural bridleways of the muddy, horsey type: a padlocked gate which can be swung open for maintenance access, but in its closed position has a large cutout with a lip a few inches high. Just high enough to stop a motorbike (or other wheeled vehicle) crossing it, but easy for a horse to step over. Obviously, you can't cycle over this - but it's quite easy for most people to lift most cycles over, even a tandem. It would, of course, still be a problem for many disabled people unless they had an able-bodied companion, and might require unhitching a trailer. It's far from perfect, but it's got to be a lot better for cyclists (and cheaper to install) than those spirals (or even lots of bollards and chicanes currently in use).

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3763/9902116896_0502309270.jpg) (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/)
Silly Sustrans Gate (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/) by Nikki Pugh (https://www.flickr.com/people/nikki_pugh/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 January, 2015, 04:34:01 pm
Exactly the thing. How much of an obstacle was it for you - and your companions? Was it worse or better for a recumbent than a knupwrite? I can see you're pretty laden there - was that a big problem? And how did Barakta cope with it, if she was with you?

ETA: Odd, but I don't recall ever having used one of those myself.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Polar Bear on 15 January, 2015, 04:59:01 pm
As for the problem of motorcycles on cycle paths, if these are really a problem* then why not adopt the design used on rural bridleways of the muddy, horsey type: a padlocked gate which can be swung open for maintenance access, but in its closed position has a large cutout with a lip a few inches high. Just high enough to stop a motorbike (or other wheeled vehicle) crossing it, but easy for a horse to step over. Obviously, you can't cycle over this - but it's quite easy for most people to lift most cycles over, even a tandem. It would, of course, still be a problem for many disabled people unless they had an able-bodied companion, and might require unhitching a trailer. It's far from perfect, but it's got to be a lot better for cyclists (and cheaper to install) than those spirals (or even lots of bollards and chicanes currently in use).

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3763/9902116896_0502309270.jpg) (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/)
Silly Sustrans Gate (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/) by Nikki Pugh (https://www.flickr.com/people/nikki_pugh/), on Flickr

There is a very real chance that if I was cycling along there I would not have seen that gate and taken a flyer.   
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: nikki on 15 January, 2015, 06:09:51 pm
Exactly the thing. How much of an obstacle was it for you - and your companions? Was it worse or better for a recumbent than a knupwrite? I can see you're pretty laden there - was that a big problem? And how did Barakta cope with it, if she was with you?

ETA: Odd, but I don't recall ever having used one of those myself.

I was the sole accompaniment on that one. Trans Pennine way somewhere in the region of Selby, I think. I don't remember it being a barrel of laffs on a (similarly loaded) Sustrans standard hybrid, but we also had to cope with a muddy singletrack section around the edge of a field as part of that bit too, so the whole experience for that bit was generally a bit ARGH!

I enjoyed the airfield bit, though.

There is a very real chance that if I was cycling along there I would not have seen that gate and taken a flyer.   

We had enough trouble getting you moving again after the last incident...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 January, 2015, 06:15:42 pm
As for the problem of motorcycles on cycle paths, if these are really a problem* then why not adopt the design used on rural bridleways of the muddy, horsey type: a padlocked gate which can be swung open for maintenance access, but in its closed position has a large cutout with a lip a few inches high. Just high enough to stop a motorbike (or other wheeled vehicle) crossing it, but easy for a horse to step over. Obviously, you can't cycle over this - but it's quite easy for most people to lift most cycles over, even a tandem. It would, of course, still be a problem for many disabled people unless they had an able-bodied companion, and might require unhitching a trailer. It's far from perfect, but it's got to be a lot better for cyclists (and cheaper to install) than those spirals (or even lots of bollards and chicanes currently in use).

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3763/9902116896_0502309270.jpg) (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/)
Silly Sustrans Gate (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/) by Nikki Pugh (https://www.flickr.com/people/nikki_pugh/), on Flickr

There is a very real chance that if I was cycling along there I would not have seen that gate and taken a flyer.
Probably worth making that point to Sustrans etc, as I doubt it's occurred to them.

Clarification: Clearly they've considered visibility of the barrier, because they've put some yellow-black tape on part of it; but they probably haven't thought of someone with a visual impairment cycling there (other than as a tandem stoker). PB, what would help you notice that? Would it work for you if the yellow-black tape extended all the way down and along the ledge? Or if the wooden part of the ledge was painted a brightly contrasting colour?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Butterfly on 15 January, 2015, 07:14:40 pm
The twirly gate is avoidable by going a different way which I used to do when I had the trailer.

As for the problem of motorcycles on cycle paths, if these are really a problem* then why not adopt the design used on rural bridleways of the muddy, horsey type: a padlocked gate which can be swung open for maintenance access, but in its closed position has a large cutout with a lip a few inches high. Just high enough to stop a motorbike (or other wheeled vehicle) crossing it, but easy for a horse to step over. Obviously, you can't cycle over this - but it's quite easy for most people to lift most cycles over, even a tandem. It would, of course, still be a problem for many disabled people unless they had an able-bodied companion, and might require unhitching a trailer. It's far from perfect, but it's got to be a lot better for cyclists (and cheaper to install) than those spirals (or even lots of bollards and chicanes currently in use).

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3763/9902116896_0502309270.jpg) (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/)
Silly Sustrans Gate (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/) by Nikki Pugh (https://www.flickr.com/people/nikki_pugh/), on Flickr

This is a right pain with a child trailer, or a tandem with a child stoker and a babyseat or for those with mobility issues. It is not, however, any use for stopping motorcycles. I've met motorbikes on stretches of path where I had to remove all my panniers to negotiate gates. Most barriers are more of a problem to those with mobility issues, children or luggage than to young fit chaps on motorbikes.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Mr Larrington on 15 January, 2015, 07:40:46 pm
(http://s7g3.scene7.com/is/image/ae235?wid=1000&hei=1000&op_sharpen=1&layer=0&size=1000,1000&layer=1&size=1000,1000&src=ae235/34861_P)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: pdm on 15 January, 2015, 08:05:31 pm
Heading into Birmingham.

(http://www.meiring.org.uk/plogger/plog-content/images/cycling-stuff/cycling-for-jo/cycle-for-josheffield-to-birmingham-232s.jpeg)

I noticed quite a few motorcycles roaring up and down the cycle path (having their own access at other places...)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 January, 2015, 08:28:48 pm
Most barriers are more of a problem to those with mobility issues, children or luggage than to young fit chaps on motorbikes.
While most of the motorbikers causing problems probably are young fit chaps, I doubt you have to be particularly fit to get a motorbike over most of those barriers - after all, it has far more power than any cyclist, and in effect a barrier in that style is just a kerb. Width-based restrictions won't keep out a trailie bike unless they're so narrow they also cause problems for everyone else legitimately using the path. I expect what seems to keep motorbikes off the Bristol-Bath path is its popularity and the availability of more attractive off-road options (equally illegal, such as Purdown) nearby.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 January, 2015, 11:13:23 pm
Exactly the thing. How much of an obstacle was it for you - and your companions? Was it worse or better for a recumbent than a knupwrite? I can see you're pretty laden there - was that a big problem? And how did Barakta cope with it, if she was with you?

I was able to waddle over it, lifting the front wheel with the handlebars to mount it.  On an upright, Id' probably have dismounted properly, because of stand-over issues.  Requires enough height and arm strength to lift the front end your bike a few inches off the ground, obviously.  With a small-wheeled bike, you'd probably just carry the whole thing across.

The ICE trike would have had more of a problem.  You'd have to dismount, rotate the trike and pull it over in reverse (this is the standard way to wheel a tadpole trike).  If it's a Sprint (or equivalent) there wouldn't be enough clearance on the low point of the cruciform, so you'd have to lift the rear wheel high enough that it wouldn't scrape.  If you've got panniers (or one of Mr Ping's finest LiFePO4 batteries) on the back, that would mean unloading if you're not very strong/tall.


Nikki may not remember, but after some of the rutted off-roading further down the track, we encountered another one of these gates.  This had acquired a sufficient accumulation of mud up against the step that it was pretty much ridable.  It's one of the easiest forms of barrier to defeat, in that respect.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 January, 2015, 11:15:47 pm
Heading into Birmingham.

(http://www.meiring.org.uk/plogger/plog-content/images/cycling-stuff/cycling-for-jo/cycle-for-josheffield-to-birmingham-232s.jpeg)

I've done a 57-point turn to negotiate that one on the ICE trike.  While being glared at by pedestrians.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: mzjo on 25 January, 2015, 12:15:43 am
As for the problem of motorcycles on cycle paths, if these are really a problem* then why not adopt the design used on rural bridleways of the muddy, horsey type: a padlocked gate which can be swung open for maintenance access, but in its closed position has a large cutout with a lip a few inches high. Just high enough to stop a motorbike (or other wheeled vehicle) crossing it, but easy for a horse to step over. Obviously, you can't cycle over this - but it's quite easy for most people to lift most cycles over, even a tandem. It would, of course, still be a problem for many disabled people unless they had an able-bodied companion, and might require unhitching a trailer. It's far from perfect, but it's got to be a lot better for cyclists (and cheaper to install) than those spirals (or even lots of bollards and chicanes currently in use).

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3763/9902116896_0502309270.jpg) (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/)
Silly Sustrans Gate (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikki_pugh/9902116896/) by Nikki Pugh (https://www.flickr.com/people/nikki_pugh/), on Flickr

Whoever is the barmy bxxgxxr who thought that one up? Any bored kid on a trailie or illegal un-taxed, uninsuredetc crosser would have a field day with that - stoppies, wheelies, bunnyhops, 180s on the backwheel in the lane to come back for another go - then he'd get a few mates to join him!! What the hell do the people who think up these things know about kids on crossers? Even a scooter could have fun on that thing!
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 14 March, 2016, 07:36:58 pm
http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2016-03-13/disabled-cyclists-hindered-by-barriers-say-charities/
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Pancho on 14 March, 2016, 08:07:11 pm
From that report, Kim: "Cardiff Council say that the barriers are intentional, and were put in place to limit the speed of two wheeled cyclists. "

I remember being gobsmacked the first time I discussed barriers with the traffic engineer responsible for cycle lanes. I pointed out that they severely degraded the cycling environment and slowed journeys massively. He replied "that's the point".
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 14 March, 2016, 08:09:43 pm
Yep.  It's because we don't build cyclepaths.  We build shared-use paths, and pedestrians get upset (sometimes reasonably) at people cycling on them.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Diver300 on 15 March, 2016, 08:16:34 am
It takes a bike around 50 m to get to very near its maximum speed. Surely to have effective speed limiting, barriers would have to be every 100 m or less. Is that what is being done?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: T42 on 15 March, 2016, 08:49:07 am
It takes a bike around 50 m to get to very near its maximum speed. Surely to have effective speed limiting, barriers would have to be every 100 m or less. Is that what is being done?

Oh gawd.  If you ever ride from Remiremont up to the Col de Bussang stick to the road.  The cycle path follows the old railway track and crosses around 50 roads in its 30k length.  Each intersection is "protected" either side by overlapping half-barriers at gut height: these are made of tree-trunks about 8" in diameter, some of which have splintered ends.

It's a beautiful ride, but doing a double zig-zag every few hundred metres while watching for road traffic and and the dandering/dawdling populace is nerve-racking, and accelerating again every time is killing.

While I'm on the topic, a new cycle path near here has a red & white double barrier at the end.  It's in the edge of the forest, and when the sun's shining the barrier as good as disappears in the dappled light.  Two of my friends have hit it at full bore.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 March, 2016, 12:44:52 pm
It takes a bike around 50 m to get to very near its maximum speed. Surely to have effective speed limiting, barriers would have to be every 100 m or less. Is that what is being done?

Don't give them ideas.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 March, 2016, 12:53:15 pm
Salvaging something positive from the write up:
Quote
He uses a three wheeled bike, which is low to the ground and has a large turning circle, ...
What a sensible description. You might think it was written by a journalist who actually wanted to impart information in a way that everyone would understand!
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 March, 2016, 01:06:16 pm
Salvaging something positive from the write up:
Quote
He uses a three wheeled bike, which is low to the ground and has a large turning circle, ...
What a sensible description. You might think it was written by a journalist who actually wanted to impart information in a way that everyone would understand!

My first thought was "if only there was a word for 'three-wheeled bike'", but the point about the turning circle is important.  It also occurred to me that while barakta (whose turning circle is worse, due to handlebar adjustment for short arms) would probably negotiate those gates with a multi-point turn in order to avoid getting out of the trike, multi-point turns may be problematic for someone with dyspraxia.

It's a shame they couldn't get some other users to demonstrate the problem.  A family with a child trailer or a mobility scooter user, for example.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 15 March, 2016, 01:20:07 pm
My thought was that it explains in a way everyone can understand what's different about a "recumbent tadpole trike" and why he rides it. I didn't watch the video but yes, other users with other needs, problems and solutions would be a good demonstration, even – maybe especially – people on normal bikes with no disabilities but just the right side of clumsy to have to foot it round those barriers.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: T42 on 15 March, 2016, 01:40:26 pm
You can imagine how these things are planned:

- how wide's a bike?
- about 18 inches?
- yeah, but that's just the straight bit you hold onto. How wide's the rest?
- about a foot?
- OK then...
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 March, 2016, 02:02:13 pm
My thought was that it explains in a way everyone can understand what's different about a "recumbent tadpole trike" and why he rides it. I didn't watch the video but yes, other users with other needs, problems and solutions would be a good demonstration, even – maybe especially – people on normal bikes with no disabilities but just the right side of clumsy to have to foot it round those barriers.

The video show him picking up the trike and carrying it through the barriers.  Not a technique most recumbent trike users would use, or even be capable of unassisted.  Most would likely dismount, lift the rear wheel and pull it through, others would do a multi-point turn or give up.  So in that sense it showed the barriers as less disabling than they might be.

A parent unloading a couple of toddlers, unhitching the trailer and carrying it through would make the point nicely, I think.  Perhaps a tandem too, which is towards the normal end of the weird bike spectrum.

Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 March, 2016, 02:03:23 pm
You can imagine how these things are planned:

- how wide's a bike?
- about 18 inches?
- yeah, but that's just the straight bit you hold onto. How wide's the rest?
- about a foot?
- OK then...

There's some sort of theoretical child's mountain bike (with road tyres) that gets used for this sort of thing, I'm sure.  Like the lightweight manual wheelchair people design building access around.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: T42 on 15 March, 2016, 05:32:38 pm
Couple of years back a friend accompanied two disabled people on tadpoles with trailers down the cycle path from Strasbourg towards Basel. Neither of them could walk: they had wheelchairs on the trailers and their drill on stopping was for A to get B's wheelchair down and help him in, then B would do the same for A.  Each tadpole+trailer combo was 3-4 metres long.

Of course, they came across overlapping ¾ barriers about a metre apart across the 3-metre-wide track.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Andrij on 15 March, 2016, 06:01:45 pm
From that report, Kim: "Cardiff Council say that the barriers are intentional, and were put in place to limit the speed of two wheeled cyclists. "

I remember being gobsmacked the first time I discussed barriers with the traffic engineer responsible for cycle lanes. I pointed out that they severely degraded the cycling environment and slowed journeys massively. He replied "that's the point".

As 'people' seem to hate speed cameras I think we should employ the cycle path barrier method to slow down cars.  I was going to suggest as an alternative to cameras and/or speed bumps/humps/cushions/whatever, but no - drivers of motor vehicles should get the same level of facility as cyclists.  It's only fair - why should be get special treatment?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: SoreTween on 15 March, 2016, 06:03:29 pm
Is it really necessary to slow cyclists on a path that wide?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 15 March, 2016, 06:05:43 pm
Is it really necessary to slow cyclists on a path that wide?

Presumably it's about political will from non-cyclists.

I expect barriers are effective, as they discourage cyclists from using the path.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: tatanab on 15 March, 2016, 06:43:55 pm
Oh gawd.  If you ever ride from Remiremont up to the Col de Bussang stick to the road.  The cycle path follows the old railway track and crosses around 50 roads in its 30k length.  Each intersection is "protected" either side by overlapping half-barriers at gut height: these are made of tree-trunks about 8" in diameter, some of which have splintered ends.
I rode that 2 years ago to see the TdeF.  I thought it was fabulous, bearing in mind I am comparing with the UK.  The barriers are set at just the right height and spaced apart just nicely so I could run a trike wheel (upright) underneath and barely slow down.  Sight lines were good, so the only places I had to look hard were the few place where the track crossed real roads as opposed to local access to fields etc.  On the way down I was trudling along nicely at 20mph, calling out to the few pedestrians who neatly sidestepped to make room.  A real contrast to the very very few times I've used comparable tracks in the UK.  The road itself is not to be recommended except at weekends because it is a major access road into Germany.  If anybody goes there, there is an absolutely stunning boulangerie in Ramonchamp, and a very nice very basic campsite too - 4 Euros a night.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: SoreTween on 15 March, 2016, 07:24:52 pm
Presumably it's about political will from non-cyclists.

I expect barriers are effective, as they discourage cyclists from using the path.
A few of these decisions need to be properly challenged.  E.G. Reading Broad Street, two polls in favour of making the whole road mixed use then after the event it's declared not a clear majority - no requirement for a winning margin stated before the poll.  English law is founded on what is reasonable, is that?  Woking town center was made entirely shared use off the back of 'Cycling Towns' funding.  This has now been reversed in some places off the back of.... I don't know what, certainly nothing in the public domain.  I suspect there may have been a few complaints, I would like to see the Council required to justify their action in response to those few complaints vs the number of foot and cycle journeys not resulting in a complaint.  This one in Cardiff looks bloody hard to justify, were any other measures considered or was 'slow the cyclists' a knee jerK?

Declaration of bias:  I used to be able to cycle commute traffic free door to door (Woking), I now cannot.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 18 March, 2017, 05:47:01 pm
The anti-tricycle bollards in King[']s Norton Park have been upgraded[1]:

(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/obstructions/2017_03_18_16_24_11.sized.jpg)

Gap is approximately (I measured in shoe-lengths) ~870mm to the edge of the tarmac on the left, ~725mm between the bollards, and the same to the edge of the tarmac on the right.  It's a good thing nobody would want to take children to the park in a trailer on Birmingham's best off-road cycle route, isn't it?


[1] The previous incarnation were rotten wooden posts in metal bases, which had been kicked in by yoof to the point where they were only a hazard to unlit cyclists at night.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: barakta on 18 March, 2017, 07:03:46 pm
How wide is my trike? We should measure that so I know.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 18 March, 2017, 07:09:01 pm
How wide is my trike? We should measure that so I know.

Track width of the Sprint is 750mm.  Call it 800mm with the thickness of the tyres and no fudge factor whatsoever.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 26 March, 2017, 01:41:52 pm
Yeah, thankfully children aren't allowed in parks now that running, laughing and shouting have all been outlawed. Scares the respectable middle-aged citizens.

At least they've got reflective stripes, though.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 27 March, 2017, 04:11:54 pm
Meanwhile, here's an alternative take on the theme.

The temporary closure of this section of road to form a short section of segregated cyclepath was deemed to be an inconvenient obstruction by these motorised road users, who have made the most of Persons Unknown (presumably a team of drunken rugball zombies) shifting the barriers out of the way:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/846269549364363266

(It's not clear in the photo, but that's a cycle-only traffic light where you have to press a button (on the left) and wait six million years to get a short period of green.  I suppose it answers the old question of whether motorists would get out of their cars to press a button at pedestrian crossings.)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 27 March, 2017, 04:35:10 pm
Ha ha! Well, I suppose tbf they might get out and push the button if they knew about it – but if they knew about it, they'd either take another route or simply jump it (I'm sure many take the second option anyway).
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Andrij on 25 March, 2019, 03:14:03 pm
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/54523681_2289239158028654_4521037856017219584_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_ht=scontent-lht6-1.xx&oh=f647f97f316e67e4c96571be2bde5cbb&oe=5D0EF246)

Yes, we've installed kilometres and kilometres of off-road cycle track.  Job done!
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: mattc on 25 March, 2019, 07:08:58 pm
That IS an excellent paint-job  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: T42 on 26 March, 2019, 08:57:55 am
"Well you never said to take the trees and things out."
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: yorkie on 15 August, 2019, 11:42:56 pm
Posted previously on the rant thread:

These barriers are on all the access points (6 from memory) to Hob Moor in York.

They are all grouped with a kissing gate and a standard gate with a RADAR key for wheelchair users etc.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190815/f16cf5d30b7f3bbf7929f0d67b26f6a4.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190815/e31cd33e73df53bd72a16c211071c69d.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190815/5d85201d0ad2770a5eca24d4dd1eabf6.jpg)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: tom_e on 16 August, 2019, 06:57:07 am
Looks weird.  I'm guessing the intent is to make it difficult to get a trail motorbike's handlebars through by leaning it.  Wonder how bad it'd be with a modern mtb with wide bars.  Obviously you could lift it over the fence, but...

(edit) it might even allow a single child trailer through straight on?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 16 August, 2019, 05:04:51 pm
What is the point of the grooves cut in the raised section? I can't work it out.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: yorkie on 16 August, 2019, 05:17:28 pm
Presumably to catch motorcycle foot-pegs?


There was a major problem with the local yobs stealing motorcycles and riding them around Hob Moor (One of York's ancient strays or parkland areas) then setting fire to them (in the usual case of the police not bothering to try and catch them) in an area that the fire brigade wouldn't be able to get to. The idea was that the grooves would catch on the foot-pegs and the A-frame would stop the m/c from being lifted over.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: yorkie on 16 August, 2019, 05:22:45 pm
Looks weird.  I'm guessing the intent is to make it difficult to get a trail motorbike's handlebars through by leaning it.  Wonder how bad it'd be with a modern mtb with wide bars.  Obviously you could lift it over the fence, but...

(edit) it might even allow a single child trailer through straight on?


Wide bar mtb's might have a problem, although people on sit-up-and-beg Dutch-style bikes seem to be able to get through. There is a RADAR key operable gate to the right of the first photo, which is an option for odd shaped bikes/trikes and trailers. I don't posses a 2-wheeled trailer, so I don't know how well they would fit. I know if I go that way with the BOB Yak single-wheel trailer I need to keep the RADAR key handy!
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 16 August, 2019, 05:30:22 pm
The idea was that the grooves would catch on the foot-pegs and the A-frame would stop the m/c from being lifted over.

And then you've got a Silly Sustrans Gate™ with a motorbike stuck in it?  Not sure that's an improvement.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: yorkie on 16 August, 2019, 05:36:24 pm
The idea was that the grooves would catch on the foot-pegs and the A-frame would stop the m/c from being lifted over.

And then you've got a Silly Sustrans Gate™ with a motorbike stuck in it?  Not sure that's an improvement.


I don't know, they could torch the motorbike and see if it melted the Silly Sustrans Gate™ - Kill two birds with one stone...  ;)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 16 August, 2019, 05:39:13 pm
That's certainly what they'd do here and probably there too. At least that way they don't start a grass fire or melt the tarmac.

Yeah, I had thought about foot pegs but didn't think the channel looked deep enough. I guess it must be!
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: TimO on 26 August, 2019, 01:31:51 pm
...
They are all grouped with a kissing gate and a standard gate with a RADAR key for wheelchair users etc.
...

... and how would any motorcyclist possibly get hold of a Radar key (https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_nkw=radar+key) ?

(Not having a go at you, yorkie, just at the utter stupidity of it).
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: yorkie on 26 August, 2019, 08:03:32 pm
...
They are all grouped with a kissing gate and a standard gate with a RADAR key for wheelchair users etc.
...

... and how would any motorcyclist possibly get hold of a Radar key (https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_nkw=radar+key) ?

(Not having a go at you, yorkie, just at the utter stupidity of it).


That's City of York Council all over, never think two steps ahead.


Mind you, the mindless oafs who do that sort of thing aren't bright enough to think of getting a RADAR key. Most of them struggle to remember to look both ways when crossing a busy road!  ;)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 04 September, 2019, 06:21:53 pm
Putting this one here because it's infrastructure so poor it might as well be an obstruction:

(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/obstructions/2019_09_04_15_26_30.sized.jpg)

(The stairs are welcome new access to the Birmingham & Worcester Canal at Selly Oak, which provides a useful pedestrian route to the new retail park from the High Street.  There's level access to the canal via a convoluted route on the other side of the Bristol Road, which is un-fun to cross at this point.)

Two cyclists came down the stairs carrying their bikes while I was taking photos.  I commented that they weren't using the splendid new wheeling ramp.  One replied to the effect that it was so steep they were concerned about doing a Basil.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: caerau on 04 September, 2019, 08:26:24 pm
There's a bridge over a railway line in Cardiff with just that that either side - complete with the groove on the Sustrans Ely trail in Cardiff.  It's not so shiny and new so clearly this isn't a new idea sadly.
Unsurprisingly, I tend to abandon the trail at that point and cycle up Cowbridge road instead.  I have tried wheeling my bike up and down it for a laugh though - you *really* don't want to be losing grip on the handlebars  :-)
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 04 September, 2019, 08:35:07 pm
There's a flight of steps a bit further down the canal that was built (using cycling money, no less) which sports no less than three different wheeling ramps, because that's how many goes it took to make one you could wheel a bike up.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 05 September, 2019, 08:30:35 am
I've encountered similar devices on supposed cycle routes in Bridgwater, Stroud and Bristol, though the last does have a ramp as an alternative – with a very awkward U-bend. The one in Stroud is quite nasty.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 05 September, 2019, 12:55:45 pm
Suggestion via twitter that it isn't for bicycles at all, but is in fact a geese ramp to open up new suicide possibilities on the A38...
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Mrs Pingu on 08 September, 2019, 05:31:38 pm
Putting this one here because it's infrastructure so poor it might as well be an obstruction:

(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/obstructions/2019_09_04_15_26_30.sized.jpg)

(The stairs are welcome new access to the Birmingham & Worcester Canal at Selly Oak, which provides a useful pedestrian route to the new retail park from the High Street.  There's level access to the canal via a convoluted route on the other side of the Bristol Road, which is un-fun to cross at this point.)

Two cyclists came down the stairs carrying their bikes while I was taking photos.  I commented that they weren't using the splendid new wheeling ramp.  One replied to the effect that it was so steep they were concerned about doing a Basil.

We have something like that locally. It's not in a place I often cycle but I do use regularly as a ped. However, the stairs only have a hand rail on one side, and that's the side they put the ramp in on (retrofitted). Except they've installed the ramp further away from the side so you really can't use the hand rail at all.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 11 September, 2019, 07:12:58 pm
Doesn't the ramp interfere with using the hand rail for some (probably smaller and less mobile) people?
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 11 September, 2019, 07:16:26 pm
Doesn't the ramp interfere with using the hand rail for some (probably smaller and less mobile) people?

I expect it does.  It certainly would if it was a decent way out to avoid handlebar entanglement.  On the other hand (literally), there's a second flight of steps with a wheeling ramp on the other side, so you can choose one that's rampless on your preferred rail-holding side.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: ElyDave on 20 September, 2019, 09:32:44 am
they have those on the footbridge at Cambridge station and on of the bridges out on the fens south of Wicken on an NCN.  I've never see it in use at Cambridge and on the rare occaision I'm station-biking I pick it up and walk up the stairs. 

As per ^^ they're generally too bloody steep
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: TimO on 21 September, 2019, 09:27:38 pm
Our bike store at work actually has a similar concept.  They made a section of the concrete up the side accessible with a wheel, which works but is far from optimal.  You have to question the intelligence of someone who designs that into a dedicated bicycle storage area (built with the building, so not a later addition).  The only advantage over a metal trough is better grip when descending, but less clearance to the wall so a greater angle is required.

it's tolerable with an unloaded bicycle, but just about anything else makes it far worse, so heavy panniers (or other bicycle bags), trailers, tricycles, tandems etc all become various degrees of more troublesome.

We do have a second storage area with level access (ie a gate in a wall), which I mostly use these days since it's closer to my office, but it's entirely uncovered so less friendly on days with inclement weather.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: RoyMacDonald on 04 March, 2020, 02:07:24 pm
Putting this one here because it's infrastructure so poor it might as well be an obstruction:

(http://www.ductilebiscuit.net/gallery_albums/obstructions/2019_09_04_15_26_30.sized.jpg)

(The stairs are welcome new access to the Birmingham & Worcester Canal at Selly Oak, which provides a useful pedestrian route to the new retail park from the High Street.  There's level access to the canal via a convoluted route on the other side of the Bristol Road, which is un-fun to cross at this point.)

Two cyclists came down the stairs carrying their bikes while I was taking photos.  I commented that they weren't using the splendid new wheeling ramp.  One replied to the effect that it was so steep they were concerned about doing a Basil.

That wouldn't stop Steve Slade. I saw him ride his Kingcycle down the handrail of the Edinburgh Velodrome once, just for a laugh.
Roy
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 28 November, 2020, 05:55:51 pm
Crossover episode with the 'Bridges for CrinklyLion' thread just along from the above:  Starring barakta, an ICE trike with Shiny! New! steering, some shitehawks, assorted PSOs, a CrossCountry Voyager and the department of gentrification's finest Weighted Companion Cubes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f48-J1Vl4Lo
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Pingu on 28 November, 2020, 06:10:42 pm
At least she didn't reverse down the steps  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 28 November, 2020, 06:12:40 pm
At least she didn't reverse down the steps  :thumbsup:

At least that would have been quicker...
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Clare on 28 November, 2020, 06:17:59 pm
Time to molish an independently steerable rear wheel.

Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Cudzoziemiec on 29 November, 2020, 11:43:44 am
And what standard was that built to? Not even wide enough if she'd met anyone coming the other way.

Also: That orangey-yellow (could be yellowy-orange) colour on parts of the surface is unattractive.
And finally: I never realized that 'yakety sax' was the same thing as the Benny Hill tune.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 29 November, 2020, 12:57:41 pm
And what standard was that built to? Not even wide enough if she'd met anyone coming the other way.

I was thinking that.  It's a useful pedestrian shortcut between the Shiny! New! retail park and student accommodation, and Silly Oak High Street, so was quite busy with PSOs heading to and from the shops.  The bridge itself is a respectable width, but the steps to it aren't, so some of the pedestrians were taking the comedy ramp route to give the others space for coronalurgi reasons.  One of them, halfway up the ramp and therefore thoroughly committed, remarked "I feel like I'm blocking the ramp if someone in a wheelchair wants to come down".  A couple of pedestrains, or two-wheeled cyclists could pass okay, but I doubt that, say, a wheelchair user could pass a pushchair easily.

Fortunately, there are a couple of more sensible alternative routes for cyclists, so its inaccessibility to cycles isn't as concerning as the steps pictured above (which I've now realised are how towpath users are expected to cross the Lapal Canal, if they manage to reconnect it to the Birmingham & Worcester).

I'm still unclear as to who is responsible for the bridge.  I can't find anything on the council website.  There's a page by the developers boasting about how it will increase footfall to the retail opportunities (https://steveritchiepartnership.co.uk/projects/battery-park-selly-oak/), but nothing planning related.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: andrewc on 29 November, 2020, 01:17:53 pm
Parental advisory warning for Sweary Barakta  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: Kim on 29 November, 2020, 01:21:23 pm
Parental advisory warning for Sweary Barakta  :thumbsup:

I made her wait at the foot of the ramp while I rode up, left the bike at the top and got ready to video, which meant that she remained unspoilered for that authentic reaction.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: T42 on 29 November, 2020, 01:36:12 pm
I feel quite tired now.
Title: Re: Silly cyclepath obstructions
Post by: yorkie on 24 March, 2022, 06:57:13 pm


Posted previously on the rant thread:

These barriers are on all the access points (6 from memory) to Hob Moor in York.

They are all grouped with a kissing gate and a standard gate with a RADAR key for wheelchair users etc.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190815/f16cf5d30b7f3bbf7929f0d67b26f6a4.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190815/e31cd33e73df53bd72a16c211071c69d.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190815/5d85201d0ad2770a5eca24d4dd1eabf6.jpg)

Bit of a thread resurrection, but I headed across Hob Moor today, having heard that the  baseplates of the access control barriers had been removed. Somewhat of a surprise to find that it was true, all of the baseplates have been removed and it is now possible to ride straight through them - even on a Brompton!

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220324/a538f8b7e4bc6271429cb4f5d234077b.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220324/50db2a9e72074a038bcd951144894908.jpg)

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk