Author Topic: Members' bikes  (Read 2465363 times)

Cudzoziemiec

  • Ride adventurously and stop for a brew.
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5800 on: 28 October, 2012, 08:37:24 pm »
I like those signs (and the bike!) There are some in a place just east of Bristol with pointing fingers carved into the walls at a road junction.
Riding a concrete path through the nebulous and chaotic future.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5801 on: 28 October, 2012, 11:41:34 pm »
I quite like it, although obviously it's not as good as orange ;D
Finding colour-coordinated bits is a bit of a bind, though, although I have managed to score a nice, green B17 :)

Colour matching can be a real pain even with bits from the same company. I ended up aiming for contrasts so I have one frame in green with black and red parts, another in Ti with black and red and one in black with black and silver. I also have a hankering for a red frame with black parts but I'm not sure just wanting another colour scheme is good enough for an N+1.
Nuns, no sense of humour

interzen

  • Venture Altruist
  • Agent Orange
    • interzen.homeunix.org
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5802 on: 29 October, 2012, 08:44:21 am »
I quite like it, although obviously it's not as good as orange ;D
Finding colour-coordinated bits is a bit of a bind, though, although I have managed to score a nice, green B17 :)

Colour matching can be a real pain even with bits from the same company. I ended up aiming for contrasts so I have one frame in green with black and red parts, another in Ti with black and red and one in black with black and silver. I also have a hankering for a red frame with black parts but I'm not sure just wanting another colour scheme is good enough for an N+1.
It's looking like it'll be mostly green and black (Mmmmmm ... Green and Black :) )
The proverbial turd on the snooker table is the silver faceplate on the stem that's currently fitted - however, since its from the bits box and likely to be replaced I'm not really that bothered. I can't remember whether or not the saddle's rails are black or copper, although even in the latter case it'd give it a nice little accent.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5803 on: 02 November, 2012, 05:55:24 pm »
This one, appears to be free of any creaks.
(Or cracks).


clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5804 on: 02 November, 2012, 05:59:00 pm »
That's rather pretty. :thumbsup:
Getting there...

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5805 on: 02 November, 2012, 05:59:39 pm »
 :)

Excellent.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5806 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:00:31 pm »
This one, appears to be free of any creaks.
(Or cracks).
And it's gold!  8)

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5807 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:00:49 pm »
It's ver' ver' shiny, and ver' ver' quick.


But above all, it is silent.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5808 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:02:32 pm »
And another one, for the new page  :P


@Del - everything in my kitchen is gold. Dontcha know.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5809 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:20:40 pm »
@Del - everything in my kitchen is gold. Dontcha know.
Auric Jurek Goldfinger
"No Mister Bond I want you to pedal faster!"

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5810 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:28:15 pm »
Yum Yum
Get a bicycle. You will never regret it, if you live- Mark Twain

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5811 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:32:24 pm »
no mudguards, brooks or carradice??    :o :o  That's not like you at all!




Very nice.

(but is your saddle quite level?  The nose looks slightly up... )

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5812 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:38:59 pm »
no mudguards, brooks or carradice??    :o :o  That's not like you at all!




Very nice.

(but is your saddle quite level?  The nose looks slightly up... )

Illusion.
S'akshully a smidge nose-down.
If you put a level on it.
(I have  ::-))

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5813 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:41:35 pm »
I have to say Jurek, I'm disappointed.

Kitchen, but no kettle. Plain wall behind, and yet- it's not a white garage door.

10/10 for pedals, valves hidden and very very clean lines.

Sleeeeeeek.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5814 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:41:55 pm »
S'akshully a smidge nose down.
If you put a level on it.
(I have  ::-))

That surprises me not a smidge
(I measured ;) )
Getting there...

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5815 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:44:21 pm »
S'akshully a smidge nose down.
If you put a level on it.
(I have  ::-))

That surprises me not a smidge
(I measured ;) )
I actually got the feeler gauge out when fitting the front mech  :-[

First time I've used that for a good few years.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5816 on: 02 November, 2012, 06:45:42 pm »
I have to say Jurek, I'm disappointed.

Kitchen, but no kettle. Plain wall behind, and yet- it's not a white garage door.

10/10 for pedals, valves hidden and very very clean lines.

Sleeeeeeek.

Thank you. :)
I have gone to some lengths to avoid the Marmite/Vegemite debate scenario  :P

zigzag

  • unfuckwithable
Members' bikes
« Reply #5817 on: 02 November, 2012, 07:35:35 pm »
nice and shiny! it looks the same as the one before, doesn't it? many happy miles! (needs some finishing touches, though ;))

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5818 on: 02 November, 2012, 07:50:38 pm »
nice and shiny! it looks the same as the one before, doesn't it? many happy miles! (needs some finishing touches, though ;))
Thanks.
For those that way inclined, here's an A&B (old with bottle cages / new without)

 

(needs some finishing touches, though ;))
What you mean ???

zigzag

  • unfuckwithable
Members' bikes
« Reply #5819 on: 02 November, 2012, 08:11:29 pm »
What you mean ???

small things like a spacer above the stem, front skewer pointing the right direction, slightly longer rear outer brake cable, front mech cable trimmed and crimped.. to tell more i'd need a closer look :)

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5820 on: 02 November, 2012, 08:21:58 pm »
looks bigger without the bottle cages.   Wait, those are 650 wheels, arent they?

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5821 on: 02 November, 2012, 08:31:29 pm »
looks bigger without the bottle cages.   Wait, those are 650 wheels, arent they?

You serious?
Nah. 700's

I have gone down (!) from a 52cm frame to a 50 - to do with maintaining VTT length with different frame geometry more than anything else.
I've lost around 15mm on VTT length, but my angle on it is that that's desirable - First long ride (Sunday) should prove me right.
Or otherwise.
 :o Ulp!

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5822 on: 02 November, 2012, 08:51:04 pm »
I have gone to some lengths to avoid the Marmite/Vegemite debate scenario  :P

Neither is the correct answer.
Getting there...

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5823 on: 03 November, 2012, 10:04:21 am »
Have you become shorter since taking the "before" photo?

The bike's looking good, and I'm toying with the idea of heading out to see it tomorrow morning if this weather holds.

Re: Members' bikes
« Reply #5824 on: 03 November, 2012, 10:28:19 am »
Cracking bike Jurek !
Ooh, perhaps the wrong adjective  ;)