Author Topic: Interesting or unusual planes?  (Read 387862 times)

Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2200 on: 15 December, 2023, 06:07:18 am »

Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2201 on: 15 December, 2023, 12:05:58 pm »
Very pretty picture.

Is nearly-in the frozen lake the only safe area to land?
<i>Marmite slave</i>

Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2202 on: 15 December, 2023, 11:14:36 pm »
Yeah, winter makes it both harder and easier. A lot more of the wetlands become landable, but the snow will also hide all kinds of surprises.


Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2204 on: 02 January, 2024, 11:28:19 am »
https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/230390103337964/?ref=browse_tab

Blah its a T7 twin seater. If it was a single seater F.6 or FGA.9 I might be looking at how big a crane would be needed to get it into my back garden. Such a beautiful aircraft.
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that.

Steph

  • Fast. Fast and bulbous. But fluffy.
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2205 on: 17 January, 2024, 05:36:49 pm »
I was waiting at the bus stop post-Asda this afternoon when I heard the rotor slap.

"That's a Chinook or similar", I thought.

Yup. Right over Crawley.
Mae angen arnaf i byw, a fe fydda'i

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2206 on: 17 January, 2024, 05:46:55 pm »
"Come, friendly Chinooks, and drop things on Crawley"
It is simpler than it looks.

Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2207 on: 17 January, 2024, 06:06:50 pm »
They used to fly down the Lea Valley when work was based next to the River Lea.
Stuff on desks would vibrate when they were at their closest.

Pingu

  • Put away those fiery biscuits!
  • Mrs Pingu's domestique
    • the Igloo
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2208 on: 08 February, 2024, 08:06:46 pm »
What's that noise? A bunch of Eurofighters going over Furryboottoon according to FR24.

Salvatore

  • Джон Спунър
    • Pics
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2209 on: 19 February, 2024, 05:13:37 pm »
A Chinook with 2 netfulls of cargo dangling on cables or somesuch. Given that it had only flown a short distance  from RAF Odiham (a couple of fields distance at most) before it looped round above me to return, I guess it was some sort of training exercise. By the time I reached the other side of the airfield, it was hovering near the ground, with only one dangly thing.

With a totally unsuitable 20mm lens

Quote
et avec John, excellent lecteur de road-book, on s'en est sortis sans erreur

GdS

  • I have come here to chew carrots and kick ass
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2210 on: 18 April, 2024, 05:25:09 pm »
I did a DIY which went past RAF Odiham in January; it was an operational day and I saw at least 4 Chinooks flying. You could hear them from the Meon Valley.

Booked a campsite for RIAT  :thumbsup: can't believe how many people get stuck in horrendous queues to get there when you can just ride straight up to the fence

Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2211 on: Yesterday at 11:23:05 am »
RAF Airbus 400M just flew down the loch at only 175ft altitude.

Erm, that's lower than many of the surrounding hills.

Took off from Elgin, been flying close to ground through Skye, through the loch valleys of Harris and Lewis ('through' not over). Then Buzzed stornoway airport.

Now doing a pass over the middle of Lewis, still sticking to no more than 150ft off the deck.

Low level flight training?
<i>Marmite slave</i>

Jaded

  • The Codfather
  • Formerly known as Jaded
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2212 on: Yesterday at 11:40:03 am »
There used to be a lot more low level activity than there is now. I don't think they have enough planes.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/operational-low-flying-training-timetable

This is somewhat useful...
It is simpler than it looks.

TheLurker

  • Goes well with magnolia.
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2213 on: Yesterday at 04:24:51 pm »
Quote from: mrcharly-YHT
RAF Airbus 400M just flew down the loch at only 175ft altitude.
....
Low level flight training?
Nah, it can't get any higher 'cos the engines are knackered.  :)

Τα πιο όμορφα ταξίδια γίνονται με τις δικές μας δυνάμεις - Φίλοι του Ποδήλατου

TimC

  • Old blerk sometimes onabike.
Re: Interesting or unusual planes?
« Reply #2214 on: Yesterday at 09:11:27 pm »
RAF Airbus 400M just flew down the loch at only 175ft altitude.

Erm, that's lower than many of the surrounding hills.

Took off from Elgin, been flying close to ground through Skye, through the loch valleys of Harris and Lewis ('through' not over). Then Buzzed stornoway airport.

Now doing a pass over the middle of Lewis, still sticking to no more than 150ft off the deck.

Low level flight training?

How are you judging its altitude? You do realise that the Mode C squawk works only on ISA numbers unless you have ATC conversion equipment. The barometric pressure at Lossiemouth is 1024mb. That means the altitude reading from Mode C transponders needs to be adjusted by 11mb (approximately 330ft) to get a reasonable approximation of the aircraft's height above sea level. If you had datalink (as Mode S supplies and the military and civil air traffic authorities can interpret), the radar altitude of the aircraft above the ground can be derived. The Minimum Separation Distance under normal circumstances for low flying fixed-wing military aircraft is 250', and it's not easy to maintain anything close to that in lumpy terrain. Within LFA7T (tactical training area) specially-qualified crews can fly down to 100ft MSD, but it's incredibly difficult to get down to that anywhere other than over ridges or large amounts of water or very flat ground.

It's likely that the A400 was operating to 250' limits, and was in fact around 3-400ft most of the time.