I'm going through the hateful task of getting quotes for replacement of my ageing combi-boiler.
I've had the first bloke come round and he has offered a couple of sensible suggestions beyond what I asked for. He is happy to install a Valliant (which appear to be the dog's doo-das) but he recommends an Intergas Rapid - which seem to get glowing reports from installers and users.
Leaving the choice of boiler aside - he is very reluctant to flush my system, in fact he is avoiding giving me a price to do it. He says that given that my system has been in place for 35 years, flushing might throw up leaks and weak points in the pipework. His solution is to do what he calls a 'Hot Flush' - as far as I can tell this means getting the radiators as hot as possible and then draining the system down, followed by putting in a user-servicable filter, for me to empty monthly. To my uneducated small brain this 'hot flush' sounds like bollocks, and although the filter is a good thing, I can't see that it would meet the usual requirement to flush the heating system before putting a new boiler in.
Of course, not flushing the system would save me money, but would this be a short term saving at the expense of the boiler going south sooner rather than later, and a warranty claim being rejected?
All thoughts welcome.