The only figure that matters in that list, in its own right, is the Power Ave: 150W. As del says, you can redo the program and compare, but the other stuff is just projected/computed guesswork.
5134 ft is 1565m, 13.02 miles is 21km, so an average of 7.45%, that's about right for Ventoux.
But I think the Turbo is being a bit off with its figures, both good and bad:-
Unless you weigh about 2kg then 150W will not power you up a 7.45% incline at 10mph. 6mph maybe, but not 10mph.
But, by the sounds of it, if you're sweating and working hard I would have expected your power reading to be higher than 150W. 150W on the flat with no wind is about 17mph on a road bike. It's the upper end of pootling, not working hard. You'd need to put in about 250W to get 10mph up that kind of slope.
Although, if you didn't have a fan pointing at you then that might explain it. Your body will spend a lot of energy trying to keep you cool if the wind is not there to help the sweat evaporate.
(I'm not saying you didn't put in a load of effort, it's just that believing those figures can lead to a false sense of security or progress. Most club riders would be very happy indeed with a 1h15 ascent of Ventoux, it took me over 2 hours when I did it and I wasn't in bad shape back then.)