What he's done must be the hardest effort. I know people say the hour record is hard, but surely it must be easier (at least mentally).
IMHO the hour record is the one to go for - it would even be possible (maybe not financially though) to have several attempts during a year. I'm surprised more top-class cyclists don't go for it.
Read the book by Michael Hutchinson... it's a great insight into the hour record.
Why more people don't go for it?
1) It is a serious financial committment
2) There are probably only a handful of people in the world who have a realistic chance on a good day to challenge Wiggins time
3) The record stands at such a level that one rider needs to commit a significant portion of his racing season to do just that.
4) I hope you are not suggesting TG should go for the hour record... realistically you need north of 450 Watt average for an hour to even begin to think about it... 250 won't cut it, I'm afraid
I've beaten Wiggin's Hr record just rocked up, did a flying lap average of 39.5 mph on a 400m outdoor velodrome, then 1 hr race most of the time way up and off the blue line by
cheating using technology - only way really
and I still didn't win!
112 laps 1:01:07.26hr 54.8Km/h 34.0mph
Back to Steve, well, absolutely amazing grit and determination, and inspirational, I can only (slightly) relate to him when i cycled from Salisbury, to Lands End, to John O'Groats and back to Salisbury, 2000 miles in 17 days, then chucked my bike in the shed for a month because I was so sick of riding the bloody thing!