« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Step v Static lunges  (Read 1469 times)

MSeries

Step v Static lunges
« on: 28 November, 2008, 09:09:56 am »
I know how to do each type, what are the different effects if any ? (holding dumbbells and maybe performing bicep curls at the same time)

and what is the effect of placing the front foot on a step ?
Logged

andygates

  • Peroxide Viking
Re: Step v Static lunges
« Reply #1 on: 28 November, 2008, 09:17:15 am »
Lunges have a greater range of motion and involve the glutes more.  Glutes are good.
Logged
It takes blood and guts to be this cool but I'm still just a cliché.
OpenStreetMap UK & IRL Streetmap & Topo: ravenfamily.org/andyg/maps updates weekly.

MSeries

Re: Step v Static lunges
« Reply #2 on: 28 November, 2008, 09:23:23 am »
Quote from: andygates on 28 November, 2008, 09:17:15 am
Lunges have a greater range of motion and involve the glutes more.  Glutes are good.

thanks, my glutes are very good. It's the impact of landing on my heel and jarring my hip that I am worried about along with the risk of losing my balance. I did some slow static lunges with dumbells on Wednesday, had some DOMS in my hams yesterday, does that sound about right ? I want to exercise my hams.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »