Author Topic: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit  (Read 10342 times)

Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« on: 06 November, 2020, 05:15:54 pm »
All things being equal and with two identical frames. One being setup as a geared bike, one as fixed. Would you change anything in terms of fit? I.e. you'd drop the nose of the saddle on the fixed or have a little less width in the bars on the geared bike.

JonB

  • Granny Ring ... Yes Please!
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #1 on: 06 November, 2020, 05:40:44 pm »
I run them the same or as close as the frames and fittings allow. The only difference is I run 170mm cranks on my main fixed bike and 172.5 on the geared but I think this was to do with what I had available at the time to build up the fixed and since starting with that length I've stuck with it. There is an argument for running even shorter cranks on fixed to avoid pedal scrapes when cornering but I don't think I ever get over that far and it's not been an issue. I don't mess with saddle angles or heights, I have experimented with bull horns for fixed and quite liked it but currently running drops and not sure I'll go back to bullhorns (they were on a different bike that's moved on).

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #2 on: 06 November, 2020, 06:09:47 pm »
As near an identical set-up as possible for me. 

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #3 on: 07 November, 2020, 03:15:44 pm »
My geared bikes are laidbacks ...
simplicity, truth, equality, peace

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #4 on: 07 November, 2020, 03:36:06 pm »
I’ve set them up the same, but 170 cranks instead of 175. That’s only because I couldn’t find a suitable chainset in 175 mind. The last time I scraped a pedal was over 30 years ago - racing the cars around York near the Barbican on my geared Orbit Gold Medal:)

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #5 on: 07 November, 2020, 03:41:57 pm »
My geared and fixed road bikes have very similar fits. The fixed has the handlebars slightly closer but that is mostly because it is mainly used as a commuter and I rarely ride on the tops in traffic.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #6 on: 07 November, 2020, 04:09:09 pm »
Mine are as similar as I can get them.

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #7 on: 07 November, 2020, 04:12:51 pm »
Pretty much the same, just shorter cranks (165 mm on fixed, 170 mm when geared).

Tomsk

  • Fueled by cake since 1957
    • tomsk.co.uk
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #8 on: 13 November, 2020, 08:19:44 pm »
Likewise: 165mm (72" gear as standard) on the main, long distance fixed, (170 x 68" on the winter fixed bike, just 'cos that's what was available) and 170 on gears. 44cm bars on fixed and roughstuff/tourer, 42cm on the geared audax bike. All now on Soma Highway One bars (https://www.somafab.com/archives/product/highway-1-bar), but a lovely short reach (75mm), square-ish shape but smooth curves (if you see what I mean), narrow radius bends and shallow drop with long rearward extension. First time I've got identical shape bars after decades of any old stuff on various machines, from Cinelli Campione del Mondo massively deep racing set-up, to narrow (38cm I think) '70s Randonneur bars.

165cm and a 72" gear is easier downhill - no knee pain in the latter stages of the last PBP, unlike two previous fixed editions. With my long legs, 165mm must be massively undersized!

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #9 on: 14 November, 2020, 02:05:18 am »
Drop saddle height 0.5".  It'll help you spin faster.

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #10 on: 14 November, 2020, 07:56:44 am »
Same. If you are pedalling, you are pedalling.

Chris N

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #11 on: 17 December, 2020, 09:31:53 am »
Shorter cranks and therefore a higher saddle.  I might put the bars slightly higher on fixed, but only so it's easier to get into the drops. 

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #12 on: 18 December, 2020, 09:45:03 am »
Shorter cranks and, ideally, a more rearward sitting position with an appropriately short stem*.  This makes things a bit safer when you grab a handful of front brake and forget to keep pedalling, which at some point you will.

*ok, my Harry Quinn track bike has a 130mm stem, but it has a VERY short top tube - probably a custom build for someone who wanted it to look as cool as possible
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #13 on: 28 December, 2020, 03:39:50 am »
Shorter cranks and therefore a higher saddle.  I might put the bars slightly higher on fixed, but only so it's easier to get into the drops.

Why shorter cranks? I run 175s

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #14 on: 28 December, 2020, 10:29:03 am »
Shorter cranks and therefore a higher saddle.  I might put the bars slightly higher on fixed, but only so it's easier to get into the drops.

Why shorter cranks? I run 175s
Cornering clearance and spinnability at 170rpm.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

Chris N

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #15 on: 28 December, 2020, 07:09:59 pm »
Yep.

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #16 on: 28 December, 2020, 07:28:13 pm »
Plus, there aren't that many 175mm fixed/track cranksets.

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #17 on: 29 December, 2020, 03:27:14 am »
Plus, there aren't that many 175mm fixed/track cranksets.

Sugino, Shimano?
Granted, I got raised BB height, so corner clearance isn't an issue.

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #18 on: 30 December, 2020, 11:41:38 am »
Out of interest, how high? I find 10 3/4" is good enough with 165mm cranks but I'd want more than 11" with 175mm cranks. I tried my singlespeed as a fixie but it was scary - 170mm cranks and a 10.5" BB meant a couple of pedal grazes on mini-roundabouts before I put the freewheel back on!

(Apols for mixed units)
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #19 on: 30 December, 2020, 11:51:46 am »
With 170mm cranks, 11” is the absolute minimum BB height I am happy with on fixed, road or track.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #20 on: 30 December, 2020, 11:58:38 am »
I have never, not once in my life, experienced pedal strike, either fixed or geared.  172.5mm cranks on everything

LittleWheelsandBig

  • Whimsy Rider
Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #21 on: 30 December, 2020, 12:08:57 pm »
I used to deliberately pedal strike during criteriums to disconcert wheelsuckers.
Wheel meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #22 on: 30 December, 2020, 04:32:27 pm »
as important as BB height and crank length are both Q and the design of your pedals. Even the width of your shoe soles can be the limiting factor.

With most of my bikes (including my track iron) I would (in the dry) expect to get pedal strike before I ran out of grip. As LWaB implies, in certain kinds of racing you are flirting with pedal strike often. [I never got good enough to get a deliberate strike that didn't also threaten to tip me off...]

cheers

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #23 on: 30 December, 2020, 05:02:56 pm »
I tore a Brooks saddle almost in half with my knee due to pedal strike on my fixie. Somehow I stayed upright - I don't know if the knee/saddle interface helped or hindered. The saddle was pretty old, but no amount of duck tape could make it rideable for more than a couple of miles. I now run 165mm cranks and M520s on the fixie (pedal strike was probably significantly contributed to by M454 pedals).

Re: Geared vs Fixed Bike Fit
« Reply #24 on: 30 December, 2020, 05:14:40 pm »
Keep the bike more upright but lean the body more, or doesn't that work?