IMO and IME whilst these rides are very good, they have over the last couple of years attracted a lesser calibre of rider. By this I mean:-
i) The amount of times I've been, and have seen undertaking by other cyclists.
ii) The need to bring a Dinotte specced light to a group ride and have it on it's highest setting.
iii) The amount of 'dork discs/dinner plates', helmet wearers and hi-vis that I've seen on rides in the last couple of years has risen exponentially.
iv) The need for assistance to change an innertube.
Like I said, they are good rides, but if you are a serious cyclist get ready to do a lot of head shaking and chin stroking.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
As a regular FNRttCer, I do not recognise this description! All are true of charity night rights, though. But those could not be more different from the FNRttC!
1. On an FNRttC, undertaking gets you a stern warning. Re-offending gets you banned from future rides.
2. I'd say about 40% wear helmets (probably to keep their Buffs in place, mostly). Percentage of high-viz wearers is much lower.
3. There may be a smidgeon of truth in the comment about bright lights, but then... it's a nightride. There are fast descents. And potholes. On the either, bright rear lights aimed in the direction of other riders' (including 'bent riders) will earn you a reprimand and stern order to switch to steady or pulse... or stash it and borrow one with fewer lumens.
4. Tail End Charlies serve their purpose. We're an inclusive group: not everyone wants to fix their own puncture, especially the newcomer riding more than 25 miles for the first time! And we do have a timetable to keep to, since the hosts of the halfway stop and breakfast have been given ETAs.