Author Topic: Royal Wedding!  (Read 61302 times)

Woofage

  • Tofu-eating Wokerati
  • Ain't no hooves on my bike.
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #25 on: 16 November, 2010, 12:47:10 pm »
I've just read up on her parents. From a Buck House POV, they really are oiks, aren't they.

What, being only millionaires and only sending her daughter to Marlborough College?

I think they earned their millions though, which is a concept quite alien to your average royal.
Pen Pusher

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #26 on: 16 November, 2010, 12:53:33 pm »
Ah, 1981 - royal wedding, patriotism everywhere.

That long, hot summer...

And Toxteth, Brixton, St Pauls, Moss Side, Handsworth etc etc...

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/qo0IkVZXmag&rel=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/qo0IkVZXmag&rel=1</a>
Getting there...

Rhys W

  • I'm single, bilingual
    • Cardiff Ajax
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #27 on: 16 November, 2010, 12:55:49 pm »
When is it? I will have to avoid it, just like the last one.  :sick:

That reminds me, for the Charles & Diana one, my dad took me and my sister up Yr Wyddfa (Snowdon) to avoid it. I was 13 and my sister would have just turned 10. The place was heaving, and we spoke to many people who were there for the very same reason.  :thumbsup:

Pancho

  • لَا أَعْبُدُ مَا تَعْبُدُونَ
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #28 on: 16 November, 2010, 12:57:06 pm »
I've just read up on her parents. From a Buck House POV, they really are oiks, aren't they.

What, being only millionaires and only sending her daughter to Marlborough College?

I think you're muddling money and respectability. The same sort of common error that Mrs M is likely to make.

NB. I'm a peasant and know my place. Marlborough, for instance isn't where I'd send my children.

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #29 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:09:59 pm »
Ah yes, 1981.  The country in recession deeper than it needed to be due to monetarist control measures forced upon the oiks by the then gubbishment.   An ostentatious royal wedding just to remind the oiks where the money and self-appointed power is was lavishly splashed across the media.

* Gets out crystal ball... *

2011:   The country will be in recession due to the extreme and unnecessary monetarist measures of the gubbishment.   A right royal fling will invade every aspect of the media reminding the oiks where the money and self-appointed power remains.   

Two things strike me on this theme:   Conservative governments dragging the UK through deeper than necessary recessions, and rich folk rubbing the noses of the oiks in it. 

We've come an awful long way as a nation in thirty years.    :(         

andygates

  • Peroxide Viking
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #30 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:25:42 pm »
Whee! Hats and bunting!  O:-)
It takes blood and guts to be this cool but I'm still just a cliché.
OpenStreetMap UK & IRL Streetmap & Topo: ravenfamily.org/andyg/maps updates weekly.

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #31 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:27:59 pm »
Ah, 1981 - royal wedding, patriotism everywhere.

Was the Charles and Di wedding seriously the summer of 1981? I remember seeing the adverts for it on my grandparents' tv and being very puzzled about how they could show stock crowd footage of something that hadn't yet taken place - and I would only have been eighteen months old at the time. Or have there been royal weddings since then?
Have you seen my blog? It has words. And pictures! http://ablogofallthingskathy.blogspot.com/

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #32 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:32:14 pm »
Yup.  1981.  Andrew married in 1986.  Edward was more tardy, marrying in 1999.  Anne married in 1973 & (more privately) 1992.
Getting there...

Hello, I am Bruce

  • Hello, I am Bruce
  • Hello, I am Bruce
    • Flickr Photos
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #33 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:35:27 pm »
The bride's parents will be able to put out some classy wedding favours.

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #34 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:36:04 pm »
Perhaps we could have a commemorative YACF jersey!


robgul

  • Cycle:End-to-End webmaster
  • cyclist, Cytech accredited mechanic & woodworker
    • Cycle:End-to-End
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #35 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:36:09 pm »
Yup.  1981.  Andrew married in 1986.  Edward was more tardy, marrying in 1999.  Anne married in 1973 & (more privately) 1992.

... and two of the victims had their names on a lot of TVs that people were watching on - Phillips and Ferguson

Rob

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #36 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:36:32 pm »
Yup.  1981.  Andrew married in 1986.  Edward was more tardy, marrying in 1999.  Anne married in 1973 & (more privately) 1992.

Ah, perhaps it's the 1986 wedding I'm remembering. That would make more sense.
Have you seen my blog? It has words. And pictures! http://ablogofallthingskathy.blogspot.com/

LindaG

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #37 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:39:52 pm »

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #38 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:43:51 pm »
I imagine that, inspired by us (obv), the happy couple will get spliced in a simple ceremony at the Register Office, then ride tandem to a campsite for a chilled out reception (train assisted if necessary).

;)
Getting there...

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #39 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:46:53 pm »
"Yes please" said Squirrel "biscuits are our favourite things."

Morrisette

  • Still Suffolkating
    • Now Suffolkating on the internet:
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #40 on: 16 November, 2010, 01:47:42 pm »
They should do it on Don't Tell the Bride. Srsly.
Not overly audacious
@suffolkncynical

Wowbagger

  • Stout dipper
    • Stuff mostly about weather
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #41 on: 16 November, 2010, 02:03:28 pm »
It's just been on the 2 pm radio 4 news. I already want to vomit.
Quote from: Dez
It doesn’t matter where you start. Just start.

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #42 on: 16 November, 2010, 02:04:17 pm »
Will his father be there?
Getting there...

Jules

  • Has dropped his aitch!
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #43 on: 16 November, 2010, 02:16:40 pm »
I may be forced to becoming an ineffectual republican again.

Well - the forum is full of them!

Race to the barricades?- nah

Post to an Internet forum - that'll do.



Audax on the other hand is almost invisible and thought to be the pastime of Hobbits ....  Fab Foodie

Woofage

  • Tofu-eating Wokerati
  • Ain't no hooves on my bike.
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #44 on: 16 November, 2010, 02:17:58 pm »
Will his father be there?

Aren't you thinking of the other one?
Pen Pusher

clarion

  • Tyke
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #45 on: 16 November, 2010, 04:44:12 pm »
I don't think there's any guarantees on either.

But you're right - his brother has different genes.
Getting there...

Chris S

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #46 on: 16 November, 2010, 05:03:52 pm »
We could have a couple of YACF sweep stakes.

How long before the Paparazzi send her round the twist?

and

How long before the rest of the Addams Royal family have her bumped off?

Wowbagger

  • Stout dipper
    • Stuff mostly about weather
Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #47 on: 16 November, 2010, 05:05:27 pm »
I think there will be a WARTY on the day - We're All Republicans Today, Yes?
Quote from: Dez
It doesn’t matter where you start. Just start.

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #48 on: 16 November, 2010, 05:06:04 pm »
We could have a couple of YACF sweep stakes.

How long before the Paparazzi send her round the twist?

and

How long before the rest of the Addams Royal family have her bumped off?

She'll tread on a landmine.

Re: Royal Wedding!
« Reply #49 on: 16 November, 2010, 05:11:09 pm »
Much like the plebeians of yore I love bread and circuses, so will be a Royalist on the day, switching quickly back to borderline republican the day after.

I wonder if I still have my commemorative coin from his parents one...