I thought critics sent the jokes to Dave who form a shortlist and put it out to a vote, so unless the shortlist included the full context 'joke' and it wasn't misquoted by them I still don't understand why that particular one was deemed the the best by those who voted. I know it's all subjective but that one doesn't seem to make sense to me.
Yes, it is a bit of a mystery.
My best guess is that the shortlist given to voters includes the full context of the joke but only the one-line versions are included in the press release that's sent out to journalists.
Of course, most of the stand-ups at Edinburgh (and elsewhere) don't tell 'jokes' anyway
Indeed.
Not to mention that there are other factors determining a joke's humour value too, such as where the joke is placed in the routine as a whole and the delivery.
These reductive lists are actually counter-productive because they only ever lead to the type of lazy reactions evident in this thread.