Author Topic: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.  (Read 6806 times)

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #25 on: 16 November, 2016, 09:31:34 am »
Opticians are, in my experience, hacks, ...

I don't get this.  Surely if you go to an reasonable optician and insist that you're not going to leave until you can see acceptably, you're not going to leave with anything less than an acceptable prescription?  Admittedly my myopia and astigmatism are quite mild, but I've never had a glasses prescription that is gives me anything less than perfectly crisp vision.  :-\
I've never had the same prescription twice in a six month period!  What looks acceptable through tiny lenses in an optician's office is often awful in a real pair of glasses.  Also, being longsighted, my eyes will accommodate for weak prescriptions...but will lose all close-up ability.

The prescription cycling glasses turn out to be unsuitable, btw.  The curved frames just don't suit corrective lenses and distortion is terrible when riding - I feel 12 feet tall and judging sideways clearance (bastard barriers on psyclepaths!) is tricky.  There is a money back guarantee so I'll get them to check they have made them correctly and, if they have, swap them for something more conventional (maybe with a cord, just in case).  My "normal" glasses are absolutely fine for cycling, with no distortion, except that they're not as secure.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #26 on: 16 November, 2016, 12:12:38 pm »
Here is the not news BONG!

Optical axes need to be correctly aligned...

rogerzilla

  • When n+1 gets out of hand
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #27 on: 18 November, 2016, 12:49:58 pm »
They made them to a PD of 69 rather than 61 because the frames aren't suitable for 61  :facepalm:  They could have asked first!

Going for more conventional frames now.
Hard work sometimes pays off in the end, but laziness ALWAYS pays off NOW.

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #28 on: 18 November, 2016, 01:15:25 pm »
Get girlie frames, which don't look too girlie.
My PD is around 61 and this has never been an issue.
GGGGRRR!

barakta

  • Bastard lovechild of Yomiko Readman and Johnny 5
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #29 on: 18 November, 2016, 02:16:08 pm »
That's rather shit to just fuck about with pupil distance rather than know the frames aren't suitable and SAY SOMETHING ffs >:(

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #30 on: 18 November, 2016, 02:35:52 pm »
That's rather shit to just fuck about with pupil distance rather than know the frames aren't suitable and SAY SOMETHING ffs >:(

That's not 'rather shit', it's TOTAL shit.

It is totally unfit for purpose and I am certainly no optician!

I am but a scientifically semi-literate retired medic who once read a little optics whilst standing in a library >40 years ago.

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #31 on: 18 November, 2016, 02:37:30 pm »
I think this sort of rubbish is a natural consequence of opticians acting like a fashion emporium, rather than an audiology department...

hellymedic

  • Just do it!
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #32 on: 18 November, 2016, 02:39:39 pm »
... <pedant> or optometry...

Kim

  • Timelord
    • Fediverse
Re: Understanding optical prescriptions - + implications for cycling glasses.
« Reply #33 on: 18 November, 2016, 02:40:14 pm »
That TAAW.