I don't understand this post?
I have a windows XP machine here that is running photoshop
... so its all sorted out for you! Sad that Photoshop is so expensive.
People have been remarkably unhelpful in this thread.
* I like dimensions expressed in pixels - on a PC screen, to me they make the most sense.
* I don't use it myself but
Qimage http://www.ddisoftware.com/qimage/feature.htm is considered the bees knees for photo printing especially if you like to think of dimensions in feet and inches or, for the modern man, mm - and don't want to do the maths yourself.
* DPI and PPI and LPI are resolutions expressed in ('I') inches, which is most unfortunate when you (like me) measure your photos in mm. eg, PPI is
Pixels
Per
Inch so a photo of 2000x2000px would print at 10" square, at 200ppi.
* A
per se standard print resolution is 300 dpi (or ppi, lpi, call it what you will - pedant alert). It is actually a bit OTT for photos but it is 'a' standard. (One of many.) I have a macro programmed in Photoshop so that I just hit F3 to convert any photo to 300ppi without resizing it.
* This is needed because my Canon camera records images at 180ppi, my Olympus DSLR at 314ppi, and my partner's Casio compact at 72ppi, and they all could end up in print.
* To print a 35x45mm photo at 300dpi you need 413x531 pixels.
* However if you only have 273x354 pixels at your disposal, you could print at 200dpi to get the same size image, and you would be most unlikely to see any difference.
* A modern camera outputs around 3000x4000px - so downsizing will probably be needed.
I hope, as they say, this helps!